It is so difficult for ordinary people to do to improve the environmental problems today.

Therefore, the state leader and big companies should be taking charge of solving the amount
of environmental damage. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the modern world, it is undeniable that environmental problems have become increasingly
complex and difficult to address. Some people argue that it is almost impossible for ordinary
individuals to make a meaningful impact, and therefore state leaders and large companies
should take full responsibility for reducing environmental damage. Although some agree with
this view, I partly support it due to several reasons, which will be examined in this essay.

One of the most apparent reasons why governments and large corporations should take the
leading role is that they possess greater resources and decision-making power. To illustrate,
state leaders can introduce environmental regulations, invest in renewable energy, and enforce
laws that limit pollution on a national scale. For instance, large companies are responsible for a
significant proportion of industrial emissions, and only through strict policies and corporate
accountability can large-scale environmental damage be effectively reduced.

However, another point that should not be overlooked is that individual actions still play an
important role in addressing environmental issues. To clarify, daily choices made by ordinary
people, such as reducing waste, conserving energy, and using public transport, collectively have
a substantial impact. For example, widespread participation in recycling programmes and
reduced plastic consumption can significantly decrease environmental pressure. If individuals
completely avoid responsibility, environmental efforts led by governments and corporations
may be less effective.

To recapitulate, it is evident that state leaders and large companies must take primary
responsibility for tackling environmental damage due to their power and influence, while the
contribution of ordinary people should not be underestimated. Therefore, I believe that solving
environmental problems requires a shared approach, in which governments and corporations
lead through policy and innovation, supported by responsible behaviour from individuals.

Today more people are traveling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits
of travelling for the traveler? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant
examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In the modern world, it is undeniable that more people are travelling than ever before. This
trend has been driven by economic development and technological progress. In this essay, an
attempt will be made to examine the main reasons why travel has become so common and the
benefits it brings to individual travellers.

One of the most apparent reasons for the increase in travel is the improvement in
transportation and affordability. To illustrate, air travel has become faster and cheaper due to
the growth of low-cost airlines and online booking platforms. For instance, people can now
compare prices easily and purchase tickets at relatively low costs, making travel accessible to a
wider range of individuals. In addition, higher living standards and more flexible working
arrangements, such as paid leave and remote work, allow people to travel more frequently than
previous generations, who often viewed travel as a luxury.

The main benefit of travelling for the traveller that should not be overlooked is personal
development and cultural awareness. To clarify, visiting different countries exposes people to
new cultures, traditions, and ways of thinking, which broadens their perspectives. For example,
travellers who interact with local communities often become more open-minded and tolerant of
cultural differences. Furthermore, travelling can improve mental well-being by reducing stress
and providing a break from daily routines. Many people return from trips feeling refreshed,
motivated, and more confident, particularly when they have successfully navigated unfamiliar
environments.

To recapitulate, it is evident that advances in transportation and rising incomes are the main
reasons why travel has become increasingly popular. Therefore, it is necessary to recognise that
travelling offers significant benefits to individuals, including personal growth, cultural
understanding, and improved mental health, making it a valuable experience in modern life.

All over the world, societies are facing growing problems with obesity. This problem affects
children and adults. What are the reasons for this? and how could it be tackled.

In the modern world, it is undeniable that obesity has become a serious and growing problem in
societies across the globe, affecting both children and adults. This issue is closely linked to
changes in lifestyle and eating habits. In this essay, an attempt will be made to examine the
main causes of obesity and the possible solutions to address this problem.
One of the most apparent causes of obesity is the widespread consumption of unhealthy food
combined with a lack of physical activity. To illustrate, fast food, processed meals, and sugary
drinks are now easily accessible and often cheaper than healthier alternatives. For instance,
many people rely on convenience foods due to busy schedules, while children are increasingly
exposed to junk food advertising. At the same time, modern lifestyles encourage sedentary
behaviour, as people spend long hours sitting at desks, using smartphones, or watching
television. As a result, calorie intake often exceeds energy expenditure, leading to weight gain
and long-term health problems.

The main solution that should not be overlooked is promoting healthier lifestyles through
education and public policy. To clarify, governments and schools can play a crucial role by
educating people about balanced diets and the importance of regular exercise. For example,
schools can introduce compulsory physical education and provide nutritious meals, while
governments can regulate food advertising aimed at children and impose taxes on sugary
products. In addition, communities should invest in facilities such as parks and sports centres to
encourage people of all ages to be more active in their daily lives.

