0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views36 pages

Unit 2

Chapter two discusses the audit of the sales and collection cycle, detailing its significance, major audit risks, and objectives. It emphasizes the importance of internal controls and the various classes of transactions involved, as well as the inherent risks and fraud detection methods related to accounts receivable. The chapter also outlines the auditors' focus areas and substantive testing procedures necessary for ensuring accurate financial reporting.

Uploaded by

letagemechu29
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views36 pages

Unit 2

Chapter two discusses the audit of the sales and collection cycle, detailing its significance, major audit risks, and objectives. It emphasizes the importance of internal controls and the various classes of transactions involved, as well as the inherent risks and fraud detection methods related to accounts receivable. The chapter also outlines the auditors' focus areas and substantive testing procedures necessary for ensuring accurate financial reporting.

Uploaded by

letagemechu29
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter two

Audit of Sales & Collection Cycle


The Sales and Collection Cycle
Meaning of the Sales and Collection Cycle
• The sales and collection cycle includes all activities involved in:
• Receiving customer orders and approving credit
• Checking availability of goods
• Shipping goods and billing customers
• Collecting cash
• Recording all related transactions in the accounting records
In short: from customer order → to cash collection → to accounting records.
Significance of the Sales and Collection Cycle

• It reflects the core operations of a business.

• Sales transactions are always material to the financial statements.

• Errors or fraud in this cycle directly affect:

• Revenue

• Accounts receivable

• Cash

• Profit

• Because of this, auditors give special attention to this cycle.


Major Audit Risks in the Sales and Collection Cycle

• Auditors mainly focus on revenue recognition risk, such as:

• Overstatement of revenue

• Understatement of revenue

• Recording fictitious sales

• Recording sales in the wrong period (cut-off errors)

Studies by the SEC(Securities and Exchange Commission) show that:

• Most financial statement frauds and audit failures involve revenue misstatements.

• Therefore, the sales and collection cycle must be examined with great care.
❖ Objective of Auditing the Sales and Collection Cycle

The overall objective is to determine whether:

• Account balances affected by the cycle are fairly presented

• Transactions comply with accounting standards

• Revenue is valid, complete, accurate, and properly recorded


5. Classes of Transactions in the Sales and Collection Cycle

No Class of Transaction Accounts Affected

1 Sales Transactions (cash & credit) Cash, Accounts Receivable, Sales

Cash, Accounts Receivable, Sales Discount, Other


2 Cash Receipts Transactions
Accounts

3 Sales Returns & Allowances Sales Returns & Allowances, Accounts Receivable
4 Write-off of Uncollectible A/R Allowance for Bad Debts, Accounts Receivable
5 Bad Debt Expense Estimation Bad Debt Expense, Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
Receivables

• Receivables are claims against customers or others for money, goods, or services.

Types of Receivables

• Accounts Receivable
• Based on oral promises to pay
• Arise from credit sales

• Notes Receivable
• Written promises to pay a specific amount on a future date
Trade vs Non-Trade Receivables
Trade Receivables
• Originate from credit sales of goods or services
• Example: customer credit sales
Non-Trade Receivables
• Receivables not related to normal sales, such as:
• Advances to officers and employees
• Advances to subsidiaries
• Security deposits
• Performance guarantees
• Dividends and interest receivable
• Claims against:
• Insurance companies
• Government bodies (tax refunds)
• Common carriers
• Creditors
• Customers for returnable items
Audit Concern:
Trade and non-trade receivables must be shown separately in the financial statements for proper
presentation and disclosure.
Internal Control over Sales & Receivables

1. Internal Controls in Sales

Internal control over sales ensures that:

• Customer orders are checked for correctness

• Credit is approved after checking customer financial condition

• Goods are issued only based on authorized shipping documents


2. Areas Requiring Strong Internal Control

• Shipping function:

• Use pre-numbered shipping documents

• Copies sent to billing department and gatekeeper

• Collection of receivables:

• Proper follow-up of collections

• Ensure collections are recorded in the correct customer account

• Write-off of receivables:

• Write-offs should be approved after review by credit department

• Internal audit of receivables (mainly for large organizations)


