API assessment: Critical issues
Isabel Ortega Diego
WHO Prequalification Team - Medicines
3.2.S.3.2 Impurities,
1 Malaysia, 29 September 2011
1 PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
1|
API quality information in a dossier
API information from the API information from the
API manufacturer: FPP manufacturer:
How the API is prepared How the API is controlled
and controlled by the API (retested) by the FPP
manufacturer. manufacturer, including
parameters that influence
the FPP performance.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
2|
API information in PQ dossiers
There are different options that can be used by applicants to
submit API information in a dossier to PQ.
• Use of a prequalified API (Certificate of PQ API= CPQ)
• Use of a European Certificate of Suitability (CEP)
• Use of a DMF/APIMF (open and restricted parts)
• Provision of full API information in the product dossier.
The use of these 4 options is described in our Quality Generic
Guideline
([Link]
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
3|
API information in PQ dossiers
Regardless of the option chosen the same quality standard is
required for the API.
This is also regardless of whether the API is pharmacopoeial
or not.
The only difference is that for CEPs, the majority of the
assessment is done by EDQM.
The API information assessed within PQ is compiled in the
Common Technical Document format (CTD)
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
4|
API Information-CTD Module 3
Section 3.2.S
3.2.S.1. General information
3.2.S.1.1. Nomenclature
3.2.S.1.2. Chemical structure
3.2.S.1.3. General properties
3.2.S.2. Manufacture
3.2.S.2.1. Manufacturer(s)
3.2.S.2.2. Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
3.2.S.2.3. Control of Materials
3.2.S.2.4. Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates
3.2.S.2.5. Process Validation and/or Evaluation
3.2.S.2.6. Manufacturing Process Development
3.2.S.3. Characterization
3.2.S.3.1. Elucidation of Structure and other Characteristics
3.2.S.3.2. Impurities
3.2.S.4. Control of the API
3.2.S.4.1. Specification
3.2.S.4.2. Analytical Procedures
3.2.S.4.3. Validation of Analytical Procedures
3.2.S.4.4. Batch Analyses
3.2.S.4.5. Justification of Specification
3.2.S.5. Reference standards or Materials
3.2.S.6. Container closure system
3.2.S.7. Stability testing
3.2.S.7.1. Stability Summary and Conclusions
3.2.S.7.2. Post-approval Stability Protocol and Stability Commitment
3.2.S.7.3. Stability Data
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
5|
What API information do you get?
A CEP
What do these mean?
A CPQ
A complete DMF (open + restricted parts)
What are the critical
aspects?
Full API dossier
The complete open part of the DMF
Can the API be fully
assessed?
Other…
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
6|
In this presentation
1) API critical issues: what is important for APIs?
2) Procedures to submit API information in the dossier
(CEP, CPQ, DMF)
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
7|
What is important for APIs?
1. What is the API?
2. Who makes the API?
3. How is the API prepared?
4. How is the API controlled?
5. Can a retest period and recommended storage conditions
be established for the API?
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
8|
What is important for APIs?
1. What is the API?
2. Who makes the API?
3. How is the API prepared?
4. How is the API controlled?
5. Can a retest period and recommended storage conditions
be established for the API?
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
9|
What is the API?
Chemical form – simple, complex?
Origin- synthetic, semi-synthetic, fermentation, herbal
origin
Chirality - one or more chiral centres?
Acid, base, salt, hydration state
Crystalline or amorphous form
Physicochemical properties – polymorphism, particle
size, solubility
Sterile
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
10 |
What is important for APIs?
1. What is the API?
2. Who makes the API?
3. How is the API prepared?
4. How is the API controlled?
5. Can a retest period and recommended storage conditions
be established for the API?
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
11 |
Who makes it?
There are two aspects to this question:
What is/are the API manufacturing site(s)?
Traceability of manufacturing chain/ changes in manufacturers (if
changes tracked).
GMP compliance status of the API manufacturer
The guarantee of quality API is the result of good manufacture
and control throughout all the steps (GMP). Comprehensive
testing of the final API does not replace this.
What is the evidence – From who? For what? Issued when?
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
12 |
Who makes it?
