0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views38 pages

Well Control

Chapter 4 discusses various methods of control for maintaining constant Bottom Hole Pressure (BHP) during drilling operations, including the Driller's Method and the Wait and Weight Method. It outlines the procedures for each method, their advantages and drawbacks, and emphasizes the importance of maintaining pressure and flow rates to prevent blowouts. Additionally, it covers the implications of pressure management in relation to the Maximum Allowable Annulus Surface Pressure (MAASP) and the safe handling of influxes.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views38 pages

Well Control

Chapter 4 discusses various methods of control for maintaining constant Bottom Hole Pressure (BHP) during drilling operations, including the Driller's Method and the Wait and Weight Method. It outlines the procedures for each method, their advantages and drawbacks, and emphasizes the importance of maintaining pressure and flow rates to prevent blowouts. Additionally, it covers the implications of pressure management in relation to the Maximum Allowable Annulus Surface Pressure (MAASP) and the safe handling of influxes.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 4 - Methods of control

• Generalities on methods of control


• Driller's method
• Wait and Weight method
• Comparison Driller's / Wait & Weight
• SCR selection

• PLSCR measurement

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
Methods of control
• Methods keeping constant BHP
– With direct circulation at constant flow rate when bit on bottom

* Driller's Method : evacuation of the influx with original mud then


circulation with kill mud
* Wait and Weight Method : circulation with kill mud since the
beginning

– Without circulation (bit on or off bottom)


* Volumetric Method when gas migrating in annulus (method
which can be used anytime but not very accurate)

* Lubricating Method to evacuate the influx when below the BOP

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


– BHP = FP for IWCF but in fact BHP maintained slightly > FP while
circulating a kick

SEC -
Methods of control
• Bull - heading : BHP not maintain constant
– If problem with influx at surface (H2S, pressure too high, ...)
– If problem of circulation (string plugged, ...)

Caution :
– Need to fracture a formation in the open hole, it will be the weakest
(not necessary the kicking zone)
 risk of internal blow out  could be a very dangerous method
– Need to know the well strength (could be applied in a deep well with
a short open hole !!)
– Procedure to start rapidly after the kick (to reduce the volume to be
squeezed)
– Pumping rate enough to have mud speed in the annulus > gas

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


migration speed

Remark : bull-heading commonly used in workover (cased hole)

SEC -
Circulation with BHP constant - Bit on bottom
• In the following, assumptions are :
– Kick while drilling : kicking zone on bottom

– Direct circulation at a constant flow rate

– Gas kick without dissolution in mud

– Surface BOP case : PLCL = 0

– Pressure losses in annulus negligible (PLA = 0)

– No safety margin on bottom (BHP = FP)

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
Circulation with BHP constant - Bit on bottom
• Four phases to consider :
– Transition phase : flow rate not constant
* When starting circulation
* When stopping circulation
* When changing SCR value

– Circulation with OMW (original mud pumped in the string)


* Drill string full with OMW
* Almost a complete cycle with Driller's method
* Displacement of original mud in surface lines only with W and W

– Replacement of original mud by kill mud in the drill string

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


– Replacement of the fluids in the annulus by the kill mud
* Drill string full with KMW

SEC -
Transition phase

• In static, before starting circulation :


– SICP + PHA = FP

• In circulation :
– BHP = PHA + CP
– The aim is to have BHP = FP all the time

• On a short while, PHA constant


 while starting, to have BHP equal FP, need to maintain
CP constant and equal to SICP

• When starting, stopping circulation, changing pump

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


speed, to maintain BHP constant and equal to FP,
maintain CP value constant (value read on the gauge at
the considered time)

SEC -
Circulation with OMW

• In static (drill string full with OMW) :


– SIDPP + PHI = FP (1)

• In circulation at SCR (drill string full with OMW) :


– BHP = PHI + DPP - PLI (2)
– BHP maintained equal to FP (constant value) (3)

• Combining (1), (2) and (3) :

DPP must be equal to (SIDPP  PLI )

P L SCR = P LI + P LA 


© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


  P L SCR  P LI
but PLA  0 at SCR 


PL SCR = pressure losses in the circuit at SCR with OMW

SEC -
Circulation with OMW

• To have BHP constant and equal FP, need to have

DPP  SIDPP  PL SCR

• (SIDPP + PLSCR) : constant value called initial circulating


pressure (ICP)

• While circulating with OMW, to maintain BHP constant and


equal to FP, DPP must be maintained constant and equal
to ICP with ICP = (SIDPP + PLSCR)

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
Replacement of fluid by Kill Mud in annulus

• In static with drill string full of KMW :


– PHI = FP (1)

• In circulation at SCR :
– BHP = PHI + DPP - PLI (2)
– BHP maintained equal to FP (constant value) (3)

• Combining (1), (2) and (3) :

DPP must be equal to PLI with KMW

KMW
But PL I  PL SCR .