3. Indicators of Weak Internal Control
• Shipment to customers without credit approval
• Shipment without informing billing department
• Errors in quantity or price on sales invoices
• Missing or unrecorded sales invoices due to poor serial number control
4. Consequences of Weak Internal Control
• Large losses from uncollectible receivables
• Fraud and misstatements in financial records
5. Key Audit Assertions for Receivables
• Existence – receivables are real
• Completeness – all receivables are recorded
• Rights & obligations – company owns the receivables
• Valuation – receivables are shown at realizable value
• Presentation & disclosure – properly classified and disclosed
B. Audit of Sales Transactions
• Understanding Internal Control
• Auditors use:
• Flowcharts
• Internal control questionnaires
• Walk-through tests
Six Transaction-Related Audit Objectives
1. Existence (Occurrence)
2. Completeness
3. Accuracy
4. Classification
5. Timing
6. Posting and summarization
Assessing Fraud Risk for A/Receivable

1. Major Fraud Risks

• Incorrect aging of accounts receivable

• Lapping of accounts receivable

• Misclassification of receivables

• Failure to recognize uncollectible accounts


2. Lapping of Accounts Receivable

• Lapping is a fraud technique where cash collected from one customer is stolen and the shortage
is covered using payment from another customer.

Why it happens:

• Lack of separation of duties

• Same person handles cash and records receivables

Effects:

• At least one customer’s account is always overstated

• Embezzlement of cash remains hidden


B. Causes, Prevention, and Detection of Lapping
Causes
• No separation between:
• Handling cash
• Recording cash receipts
Prevention Methods
• Proper separation of duties
• Mandatory employee vacations for those handling cash and records
Detection Methods
• Compare:
• Remittance advices
• Cash receipts journal
• Duplicate deposit slips
• Check consistency of names, dates, and amounts
C. Inherent Risks in Accounts Receivable

• Examples of inherent risks:

• Recording sale of receivables as sales instead of financing

• Misclassification of receivables as current

• Incorrect aging of receivables

• Failure to recognize doubtful accounts

Higher inherent risk = higher chance of material misstatement


D. Auditor’s Focus in Sales & Receivables Cycle

Auditors mainly focus on:

• Controls that prevent or detect embezzlement

• Controls over cutoff

• Controls over allowance for uncollectible accounts

E. Substantive Tests for Accounts Receivable

Two Main Types

• Analytical Procedures (AP)

• Tests of Details of Balances


F. Analytical Procedures for A/R
• Identify unusual fluctuations
• Detect possible misstatements
Timing
• Performed after balance sheet date
• Before tests of details of balances
Application
• Applied to the entire sales and collection cycle
• Receivables Requiring Special Attention
• Large or unusual balances
• Long outstanding balances
• Related-party receivables
• Credit balances in A/R
G. Tests of Details of Accounts Receivable Balance

• Auditors use balance-related audit objectives:

1. Detail Tie-in Objective

• A/R totals must agree with:

• Master file

• General ledger

• Procedure: Reconcile aged trial balance with control account

2. Existence Objective

• Recorded receivables actually exist

• Procedure: Confirmation of accounts receivable


3. Completeness Objective

• All receivables are recorded

• Procedure: Reconcile subsidiary ledger with control account


Hard to detect omissions through confirmations alone

4. Accuracy Objective

• Amounts are correct

• Procedure: Confirmation

• If no response → use alternative procedures:


• Sales invoices
• Shipping documents
• Cash receipts
5. Classification Objective

• Proper classification:

• Trade vs non-trade

• Current vs non-current

• Notes vs accounts receivable

6. Cutoff Objective

• Transactions recorded in correct period

• Errors cause overstatement or understatement


7. Realizable Value Objective

• Receivables shown at amount expected to be collected

• Procedures include:
• Review allowance for doubtful accounts
• Discussion with credit manager
• Review past write-offs
• Examine correspondence files

8. Rights and Obligations Objective

• Company actually owns the receivables

• Procedures:
• Review board minutes
• Confirm with banks
• Examine debt contracts
9. Presentation and Disclosure Objective

• Proper disclosure according to accounting standards

• Includes:

• Revenue recognition policy

• Related-party receivables

• Segregation of significant balances


H. Confirmation of Accounts Receivable

• A confirmation is a direct written response from a third party.

