Module2 DeepNotes
Module2 DeepNotes
MODULE 2
Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills
Deep Essay-Style Study Notes | 12 Hours
PART 1 — SELF-AWARENESS
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 1
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
It is important to understand what self-awareness is not. It is not self-obsession or excessive self-focus, which
can shade into narcissism or rumination. It is not self-criticism or self-blame. It is not a static conclusion about
who you are — 'I am an introvert' or 'I am bad at relationships' — but a dynamic, ongoing process of
observation and reflection. Self-awareness is the honest, non-defensive capacity to see yourself clearly,
including the parts that are uncomfortable.
Hurlock (2007) situates self-awareness within the broader development of identity across the lifespan. She
draws on Erikson's concept of the ego identity — the coherent, continuous sense of self that individuals build
through experience and reflection. Without self-awareness, identity development is shallow and reactive; the
person simply adopts the expectations of others without ever genuinely knowing or choosing who they are.
WHO (1994) defines self-awareness in the context of life skills as including knowledge about one's nature,
character, strengths, weaknesses, desires, and dislikes. Critically, WHO also includes awareness of one's rights
and the awareness of when one is feeling stressed or under pressure. This broader definition makes self-
awareness directly relevant to health-promoting behaviour — you cannot manage stress you have not
recognised; you cannot assert your rights if you do not know you have them.
1. Self-Knowledge
Self-knowledge is the most fundamental component — it is the accumulation of accurate information about
oneself. This includes knowing one's personality traits, habitual patterns of behaviour, characteristic emotional
responses, intellectual strengths and limitations, and personal history. Self-knowledge is built over time
through experience, reflection, and honest feedback from others. It is important to distinguish self-knowledge
from self-concept: self-knowledge is the actual information a person holds about themselves, while self-
concept is the overall picture or narrative they construct from that information. A person can have extensive
self-knowledge but organise it into a distorted or unhelpful self-concept. Life skills education works on both —
building accurate self-knowledge and helping individuals construct a realistic, compassionate, and growth-
oriented self-concept.
2. Self-Concept
The self-concept is the organised, coherent picture a person holds of who they are. It is not a single belief but
a structured system of beliefs about the self — covering the physical self (how one looks and relates to one's
body), the social self (how one is seen and relates to others), the academic/professional self (one's
competence and role), and the moral self (one's values and ethical identity). Carl Rogers distinguished
between the real self-concept (based on actual experience) and the ideal self-concept (based on who one
believes one should be). The gap between these two — what Rogers called incongruence — is a primary
source of psychological distress. A healthy self-concept is not perfect or uniformly positive; it is realistic,
stable, and flexible enough to accommodate new information and growth.
3. Self-Esteem
Self-esteem is the evaluative component of self-awareness — not just knowing who you are, but how you feel
about who you are. It is the degree of positive or negative regard one holds for oneself. High self-esteem does
not mean arrogance or an inflated sense of superiority; it means a stable, grounded sense of one's own worth
and value as a person, independent of external achievement or approval. Low self-esteem — a persistent
sense of inadequacy or unworthiness — is one of the most consistent predictors of poor mental health,
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 2
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
relationship difficulty, and vulnerability to social pressure. Hurlock (2007) traces the roots of self-esteem to
early childhood experiences, particularly the quality of parental responsiveness and the consistency of positive
regard from caregivers. Nelson-Jones (2007) identifies building self-esteem as a central goal in life skills
counselling.
4. Self-Efficacy
Self-efficacy, developed by Albert Bandura, is the belief in one's own ability to perform specific tasks or handle
particular situations effectively. Unlike self-esteem, which is a global evaluation of worth, self-efficacy is
domain-specific — a person may have high self-efficacy in academic work but low self-efficacy in social
situations, or vice versa. Self-efficacy directly shapes behaviour: people with high self-efficacy in a domain
approach tasks in that domain with confidence, persist through difficulty, and recover quickly from setbacks.
People with low self-efficacy avoid challenges, give up easily, and interpret difficulty as evidence of
incompetence. Bandura identified four sources through which self-efficacy is built: mastery experiences
(succeeding at tasks), vicarious learning (seeing similar others succeed), verbal persuasion (being encouraged
by credible others), and physiological interpretation (reading one's own arousal signals accurately).
