0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views7 pages

SME Credit Scoring Model - Format

The document outlines a Credit Risk Model developed by a research team at the Bangladesh Institute of Bank Management, focusing on small enterprises. It includes a detailed credit scoring model with various criteria, weights, and scoring parameters across financial factors, business and industry factors, relationship and security factors, and specific concerns for manufacturing, trading, and service sectors. The total score for assessing credit risk is 100, with acceptable scores above 65.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views7 pages

SME Credit Scoring Model - Format

The document outlines a Credit Risk Model developed by a research team at the Bangladesh Institute of Bank Management, focusing on small enterprises. It includes a detailed credit scoring model with various criteria, weights, and scoring parameters across financial factors, business and industry factors, relationship and security factors, and specific concerns for manufacturing, trading, and service sectors. The total score for assessing credit risk is 100, with acceptable scores above 65.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SME Credit Risk Model

Research Team:

Dr. Ashraf Al Mamun


Professor, BIBM

Dr. Md. Mosharref Hossain


Associate Professor, BIBM

A. N. K. Mizan
Former Assistant Professor, BIBM

Bangladesh Institute of Bank Management


Mirpur 2, Dhaka

1
Appendix I: Credit Scoring Model
Credit Scoring Model for Small Enterprise
Borrower:
Branch: Date of Assessment:
Type of Business: Manufacturing Service Trading
Acceptable Score: > 65
Total Score Grading
Calculated Score
Criteria Weight Parameter Score
Value Obtained
1. Financial Factors 25%
Liquidity (×) Times Less than 0.5× 0
CA/CL 0.5 - 0.99× 1
1- 1.24× 2
> 1.25× 3
Sales Growth (Last Two Years) Less than 1% 0
(Current Year's Sales / Previous Year's Sales)-1 1% - 5% 0.5
5.01% - 10% 1
10.01% - 15% 1.5
15.01% - 20% 2
20.01% - 25% 2.5
> 25% 3
Operating Profit Margin Less than 0 0
(Operating Profit/Sales) *100 0 - 5% 0.5
5.01% - 10% 1
10.01% - 15% 1.5
15.01% - 20% 2
20.01% - 25% 2.5
More than 25% 3
Debt Equity Ratio (×) Times > 2× 0
Total Debt/Total Equity 1.51 - 2× 0.5
1.1 - 1.5× 1
0.81 - 1.1× 1.5
0.51 - 0.80× 2
0.21 - 0.50× 2.5
< 0.20× 3
Debt Service Coverage Ratio Less than 1× 0
Operating Profit/(Total Interest + CMLTD*) 1 - 1.5× 1
*current matured portion of long-term debt 1.51 - 2× 1.5
More than 2× 2
Bad Debt (Receivable) More than 15% 0
(Gross credit sales - Collection)/Total credit sales 10.01% - 15% 0.5
5.01% - 10% 1
0 - 5% 1.5
No default 2
Receivable Turnover in days More than 90 0
Total Credit Sales/Sales per day 60 - 89.99 1
30 - 59.99 1.5
Less than 30 2
Payables Turnover in Days 0 days 0
Accounts Payable/Cost of Goods Sold per day 1 - 15 days 1
15.01 - 30 days 1.5
30.01 - 45 days 2
45.01 - 60 days 2.5
> 60 days 3
Asset Utilization Ratio < 1% 0
(Net Income to Total Asset) 1% -10% 1
10.01% - 20% 1.5
> 20% 2
Assets Growth Less than 5% 0
(CYA / PYA)-1 5.01% - 10% 1
10.01% - 15% 1.5
More than 15% 2
Total Score 25

2
2. Business and Industry Calculated Score
30% Parameter Score
Factors Value Obtained

Age of Business < 1year 0


1 - 2 years 1
2 - 5 years 1.5
> 5 years 2
Legal Form of Business Proprietorship 1
Partnership 1.5
Private limited 2
Experience of the Entrepreneur No experience 0
Up to 1 year 1
1 to 3 years 2
More than 3 years 3
Client Concentration Up to 2 0.5
(No. of Major Buyers) 3-6 1
7 - 10 1.5
More than 10 2
Payment Behaviour with Supplier > 50 days PD 0
(Payment dues to suppliers in days) 31 - 50 days PD 1
11 - 30 days PD 1.5
0 - 10 days PD 2
Industry Condition Cause of concern 0
Slightly uncertain 1
Average 2
Excellent 3
Market Competition Highly competitive 0
Moderately competitive 1
Less competitive 1.5
Dominant player 2
Reputation of the Business/Client No reputation 0
(Based on banker's wisdom) Poor reputation 1
Fair to good reputation 1.5
Very good reputation 2
Premises Status of Business Rental but not sufficient 0
Rental 1
Family owned 1.5
Personally owned 2
Entry Exit Barriers Easy 0
Average 1
Difficult 2
Linkage with other Firms No linkage 0
Only forward/backward 1
Both forward and backward 2
Succession No succession 0
Succession 1-3 years 1
Succession 0-1 year 2
Ready succession 3
Business Books and Records No record at all 0
Unstructured record 1
Structured but not as per FS 2
Structured and as per FS 3
Total Score 30