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


OMW

KMW
So DPP must be equal to PL SCR .
OMW

SEC -
Replacement of fluid by Kill Mud in annulus

• To have BHP constant and equal FP, need to have

KMW
DPP  PL SCR .
OMW

• PLSCR . KMW / OMW : constant value called Final


Circulating Pressure (FCP)

• While replacing fluids by kill mud in the annulus, to


maintain BHP constant and equal to FP, DPP must be

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


maintained constant and equal to FCP

SEC -
Replacement of OMW by KMW in the string

• In static :
– DPP + PHI = FP (1)

• In circulation at SCR :
– BHP = PHI + DPP - PLI (2)
– BHP maintained equal to FP (constant value) (3)

• Combining (1), (2) and (3) :

DPP must be equal to (FP - PHI )  PLI

• DPP = ICP when KMW arriving on rig floor

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


• DPP = FCP when KMW passing the bit

SEC -
Replacement of OMW by KMW in the string
• In this phase, according to drill string and well profile, PHI
and PLI do not vary at the same rate
– In vertical well :
* PHI increases regularly with depth
* Larger variation of PL in bit and DC than in DP

– In horizontal well :
* PHI increases until horizontal drain entry, then remains constant
* PL increases all along the string, variation according to the
string used
• Necessary to calculate PHI and PLI at different points :
– At each change of well inclination (KOP, end of build up, etc..)

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


– At each change of drill string inside diameter (DC, bit entry, etc..)

SEC -
Replacement of OMW by KMW in the string
• Straight line corresponds to a vertical well with DP from
bottom to surface
• Line 1 corresponds to a vertical well
• Line 2 corresponds to a deviated well

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
Replacement of OMW by KMW in the string

• Difference between straight line and real line : few bar


• Small difference if low SCR and KMW close to OMW
• To be taken in account in deviated wells specially if low
safety margin
• In practice :
– Maintain DPP = ICP until arrival of Kill Mud on rig floor ( volume of
surface lines must be known)
– Reset strokes counter at 0 when Kill Mud on rig floor
– With Driller's Method, during this phase :
* No need to make accurate calculation

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


* If all influx has been removed, CP will remain constant and
equal to SIDPP
* Normally no need to touch the choke, DPP will take the correct
values

SEC -
Circulation keeping BHP constant - Summary
• Starting / stopping or changing flow rate :
– Keep CP constant (keep same CP value in static and in circulation)

• Circulating with original mud weight :


– Keep DPP constant and equal to ICP

• Replacing original mud by kill mud inside the string :


– Follow variation from ICP to FCP, or with Driller's keep CP = SIDPP
– Maintain DPP = ICP until kill mud arrives at the rig floor

• Replacing fluids by kill mud in the annulus :


– Keep DPP constant and equal to FCP

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training
Driller’s method - First part

SEC -
© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training
Driller’s method - Second part

SEC -
Driller's Method
• First part : evacuation of influx with Original Mud :
– Phase 2 :
* When pump at SCR, DPP should be equal to ICP. If not, keep DPP
equal to the value given by the circuit
• Second part : replacement of Original Mud by Kill Mud :
– Phase 3 :
* If annulus clean and choke well adjusted
 nothing to do (if annular clean and full of original mud !)
* However check that DPP follows the correct value and that CP
remains constant and equal SIDPP
* If something wrong, refer to DPP and follow the line ICP - FCP

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training
Wait and weight method

SEC -
Wait and weight method
• Influx evacuation with Kill Mud
– phase 2 :
* When pump is at SCR, DPP should be equal to ICP. If not, keep
DPP equal to the value given by the circuit
– phase 3 :
* If influx still far from surface  almost not necessary to touch the
choke
* Easier to draw a straight line from ICP to FCP and stay few bar
above this line rather than doing by step
* Exact evolution of pressure from ICP to FCP to be followed if
fragile deviated well

• When starting circulation, if possible, better :

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


– To start circulating with OMW and to adjust correctly choke opening
– Then to check that all values are correct
– Then to start injection of the kill mud