Sites of manufacture (incl. manufacturing, packaging, labelling,
testing and storage of the API):
What's the address?
PQ requests that the applicant declares the API manufacturing
blocks involved, since different blocks at the same site can
have varying GMP compliance.
Are there external suppliers for intermediates?
The manufacturers of intermediates should also work under
GMP.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
13 |
Who makes it?
How far back in the manufacturing chain to go?
If you do not have access to a DMF/full dossier then you will
probably be limited to the API site.
With a DMF/full dossier you can determine:
– If they are undertaking all the steps themselves, or if they
are buying in intermediates.
– Who are the suppliers of the starting materials.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
14 |
What is important for APIs?
1. What is the API?
2. Who makes the API?
3. How is the API prepared?
4. How is the API controlled?
5. Can a retest period and recommended storage conditions
be established for the API?
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
15 |
How is the API prepared?
To assess how the API manufacturer is making the API
you are going to need access to the DMF (full DMF
including restricted part) or to full API details in the
dossier.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
16 |
How is the API prepared?
The assessment of the API preparation will allow you to conclude
on:
The potential impurities that may need to be controlled in the
specifications.
How the API is being controlled throughout the process (in-
process controls, critical steps, control of intermediates…).
The quality of the materials used in its production (starting
materials, reagents, solvents, catalysts), since these can have
an impact on the API impurity profile.
How well and consistently the API is being manufactured.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
17 |
How is the API prepared?
Is the starting point of the manufacturing process acceptable?
Z
X +Y API starting material(s) (SM)
Not under GMP +
brief information API intermediate(s)
Under GMP +
Final API intermediate detailed information
Crude API
Final API
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
18 |
Traditional manufacturing
Raw
Final API
materials
Traditionally, the API manufacturer produced the API from
simple raw materials at their own facility.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
19 |
Contemporary manufacturing
Intermediate
API-SM
API-SM
Raw Material Final API
Now it is very common that intermediates late in the
synthesis are being purchased externally by the API
manufacturer.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
20 |
API Starting material
Choice of API-SM
ASSESSORS
Simpler Final API
molecules
INDUSTRY
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
21 |
API Starting material
API manufacturers prefer to have the starting material defined
as late in the synthesis as possible because:
The API-SM introduction is the point at which GMP applies to
manufacture.
This can be financially advantageous when API
manufacturers buy reaction intermediates from secondary
manufacturers that do not operate under GMP.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
22 |
API Starting material
The problem for assessors is:
There is a concern that critical steps are not carried out under
GMP.
Information on the preparation of a complex API from only one
or two steps makes determination of impurities in the API very
difficult.
If the API-SM is complex it is hard to judge the acceptability of
the API-SM specifications.
There is a concern that impurities from the API-SM may be
carried over with the API.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
23 |
Potential impurities
API starting
API SM impurities
material
Reagents
Solvents
Catalysts
Reaction by-products API intermediate
Reagents
Solvents
Catalysts
Reaction by-products Crude API
Crystallisation solvent
Degradation products Final API
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
24 |
Potential impurities
Impurities in the API-SM
Residue of the API-SM
Residue of the intermediate
Reagents
Solvents
Catalysts
Reaction by-products
Degradation products
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
25 |
How is the API prepared?
What are the potential impurities?
Can the potential impurities be carried over into the final API?
If so, are the potential impurities detectable by the analytical
procedure?
If the absence of certain impurity in the final API cannot be
demonstrated, a test and limit needs to be included in the API
specification or in raw material or intermediate.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
26 |
What is important for APIs?
1. What is the API?
2. Who makes the API?
3. How is the API prepared?
4. How is the API controlled?
5. Can a retest period and recommended storage conditions
be established for the API?
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
27 |
How is the API controlled?
Even without access to a DMF you can at least ensure the
presence of certain tests.
Unfortunately, if you do not know the preparation of the API
(DMF or full dossier), you cannot be certain on the potential
impurities and their control (i.e. toxic metals, genotoxins…).
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
28 |
How is the API controlled?
