0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views2 pages

References

The document is a compilation of various studies and articles focused on peer review, feedback, and differentiated instruction in language learning contexts. It includes research on the effectiveness of peer correction, the impact of feedback on writing performance, and the attitudes of students towards peer review practices. The references span multiple years and cover a range of educational journals and conferences.

Uploaded by

Nikitha Joy
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views2 pages

References

The document is a compilation of various studies and articles focused on peer review, feedback, and differentiated instruction in language learning contexts. It includes research on the effectiveness of peer correction, the impact of feedback on writing performance, and the attitudes of students towards peer review practices. The references span multiple years and cover a range of educational journals and conferences.

Uploaded by

Nikitha Joy
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Feng, L. (2023). On the role of peer review in the teaching of second language writing.

SHS
Web of Conferences, 171, 02013. [Link]
Jung, H. (2024). Enhancing L2 listening proficiency and metacognitive awareness through self-
annotation in high school EFL. English Teaching, 79(3), 31–59.
[Link]
Sapan, M., & Mede, E. (2022). The effects of differentiated instruction (DI) on achievement,
motivation, and autonomy among English learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching
Research, 10(1), 127–144. [Link]
Weganofa, R., & Mujiono. (2025). A meta-analysis of the effects of differentiated instruction on
English language proficiency. Journal of English Educators Society, 10(2).
[Link]
Zokirov, M., Khasanova, O., & Askarova, S. (2024). Peer-correction and self-correction of errors
in foreign language classes and their benefit. SHS Web of Conferences, 206, 01001.
[Link]

Arnold, J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge University Press.


Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,
77(1), 81–112. [Link]
Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms.
University of Michigan Press.
Mandela, N. (2003, July 16). Address by Mr. Nelson Mandela at the launch of Mindset Network
[Speech transcript]. Johannesburg, South Africa.
[Link]
network
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 framework for 21st century learning
definitions. [Link]
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.
[Link]
Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review
of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. [Link]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Harvard University Press.

Arif, M., & Lestari, S. (2014). Peer correction in EFL contexts: Strengths and weaknesses in
Indonesian classrooms. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(2), 45–58.
Cahyono, B. Y., & Rosyida, F. (2016). EFL students’ attitudes toward peer review in writing
classes. International Journal of English and Education, 5(1), 182–195.
Henderson, M., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., Dawson, P., Molloy, E., & Mahoney, P. (2019).
Conditions that enable effective feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7),
1401–1416. [Link]
Hu, G. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for less reliance
on peer review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(4), 292–311.
[Link]
Lee, I. (2008). Understanding reactions to teacher and peer feedback in the secondary ESL
writing classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144–164.
[Link]
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review
to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43.
[Link]
Mendonça, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL
writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745–769. [Link]
Minh, N. T. (2015). Multidimensional feedback in Vietnamese EFL writing: A study of student
attitudes and preferences. Journal of Asian Education and Culture, 6(3), 210–225.
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer
feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401.
[Link]
Nunan, D. (1993). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Shen, Y. (2025). The affective dimension of peer review: A longitudinal study of trust and
emotional safety in EFL writing. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 9(1), 112–130.
Simard, D., Guénette, D., & Bergeron, A. (2015). L2 learners’ perceptions of oral peer
correction. Language Awareness, 24(2), 128–147.
[Link]
Witbeck, M. C. (1976). Peer correction in the writing class. TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 321–326.
[Link]
Yastıbaş, G. C., & Yastıbaş, A. E. (2015). The impact of peer feedback on writing anxiety in
Turkish EFL students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 530–538.
[Link]
Zhang, S. (1985). Reflections on feedback: Student and teacher attitudes toward various
feedback methods. ESL Magazine, 2(1), 18–25.

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language
pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,
77(1), 81–112. [Link]
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review
to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43.
[Link]
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.
[Link]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Harvard University Press.
Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback in Japanese
language classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 525–541.
[Link]

You might also like