5. Self-Regulation
Self-regulation is the ability to manage one's own thoughts, emotions, impulses, and behaviours in line with
one's goals and values. It is sometimes called self-control, but this term can suggest suppression — self-
regulation is more than suppression. It is the active, ongoing process of monitoring one's internal states and
adjusting one's behaviour in response. Self-regulation involves delaying gratification (resisting immediate
impulse in favour of longer-term goals), managing emotional reactions (processing feelings without being
overwhelmed by them), maintaining attention and effort (persisting on tasks despite distraction or fatigue),
and adjusting behaviour based on feedback. Hurlock (2007) discusses self-regulation as a developmental
achievement — young children have very limited self-regulatory capacity, which develops gradually through
childhood and adolescence as the prefrontal cortex matures. Deficits in self-regulation are associated with
academic underperformance, substance abuse, relationship difficulties, and a range of mental health
conditions.
6. Self-Reflection
Self-reflection is the active, deliberate process of turning attention inward to examine one's own thoughts,
feelings, motivations, and behaviours. Where self-knowledge is the content of what one knows about oneself,
self-reflection is the process by which that knowledge is generated and updated. Without regular self-
reflection, self-knowledge stagnates — people continue operating on outdated assumptions about themselves
and the world. Self-reflection is what allows a person to notice patterns ('I always get defensive when I feel
criticised'), question their assumptions ('Why do I believe I am not capable of this?'), and make deliberate
choices about change. Nelson-Jones (2007) places self-reflection at the heart of personal growth and
counselling. In life skills training, self-reflection is cultivated through structured activities like journaling,
guided discussion, and reflective feedback exercises.
7. Emotional Awareness
Emotional awareness is the ability to recognise, name, and understand one's own emotional states. This is
more demanding than it sounds. Research by Lisa Feldman Barrett and others has shown that many people
have a very limited emotional vocabulary — they can recognise that they feel bad, but cannot differentiate
between anger, shame, fear, disappointment, and grief, each of which has very different implications for
appropriate action. Barrett's concept of emotional granularity refers to the degree of precision with which a
person can distinguish and label their emotional states. High emotional granularity is associated with better
mental health, better coping, and more effective interpersonal functioning. Emotional awareness is the
component of self-awareness most directly targeted by emotional intelligence programmes and by WHO's life
skill of coping with emotions.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 3
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
8. Body Awareness
Body awareness is the ability to recognise and understand the physical signals one's body sends as reflections
of one's psychological state. Stress, anxiety, anger, excitement, and fatigue all have characteristic physical
signatures — tension in the shoulders, tightness in the chest, a racing heart, shallow breathing, heaviness in
the limbs. Body awareness means being able to read these signals accurately and use them as information
about one's inner state. This component is increasingly recognised as important in psychology and education,
building on somatic approaches that emphasise the mind-body connection. WHO's inclusion of coping with
stress as a core life skill implicitly requires body awareness — you cannot manage stress responses you cannot
first recognise in your body.
9. Social Awareness
Social awareness is the component of self-awareness that operates at the interface between self and others
— it is the awareness of how one is perceived by others, how one's behaviour affects others, and how one fits
into social contexts. It is related to Level 5 of the self-awareness developmental model (meta self-awareness)
— the understanding that one exists as an object in the minds of others. Social awareness is the foundation of
social sensitivity, tact, and appropriate behaviour in different social contexts. It is also, as George Herbert
Mead argued, deeply involved in the construction of self-concept itself — we know ourselves partly by seeing
ourselves through the eyes of others. The Johari Window model directly addresses this component: the blind
spot quadrant represents exactly the aspects of social awareness that have not yet been developed.
this seems basic, it is a genuine achievement of self-representation. Hurlock (2007) notes that the quality of
this early self-concept — whether it is positive or negative, accurate or distorted — is heavily influenced by the
responses of caregivers and significant others.
Self-Awareness in Adulthood
Self-awareness continues to deepen through adulthood, though the process is less dramatic than during
adolescence. Experiences of failure, relationship difficulty, career transitions, and psychological crisis often
serve as the catalysts for deeper self-examination. Nelson-Jones (2007) observes that many adults who seek
counselling are, at one level, seeking to develop the self-awareness they never built in earlier life. The
therapeutic process, in large part, is a guided journey of self-discovery.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 5
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
When the gap between them is large — when a person feels they fall far short of who they think they should
be — the result is anxiety, low self-esteem, and psychological distress.
This framework has direct implications for self-awareness. To develop genuine self-awareness, a person must
be willing to see the real self clearly, without immediately distorting it to match the ideal. This requires what
Rogers called unconditional positive regard — the experience of being accepted as one is, without conditions.