To recapitulate, it is evident that poor dietary choices and inactive lifestyles are the primary
reasons behind the global rise in obesity. Therefore, it is necessary that both individuals and
authorities take responsibility by promoting healthier eating habits and encouraging regular
physical activity in order to reduce obesity and improve public health.

Working long hours causes a great deal of stress and can be very bad for one's health.
VinMec’s top management must find a way to reduce this type of stress. To what extent do
you agree or disagree?

In the modern world, it is undeniable that working long hours has become common in many
organisations, often leading to high levels of stress and serious health problems. Although some
may argue that employees should manage stress by themselves, I strongly agree that VinMec’s
top management must take responsibility for reducing this type of stress due to several
important reasons, which will be examined in this essay.

One of the most obvious reasons is that excessive working hours can severely damage
employees’ physical and mental health. To illustrate, long-term stress is closely linked to
illnesses such as heart disease, depression, and burnout. For instance, medical staff who
regularly work overtime may suffer from chronic fatigue, which reduces their ability to
concentrate and increases the risk of mistakes. As a result, both employees and patients can be
negatively affected. Therefore, it is in the organisation’s best interest to ensure reasonable
working hours and sufficient rest periods.

Another point that should not be overlooked is that reducing workplace stress can improve
productivity and job satisfaction. To clarify, employees who feel supported by management are
more likely to be motivated and loyal. For example, introducing flexible working schedules,
hiring additional staff, or providing wellness programmes can help create a healthier work
environment. Furthermore, when workers are less stressed, they tend to perform their duties
more efficiently and deliver higher-quality service, which enhances the organisation’s
reputation.

To recapitulate, it is evident that long working hours pose serious risks to employees’ health and
overall performance. Therefore, it is necessary that VinMec’s top management actively
implement policies aimed at reducing excessive workloads and promoting work-life balance, in
order to protect staff well-being and ensure sustainable organisational success.

Many think that in today’s world, it is tough for people to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Others,
however, feel that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.

In the modern world, it is undeniable that maintaining a healthy lifestyle has become a major
concern for many people. While some believe that it is difficult to stay healthy in today’s fast-
paced society, others argue that being fit and well is easy for those who are truly motivated. In
this essay, an attempt will be made to examine both perspectives before presenting my own
opinion.

Those who believe that maintaining a healthy lifestyle is difficult provide some reasons to justify
their view. One of the most obvious reasons is the widespread availability of unhealthy food. To
illustrate, fast food and processed meals are cheap, convenient, and heavily advertised, making
them attractive choices for busy individuals. For instance, many people working long hours rely
on takeaway food rather than preparing nutritious meals at home. In addition, modern lifestyles
encourage inactivity. People spend long periods sitting at desks, commuting, or using electronic
devices, which reduces opportunities for regular exercise.
Those who feel that it is easy to be healthy also have some points that should not be
overlooked. One positive side is that people today have greater access to health information
and fitness facilities than ever before. To clarify, the Internet provides guidance on balanced
diets, workout routines, and mental well-being. For example, individuals can follow free exercise
videos or use mobile applications to track their physical activity. Furthermore, many cities now
offer gyms, parks, and sports centres, making exercise more accessible.

To recapitulate, it is evident that some consider healthy living difficult due to unhealthy food
choices and sedentary lifestyles, while others argue that modern resources make it achievable.
Having considered both sides thoroughly, I have personally come to believe that although
staying healthy is more challenging than in the past, it is still possible for people who are
disciplined and motivated. Therefore, individuals must take personal responsibility for their
health, while governments should support healthier environments.

The amount of time spent on exercise and sport should be increased in schools in order to
tackle the problem of overweight children. do you think this is the best way to deal with the
problem? what other solutions can you suggest?

The rise in childhood obesity has become a pressing public health concern, and increasing the
amount of time allocated to exercise and sport in schools is often proposed as a solution. While
this approach can play a valuable role, it is not, on its own, the most effective way to address
the problem. A broader, more comprehensive strategy is required.

There is no doubt that schools are well-placed to promote physical activity. By increasing time
spent on sport and exercise, children are encouraged to develop healthy habits early in life,
improve cardiovascular fitness, and reduce sedentary behaviour associated with prolonged
screen use. Moreover, regular physical activity has additional benefits such as improved
concentration, mental health, and social skills, which further justify its inclusion in the school
curriculum.