3
3. Relationship and Security Calculated Score
Parameter Score
Factors 25% Value Obtained
Limit Utilization Bellow 40% 0
(In case of credit facilities used by the client) 40.01% - 50% 1
50.01% - 60% 2
More than 60% 3
Deposit Statements (Any formal Financial Institution) No deposit statement 0
Figures in Thousands TK. Confirmed and (0 - 20) 1
Confirmed and (20.01 - 50) 2
Confirmed and (> 50) 3
Repayment Record More than 60 days due 0
45 - 60 days due 1
30 - 45 days due 2
Up to 30 days 3
Returned Cheques Often 0
Sometimes 1
Rare 2
Never 3
Relationship with Bank (s)/NBFIs No relationship 0
Less than one year 1
One - five years 2
More than five years 3
Security Coverage (Collateral) No collateral 0
(Value of the asset/Requested amount of loan) *100 1% - 10% 0.5
10.01% - 30% 1
30.01% - 50% 2
More than 50% 3
Security Coverage (Primary) No security 0
Simple hypothecation 1
Registered hypothecation 2
Fully pledged/mortgaged 3
Marketability of securities More than 90 days 0
61 - 90 days 1
31 - 60days 1.5
Up to 30days 2
Availability of Group/Social Guarantee Not available 0
Available but not strong 1
Strong 2
Total Score 25

4
Calculated Score
4. Manufacturing Concern 20% Parameter Score
Value Obtained
Availability of Raw Materials Not Sufficiently available 0
100% imported 0.5
Imported and local 1
Indigenous sources 2
Number of Major Raw Materials Supplier No certain supplier 0
Up to two 1
Three - five 1.5
More than five 2
Skill of the Entrepreneur about the Product Unskilled 0
or Production Process Semi Skilled 1
Some technical knowledge 1.5
Highly skilled 2
Availability of Machineries Not Available & no technical
0
and Spare Parts support
Less available &technical
1
support is costly
Available but technical
1.5
support is costly
Highly available and easy to
2
maintain

Technology Foreign 0.5

Domestic 1
Storing Capacity Not sufficient 0
Sufficient but not appropriate 1
Sufficient and appropriate 2
Storability (Finished Product) No storability 0
Less than 5 days 0.5
5 - 30days 1
More than 30days 2
Seasonality of the Product Highly seasonal 0
Less seasonal 1
No seasonality 2
Availability of Skilled Labor Rare 0
Partly available 1
Available 2
Inventory Turnover in Days More than 60 days 1
31- 60 days 2
Less than 30 days 3
Total Score 20
Grand Total 100

5
Calculated Score
4. Trading Concern 20% Parameter Score
Value Obtained
Origin of the Product Not certain (Pirated) 0
Imported 0.5
Domestic 1
Nature of Goods Highly perishable 1
Partly perishable 1.5
Not perishable 2
Warehouse Facilities No warehouse facility 0
Not enough 1
Enough but not appropriate 2
Enough and appropriate 3
Substitute Products Close substitute product 1
Moderately substitute product 2
No substitute product 3
Distribution of the Products Retail 1
Wholesale 1.5
Retail + wholesale 2
Distribution Channel Weak distribution channel 0
Depends on buyer's vehicle 1
Rental vehicle 2
Own vehicle 3
Selling Mode More than 90% on Credit 0
70.01% - 90% on credit 0.5
50.01% - 70% on credit 1
30% - 50% on credit 1.5
Less than 30% on credit 2
Nature of the Buyer Irregular buyer 0
Regular buyer 0.5
Confirmed Regular buyer 1
Inventory Turnover in days More than 60 days 1
31 - 60 days 2
Less than 30 days 3
Total Score 20
Grand Total 100

6
Calculated Score
4. Service Concern 20% Parameter Score
Value Obtained
Location of the Business Not at suitable place 1
Suitable but not the best 2
Prime location 3
Quality of Service Poor 0
Good 1
Very good 2
Outstanding 3
Client Concentration Up to 2 0.5
(No. of Service Recipient) Three to six clients 1
Seven to ten Clients 1.5
More than 2
Seasonality of the Service Highly seasonal 1
Less seasonal 2
No seasonality 3
Target Market Widely focused 1
Moderately wide 2
Narrowly focused 3
Substitute Services Close substitute 1
Moderately substitute 2
No Substitute services 3
Nature of the Buyer Irregular buyer 1
Regular buyer 2
Confirmed regular buyer 3
Total Score 20
Grand Total 100

You might also like