Scribd
Upload
2 views12 pages

Iterated Piecewise Affine (IPA) Approximation For Language Modeling

The document presents the Iterated Piecewise Affine (IPA) approximation as a principled approach to language modeling, aiming to derive competitive architectures from function approximation rather than engineered designs. IPA utilizes first-order Taylor approximations, piecewise blending through kernels, and iterative column/row operations to achieve nonlinearity while maintaining causality and low-rank factors. Results indicate that IPA performs comparably to Transformer models like GPT in next-token prediction tasks, emphasizing interpretability and modularity in its design.

Uploaded by

praveenkumar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2 views12 pages

Iterated Piecewise Affine (IPA) Approximation For Language Modeling

The document presents the Iterated Piecewise Affine (IPA) approximation as a principled approach to language modeling, aiming to derive competitive architectures from function approximation rather than engineered designs. IPA utilizes first-order Taylor approximations, piecewise blending through kernels, and iterative column/row operations to achieve nonlinearity while maintaining causality and low-rank factors. Results indicate that IPA performs comparably to Transformer models like GPT in next-token prediction tasks, emphasizing interpretability and modularity in its design.

Uploaded by

praveenkumar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Iterated Piecewise Affine (IPA) Approximation for

Language Modeling
An intuitive tour of the core ideas

After Shamsi, Hua, Williams (arXiv:2306.12317)


Motivation: From Craft to Principle

Transformers work extremely well, but their architecture feels engineered rather than derived.

Question: Can we derive a competitive architecture by starting from function approximation?


Idea: Treat a language model core as a function F : Rn×m → Rn×m and approximate F with
simple, interpretable pieces.

IPA Approximation 2/12


One-Slide Summary

IPA (Iterated Piecewise Affine):

Start with first-order Taylor (affine) approximations of F .


Make them piecewise using kernels to blend local affine models.
Iterate column/row operations (layers) to build nonlinearity.
Add causality masks + low-rank factors to be language-model ready.

Result: Principled model that mirrors Transformer behavior and performs comparably on
next-token prediction.

IPA Approximation 3/12


Intuition: Taylor, Then Piecewise

Local affine: F (x ) ≈ F (x0 ) + F ′ (x0 )(x − x0 ) is good only near x0 .


Piecewise: Use multiple centers xp with kernels Kp (x ):
P
X   X
F (x ) ≈ Kp (x ) F (xp ) + F ′ (xp )(x − xp ) , Kp (x ) = 1.
p=1 p

Matrix case: Work in columns/rows of X ∈ Rn×m to get efficient structures.

IPA Approximation 4/12


Two Views of F : Columns and Rows

Let X = [x·1 · · · x·m ] and F (X ) = [f·1 · · · f·m ].


Column view (per token):
m
X
f·j (X ) ≈ aj + Sj,l x·l
l=1

Row view (per feature):


n
X
fi· (X ) ≈ bi + Ti,r xr ·
r =1

Stack column and row ops alternately ⇒ expressivity with simple blocks.

IPA Approximation 5/12


Kernels: Blending the Pieces

Column kernels:
(p)
Kj,l (X ) ∝ exp x·l⊤ Wp x·j


Row kernels: Gaussian radial kernels.


Why: Kernels softly select and combine local affine parts.

IPA Approximation 6/12


Language Modeling: Causality + Sharing + Low-Rank

Causality: Only past tokens can influence the next token.

Column op: restrict sums to l ≤ j.


Row op: constrain Ti,r for simplicity.

Parameter sharing: reuse across positions.


Low-rank factors: shrink heavy matrices (Wp = SL SR ).

IPA Approximation 7/12


Relationship to Transformers (Intuition)

Column op ≈ token mixing (attention-like).


Row op ≈ feature mixing (feedforward-like).
But IPA is derived from approximation, not attention heuristics.

IPA Approximation 8/12


Evidence: Snapshot of Results (WikiText103)

Comparable to GPT-style decoders with similar parameter budgets.

Model Train loss Test loss Speed


GPT-100 4.51 4.45 ∼28 ms
IPA-100 4.49 4.38 ∼31 ms
GPT-500 3.90 3.90 ∼149 ms
IPA-500 3.98 3.89 ∼147 ms

IPA Approximation 9/12


Why This Matters

Derivation over design — principled path from Taylor to iteration.


Interpretability — local linear pieces + kernels.
Modularity — clear knobs (pieces, kernels, low-rank).
Practicality — competitive LM performance.

IPA Approximation 10/12


Takeaways

IPA offers a mathematically grounded LM alternative:

1. Columns/rows for sequence vs. feature mixing.


2. Kernels select local affine experts.
3. Iteration yields depth + causality.

IPA Approximation 11/12


Reference

Shamsi, D.; Hua, W.-y.; Williams, B.


Iterated Piecewise Affine (IPA) Approximation for Language Modeling.
arXiv:2306.12317.

IPA Approximation 12/12

You might also like