However, focusing solely on exercise overlooks the primary cause of overweight children:
unhealthy diets. Even high levels of physical activity cannot fully compensate for excessive
consumption of processed foods, sugary drinks, and high-calorie snacks. Many children develop
poor eating habits at home, influenced by family lifestyles and aggressive marketing of
unhealthy foods. As a result, increasing school sports without addressing nutrition may have
only a limited impact on obesity rates.
Therefore, other solutions must be implemented alongside increased physical education. One
effective measure is improving food education, both in schools and at home. Teaching children
about balanced diets, portion control, and the long-term consequences of poor nutrition can
empower them to make healthier choices. Additionally, governments can regulate the
advertising of unhealthy foods to children and ensure that school cafeterias provide nutritious
meals rather than processed alternatives. Parental involvement is also crucial, as parents largely
control children’s diets and daily routines.

In conclusion, while increasing exercise and sport in schools is a positive and necessary step, it is
not the best or only solution to childhood obesity. A combined approach that includes
nutritional education, healthier food environments, and parental responsibility is far more likely
to produce lasting results.

Nowadays, a growing number of peoples with health problems are trying alternative
medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive
or a negative development?

In the modern world, it is undeniable that an increasing number of people with health problems
are choosing alternative medicines and treatments instead of consulting their usual doctors.
Although some believe that this trend offers greater freedom and choice, I am convinced that it
is largely a negative development due to several important reasons.

One of the most obvious drawbacks is that many alternative treatments lack scientific evidence
and proper regulation. To illustrate, unlike conventional medicine, which is tested through
clinical trials, some alternative therapies have not been proven to be safe or effective. For
instance, a patient who relies solely on herbal remedies for a serious illness such as cancer may
delay receiving proper medical treatment, which can worsen their condition. Furthermore,
inaccurate information about alternative medicine is widely available online, making it easy for
people to be misled.

Another negative aspect that should not be overlooked is the risk of misdiagnosis and
inappropriate treatment. To clarify, trained doctors are able to identify underlying health
problems through examinations and medical tests. In contrast, many alternative practitioners do
not have formal medical qualifications. For example, symptoms that appear minor may actually
indicate a serious disease that requires professional medical attention. As a result, depending
mainly on alternative medicine can lead to preventable complications and long-term health
damage.

To recapitulate, it is evident that while alternative medicine may offer comfort to some people,
its widespread use instead of professional healthcare can be dangerous. Therefore, it is
necessary that people continue to seek advice from qualified doctors and use alternative
treatments only as a complementary option rather than a replacement for modern medicine.

Some people prefer to work in the same type of job throughout their lifetime while others
like to change the type of job they do. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In the modern world, it is undeniable that people have different attitudes toward their careers.
While some people prefer to remain in the same type of job throughout their lifetime, others
enjoy changing the type of work they do. In this essay, an attempt will be made to examine both
perspectives before presenting my own opinion.

Those who support staying in the same type of job provide some reasons to justify their view.
One of the most obvious benefits is job security and stability. To illustrate, employees who
remain in one field for many years often gain extensive experience and become highly skilled,
which increases their value to employers. For instance, a person who has worked as an
accountant for decades may achieve a senior position and enjoy a stable income. In addition,
staying in one profession allows individuals to build long-term relationships with colleagues and
develop a strong professional reputation.

Those who prefer changing the type of job they do also have some points that should not be
overlooked. One major reason is that job changes provide opportunities for personal growth
and skill development. To clarify, by working in different fields, individuals can discover their
true interests and strengths. For example, someone who moves from marketing to design may
realise a hidden talent and achieve greater job satisfaction. Furthermore, changing careers can
prevent boredom and increase motivation, as people face new challenges and experiences.

To recapitulate, it is evident that some prefer lifelong careers because of stability and security,
while others value career changes for growth and satisfaction. Having considered both sides
thoroughly, I have personally come to believe that changing the type of job can be more
beneficial in the long term, as it allows individuals to adapt to a changing job market and find
work that truly suits them.

Some people encourage young children to leave their parents house as soon as they become
adults while other say children should stay at their parents house as long as possible. Discuss
both the views and give your opinion.

In the modern world, it is undeniable that attitudes toward when young people should leave
their parents’ home vary widely. While some people believe that young adults should move out
as soon as they become adults, others argue that children should remain with their parents for
as long as possible. In this essay, an attempt will be made to examine both perspectives before
presenting my own opinion.