Environments that are highly critical or demanding of perfection make genuine self-awareness difficult,
because the person learns to hide the real self even from themselves.
Level 0 — Confusion
At this foundational level, the individual has zero self-awareness. There is no recognition of the self at all —
not even recognition of a mirror as a reflective surface. A person functioning at this level is entirely unaware of
any mirror reflection or of the mirror itself as an object distinct from the world around it. This level is not
limited to infants. It can also be momentarily exhibited by adults — for example, when a person catches an
unexpected glimpse of their own reflection in a darkened window or unfamiliar surface and is startled for a
split second, mistaking their own reflection for another person before recognising it. That brief moment of
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 6
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
confusion — before recognition kicks in — is a fleeting return to Level 0 functioning. It illustrates that self-
recognition, even in adults, is not automatic in all contexts; it depends on environmental cues and attentional
readiness.
Level 1 — Differentiation
At this level, the individual begins to understand that the mirror is not simply part of the surrounding world —
it has a special property: it reflects things. The person can now differentiate between what is in the mirror and
what is in the surrounding environment. Critically, they begin to notice that their own movements produce
corresponding movements in the mirror, and that these movements are different from the movements of
other objects in the environment. This is a significant cognitive and perceptual achievement — the individual
has begun to distinguish between mirror-image and non-mirror reality, and has noticed a relationship
between their own physical actions and what appears in the reflective surface. However, at this stage, the
person has not yet connected the reflection to their own identity. They see a relationship, but not yet a self.
Level 2 — Situation
At Level 2, a crucial link is made: the individual connects the movements seen in the mirror to their own bodily
experience. This is the first hint of self-exploration on a projected surface. What is visualised in the mirror is
now understood to be special to the self — not just any moving image, but a representation tied to one's own
body and actions. The child or individual at this level will often engage in deliberate self-exploration: making
movements and watching the mirror to confirm the correspondence. This is a genuinely playful and
investigative level of self-awareness — the self is being discovered as a physical, moving entity that can be
externally observed. It marks the beginning of the understanding that one has an external appearance, a
bodily self that is visible to the world.
Level 3 — Identification
This is the level at which genuine self-recognition takes effect. The individual now understands that what is in
the mirror is not another person — it is themselves. This is the developmental achievement measured by the
classic rouge test in developmental psychology, where a spot of rouge is placed on a child's nose and the child
is shown a mirror. A child who has reached Level 3 will touch their own nose (recognising that the reflection is
themselves and the rouge is on their face), rather than touching the mirror. A telling behavioural indicator of
this level is in how a child uses language: at Level 3, a child looking in a mirror will refer to themselves —
'That's me' — rather than referring to the mirror as if the reflection were a separate entity. They have
identified the self. The mirror is now a tool for self-knowledge, not a source of confusion or simply an
interesting reflective surface.
Level 4 — Permanence
Level 4 introduces a new and profound dimension: the self is not just present in the current mirror image — it
persists through time. At this level, an individual can identify themselves in photographs taken at a different
time, in a different place, when they looked different or younger. They recognise that the child in an old
photograph is the same 'I' as the person looking at it now, despite changes in appearance. This is the
emergence of what can be called the 'permanent self' — a continuous, stable identity that persists across time
and change. This is a major cognitive achievement. It requires the ability to hold a concept of self that is not
dependent on any particular present-moment sensory experience, but is an enduring mental representation.
Hurlock (2007) would connect this to the development of autobiographical memory and the sense of personal
history that becomes central to identity in later childhood and adolescence.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 7
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
perspective by others. They begin to grasp that other people have minds, and that they themselves can exist
as an object in those minds. This is sometimes called 'meta' self-awareness because it is awareness of
awareness — the self being conscious of being conscious, including being conscious that others are conscious
of you.
This level is closely related to what developmental psychologists call the Theory of Mind — the understanding
that other people have their own thoughts, beliefs, and perceptions that may differ from one's own. The
emergence of Theory of Mind in early childhood (typically around age 4) is a prerequisite for Level 5 self-
awareness, but Level 5 develops more fully through adolescence and adulthood as the individual increasingly
understands the social self — how they appear, how they are perceived, and how they exist in the social world
as a person with a reputation, a social identity, and a presence in the minds of others.
