Scribd
Upload
14 views42 pages

Mooc Module 2 Slides

The document discusses the adoption of AI in justice systems, highlighting its potential to enhance judicial services, improve access to justice, and reduce costs while also addressing associated risks. It provides examples of AI applications in civil and criminal investigations and law enforcement, and emphasizes the need for judicial operators to evaluate the benefits and risks of AI. Additionally, the document considers the implications of AI for the Supreme Court of India and the varying rates of AI adoption in different contexts.

Uploaded by

agnes
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
14 views42 pages

Mooc Module 2 Slides

The document discusses the adoption of AI in justice systems, highlighting its potential to enhance judicial services, improve access to justice, and reduce costs while also addressing associated risks. It provides examples of AI applications in civil and criminal investigations and law enforcement, and emphasizes the need for judicial operators to evaluate the benefits and risks of AI. Additionally, the document considers the implications of AI for the Supreme Court of India and the varying rates of AI adoption in different contexts.

Uploaded by

agnes
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

The adoption of AI across justice systems

can increase the effectiveness of judicial


services for citizens, facilitate better
access to justice, and decrease costs.
Along with the many benefits of AI
adoption in the justice context, this
module will present the associated risks
and demonstrate how judicial operators
can assess the benefits and risks of AI
adoption. Next, it will focus on examples
of responsible AI adoption in justice
contexts.
Examples include AI’s application for civil
and criminal investigations (i.e. risk
assessment, docket management, case
management, jury selection, contract
review, electronic discovery, legal
research) and law enforcement (i.e.
digital evidence, facial recognition,
predictive policing). It will conclude with
a discussion on the potential of AI for the
Supreme Court of India and different
opportunities and risks for the country’s
judicial system.
Acquire an understanding of the benefits and risks of AI
adoption in justice systems

Familiarize yourselves with concrete examples of AI


adoption for civil and criminal investigations, as well as law
enforcement

Contemplate the different rates of AI adoption in different


contexts, including the Supreme Court of India
Hon. Benes Z Aldana Jhalak Kakkar Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud
The National Judicial College, President; National Law University of Delhi, Supreme Court of India,
Former Chief Trial Judge of the Coast Guard Executive Director Judge and Head of e-Courts
/ USA / India / India
Hon. Benes Z Aldana | The National Judicial College,
President; Former Chief Trial Judge of the Coast Guard
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
Applies applicable law to the
established facts in an impartial
manner

Pronounces fair, impartial, and


(to the extent humanly possible)
accurate judgments
04
04
3. Can AI effectively partake of the
majesty and dignity of the judiciary
as a branch of government?

4. Will AI be perceived as capable


of presiding over disputes with the
depth of knowledge, experience,
and emotional intelligence of
human judges?

5. Can AI lawfully be deployed in


criminal matters (other than,
perhaps traffic infractions)?
04
Jhalak Kakkar | National Law University of Delhi,
Executive Director
04
Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud | Supreme Court of
India, Judge and Head of e-Courts
04
04

You might also like