Purpose

• Existence

• Accuracy

• Cutoff

Auditing Standard Requirement

• Auditing standards require confirmation of A/R when practical


2. Tests of details of A/Receivable

A. When Confirmation of Accounts Receivable Is NOT Appropriate


Auditing standards say confirmation may not be required in these cases:
i. Accounts receivable is immaterial
• The balance is too small to affect users’ decisions.
ii. Confirmation is ineffective
• Expected low response rate
• Excessive delay in receiving replies
iii. Internal control over sales & collections is strong
• Inherent risk is low
• Control risk is low
• Other substantive evidence is sufficient
• In such cases, auditors rely on alternative substantive procedures.
B. Confirmation Decisions
• Auditors must make four key decisions about confirmation.
1. Type of Confirmation (Which form to use?)
a) Positive Confirmation
• Customer must respond whether they agree or disagree
Forms:
• Blank confirmation
• Invoice-based confirmation
More reliable
• Non-response requires follow-up
• More costly
• Second requests
• Follow-ups needed
b) Negative Confirmation

• Customer responds only if they disagree

Less reliable

• No response may mean:

• Agreement, or

• Customer ignored it

Less costly

• No follow-ups required
2. Timing Decision (When to send confirmations?)

Confirmations can be sent:

• At interim date, or

• Close to balance sheet date

Reliability

• Confirmations sent closer to year-end are more reliable

• Interim confirmations require roll-forward procedures


3. Sample Size Decision (How Many Accounts to Confirm?)

• When an auditor plans to send confirmations to customers, one important question is how
many accounts should be selected.
The number of accounts (sample size) is not chosen randomly; it is influenced by several audit
considerations.

• Factors Affecting Sample Size

i) Tolerable Misstatement

• This is the maximum error in accounts receivable that the auditor is willing to accept without
changing the audit opinion.

• Lower tolerable misstatement → Larger sample size

• Higher tolerable misstatement → Smaller sample size

If the auditor wants very accurate results, more accounts must be tested.
ii) Inherent Risk

• Inherent risk is the possibility that errors exist in accounts receivable before considering internal
controls.

• Lower inherent risk → Smaller sample size

• Higher inherent risk → Larger sample size

• If the nature of the business makes errors more likely, the auditor increases testing.

iii) Control Risk

• Control risk refers to the chance that the client’s internal control system will fail to prevent or detect
errors.

• Lower control risk (strong controls) → Smaller sample size

• Higher control risk (weak controls) → Larger sample size

• When controls are reliable, the auditor can test fewer accounts.
iv) Detection Risk from Other Substantive Tests

• Detection risk is the risk that audit procedures will not find existing misstatements.

• Lower achieved detection risk from other tests → Smaller sample size

• Higher detection risk → Larger sample size

• If other audit evidence is strong, fewer confirmations are needed.

v) Type of Confirmation

• The method of confirmation also affects how many accounts must be selected.

• Negative confirmation → Larger sample size required


(Because customers respond only if they disagree, so evidence is weaker.)

• Positive confirmation → Smaller sample size


(Customers must reply whether they agree or disagree, so evidence is stronger.)
4. Selection of Items for Confirmation

Auditors stratify accounts receivable based on:

• Size of balance

• Age of account

Selection Approach

• Larger balances → higher risk → selected first

• Older balances → higher chance of misstatement

• Smaller accounts → still included to ensure coverage


Analysis of Differences in Confirmation Replies
• When confirmed balances do not agree with client records, auditors investigate.
Common Causes of Differences
1. Payment already made
• Customer paid before confirmation date
• Client failed to record receipt
• Auditor checks for:
• Cash theft
• Lapping
• Cutoff errors
2. Goods not yet received
• Goods in transit
• Client records sale at shipment date
• Customer records purchase upon receipt
3. Goods returned
• Client failed to record credit memo
• Indicates weakness in recording sales returns & allowances
Documentation Requirements for Accounts Receivable

• Audit working papers must include evidence of:

• Tests of allowance for doubtful accounts

• Inquiries about receivables:

• Sold

• Pledged

• Assigned

• Cutoff testing

• Roll-forward procedures (if confirmations sent at interim)


Basic Substantive Procedures for A/R

Auditors document evidence of:

• Substantive analytical procedures

• Unusual or abnormal sales transactions

• Understanding of revenue recognition policy

• Identification of specific items tested

• Results of tests of details


THE END

You might also like