CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer: Dr. Jayanthi, J Suneetha& [Link]
Department: CSE
Allotted sem/sec:VI , A,B,C
Date of the review: 19/4/2022
Name of CI: Mrs. Sagarika Behera, Dr. Sudha D, Ms. Savitha.S, Dr. Jagadishwari V, Mrs Manjula
H T, Ms. Jayanthi
Subject Name: System Software Laboratory
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Expectation Reviewer
1 A. Content for Setting the Expectation
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
Assessment schedule is available in
1 Assessment schedule 9 calendar of Events
Evaluation is based on IA
2 Evaluation guidelines 9
Presentation Quality is good.
3 Presentation quality of contents 8
Lesson plan according to the template
4 Lesson Plan as per template 9
Feedback from previous batch Subject is very interest
5 9
students
By conducting Quiz, interaction with
Mechanism for emotional
6 9 students during class
connectivity
Students will be grouped in teams and
Mechanism for students to study small projects based on topic will be
7 8
the subject assigned.
Total 61
Total Avg.= = =97 %
45 63
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
Any other comments/suggestions:
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer: Dr. Jayanthi, J Suneetha& [Link]
Department: CSE
Allotted sem/sec:VI , A,B,C
Date of the review: 19/4/2022
Name of CI: Mrs. Sagarika Behera, Dr. Sudha D, Ms. Savitha.S, Dr. Jagadishwari V, Mrs Manjula
H T, Ms. Jayanthi
Subject Name: System Software Laboratory
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 B. Delivery Reviewer
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
All content for setting of expectation Yes it is covered
1 9
covered
Response from students on expectation It is good
2 8
set by subject teachers.
3 Emotional connectivity with students 8 Good
Experience sharing by previous batch The subject is good and interesting and
4 7
students taught by experienced faculty.
Usage of workbook in class or as Not yet started
5 8
homework
6 Queries from students 9 No queries
7 Active participation of class 9 Most of the students will interact
Yes It is effective and all the concepts
8 Best practices effective 8
will execute
9 Tools/Technology effective 8 Sub line text or Visual studio
10 Pedagogy (e.g. Flip classroom)effective 9 At the last they are conducting
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
Total 83
Total Avg.= = =92%
90 90
Any other comments/suggestions:
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer: Dr. Jayanthi, J Suneetha& [Link]
Department: CSE
Allotted sem/sec:VI , A,B,C
Date of the review: 19/4/2022
Name of CI: Mrs. Sagarika Behera, Dr. Sudha D, Ms. Savitha.S, Dr. Jagadishwari V, Mrs Manjula
H T, Ms. Jayanthi
Subject Name: System Software Laboratory
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Content Development Reviewer
2 A. Teaching Contents
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
C programming concepts and basic
1 Prerequisites 9 understanding of Compiler design and
System Software.
2 Flipped classroom 9 Flipped Class are scheduled
GATE specific questions with solutions
3 GATE specific questions 9
available
4 Previous VTU QP solutions 9 VTU QP solutions are available
5 Module wise notes 9 Yes Module wise notes foe each concepts
6 Assessment materials 9 Yes it is uploaded
7 Workbook 7 Yes available
8 Useful videos 8 Videos links are included in the lesson plan
9 Multimodal content 8 yes
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
10 Quality of content 9 Good easy to revise
Total 86
Total Avg.= = =96 %
90 90
Any other comments/suggestions:
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer: Dr. Jayanthi, J Suneetha& [Link]
Department: CSE
Allotted sem/sec:VI , A,B,C
Date of the review: 19/4/2022
Name of CI: Mrs. Sagarika Behera, Dr. Sudha D, Ms. Savitha.S, Dr. Jagadishwari V, Mrs Manjula
H T, Ms. Jayanthi
Subject Name: System Software Laboratory
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 B. Teaching Content Delivery
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
1 LMS tools used 9 Google Classroom created
2 Game based learning/animated videos 8 Quiz sessions planned
3 Discussion with peers 8 Group activities planned
4 Discussion forum 9 Google Classroom
5 Co-teaching 9 Faculty was interchanged
6 Assessment materials used 9 Assignments, Quiz available
7 Virtual lab (for lab subject) 0 -NA-
Usage of workbook in class or as Done
8 8
homework
9 Queries from students 9 Answered the queries by students
10 Active participation of class 8 Moderate interaction by students
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
Hands-on classes during theory hours
11 Best practices effective 9
using the student laptop
12 Tools/Technology effective 9 Flex(LEX & YAAC) and gcc Compiler
13 Pedagogy (e.g. Flip classroom) effective 7 Is
Total 102
Total Avg.= = =%
117 117
Any other comments/suggestions:
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer: Dr. Jayanthi, J Suneetha& [Link]
Department: CSE
Allotted sem/sec:VI , A,B,C
Date of the review: 7/6/22
Name of CI: Mrs. Sagarika Behera, Dr. Sudha D, Ms. Savitha.S, Dr. Jagadishwari V, Mrs Manjula
H T, Ms. Jayanthi
Subject Name: System Software Laboratory
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Evaluation Reviewer
3 A. Evaluation Content Reviewer
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
Coverage of COs as part of The CO is mapped across the entire
1 8 syllabus
assessment
The evaluation strategies like IAT are
2 Evaluation strategies 8 planned and the same is followed
3 BT-used (70 %- RUA, 30%: AEC) - NA
Scheme of evaluation is created and made
4 Scheme of evaluation 9 available.
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
Students are evaluated based on Viva,
5 Tools for evaluation 9 demonstration lab exercise conduction
Total 42
Total Avg.= = =93 %
45 45
Any other comments/suggestions:
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer: Dr. Jayanthi, J Suneetha& [Link]
Department: CSE
Allotted sem/sec:VI , A,B,C
Date of the review: 15/6/2022
Name of CI: Mrs. Sagarika Behera, Dr. Sudha D, Ms. Savitha.S, Dr. Jagadishwari V, Mrs Manjula
H T, Ms. Jayanthi
Subject Name: System Software Laboratory
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 B. Evaluation Execution
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
Continuous evaluation sheet is used to
1 Evaluation effective 9 evaluate the students for every lab session
Discussed during Lab hours
2 Discussion on evaluation 9
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
Common mistakes discussed
3 Sharing of common mistakes made 8
The presentation skills to be followed in
4 Sharing of better presentation tips 8 VTU exams were discussed in class
Total 34
Total Avg.= = =94 %
40 36
Any other comments/suggestions:
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021