SEC -
Advantages and drawbacks
• Driller's method advantages :
– Easier (always a constant value; if problem, easier to detect and analyse)
– Can be started very quickly just after pressure “stabilisation”

• Driller's method drawbacks :


– Maximum pressure in the annulus (mainly below BOP !!)
– Need to circulate 2 cycles to kill the well

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
Advantages and drawbacks
• Wait and Weight method advantages
– Less pressure in the annulus than with driller’s method
– Only one cycle of circulation

• Wait and Weight method drawbacks :


– Wait until kill mud ready (may need to use volumetric method during this
period)
– Seems more "complex" : (evacuation of the influx and pumping kill mud at
the same time)
– In some cases, needs to determine exact evolution of DPP between
ICP and FCP

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
Method to use
• Wait and Weight method :
– Often, less advantages on pressure reduction than forecasted

* Annulus pressure could be close to the one obtained with driller's


method even if short waiting time to prepare kill mud
* Will probably (certainly !) not reduce shoe pressure except if long
open hole
– Interesting method if reserve of kill mud and / or if possibilities to get
weighted mud rapidly

• Driller's method could be used to start circulation rapidly. It


gives time to prepare the kill mud
• When kill mud is ready, Wait and Weight can be started at

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


any time
• The choice can be different according to situation (weather
forecast, barite volume on board, personal skill, ..)

SEC -
Driller's and W & W common considerations
• MAASP consideration :
– MAASP value with OMW to be taken into account only when gas in
open hole (until arrival of "top of gas bubble" at shoe level)
– Keep in mind :
* Influx already displaced by circulation before closing the well
* Free gas starts migrating as soon as entering the well
– Therefore, "top of gas bubble" higher than imagined when starting
circulation (could be few hundred meters above bottom !)
– If gain volume  open hole volume : no sense to take MAASP in
consideration
– The shoe position has been determined considering :

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


* Well full of gas  no risk to overcome MAASP if correct killing
procedure
* A kick tolerance  no risk to overcome MAASP if correct killing
procedure and influx volume less than kick tolerance

SEC -
Driller's and W & W common considerations
• MAASP consideration :
– MAASP value could be a very pessimistic value
– Difference (MAASP - CP) gives the margin at shoe (Pfrac - Shoe
Pressure) only when cased hole full with well mud density used to
calculate the MAASP
– Reduction of Shoe Pressure as soon as free gas enters in cased hole
– Be realistic :
* Generally, if CP < MAASP when closing the well and / or when
starting circulation, no risk of fracturation
* If CP > MAASP during observation and KMW < dfrac  possible to
control the well but circulate instead off bleeding the well !
* If CP > MAASP during observation and KMW > dfrac

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


 bull-heading and plugging of the kicking zone should be
considered
* But, always risk of "fracturation" if wrong killing procedure
applied !!

SEC -
Driller's and W & W common considerations
• MAASP consideration :
– Shoe Pressure can be "controlled" using DPP if open hole's content is
well known

DPP MAX  Pfrac  PHA OH  PHI   PLI

DPPmax : maximum admissible DPP in bar


Pfrac : maximum pressure allowable at shoe in bar
PHA OH : hydrostatic pressure produced by fluid column in open hole
in bar

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


PHI : hydrostatic pressure produced by fluid column in the drill
string in bar
PLI : pressure losses inside the drill string in bar

SEC -
Driller's and W & W common considerations
• Action on the choke :
– To be opened progressively when starting the pump
– Need to increase choke opening slowly until arrival of gas in surface
with a gas kick
– Need to decrease choke opening when gas arriving at surface
– Need to increase choke opening when return of clean mud
– Need to increase progressively choke opening when kill mud is in the
annulus
– Delay between choke manipulation and DPP variation ( 3 s / km or 1 s
/ 1 000 ft)  need to anticipate the actions
– Important to adjust the hydraulic choke regulator (if available) at
minimum value

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


– If necessary to adjust all the time the choke in the same direction,
think to a circulating incident (wash out, plugged choke)

SEC -
Driller's and W & W common considerations
• Safety margin :
– Necessary on rig and on simulator
– According to MAASP value
–  5 - 10 bar ( 150 psi) if possible, to allow quiet choke adjustments

• Surface line volume :


– Need to be known when pumping kill mud
– Strokes counter reset to 0 when KMW at the rig floor level