Level 5 self-awareness is the foundation of social sensitivity, empathy, and social intelligence. It is also the
source of self-consciousness in the uncomfortable sense — the anxiety of being watched, judged, or evaluated
by others. The adolescent who is acutely aware of how they appear to peers is operating at Level 5. So is the
person who can genuinely consider how their behaviour affects another person's experience of them — a
capacity that is central to all mature interpersonal functioning.
Self-Report Instruments
Psychological questionnaires and inventories are widely used to facilitate self-assessment. The Myers-Briggs
Type Indicator (MBTI), though its scientific validity is debated, is widely used in educational and organisational
settings to help individuals understand their personality preferences — how they gain energy, how they
process information, how they make decisions, and how they relate to structure. The Big Five Personality
Inventory (measuring Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism) is a more
scientifically validated instrument for the same purpose. These tools are not diagnostic in a clinical sense —
their value lies in facilitating reflection and conversation about the self.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 8
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
The Johari Window is used in life skills training to help individuals understand that self-awareness is not just an
individual project — it is also a social one. Feedback from others reduces the blind spot. Willingness to self-
disclose reduces the hidden area. Both expand the open area, which represents genuine, shared self-
awareness.
Reflective Journaling
One of the most powerful and accessible tools for developing self-awareness is reflective writing. Keeping a
journal in which one records not just events but reactions, feelings, patterns, and questions about oneself
builds the habit of self-observation over time. Nelson-Jones (2007) recommends structured reflection as a
core counselling homework task. In life skills education, reflective writing is used to help learners make
connections between their inner life and their outer behaviour.
PART 2 — EMPATHY
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 9
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
Nelson-Jones (2007) treats empathy as a central counselling skill — the capacity to understand the client's
frame of reference accurately and to communicate that understanding back to them. He distinguishes
between primary empathy (understanding the explicit content of what someone is saying and feeling) and
advanced empathy (understanding the deeper, less explicit meanings behind what someone communicates).
The distinction matters for life skills: we can teach basic empathic listening — attending to what someone says
— but deeper empathy involves understanding what they mean and what they feel, including things they may
not have fully articulated themselves.
Affective Empathy
Affective empathy goes a step further — it involves actually feeling something of what another person is
feeling. When you witness someone in pain and feel distressed yourself, or when a friend's joy becomes your
joy, you are experiencing affective empathy. This is the more visceral, emotional dimension of empathy. It is
deeply rooted in what neuroscientists have called the mirror neuron system — neural circuits that activate
both when we perform an action and when we observe someone else performing it, creating an automatic
resonance between self and other.
Compassionate Empathy
Compassionate empathy — sometimes called empathic concern — is the combination of understanding
another's feelings and being moved to help. It is empathy that leads to action. This is the form most directly
relevant to prosocial behaviour, caregiving, social work, and leadership. Rajasenan (2010) connects this form
of empathy directly to leadership effectiveness — a leader who genuinely understands and cares about the
people they lead is far more effective than one who simply manages from a distance.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 10
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
Empathy has implications that extend far beyond individual relationships. At the social level, empathy is the
psychological foundation of tolerance, non-discrimination, gender sensitivity, and peaceful coexistence.
UNESCO (2001) explicitly identifies empathy as a critical component of life skills education in multicultural and
conflict-affected contexts. When individuals can genuinely understand the experience of people from different
social groups — different castes, religions, genders, or economic backgrounds — the psychological basis for
discrimination and prejudice is significantly weakened.
The absence of empathy is consistently found in research on bullying, violence, and social cruelty. Bullies
typically display low empathy for their victims. Perpetrators of domestic violence typically show limited
capacity to feel their partner's experience. Understanding this helps us see why empathy development is not
merely a 'soft skill' — it is a public health and social justice concern. Life skills programmes that build empathy
are simultaneously building more humane communities.
Empathy: 'I feel with you.' You imaginatively enter the other person's experience and understand it
from the inside.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 11
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
solvable; someone with a negative intrapersonal orientation will interpret the same setback as evidence of
personal inadequacy or permanent failure.
Hurlock (2007) connects intrapersonal functioning to developmental history — the quality of early caregiving
relationships, the messages received about one's worth and capability, and the experiences of success or
failure that have shaped one's self-concept. Nelson-Jones (2007) uses the concept of 'life skills deficits' to
describe the ways in which poor intrapersonal habits — negative self-talk, rumination, catastrophising —
function as skills that were never adequately developed.