There may be tests for:
Identification. Chiral API? – test for optical rotation
Assay
Impurities – Organic, inorganic, solvents, residue on
ignition/sulphated ash, heavy metals, chiral impurities
Water
Physical properties – Polymorphism; Particle size
Microbial quality for sterile APIs
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
29 |
What if a monograph is available?
Monographs are developed based upon how the API was
prepared historically. A particular manufacturer's method of
preparation may lead to unexpected impurities, due to a
different route of synthesis, different reagents, etc.
Regardless of whether a pharmacopoeial standard is claimed,
a discussion should be provided of the potential and actual
impurities arising from the synthesis, manufacture or
degradation of the API.
The discussion should not be limited to the impurities specified
in the API monograph
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
30 |
What if a monograph is available?
It is important that when you read an API monograph you also
consider the general monographs that are also applicable to
the API. These also form part of the monograph and are not
optional or nice to know.
For example any API monograph in the European
Pharmacopoeia needs to be read in conjunction with the
general monographs:
– Substances for Pharmaceutical Use (2034) and
– Control of Impurities In Substances For Pharmaceutical
Use (5.10)
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
31 |
What if a monograph is available?
EP 2034 and 5.10 General Monographs:
The limits for impurities of the monograph only apply to the
specific impurities listed in the monograph.
If the API monograph does not provide suitable control for a
new impurity, a suitable test for control must be developed
and included in the API specification.
Residual solvents and impurities (except the ones limited in
the monograph) are limited according to the ICH principles
(see ICHQ3C and ICHQ3A).
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
32 |
How is the API controlled?
Do not forget the test method. The limits are important but having
a validated test method is a prerequisite underlying everything.
The API methods should be able to separate/detect the
potential impurities/solvents of the manufacturing process.
All non-pharmacopoeial methods must be fully validated,
particularly assay, related substances and residual solvents
methods, as outlined in ICHQ2.
The pharmacopoeial methods should also be shown suitable for
determination of impurities related to the manufacturer's specific
route of synthesis and not covered by the monograph.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
33 |
What is important for APIs?
1. What is the API?
2. Who makes the API?
3. How is the API prepared?
4. How is the API controlled?
5. Can a retest period and recommended storage conditions
be established for the API?
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
34 |
What API information do you get?
A CEP
What do these mean?
A CPQ
A complete DMF (open + restricted parts)
What are the critical
aspects?
Full API dossier
The complete open part of the DMF
Can the API be fully
assessed?
Other…
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
35 |
European Certificate of Suitability (CEP)
The DMF has already been assessed by EDQM
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
36 |
European Certificate of Suitability (CEP)
This means the EDQM has already assessed the applicant’s
DMF (method of preparation etc…) to determine if the API
quality is adequate and if the API can be fully controlled by the
[Link]. monograph.
There will be two possible conclusions in the CEP:
a) The API can be fully controlled by the monograph.
b) The API can be fully controlled by the monograph only if
additional tests and limits are applied.
See [Link]
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
37 |
European Certificate of Suitability (CEP)
3.2.S.1. General information
3.2.S.1.1. Nomenclature
3.2.S.1.2. Chemical structure
3.2.S.1.3. General properties
3.2.S.2. Manufacture
3.2.S.2.1. Manufacturer(s)
3.2.S.2.2. Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
3.2.S.2.3. Control of Materials
3.2.S.2.4. Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates
3.2.S.2.5. Process Validation and/or Evaluation
3.2.S.2.6. Manufacturing Process Development
3.2.S.3. Characterization
3.2.S.3.1. Elucidation of Structure and other Characteristics
3.2.S.3.2. Impurities
3.2.S.4. Control of the API
3.2.S.4.1. Specification
3.2.S.4.2. Analytical Procedures
3.2.S.4.3. Validation of Analytical Procedures
3.2.S.4.4. Batch Analyses
3.2.S.4.5. Justification of Specification
3.2.S.5. Reference standards or Materials
3.2.S.6. Container closure system
3.2.S.7. Stability testing
3.2.S.7.1. Stability Summary and Conclusions
3.2.S.7.2. Post-approval Stability Protocol and Stability Commitment
3.2.S.7.3. Stability Data
The API quality is adequate and
the monograph (limits and test
methods) is able to control the
quality of the API
38 | API Assessment - Zazibona June 2014
CEP WHERE ALL IMPURITIES ARE CONTROLLED BY THE MONOGRAPH
Certificate of suitabiliy
No. RX-CEP-Year-XXX-Rev XX
Name of the substance:
XXX
Name of holder:
XXX
Site of production:
XXX
we certify that the quality of the substance is suitably controlled by
After examination of the information provided on the manufacturing method and subsequent processes (including
purification) for this substance on the site of production mentioned above, XXX, we certify that the quality of the substance
monograph XXX
is suitably controlled by monograph XXX (Ph. Eur. …).