Those who support young people leaving home early provide some reasons to justify their view.
One of the most obvious benefits is that living independently helps young adults develop
essential life skills. To illustrate, managing household chores, paying bills, and budgeting money
encourage responsibility and self-reliance. For instance, a young person who lives alone may
quickly learn how to plan expenses and make important decisions without depending on others.
In addition, early independence can increase confidence and prepare individuals for future
challenges in their personal and professional lives.

Those who believe that children should stay with their parents also have some points that
should not be overlooked. One major reason is the financial advantage of living at home. To
clarify, young adults can save money on rent, utilities, and food, which is especially important in
cities with a high cost of living. For example, staying with parents allows young people to save
for higher education, starting a business, or buying a home. Furthermore, living together can
strengthen family bonds and provide emotional support during stressful periods.

To recapitulate, it is evident that some support early independence because it builds

responsibility and confidence, while others prefer children to stay at home due to financial and
emotional benefits. Having considered both sides thoroughly, I have personally come to believe
that young people should leave their parents’ home only when they are financially and
emotionally ready, rather than based solely on age.

Students should pay the full cost for their own study, because university eduation benefits
individuals rather than society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a widely held view that students must pay full tuition since they are the sole
beneficiaries of the degrees they earn from educational institutions. In this essay, I disagree
with this notion because students may not have the resources to pay fees, and graduates mostly
use their skills in the community to address pressing problems.

The supporters of university learners paying the full cost of education need to consider the
general welfare of those studying. Many have no jobs or access to income and rely on their
immediate others for educational and personal finances. Based on this reason, they cannot
afford to foot the bills associated with obtaining a degree. In addition, some come from low-
income societies where resources are scarce; paying for schooling, therefore, marginalises
educational access for people coming from disadvantaged positions.

Furthermore, it is important to factor in the benefits that graduating individuals bring to society.
In a world struggling with a plethora of challenges, many innovative ideas and solutions have
been discovered by educated people. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, some of the
world's most spectacular medical trials were conducted, contributing to the discovery of
vaccines that helped to save human life. Credit goes to the researchers and scientists who
collaborated to contribute positively to global public health, showing the vitality of graduates in
society.

In conclusion, I favour a balanced argument that acknowledges the financial statuses of

students, as well as their potential contribution to society. This may mean lowering the amounts
they pay so that they are not excluded from learning institutions, which also gives them a fair
chance to be stewards of different communities in the future.

In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out bout the
history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people
research this?

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in learning about the history of houses and
buildings people live in, particularly in some countries. This trend is mainly driven by concerns
about safety, cultural value, and personal curiosity. To satisfy this interest, individuals can use
both official records and informal sources to research a building’s past.
One important reason for this interest is safety and practicality. People may want to know
whether a building has structural problems, previous damage, or a history of natural disasters
such as floods or earthquakes. In addition, some individuals are concerned about past criminal
activities or unusual events that may have occurred in a property. Knowing this information can
help residents make informed decisions and feel more secure in their living environment.

Another reason is cultural and emotional attachment. Older buildings often reflect historical
periods, architectural styles, or significant local events, which can give residents a sense of
identity and connection to the past. For some people, living in a historically important house
increases pride and appreciation for their community. Moreover, curiosity about previous
owners and how a building has changed over time can make a place feel more meaningful and
personal.

There are several ways people can research the history of a house or building. Official sources
such as government land records, property documents, and local council archives can provide
reliable information. Additionally, libraries, historical societies, and old newspapers may offer
valuable details. In some cases, speaking with long-term residents or neighbours can reveal
personal stories that are not recorded in official documents.

In conclusion, people are increasingly interested in the history of their homes due to safety
concerns, cultural value, and personal curiosity. By using a combination of official records and
local knowledge, individuals can successfully uncover the past of the buildings they live in.

Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government,
while other people think this is a good idea for young people to take on these positions.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

A school of thought holds that the youth are not eligible for high-ranking governmental
positions, while others opine the reverse. This essay attempts to shed light on both perspectives
before presenting my final point.