Intrapersonal skills include self-awareness (discussed above), emotional regulation, self-monitoring (the ability
to observe your own behaviour in real time), and internal dialogue management (the ability to recognise and
modify unhelpful self-talk patterns). These are the skills of inner life that determine how a person shows up in
the outer world.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 12
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
Social psychology has identified several consistent factors that influence interpersonal attraction. These are
not arbitrary — they reflect deep patterns in how human beings process social information and form social
bonds.
Similarity
We are strongly attracted to people who are similar to us — in attitudes, values, interests, personality, and
background. The similarity-attraction effect is one of the most consistently replicated findings in social
psychology. Similarity validates our own worldview (someone who agrees with us reinforces our sense that we
see things correctly), reduces conflict potential, and makes communication easier. Donn Byrne's
reinforcement-affect model proposes that we are attracted to similar others because similarity is rewarding —
it produces positive affect — and we associate that positive affect with the person.
Complementarity
While similarity is a dominant factor, there is also evidence that in some domains, complementarity — having
characteristics that complement rather than mirror each other — enhances attraction. A dominant person
may be more satisfied with a partner who is comfortable following; a highly organised person may appreciate
a more spontaneous partner. This does not contradict the similarity effect — it refines it. Similarity in values
and attitudes tends to be more important for relationship quality than similarity in personality traits.
Physical Attractiveness
Research consistently shows that physical attractiveness is a significant factor in initial attraction, across
cultures and age groups. The halo effect — the tendency to attribute positive qualities to physically attractive
people — means that attractiveness influences not just romantic attraction but social and professional
evaluation as well. However, physical attractiveness becomes less important as relationships deepen: it is
most influential at initial stages and less so over time, as other factors — personality, values, shared
experience — become more significant.
Reciprocity
We are attracted to people who like us. This seems almost tautological, but it is psychologically significant.
Knowing that someone holds us in positive regard raises our self-esteem, reduces social anxiety, and makes
social interaction enjoyable. Reciprocal liking creates a positive feedback loop: I like you because you like me;
you like me because I like you; our mutual positive regard deepens the relationship. This also has an important
implication for life skills: expressing genuine appreciation and positive regard for others tends to build
attraction and relationship quality.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 13
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
This theory proposes that we are attracted to people we associate with positive feelings. If someone is present
when we feel good — when we are relaxed, successful, or having fun — we associate those positive feelings
with them and develop attraction toward them. Conversely, if someone is consistently associated with
negative experiences, we develop avoidance. The theory explains why context matters in relationship
formation: the circumstances in which people meet shape their initial affect toward each other.
Equity Theory
Equity theory, developed by Adams, extends social exchange by adding the dimension of fairness. It proposes
that people are attracted to and most satisfied in relationships where the ratio of rewards to contributions is
roughly equal for both parties. When one person feels they are contributing significantly more than the other
— emotionally, practically, financially — and receiving proportionally less, they experience inequity, which
produces resentment and relationship dissatisfaction. Equity theory is particularly relevant to understanding
relationship breakdown and to the development of assertiveness and boundary-setting skills.
Trust-Building
Trust is the foundation of any deep relationship. It is built slowly, through consistent behaviour over time —
keeping promises, being honest, showing up when needed, respecting confidentiality, and demonstrating
reliability. Nelson-Jones (2007) emphasises that trust requires congruence between what one says and what
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 14
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
one does. Life skills training helps individuals understand trust as an active, ongoing process of behaviour, not
a static state that is either present or absent.
Active Listening
Active listening — genuinely attending to what another person is saying, both verbally and non-verbally,
without rushing to respond or judge — is one of the most powerful relationship-building skills. It
communicates respect, interest, and care. Most people feel genuinely heard very rarely in their lives. The
experience of being truly listened to is itself therapeutic and deeply bonding. Active listening involves giving
full attention, reflecting back what has been heard, asking open questions, and resisting the impulse to
immediately offer advice or solutions.
Self-Disclosure
Appropriate self-disclosure — sharing genuine thoughts, feelings, and experiences with another person —
builds intimacy and trust. The word 'appropriate' is important: too little self-disclosure keeps relationships
superficial; too much, too soon, can overwhelm and push others away. Effective self-disclosure follows a
gradual, reciprocal deepening: I share something, you share something; I go a little deeper, you go a little
deeper. This is the normal rhythm of relationship development, and it requires the courage to be genuine
alongside the sensitivity to calibrate the depth of sharing to the context and the relationship.
