Chapter 4 Reading guide
Rohith Modem
Anderson University
Analytics and the Enterprise
April Adams
Feb 27, 2026
1. Why does our textbook author suggest that Data Analytics functions be separated
from the Enterprise IT function?
According to Sah (2022), data and analytics initiatives are run in a totally different way in
contrast to the conventional enterprise IT initiatives. The majority of IT projects like ERP or
CRM implementation have structured processes in which requirements can be defined in
advance and then the development starts. These systems have automated business processes
that are already known, which makes the process of planning relatively predictable. On the
contrary, projects of data and analytics are exploratory. Leaders might start off asking general
questions and not precise specifications and gradually with the analysis of data they start to
understand more.
Due to this ambiguity, analytics teams need the flexibility, exploration, prototyping and
high-speed collaboration with business partners. Classical IT departments are known to have
high levels of governance, have long approval cycles, and cumbersome development models
likely to slug innovation. By integrating analytics into IT, it is in danger of being seen as a
technical support feature, as opposed to strategic capability.
The separation of data and analytics with enterprise IT enables the function to be more
business-focused in its priorities and to be more agile. It focuses on value creation, insight
creation, and decision support as opposed to maintaining the system. According to Sah
(2022), this structural difference makes it more responsive, leads to better stakeholder trust,
and allows analytics to work as a strategic enabler rather than a back-office technology unit.
2. What are the 3 different organizational models recommended in the textbook?
Describe each in your own words (no cut and paste!).
As Sah (2022) notes, enterprises usually have three models available to them:
Decentralized Model
This design features regions or business teams that have their own analytics team that are
independent of one another. Local teams are free to address the needs in regions. Although
this is favorable to responsiveness, it can lead to the inconsistency of standards, tools, and
data definitions across the enterprise.
Centralized Model
The analytics activities in this model are controlled by a single core team, usually the one
that is located at headquarters. This facilitates standardization, economies of scale and a more
powerful governance. Nonetheless, it could not easily respond rapidly to local needs that are
unique to the area (Sah, 2022).
Federated Model
This model is an integration of centralized control and regional flexibility. Enterprise
wide standards and common capabilities are handled by a central team and local needs by
regional teams. It focuses on finding the balance between consistency and autonomy, but
high coordination within central teams and local teams is required.
3. Of the 3 models above, which one does the textbook author recommend as best? In
your own words, why is it supposed to be better? Do you agree?
According to Sah (2022), the federated model is suggested by the author to large and
complex global enterprises. This structure is a combination of centralized control and
decentralized flexibility. It enables common investments of technology, common standards
and utilization of solutions and yet remain responsive in the locality.
The federated method minimizes redundancy, enhances the uniformity of the data, and
allows collaborating across the enterprise. It might cause tension between the central and
regional teams, but good governance and leadership would be able to control them.
I agree with the suggestion. Global alignment and local agility are necessary in large
organizations. The extreme of a centralized or decentralized structure will most probably
bring about inflexibility or disunity. The federated model offers an equilibrium model when
well managed (Sah, 2022).
4. What are the 5 towers of an ideal data and analytics organization? In your own
words, describe each.
According to Sah (2022), five logical towers are described:
Governance Tower
In charge of strategy, demand management, roadmap planning, risk management, change
management and performance monitoring. It provides conformity with enterprise objectives.
Business Tower
Serves as the liaison between stakeholders in the business and the technical departments.
Members are aware of business priorities and analytics. They co-innovate and make solutions
provide quantifiable value.
Technology and Architecture Tower
Determines enterprise data architecture, manages standards and promotes data
governance. It provides well-designed, scalable and secure analytics infrastructure.
Solution Delivery Tower
Manages analytics initiatives through design to implementation. This team develops and
tests applications and passes them over to them to maintain.
Service Delivery Tower
Manages and maintains deployed analytics solutions. It operates stability of operations,
ticketing, improvements, and improvement.
5. Describe in your own words why data governance is so complex.
Data governance is a complex concept since the enterprise information is in different
operations and systems in various geographies. The way all business functions produce and
use data differs and in most cases, has different definitions and quality standards. According
to Sah (2022), the data governance is not a technical task; it must be owned by the business.
Data custodians are the business leaders and IT the supporting role. Such mutual
responsibility complicates the organization.
Data Governance entails well-set functions like data owners, data stewards and governing
council. The policies should specify the creation, storage, access, protection, and utilization
of data. Also, businesses have to deal with regulation, privacy needs, and data security
threats. It is more challenging to align these components in international business.
Cultural resistance is another problem. Departments can be reluctant to share information
or use common definitions. The executive sponsorship is necessary since the governance
initiatives frequently presuppose the behavioral and process modifications. Devoid of
effective leadership determination and cross functional cooperation, governance systems can
be on paper but not working in the field. Due to all these reasons, data governance is a
technical and organizational change project (Sah, 2022).
6. In your own words, how are Solution delivery and Service delivery related?
Solution delivery and service delivery are two phases of the analytics lifecycle that are
closely related to each other. The solution delivery tower is dedicated to the design,
construction, testing, and implementation of analytics application in accordance with the
approved business requirements. This stage is project-based and it is commonplace to have
irregular workloads depending on the quantity and size of initiatives being undertaken (Sah,
2022).
When a solution has been deployed and its users have adopted it, the service delivery
tower becomes the responsible party. This department makes sure that the application is
functional even after. They have responsibilities to monitor the performance of the systems,
schedule data refresh process, address user problems, make minor improvements, and create
operational stability.
The association between the two towers is acute. Service teams will not be effective in
maintaining solutions without proper knowledge transfer, documentation and
communication. In other organizations, and particularly those who embrace the DevOps
practices, the two roles can be merged into one cross-functional team. Nevertheless, in these
situations, the difference between creating new capabilities and sustaining the ones is still
significant.
Sah (2022) emphasizes that the transition between these towers should be well-timed so
that the sustainability, continuous improvement and business value fulfillment due to
analytics investments can be obtained in a long-term perspective.
7. From the week in the life section of chapter 4, in your own words, which aspect
seems to be the most challenging? While this answer can be subjective, the
reasoning behind your answer is the crucial part of this answer.
Balancing between competing priorities and continuing innovation and operational
excellence seems to be the most difficult part. Sah (2022) points out that the analytics team is
required to process incoming demands, business impact, project prioritization, development
work, and business maintenance, user training, business governance, and business value
measurement simultaneously. This leaves a balancing act at all times. Different functional
stakeholders can make urgent requests and each of them can prove to be of high priority. The
team needs to make dispassionate decision making on priorities without ruining the
relationships. Simultaneously they have to keep on experimenting with new analytical
concepts and testing new solutions as they would push the future value (Sah, 2022).
Reference
Sah, P. (2022). Defining enterprise data and analytics strategy. Springer.