On the one hand, proponents of older leadership highlight the necessity of experience and
emotional stability. Seniority in government is often synonymous with a long-term
understanding of the intricate "checks and balances" that maintain societal stability. For
instance, in matters of constitutional law or international diplomacy, an experienced leader is
more likely to anticipate the secondary and tertiary consequences of a policy shift. This
seasoned perspective is particularly vital during periods of national crisis, where the "historical
memory" of past recessions or conflicts provides a blueprint for effective action. Furthermore,
the psychological maturity developed over a long career often results in a pragmatic approach
to legislation, ensuring that policies are not merely popular in the short term but are
sustainable over several decades.

On the other hand, the argument for youth in government centres on the need for innovation
and contemporary relevance. The 21st century is characterised by "disruptive technologies,"
such as blockchain, quantum computing, and synthetic biology—fields where younger
generations often possess a more intuitive grasp than their predecessors. A government that
lacks young decision-makers may suffer from a "competency gap," leading to inadequate
regulation of the digital economy or a failure to capitalise on emerging industries. Beyond
technical expertise, young leaders represent a vital demographic link; they are more likely to
prioritise existential threats like environmental degradation and the precariousness of the
modern "gig economy." By integrating youth into high-level positions, a state ensures that its
legislative agenda remains aligned with the needs of the working-age population, who will
inherit the long-term outcomes of current policies.

In my opinion, the most robust governance is achieved through intergenerational synergy rather
than the dominance of one group over the other. Relying solely on the "old guard" can result in
political ossification, where a government becomes rigid and resistant to necessary change.
However, a government comprised entirely of youth might lack the foundational stability
required to survive systemic shocks. Therefore, the ideal approach is a meritocratic framework
where important positions are accessible to young people who demonstrate exceptional
competence, allowing them to work alongside experienced mentors. This creates a dual-layered
leadership: one that provides the "anchor" of experience and another that provides the
"engine" of innovation.

In conclusion, while the cautious and seasoned judgment of older officials provides a necessary
safeguard for the state, the fresh perspectives and technological fluency of younger leaders are
indispensable for future-proofing a nation. A balanced distribution of authority across
generations is not merely a matter of fairness, but a strategic necessity for any government
aiming to be both stable and visionary.
Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could
be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

In the prevailing era, a number of individuals argue that the government wastes money on the
arts instead of allocating it for other purposes. Even though investing in the arts helps to
stimulate a country's economic growth by promoting tourism, I think that public funds should
be spent on other essential areas, such as healthcare, education, and public transportation.

On the one hand, one of the main arguments in favour of funding the arts is that it boosts the
tourist industry and promotes cultural awareness, which in turn directly contributes to fostering
the economy of nations. Public funds are often invested in creating unique cultural attractions,
organising festivals, and renovating historic buildings in engaging and interactive ways. Tourists,
who visit these artistic sites, frequently spend money on food, transportation, and guided tours,
thereby generating substantial revenue for countries. For example, Paris attracts millions of
tourists for its galleries, museums, and landmarks that contribute significantly to France's GDP.
In this sense, allocating grants for the arts can not only provide tangible economic benefits but
also enhance cultural awareness.

On the other hand, I contend that the government should allocate public money to ensure
citizens have access to free basic education, public transportation, and healthcare. These areas
address critical societal needs, as some people may struggle to access them due to financial
constraints. For example, Canada has a publicly funded healthcare system, ensuring citizens
have access to medical services without high costs. This reduces financial burdens and improves
public health. Therefore, public funds should be directed towards vital public sectors.

To conclude, although the government's spending on the arts can contribute to many countries'
development, I firmly contend that authorities should prioritise funding for fundamental
sectors, which are essential for the well-being of the population.

Shopping is becoming more and more popular as a leisure activity. However, some people feel
that this has both positive and negative effects. Why is shopping so popular? What effects
does its increase in popularity have on individuals and on society?

In recent years, shopping has increasingly been regarded not only as a necessity but also as a
form of leisure and entertainment. This essay will explore the reasons behind the growing
popularity of shopping as a pastime and examine its effects on individuals and society.
One key reason why shopping has become so popular is the transformation of retail
environments. Modern shopping centres are designed to offer more than just goods; they
provide dining options, cinemas and social spaces, making shopping an enjoyable experience. In
addition, the rapid growth of online shopping has made purchasing goods more convenient and
accessible than ever before. With just a few clicks, consumers can browse a wide range of
products, compare prices and receive items at home, which has turned shopping into an
effortless and time-efficient leisure activity.