The following impurities are also detected and their limits are set at:
The following impurities are also detected and their limits are set at:
—
—
—
The submitted dossier must be updated after any significant change that may alter the quality, safety or efficacy of the
—
substance.
Manufacture of the substance shall take place in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practice and in accordance with the
dossier submitted.
Failure to comply with these provisions will render this certificate void.
This certificate is granted within the framework of the procedure established by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission
[Resolution AP-CSP (99) 4] for a period of five years starting from XXX. Moreover, it is granted according to the provisions
of Directive 75/318/EEC amended and Directive 81/852/EEC amended, and the related guidelines.
This certificate does not replace a batch analysis certificate.
(…)
European Certificate of Suitability (CEP)
3.2.S.1. General information
3.2.S.1.1. Nomenclature
3.2.S.1.2. Chemical structure
3.2.S.1.3. General properties
3.2.S.2. Manufacture
3.2.S.2.1. Manufacturer(s)
3.2.S.2.2. Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
3.2.S.2.3. Control of Materials
3.2.S.2.4. Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates
Additional tests (e.g.
3.2.S.2.5. Process Validation and/or Evaluation
3.2.S.2.6. Manufacturing Process Development
3.2.S.3. Characterization
3.2.S.3.1. Elucidation of Structure and other Characteristics
3.2.S.3.2. Impurities
3.2.S.4. Control of the API
impurities, solvents,
3.2.S.4.1.
3.2.S.4.2.
3.2.S.4.3.
Specification
Analytical Procedures
Validation of Analytical Procedures
+ catalysts…not detected
3.2.S.4.4. Batch Analyses
3.2.S.4.5. Justification of Specification
3.2.S.5. Reference standards or Materials
3.2.S.6. Container closure system
by the methods of the
3.2.S.7. Stability testing
3.2.S.7.1.
3.2.S.7.2.
Stability Summary and Conclusions
Post-approval Stability Protocol and Stability Commitment
monograph)
3.2.S.7.3. Stability Data
The API quality is adequate and
the monograph is able to control
the quality of the API only if it is
supplemented by the limit and
test(s) given in the CEP annex.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
40 |
CEP WITH APPENDIX(CES) WHERE NEW IMPURITIES ARE CONTROLLED BY
ADDITIONAL METHOD(S)
Certificate of suitabiliy
No. RX-CEP-Year-XXX-Rev XX
on 0
Name of the substance:
XXX
Name of holder:
XXX
Site of production:
XXX
After examination of the information provided on the manufacturing method and subsequent processes (including
purification) for this substance on the site of production mentioned above, XXX, we certify that the quality of substance is
(…) we
suitably certify
controlled that
by the the quality
monograph XXX ([Link]…)
the substance is suitably
only if it is supplemented by thecontrolled bybased
following test(s), theon the
monograph
analytical givenonly
X (...)
procedure(s) if it is supplemented by the following test(s), based on the
in annex.
— Test for the following impurities/related substances/by liquid chromatography (annex 1)
analytical procedure(s) given in annex.
XXXnot more than XXX
XXX not more than XXX
The
− submitted
Test for dossier must be updated aftersubstances/residual
impurities/related any significant change that solvents
may alter theby
quality,
(…)safety or efficacy of the
chromatography
substance.
(annex
Manufacture X)substance shall take place in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practice and in accordance with the
of the
dossierXXXX
submitted. not more than XXX
Failure to comply with these provisions will render this certificate void.
