0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views29 pages

Identifying Research Problems

The document outlines the process of identifying research problems and formulating research questions, emphasizing the importance of a clear and focused research problem as the foundation of good research. It discusses the distinction between research problems and questions, criteria for selecting problems, types of variables, and the formulation of hypotheses. Additionally, it highlights common mistakes students make and provides a structured framework for developing research questions and hypotheses.

Uploaded by

Alberth Dalope
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views29 pages

Identifying Research Problems

The document outlines the process of identifying research problems and formulating research questions, emphasizing the importance of a clear and focused research problem as the foundation of good research. It discusses the distinction between research problems and questions, criteria for selecting problems, types of variables, and the formulation of hypotheses. Additionally, it highlights common mistakes students make and provides a structured framework for developing research questions and hypotheses.

Uploaded by

Alberth Dalope
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Identifying Research

Problems & Formulating


Research Questions
Alberth
Core References
•Ary (2010) Introduction to Research in
Education
•Dörnyei (2007) Research Methods in Applied
Linguistic
Research Problem vs Research Question
• Research Problem = What needs to be
studied (the gap)
• RQs = What the researcher will ask to
investigate that gap
Ary: What Is a Research Problem?
• A situation requiring investigation
• Must be researchable and grounded in
evidence
• Expresses a clear gap or need for inquiry
Ary: Sources of Research Problems
• Theory and literature
• Practical issues in educational settings
• Personal/professional experience
• Replication of previous studies
Ary: Criteria for Selecting a Problem
• Feasible (time, access, skills)
• Significant (contribution to field)
• Ethical
• Clear variables that can be investigated
Ary: From Topic → Problem → Purpose Statement
Broad topic → Specific problem → Purpose of study
Example:
Topic: Speaking anxiety
Problem: Limited evidence on anxiety sources in
online classes
Purpose: Identify key triggers of anxiety among
EFL learners
Ary: Variables
• Variable = characteristic that varies
• Types:
– Independent
– Dependent
– Control
• Must be defined and measurable
Independent Variables (IV)
• The variable that is manipulated or selected to
examine its effect
• The presumed cause
• Researcher controls or defines it
• Example:
– Type of feedback
– Interactional support level
– Teaching method
Dependent Variables (DV)
• The variable that is measured in the study
• The presumed effect or outcome
• Changes because of the independent variable
• Example:
– Speaking anxiety
– Writing performance
– Motivation scores
Control Variables (CV)
• Factors that could influence the DV but are kept constant
• Used to remove alternative explanations
• Increase the study’s internal validity
• Examples:
– Proficiency level
– Age or gender
– Same teacher, same task, same time limit
– Prior online learning experience
Ary: Operational Definitions
•Make abstract concepts concrete and replicable
•Specify the instrument, indicators, or
procedures used
•Explain how a variable will be observed or
measured in the study
Ary: Hypotheses
• Tentative prediction or explanation
• Should be clear, testable, directional/non-
directional
• Example: Students receiving teacher
feedback will show higher motivation.
Ary: Types of Hypotheses
• Null hypothesis (H0)
• Alternative hypothesis (H1)
• Directional vs non-directional hypotheses
Null Hypotheses (H0)
A null hypothesis is a hypothesis that states
there is no relationship, no difference, or no
effect between variables.
Alternative Hypotheses (H1)
An alternative hypothesis is a hypothesis
that states there is a relationship, difference,
or effect between variables.
Directional Hypothesis
A directional hypothesis is a hypothesis that
predicts the specific direction of the relationship
or difference between variables.
H₁: Students using mobile apps will score higher
in vocabulary than those using textbooks.
Non-Directional Hypothesis
A non-directional hypothesis is a hypothesis that
predicts a relationship or difference but does not
specify the direction.

H₁: Students using mobile apps will have different


vocabulary scores than those using textbooks.
Dörnyei: Why Topic Selection Matters
• Poorly defined problems lead to weak studies
• Topic must be meaningful and feasible
• Early clarity prevents methodological confusion
Dörnyei: Narrowing a Topic
• Start broad → narrow logically
• Consider:
– Population
– Setting
– Variables/phenomena
– Methodological angle
• Narrowing ensures the study is manageable
Dörnyei: Identifying Research Gaps
• Look for:
– Under-researched areas
– Contradictory findings
– New contexts
– Methodological limitations
• Gaps justify the study
Dörnyei: Formulating Good Research Questions
• RQs must be:
– Clear
– Focused
– Answerable
– Aligned with the method
• RQs drive the entire design
Dörnyei: Evaluating RQ Quality
• Is it feasible?
• Is it significant?
• Does it avoid ambiguity?
• Is it researchable within constraints?
Integrated Framework: From Problem to RQ
1. Identify topic area
2. Review literature
3. Identify gap
4. Formulate research problem
5. Define variables/phenomena
6. Create RQs (and hypotheses if needed)
RQ Examples Based on Ary & Dörnyei
Research Questions (RQs)
RQ1: Does interactional support predict EFL
learners’ speaking anxiety in online classrooms?
RQ2: Does teacher feedback quality predict EFL
learners’ speaking anxiety?
RQ3: Does technological competence predict EFL
learners’ speaking anxiety?
Hypothesis Examples Based on Ary & Dörnyei
H1: Higher levels of interactional support are associated
with lower speaking anxiety.
H2: Higher-quality teacher feedback is associated with
lower speaking anxiety.
H3: Higher technological competence is associated with
lower speaking anxiety.
Common Student Mistakes
• Topic too broad
• Vague or unfocused problem
• RQs not aligned with data collection
• Undefined variables
• Research problem not grounded in literature
Final Summary
• A clear problem is the foundation of good research
• Ary → structure, variables, hypotheses
• Dörnyei → topic narrowing, gaps, feasibility, RQs
• A strong proposal begins with a well-formulated
research problem
Thank You

You might also like