The increasing popularity of shopping has several effects on individuals. On the positive side,
shopping can serve as a form of relaxation and stress relief, allowing people to take a break from
daily pressures. For example, browsing stores or online platforms may provide a sense of
enjoyment and temporary satisfaction. However, excessive shopping can also encourage
impulsive spending and materialism, leading some individuals into financial difficulties or
unhealthy consumption habits.

At a societal level, the rise of shopping as a leisure activity brings both benefits and challenges.
Economically, higher consumer spending can stimulate economic growth, create jobs and
support the development of the retail and service sectors. Nevertheless, overconsumption may
contribute to environmental problems, such as increased waste and resource depletion, and can
reinforce a culture that prioritises material possessions over more sustainable values.

In conclusion, shopping has become popular as a leisure activity due to greater convenience and
the entertainment-focused nature of modern retail. While this trend offers enjoyment for
individuals and economic benefits for society, it also raises concerns about overconsumption
and long-term sustainability.

In many countries, the number of people suffering from stress is increasing. What are the
causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to address it?

In many countries, stress has become increasingly common among people of different age
groups. This essay will examine the main causes of this problem and discuss possible measures
that could be taken to address it.
One major cause of rising stress levels is excessive pressure in education and the workplace. In
many societies, academic achievement and career success are regarded as the primary
indicators of personal value, which places heavy expectations on students and employees. For
example, in many education systems, students’ academic performance is largely determined by
high-stakes examinations that strongly influence university admission and future career
opportunities. As a result, individuals are required to perform consistently at a high level within
limited time frames, leading to anxiety, exhaustion and even burnout. At a deeper level, this
reflects a performance-oriented culture that prioritises productivity over personal well-being.

To address these underlying causes, several practical measures can be implemented.

Educational institutions and employers should establish more balanced schedules and set
realistic performance expectations, rather than placing excessive emphasis on competition and
outcomes. For instance, some schools have reduced the weight of final examinations and
introduced continuous assessment systems, allowing students to demonstrate progress over
time instead of relying on a single test. In addition, greater investment in mental health support
services, such as counselling programmes, would help individuals develop effective coping
strategies. These measures are effective because they directly reduce performance-related
pressure rather than merely alleviating the symptoms of stress.

In conclusion, the increasing prevalence of stress is largely driven by excessive performance

pressure in modern education and work environments. While support services are beneficial,
meaningful progress is unlikely unless societies reconsider how success is defined and
measured. Without such changes, stress-management programmes may only provide
temporary relief, as seen in workplaces where counselling is available but workloads remain
[Link] addressing this root cause, stress levels can be reduced in a more sustainable
manner.

In many countries, young people leave their parents' home in their early twenties and go on
to live on their own, while others prefer to stay with their families until a later age. Do you
think the advantages of young people living with their parents for longer outweigh the
disadvantages?

In many societies, it is common for young adults to leave the parental home in their early
twenties, while in others, staying with family until a later age is widely accepted. Although
prolonged cohabitation with parents may limit independence to some extent, I strongly believe
that the advantages of young people living with their parents for longer outweigh the
disadvantages, particularly in today’s economic and social context.
One major advantage is financial stability. Young adults who remain at home are often able to
save a substantial portion of their income, as they are not burdened by rent, utility bills, or
other living expenses. This financial cushion can later be invested in higher education, starting a
business, or purchasing property, all of which contribute to long-term security. Given the rising
cost of living and housing in many countries, leaving home too early can lead to financial stress
and even debt, which may hinder future opportunities.

Another significant benefit is emotional and practical support. Living with parents allows young
people to benefit from guidance, shared responsibilities, and a stable environment while
transitioning into adulthood. This is especially valuable during early career stages, when
individuals may face uncertainty or pressure. Strong family bonds can also promote mental well-
being, reduce loneliness, and encourage mutual care between generations.

Admittedly, there are some disadvantages. Critics argue that staying at home for too long may
delay the development of independence and essential life skills such as decision-making and
self-discipline. However, this drawback is not inevitable. Young people can still take
responsibility for household tasks, manage their finances, and make independent choices while
living with their parents. Independence is shaped more by attitude and upbringing than by
physical location.

In conclusion, while living independently at a younger age can foster self-reliance, the financial,
emotional, and social advantages of staying with parents for longer are more substantial. When
managed responsibly, this arrangement can better prepare young people for a secure and
successful future, making its benefits outweigh the potential disadvantages.

With deforestation, urban development and illegal hunting, many animals species are
becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of
[Link] they think it is important to protect animals? What measures can be taken to
deal with this problems.