This certificate is granted within the framework of the procedure established by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission
[Resolution AP-CSP (99) 4] for a period of five years starting from XXX. Moreover, it is granted according to the provisions
of Directive 75/318/EEC amended and Directive 81/852/EEC amended, and the related guidelines.
(…)
European Certificate of Suitability (CEP)
Check that the CEP is valid ([Link], databases, certification
database).
RX-CEP-Year-Number-Rev XX:
R=renewal (R0= first CEP; R1= renewal once after the first 5 years, then
unlimited validity)
Rev= revisions (i.e. Rev 00, Rev 01, Rev 02, etc), after:
o Changes
o Revisions of the monographs (the manufacturer has to show
compliance with the new requirements)
Check that declaration of access has been filled in for the Marketing
Authorisation Applicant and that it comes with all annexes (if any).
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
42 |
CCertificate of suitabiliy
No. RX-CEP-Year-Number-Rev XX
0
Name of the substance:
XXX
Name of holder:
XXX
Site of production:
A CEP does not indicate GMP compliance, it is not a GMP certificate.
XXX
After examination of the information provided on the manufacturing method and subsequent
processes (including purification) for this substance on the site of production mentioned above,
XXX, we certify that the quality of the substance is suitably controlled by monograph XXX
(…).
The following impurities are also detected and their limits are set at:
—
—
The submitted dossier must be updated after any significant change that may alter the quality, safety or efficacy of the
substance.
Manufacture of theof
Manufacture the substance
substance shall
shall take place take place
in accordance in accordance
with Good Manufacturingwith Good
Practice and Manufacturing
in accordance with the dossier submitted.
Practice and in accordance with the dossier submitted.
Failure to comply with these provisions will render this certificate void.
This certificate is granted within the framework of the procedure established by the European
Pharmacopoeia Commission […] for a period of five years starting from
XXX. Moreover, it is granted according to the provisions of Directive (….) and the related guidelines.
This certificate has XX lines only.
Signature
Strasbourg, XXX
European Certificate of Suitability (CEP)
Please also note that:
Compliance with the specifications can only be shown by
certificates of analysis from the API manufacturer (the CEP
does not replace a CoA).
Applicants for a CEP can decide whether a retest period is
mentioned in the CEP or not.
If a retest period is not mentioned, stability data need to be
provided and assessed (not assessed by EDQM!) in order to
establish a retest period and storage conditions.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
44 |
CEP and retest period
If a retest period is mentioned, the storage conditions applied
are those of the EU guideline CPMP/QWP/609/96/Rev 2 (i.e.
those for climatic zone I/II, the relevant zone for the EU).
Therefore if you see a CEP with a retest period but no storage
statement mentioned, it should be assumed that the
temperature statement for the API is at least "store below
25°C".
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
45 |
Prequalified APIs (CPQ)
The DMF has already been assessed by WHO PQ
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
46 |
Prequalified APIs (CPQ)
3.2.S.1. General information
3.2.S.1.1. Nomenclature
3.2.S.1.2. Chemical structure
3.2.S.1.3. General properties
3.2.S.2. Manufacture
3.2.S.2.1. Manufacturer(s)
3.2.S.2.2. Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
3.2.S.2.3. Control of Materials
3.2.S.2.4. Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates
3.2.S.2.5. Process Validation and/or Evaluation
3.2.S.2.6. Manufacturing Process Development
3.2.S.3. Characterization
3.2.S.3.1. Elucidation of Structure and other Characteristics
3.2.S.3.2. Impurities
3.2.S.4. Control of the API
3.2.S.4.1. Specification
3.2.S.4.2. Analytical Procedures
3.2.S.4.3. Validation of Analytical Procedures
3.2.S.4.4.
3.2.S.4.5.
Batch Analyses
Justification of Specification
3.2.S.5. Reference standards or Materials
The API quality is adequate
AND
3.2.S.6. Container closure system
3.2.S.7. Stability testing
3.2.S.7.1. Stability Summary and Conclusions
3.2.S.7.2. Post-approval Stability Protocol and Stability Commitment
the API manufacturing site has
3.2.S.7.3. Stability Data
been verified GMP compliant
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
47 |
Prequalified APIs (CPQ)
List of PQ APIs
+ WHO inspection report
Website (Public) Website (Public)
Confirmation Document (CPQ)
48 | API Assessment - Zazibona June 2014
Prequalified APIs (CPQ)
The CPQ provides an assurance that the supplied API is of
good quality (assessment + GMP).
