CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer:
Department:
Allotted sem/sec:
Date of the review:
Name of CI:
Subject Name:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Expectation Reviewer
1 A. Content for Setting the Expectation
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
1 Assessment schedule
2 Evaluation guidelines
3 Presentation quality of contents
4 Lesson Plan as per template
Feedback from previous batch
5
students
Mechanism for emotional
6
connectivity
Mechanism for students to study
7
the subject
Total
Total Avg.= =¿%
63 ¿ ¿
Any other comments/suggestions:
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer:
Department:
Allotted sem/sec:
Date of the review:
Name of CI:
Subject Name:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 B. Delivery Reviewer
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
All content for setting of expectation
1
covered
Response from students on expectation
2
set by subject teachers.
3 Emotional connectivity with students
Experience sharing by previous batch
4
students
Usage of workbook in class or as
5
homework
6 Queries from students
7 Active participation of class
8 Best practices effective
9 Tools/Technology effective
10 Pedagogy (e.g. Flip classroom)effective
Total
Total Avg.= =¿%
90 ¿ ¿
Any other comments/suggestions:
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer:
Department:
Allotted sem/sec:
Date of the review:
Name of CI:
Subject Name:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Content Development Reviewer
2 A. Teaching Contents
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
1 Prerequisites
2 Flipped classroom
3 GATE specific questions
4 Previous VTU QP solutions
5 Module wise notes
6 Assessment materials
7 Workbook
8 Useful videos
9 Multimodal content
10 Quality of content
Total
Total Avg.= =¿%
90 ¿ ¿
Any other comments/suggestions:
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer:
Department:
Allotted sem/sec:
Date of the review:
Name of CI:
Subject Name:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 B. Teaching Content Delivery
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
1 LMS tools used
2 Game based learning/animated videos
3 Discussion with peers
4 Discussion forum
5 Co-teaching
6 Assessment materials used
7 Virtual lab (for lab subject)
Usage of workbook in class or as
8
homework
9 Queries from students
10 Active participation of class
11 Best practices effective
12 Tools/Technology effective
13 Pedagogy (e.g. Flip classroom) effective
Total
Total Avg.= =¿
117 ¿
Any other comments/suggestions:
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer:
Department:
Allotted sem/sec:
Date of the review:
Name of CI:
Subject Name:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Evaluation Reviewer
3 A. Evaluation Content Reviewer
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
Coverage of COs as part of
1
assessment
2 Evaluation strategies
3 BT-used (70 %- RUA, 30%: AEC)
4 Scheme of evaluation
5 Tools for evaluation
Total
Total Avg.= =¿%
45 ¿ ¿
Any other comments/suggestions:
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021
CMR Institute of Technology
Bengaluru
Process Review Checklist
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expectations from Process Reviewers
Process reviewers should ensure 'effective use' of best practices, technology, tools, pedagogy, and
organizational processes/templates/checklists to achieve 'learning outcomes' in 'resonance' with the class's
abilities to learn through various modes and mechanisms.
Along with the checklist items, the reviewer should give suggestions to improve. The reviewer should ensure
that the process is modified as suggested to achieve the learning outcomes. The suggestions and its
effectiveness should be recorded and sent to the IQAC team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the reviewer:
Department:
Allotted sem/sec:
Date of the review:
Name of CI:
Subject Name:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 B. Evaluation Execution
Grade (0-9)
# Checklist 0:Lowest, Remarks
9:highest
1 Evaluation effective
2 Discussion on evaluation
3 Sharing of common mistakes made
4 Sharing of better presentation tips
Total
Total Avg.= =¿
36 ¿ ¿
Any other comments/suggestions:
Version 3.0, Date: 27th Jan. 2021