Doris — Stationery Organiser Project
SUGGESTIONS
MAXIMUM MARK
CRITERIA JUSTIFICATION FOR
MARK OBTAINED
IMPROVEMENT
1.
Clear identification of the need for a Include a short
Identification
compact, functional organiser for paragraph comparing
of a need or
students. Analysis is thoughtful and existing organisers to
opportunity 5 5
relevant, leading to a realistic, well- reinforce the
with analysis
written design brief. justification for your
leading to a
design.
design brief
Well-structured research into
2. Research Add more measured
materials, sizes, finishes, and user
into the design ergonomic data (e.g.,
preferences. The specification is
brief resulting 10 9 storage dimensions for
justified and detailed, showing clear
in a standard stationery
understanding of user requirements.
specification sizes).
A wide variety of creative and
Provide more structural
3. Generation practical ideas presented with clear
and joinery details for
and sketches and annotations. Each idea
20 18 each concept to show
exploration of evaluated effectively with reasoning
deeper technical
design ideas for suitability.
awareness.
Excellent, logical development
Include more evidence
process from initial ideas to final
4. Development of trial construction or
concept. Shows iterative
of proposed 15 14 small prototypes to
improvement based on feedback and
solution validate design
feasibility.
decisions.
Comprehensive production plan with Add estimated time
cutting list, materials, and stages of durations and potential
5. Planning for
manufacture. Logical and realistic 10 9 risk control measures
production
sequence with safety awareness. for a more complete
plan.
The final product is neatly
constructed, durable, and Further refine finishing
6. Product aesthetically pleasing. Good (edges, varnish, polish)
30 27
realisation precision in assembly and finish. for a professional-
Fully meets specification. quality appearance.
Detailed testing includes user Provide quantitative
feedback and performance checks. data or visual
7. Testing and
Strengths and weaknesses are 10 9 comparisons to support
evaluation
identified with meaningful evaluation claims more
improvement proposals. strongly.
Total: 91 / 100
Remarks:
An excellent, creative, and well-executed project. The product is functional, well-made, and effectively addresses
user needs. Presentation and research are of A* standard, with strong evidence of refinement and practical skill.
NOTE: This is a fair-lenient moderated mark scheme; Therefore, effect the suggestions for
improvement to further strengthen the justification for your final score.