The API specifications, assay test method and related
substances test method accepted for the API are appended to
the CPQ.
The approved details can be verified in the list of PQ APIs
([Link]
Also, the DMF assessment report is potentially available for
National Medicine Regulatory Authorities.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
49 |
Drug Master File (APIMF/ASMF)
FPP
Manufacturer
AP
+
RP
WHO
API
Manufacturer
+
DMF assessment is conducted in conjunction with an FPP application.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
50 |
Drug Master File (APIMF/ASMF)
DMFs protect the confidentiality of the API manufacturer
information and are divided in two parts:
– The Applicant's part (AP) or open part contains the
information that the DMF holder regards as non-confidential
to the FPP applicant. It should contain sufficient information
to enable the FPP applicant to take full responsibility of the
API.
– The Restricted part (RP) or closed part contains the
information that the DMF holder regards as confidential.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
51 |
Drug Master File (APIMF/ASMF)
3.2.S.1. General information
3.2.S.1.1. Nomenclature
3.2.S.1.2. Chemical structure
3.2.S.1.3. General properties
3.2.S.2. Manufacture
3.2.S.2.1. Manufacturer(s)
3.2.S.2.2. Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
3.2.S.2.3. Control of Materials RP
3.2.S.2.4. Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates
3.2.S.2.5. Process Validation and/or Evaluation
3.2.S.2.6. Manufacturing Process Development
3.2.S.3. Characterization
3.2.S.3.1. Elucidation of Structure and other Characteristics
3.2.S.3.2. Impurities
3.2.S.4. Control of the API
3.2.S.4.1. Specification
3.2.S.4.2. Analytical Procedures
3.2.S.4.3. Validation of Analytical Procedures
3.2.S.4.4. Batch Analyses
3.2.S.4.5. Justification of Specification
3.2.S.5. Reference standards or Materials
3.2.S.6. Container closure system
3.2.S.7. Stability testing
3.2.S.7.1. Stability Summary and Conclusions
3.2.S.7.2. Post-approval Stability Protocol and Stability Commitment
3.2.S.7.3. Stability Data
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
52 |
Drug Master File (APIMF/ASMF)
Our APIMF procedure is described in
[Link]
[Link]
A DMF procedure serves to bring the API manufacturer under
closer regulatory examination. It creates a direct link between
the regulator and the API manufacturer.
It is of little use if there is no communication between the FPP
manufacturer and the API manufacturer, especially if changes
to the DMF are not communicated to the FPP manufacturer.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
53 |
What API information do you get?
A CEP Full API assessment
has been already done
A CPQ
A complete DMF (open + restricted parts)
Full API assessment can
be done
Full API dossier
The complete open part of the DMF
Full API assessment
Other… cannot be done
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
54 |
Conclusion
There are critical issues to be assessed in the API information
provided by the API manufacturer.
These critical issues can only be assessed if full information on
the API is provided.
The assessment work does not need to repeated in the case
of CEPs and WHO Prequalified APIs.
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
55 |
Thank you
Please feel free to email me at: Kaushalv717@[Link]
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
56 |
Questions?
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
57 |
Abbreviations
AP: Applicant's part of a DMF (or Open part)
API: Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient
CEP: Certificate of suitability to the monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia
CoA: Certificate of Analysis
CPQ: Confirmation of API Prequalification document
CTD: Common Technical Document
DMF: Drug Master File (in PQ APIMFs= API Master Files, in the EU ASMFs=Active Substance Master Files)
EDQM: European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare
EU: European Union
FPP: Finished Pharmaceutical Product
GMP: Good Manufacturing Practice
Ph. Eur.: European Pharmacopoeia
RP: Restricted part of a DMF or closed part
SM: API Starting Material
WHOPIR: WHO Public Inspection Report
PQT Medicines Quality Assessment Training 25-28 May 2015
58 |