1. Intrapersonal Conflict
Intrapersonal conflict occurs within a single individual — it is an internal psychological struggle between
competing desires, values, beliefs, or courses of action. When a person wants two things that are mutually
incompatible — for example, the desire for career advancement versus the desire for more time with family —
they experience intrapersonal conflict. Kurt Lewin identified three classic forms of intrapersonal conflict:
● Approach-Approach Conflict: The individual must choose between two equally attractive options. For
example, being offered two appealing job opportunities simultaneously. Though seemingly pleasant,
this conflict can cause significant anxiety because choosing one means losing the other.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 15
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
● Avoidance-Avoidance Conflict: The individual must choose between two equally unattractive options —
a 'lesser of two evils' situation. For example, having to choose between a painful medical procedure and
the continuing pain of an untreated condition. This type produces the most psychological distress.
● Approach-Avoidance Conflict: The individual is both attracted to and repelled by the same option. For
example, wanting to speak up in a group but fearing embarrassment. This is the most psychologically
complex form, as the conflict does not resolve by simply choosing or not choosing — the ambivalence
itself must be worked through.
Intrapersonal conflict is resolved through self-awareness, values clarification, and decision-making skills.
Nelson-Jones (2007) treats unresolved intrapersonal conflict as a major source of anxiety, indecision, and
psychological distress. Life skills education that builds self-awareness and decision-making capacity directly
addresses this type of conflict.
2. Interpersonal Conflict
Interpersonal conflict occurs between two or more individuals. It is the most commonly recognised form of
conflict and the one most directly addressed by conflict resolution skills. Interpersonal conflict arises from
differences in needs, goals, values, perceptions, communication styles, or competition for limited resources. It
can occur in any relational context — between friends, romantic partners, family members, colleagues, or
strangers.
Interpersonal conflict is not inherently destructive. Rajasenan (2010) emphasises that in leadership and group
contexts, managed interpersonal conflict is often the engine of creativity and growth — it surfaces different
perspectives and prevents groupthink. The problem is not conflict itself but the absence of skills to manage it
constructively. When individuals lack assertiveness, active listening, and negotiation skills, interpersonal
conflict escalates rather than resolves. When these skills are present, conflict becomes a dialogue that
strengthens rather than damages relationships.
3. Intragroup Conflict
Intragroup conflict occurs within a group — among members of the same team, family, organisation, or
community. It arises when members disagree about goals, roles, responsibilities, procedures, or values within
the group. Intragroup conflict is particularly complex because it involves multiple relationships simultaneously
— a conflict between two members affects all other members and the functioning of the group as a whole.
Intragroup conflict can be productive when it is task-focused — when members disagree about the best way
to achieve a shared goal, the conflict generates discussion, evaluation of alternatives, and better decision-
making. It becomes destructive when it becomes personal — when differences about tasks become attacks on
character or when subgroups form and compete for dominance. The skill of distinguishing task conflict from
relationship conflict, and keeping group disagreements at the task level, is a critical group management and
leadership competency identified by Rajasenan (2010).
4. Intergroup Conflict
Intergroup conflict occurs between different groups — between departments in an organisation, between
communities, between social classes, between religious or ethnic groups, or between nations. This is the
broadest and often most entrenched form of conflict. Intergroup conflicts are characterised by in-group
favouritism (preferring members of one's own group) and out-group derogation (viewing members of the
other group negatively), both of which are well-documented psychological tendencies.
Henri Tajfel's Social Identity Theory explains intergroup conflict as rooted in the human need to maintain a
positive social identity. When one's group is in conflict with another, the conflict is not merely about resources
or goals — it is also about the dignity and worth of the group and, by extension, of the individuals within it.
This is why intergroup conflicts are so emotionally intense and so resistant to purely rational resolution.
UNESCO (2001) identifies life skills education — especially empathy, perspective-taking, and communication
skills — as essential tools for reducing intergroup conflict and building social cohesion.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 16
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
5. Role Conflict
Role conflict arises when an individual occupies multiple social roles that make competing or incompatible
demands. For example, a person who is simultaneously an employee, a parent, and a caregiver for an ageing
parent may find that the demands of these three roles cannot all be met simultaneously — time spent at work
is time taken from family; energy given to caregiving leaves less for professional responsibilities. Role conflict
is a pervasive source of stress in modern life, where individuals are expected to manage an increasing number
of social roles.