• SCR value :
– Could select a low value for tricky phases of the control

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


– Could select a higher value when no more gas in the well

SEC -
Driller's and W & W common considerations
• Tank level evolution :
– Increases until gas reaches the surface (no change in volume with a
liquid kick)
– Decreases while evacuating the gas
– Should be the same after influx evacuation than before the kick
(if no mud transfer, dump, excepted volume increase due to barite, etc.)
– Important to be monitored by drilling crew continuously.(losses,
expansion of gas,…)

• Tricky phases :
– When starting, stopping, changing the pump speed,

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


– When evacuating the gas at surface
– Necessary to have a good co-ordination between driller and choke
operator

SEC -
Driller's and W & W common considerations
• End of control :
– Check kill mud return in surface (if not, continue circulation until in
surface !)
– When kill mud in surface, stop circulation and close the well
– Check surface pressures, pressure du to :
* Trapped pressure in the circuit
* KMW not enough
– To know the cause, bleed off through the choke :
* Trapped pressure if pressure remain 0
* If pressures increase  control not completed (KMW not correct
or well not cleaned)  observe pressures, analyse, circulate and

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


adjust KMW if necessary
– When pressures equal to 0, bleed off through choke and stand pipe
manifolds. Then open the BOP

SEC -
Driller's and W & W common considerations
• KEEP IN MIND :
– THE CIRCUIT GIVES ALWAYS THE CORRECT VALUES
– TAKE ALWAYS IN CONSIDERATION THE VALUES GIVEN BY
THE CIRCUIT, NOT THE CALCULATED ONES (values
calculated with approximate formulas and values neglected)
– SURFACE PRESSURES SHOW WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE
CIRCUIT

– LESS ACTION ON THE CHOKE = BETTER THE CONTROL

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
String equipped with a non return valve
• Two possibilities to determine SIDPP
– First method : Pump very slowly (few strokes / min) the well being shut
When the valve opens : DPP  SIDDP (when opening the valve, DPP and
CP increase at the same rate)
010JB9716
Pressure

SICP
SIDPP

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


Volume pumped
Surface pressure evolution

SEC -
String equipped with a non return valve
• Two possibilities to determine SIDPP
– Second method : Start driller’s method at the planned SCR

* SIDPP obtained by (DPP - PL SCR)


DPP = value read on the drill pipe pressure gauge when pump
stabilised at SCR and CP = SICP

• Second method the easiest and fastest, but if PL SCR have


changed  SIDPP value will be false
• First method needs to have accurate recorders and a very
slow pumping rate
• In the 2 cases, need to know SICP value

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
SCR selection
• Reasons to use SCR :
– Easier to adjust choke opening

– Reduce risk of equipment failure


* Less pressure in the circuit
* Only one pump in use
– Limit of mud-gas separator (maximum pressure allowable in the mud-gas
separator set by the mud seal height. Pressure in the mud-gas separator
equal to gas PL in vent line)

– Necessary time to weight the mud

– PLA can be neglected  simplification of control equations and

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


procedures
– Less variation of BHP if an incident happens and is not detected

– Less deviation from the straight line ICP - FCP while replacing original
mud by kill mud in drill string

SEC -
SCR selection
• SCR selection :
– Around 600 l / min (160 gpm,  3.5 bbl / min) (from 1/4 to 1/2 of drilling
flow rate)
– According to the skill of the choke operator
– According to the equipment (choke, weighting capacity,...)
– According to kick volume (mud-gas separator limits)
– Can be changed during the control :
* Can be increased when gas has been evacuated (normally, no need
to adjust the choke opening when circulating liquids)
* Can be reduced during tricky phases (gas evacuation, KMW in
choke line for subsea BOP, ...)

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


Only drawback of selecting slow SCR : longer circulating time

SEC -
SCR selection according to mud gas separator

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
PL SCR measurement

• When to measure :
– When starting every shift
– When changing mud characteristics (density, viscosity, ...)
– When changing drill string characteristics (bit nozzle, BHA, etc...)
– Every 150 m drilled (500 ft) (API requirement)

• Should be measured :
– At different SCR (at least two)
– With each pump
– The well open with surface BOP

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -
PL SCR measurement

• Pressure readings :
– On gauges used while circulating the kick

• Subsea BOP :
– PL measured through riser (open well)  PL riser
– PL measured through choke (choke fully open)  PL choke line
– The difference between the two values give PL CL

© 2004 ENSPM Formation Industrie - IFP Training


SEC -

You might also like