Student: Timur Kayhan | ID: 240201463
Date: March 4, 2026
AI Ethics Insights and Career Impact
Beginning with early ideas from Alan Turing, the talk called "AI Ethics" walked through how artificial
intelligence has changed over time. Moving ahead into today's tools such as Gemini and Sora, it
showed that progress brings complications along with power. Though machines now do tasks faster
than ever before, concerns about fairness, control, and misuse grow stronger. From the 1956
Dartmouth meeting onward, each leap forward pulled benefit and risk tighter together. What started
as theory now shapes real-world choices - without clear answers always available.
Key Learning Points
A key point in the talk focused on what researchers call the Productivity Paradox - alongside growing
fears about skill erosion. When artificial intelligence handles increasingly sophisticated work,
evidence suggests people might weaken their own reasoning abilities and struggle when working
independently. One example came from an MIT investigation showing heavy dependence on
language-generating systems could reduce mental activity, affecting both creative expression and
decision patterns.
Laws around ethics are tightening, step by step. One slide pointed out universities setting up clear
guidelines - like the 2024 Ethical Guide for the Use of Generative AI from YÖK - so research stays
honest when tech gets involved. Thoughts then turned to Asimov’s robotic laws, alongside Stephen
Hawking’s concern: artificial intelligence might lift us up - or break everything, if handled poorly.
Future career considerations
Later on, mastering artificial intelligence may become standard - yet staying alert and questioning
remains just as vital. Shifting quickly matters now more than ever, especially after hearing how new
workers should focus on learning itself, not only fixed knowledge. It strikes me that even though
automation helps speed up work across banking, legal tasks, or medical services, unseen risks around
unfairness, exclusion, or data misuse come along too.
Starting with real-world decisions keeps me grounded when using AI alongside practice. Instead of
treating tools as substitutes, I work beside them - shaping choices through insight only experience
brings. Where judgment matters most, like strategy or intricate cases, attention stays personal. This
path sidesteps erosion of skill over time. Thinking guides technology, not the reverse. Quality
emerges when ethics lead, backed quietly by machine speed. The benchmark? Work that speaks
thoughtfully because it was shaped that way.