Role conflict can also arise when there is ambiguity about what a role requires — role ambiguity — or when
different people who are important to the individual have different expectations of how a role should be
performed. Hurlock (2007) discusses role conflict extensively in the context of adult development, where the
accumulation of roles and the intensification of their demands is a central feature of middle adulthood.
6. Value Conflict
Value conflict arises from genuinely different beliefs about what is right, important, or worthwhile. Unlike
conflicts over resources or interests — which can in principle be resolved through negotiation and
compromise — value conflicts are more difficult to resolve because values are not easily divided or traded. A
conflict between a person who believes individual freedom should always be prioritised and a person who
believes community obligation should take precedence is a value conflict. Neither party is simply wrong —
they hold different but internally coherent systems of belief.
Value conflicts require a different approach from interest-based conflicts. They rarely yield to the position-
versus-interest technique that works for resource conflicts. Resolution, when it is possible, typically involves
not agreement on values but respect for difference — the capacity to maintain a functioning relationship or
cooperation despite holding different fundamental beliefs. This requires the empathy and perspective-taking
skills that are foundational to the life skills framework.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 17
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
Negotiation
Negotiation is the skill of reaching mutually acceptable agreements through discussion. Effective negotiation
involves preparation (understanding your own needs and priorities, and trying to understand the other
party's), communication (expressing your needs clearly and listening to theirs), creative problem-solving
(generating options that might satisfy both parties), and agreement (reaching a clear, specific understanding
of what has been decided). Nelson-Jones (2007) treats negotiation as a core life skill because it is relevant not
just in formal settings but in everyday relational situations — with partners, children, employers, and friends.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 18
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
Component Explanation
Sender The person who initiates communication. The sender encodes their
thoughts, feelings, or information into a message — choosing words,
tone, and manner of expression.
Message The content of the communication — the thoughts, information,
feelings, or intentions that the sender wishes to convey. A message
always has both a content level (what is being said) and a relational
level (how the sender feels about the receiver and the relationship).
Encoding The process of translating thoughts into communicable form —
choosing words, selecting non-verbal cues, and deciding on a medium.
Encoding is influenced by the sender's vocabulary, emotional state,
cultural background, and assumptions about the receiver.
Channel The medium through which the message is transmitted. Channels
include face-to-face conversation, telephone, written text, email, social
media, and body language. The choice of channel affects how the
message is received.
Receiver The person to whom the message is directed. The receiver decodes the
message — interpreting the words, tone, and non-verbal signals in light
of their own knowledge, beliefs, emotional state, and cultural
background.
Decoding The interpretation of the received message. Decoding is influenced by
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 19
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
PART 7 — LISTENING
Passive listening involves simply receiving a message without actively engaging with it or providing feedback. It
may be appropriate in some contexts — listening to a lecture, for instance — but it is inadequate for
interpersonal communication, where the speaker needs to know they are being heard and understood.
Active Listening
Active listening is the fully engaged, intentional process of attending to what another person is communicating
— verbally and non-verbally — and demonstrating that attention through responsive feedback. Active
listening involves giving the speaker undivided attention, restraining the impulse to interrupt or formulate
responses while the other person is still speaking, observing non-verbal cues alongside verbal content,
reflecting back what has been heard to confirm understanding, asking clarifying questions, and suspending
judgment. These are not natural habits for most people — they must be deliberately cultivated.
Empathic Listening
Empathic listening goes beyond active listening to include genuine emotional attunement — not just
understanding what the other person is saying, but feeling something of what they are feeling. Stephen Covey
described empathic listening as 'listening with the intent to understand, not the intent to reply.' Most people,
he observed, listen in order to formulate their next response. Empathic listening suspends that agenda
entirely and focuses on understanding the other person's experience. This is the form of listening that Nelson-
Jones (2007) identifies as the foundation of effective counselling and the deepest form of interpersonal
respect.
Reflective Listening
Reflective listening is a specific technique within active listening: restating in your own words what the
speaker has said, to check your understanding and to communicate that you have been paying attention. It
does not involve agreement or evaluation — simply accurate reflection. 'So what I'm hearing is that you felt
dismissed when that happened — is that right?' This kind of response de-escalates tension, confirms
understanding, and shows the speaker they are genuinely heard.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 21
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
Verbal communication refers to the use of language — spoken or written words — to convey meaning. It is the
primary channel through which complex, precise information is transmitted between people. The quality of
verbal communication depends on clarity, appropriateness, precision, and the ability to adapt language to the
listener and context.
