Scribd
Upload
6 views2 pages

Display PDF

The High Court of Orissa addressed W.P.(C) No.30774 of 2025, where the petitioner, Anadi Thakur, challenged a notice to show cause regarding alleged encroachment. The court deemed the petition premature and instructed the petitioner to respond to the notice within ten working days, with a decision to be made by the Tahasildar within fifteen days thereafter. Additionally, the court ordered that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner until a decision is reached on their reply.

Uploaded by

haliapila01
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views2 pages

Display PDF

The High Court of Orissa addressed W.P.(C) No.30774 of 2025, where the petitioner, Anadi Thakur, challenged a notice to show cause regarding alleged encroachment. The court deemed the petition premature and instructed the petitioner to respond to the notice within ten working days, with a decision to be made by the Tahasildar within fifteen days thereafter. Additionally, the court ordered that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner until a decision is reached on their reply.

Uploaded by

haliapila01
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.30774 of 2025

Anadi Thakur …. Petitioner(s)


Mr. Bhojaraj Seth, Adv.

-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Party(s)
Miss Gayatri Patra, ASC

CORAM:
HON’BLE [Link] SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

Order ORDER
No. 31.10.2025
01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner alleged to be an

encroacher has challenged the notice to show cause dated

24.06.2025 issued by the Tahasildar, Gaisilat/Opposite

Party No.4 vide Annexure-1.

3. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

4. Learned counsel for the State, at the outset, submits that

instead of filing reply to the show cause notice dated

24.06.2025, the Petitioner has preferred this Writ Petition.

Hence, the prayer made in this Writ Petition is premature.

5. Considering the above submission of learned counsel

for the State, this Court directs the Petitioner to file his

reply to the notice to show cause dated 24.06.2025 within a

Signature Not Verified period of ten working days hence. In such event, the
Digitally Signed
Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA
Designation: Personal Assistant Tahasildar, Gaisilat shall look into the reply of the
Reason: Authentication
Location: High Court of Orissa
Date: 06-Nov-2025 12:26:36
Page 1 of 2
Petitioner and pass a lawful order on the said reply of the

Petitioner within a period of fifteen working days

thereafter.

6. It is further directed that till a decision on the reply of

the Petitioner is taken, no coercive action shall be taken

against the Petitioner pursuant to the impugned notice

vide Annexure-1.

7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi)


Judge
Ayaskanta

Signature Not Verified


Digitally Signed
Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA
Designation: Personal Assistant
Reason: Authentication
Location: High Court of Orissa
Date: 06-Nov-2025 12:26:36
Page 2 of 2

You might also like