Appropriate Language
Language must be adapted to the listener, the context, and the relationship. The vocabulary, register
(formal/informal), and level of technical detail appropriate in a conversation with a close friend are different
from those appropriate in a job interview or a formal presentation. The inability to adapt language — using
overly technical language with a non-specialist, or overly casual language in a formal setting — is a common
communication failure. Rajasenan (2010) identifies contextual language adaptation as a key component of
leadership communication.
Assertive Expression
Assertive expression — communicating one's needs, feelings, and views directly and honestly while respecting
the other person — is a foundational verbal skill. Assertive communication uses 'I' language rather than 'You'
language, which reduces the listener's defensiveness. 'I feel unsupported when decisions are made without
consultation' is an assertive, non-blaming expression. 'You never consult me' is an attacking expression that
triggers defensiveness. The shift from 'you' to 'I' is small syntactically but large psychologically.
Facial Expressions
The face is the primary channel of emotional communication. Research by Paul Ekman identified six universal
facial expressions — happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disgust, and surprise — that are recognised consistently
across cultures, suggesting a biological basis for emotional expression. Facial expressions are the most
automatic and least consciously controlled channel of non-verbal communication, which is why they are often
the most trusted indicators of genuine emotional states. The ability to read facial expressions accurately is an
important component of empathy and social intelligence.
Eye Contact
Eye contact is one of the most potent non-verbal signals in human communication. Appropriate eye contact
communicates attention, respect, confidence, and genuine engagement. Too little eye contact is often
interpreted as evasiveness, disinterest, or low confidence. Excessive, unbroken eye contact can be
experienced as threatening or intimidating. The norms for appropriate eye contact vary significantly across
cultures — in many Western contexts, sustained eye contact signals confidence and honesty; in some Asian
and African cultures, sustained eye contact with authority figures is considered disrespectful. Cultural
awareness in non-verbal communication is therefore an important dimension of this skill.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 23
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
discomfort and communicate something unintended about the relationship. Awareness of proxemics is
particularly important in cross-cultural communication, where spatial norms differ significantly.
Gestures
Gestures — hand and arm movements that accompany speech — serve several functions. Illustrators are
gestures that complement and amplify verbal content. Emblems are gestures that have a specific agreed-upon
meaning independent of words (a thumbs-up, a wave). Regulators are gestures that manage the flow of
conversation — a raised hand to indicate 'let me finish,' a nod to signal 'keep going.' Adaptors are self-
soothing gestures that often signal anxiety or discomfort — touching the face, fidgeting, playing with
jewellery. Awareness of gesture use and its communicative impact is part of non-verbal communication skill,
though gesture norms, like other non-verbal norms, vary widely across cultures.
Touch
Touch is a powerful non-verbal communicator of warmth, support, intimacy, and — when unwanted — threat.
The norms around appropriate touch are among the most culturally variable of all non-verbal norms, and the
most sensitive in terms of personal boundaries and power. Appropriate, consensual touch — a handshake, a
pat on the back, a hug between friends — is a significant channel of relational warmth and support. In life skills
education, the discussion of touch focuses primarily on boundaries, consent, and cultural sensitivity.
Non-Verbal Communication: Uses body, face, voice qualities, space, and touch. Primarily conveys
emotions, relational signals, and attitudes. Partly unconscious. Often more trusted than verbal content
when the two conflict.
Key insight (Nelson-Jones, 2007): Effective communication requires congruence between verbal and
non-verbal channels. When they conflict, listeners trust the non-verbal.
REFERENCES
Hurlock, E.B. (2007). Developmental Psychology. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd.
Nelson-Jones, R. (2007). Life Counseling Skills. New Delhi: Sage Publishers.
Rajasenan, U. (2010). Life Skills, Personality and Leadership. Chennai: RGNIYD.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 24
PSY 6B 04 – Life Skill Education | Module 2: Mother Skills, Survival Skills & Communication Skills | Deep Study Notes
UNESCO & Indian National Commission for Cooperation. (2001). Life Skills in Non-Formal Education: A Review.
Paris: UNESCO. [Link]
World Health Organization. (1994). Life Skills Education in Schools. Geneva: WHO, Division of Mental Health.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2),
191–215.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Rogers, C.R. (1961). On Becoming a Person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hurlock (2007) | Nelson-Jones (2007) | Rajasenan (2010) | UNESCO (2001) | WHO (1994) Page 25