In today's society, it has become common for endangered species to be listed in "Red Books"
due to rapid urbanisation and the resulting deforestation. Furthermore, illegal hunting has
become a growing trend that accelerates wildlife extinction. I strongly agree that animals must
be protected through more rigorous measures.
To begin with, animals are an integral part of the global ecosystem. Wildlife provides essential
life support for humans, including critical medical breakthroughs. For example, the Atlantic
horseshoe crab has saved countless lives through its unique blue blood, which contains a
clotting agent used to test the purity of pharmaceutical drugs. Moreover, compounds from
certain frogs are currently being researched to treat depression, seizures, and memory loss.
Beyond clinical research, animals like pets provide emotional support that human services often
cannot replicate.

However, illegal hunting remains one of the greatest threats to biodiversity. To confront this
issue, governments must implement tighter restrictions and stricter laws. For instance,
authorities should impose heavy fines and permanently confiscate the weapons and traps of
poachers. Such deterrents could significantly prevent further illegal hunting and the
environmental degradation that stems from it.

In conclusion, while human activities and poaching have caused unimaginable harm to wildlife,
the damage is not yet irreversible. By implementing stricter government regulations and
prioritising the conservation of animals which are essential for both medical innovation and
emotional well-being, we can restore the natural balance. Protecting these creatures is not
merely an ethical choice but a necessary step for the survival of our global ecosystem.

Companies are responsible only for making money for their investors. Therefore, they should
not be held accountable for the environmental and social costs of their business activity to
society as a whole. Businesses should do no more than concentrate on making profit. To what
extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some people argue that companies should focus solely on generating profits for their investors
and should not be held responsible for the environmental and social consequences of their
business activities. I strongly disagree with this view because long-term business success
depends not only on profit-making but also on social responsibility and environmental
sustainability.

One major reason why companies should be accountable to society is that consumers play a
decisive role in determining a company’s future. In the modern market, people are increasingly
aware of ethical and environmental issues, and they tend to support businesses that
demonstrate social responsibility. If a company focuses only on maximising profits while
damaging the environment or exploiting communities, it is likely to face public criticism,
consumer boycotts, and a loss of investor confidence. By contrast, companies that protect the
environment and maintain positive relationships with local communities can build trust,
strengthen their brand image, and achieve sustainable growth over time.

Another important consideration is the need to preserve natural resources for future
generations. Environmental damage caused by irresponsible business practices can lead to
serious long-term consequences, such as climate change and resource depletion, which
ultimately harm both society and businesses themselves. For example, excessive reliance on
fossil fuels without investing in renewable energy sources may increase short-term profits, but it
also creates economic and environmental risks in the long run. Companies that adopt
sustainable practices are better positioned to adapt to future challenges and ensure their
continued success.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that businesses should not concentrate solely on making profits.
Taking responsibility for environmental and social impacts not only benefits society as a whole
but also contributes to the long-term stability and prosperity of companies themselves.

The importance of academic subjects as compared to exrracurricular activities is increasing

every [Link] people suggest that sports calsses should be sacrificed in high school so
students can cincentrate on academic demic subjects. Do you agree or disagree?

The growing emphasis on academic achievement has led some people to argue that sports
classes should be eliminated in high school so that students can focus entirely on academic
subjects. While academic success is undoubtedly important, I strongly disagree with this view,
as extracurricular activities—particularly sports—play an essential role in students’ overall
development and academic performance.

Firstly, participation in sports contributes significantly to students’ physical health and mental
well-being, both of which are fundamental to effective learning. Regular physical activity
improves concentration, reduces stress, and enhances memory, enabling students to perform
better in academic subjects. Without sports classes, students are more likely to experience
fatigue, anxiety, and a lack of motivation, which can ultimately undermine their academic
progress.
Moreover, extracurricular activities help students develop valuable life skills that cannot be
acquired through academic study alone. Team sports, for instance, teach cooperation,
leadership, time management, and discipline—skills that are crucial for success in higher
education and future careers. High school is a formative stage in which students should be
encouraged to develop holistically rather than being judged solely on examination results.

Admittedly, academic subjects form the foundation of intellectual development and are vital for
university admission and professional opportunities. However, prioritising academics at the
expense of sports creates an imbalanced education system. A well-structured timetable can
accommodate both academic learning and extracurricular activities without compromising
either.

In conclusion, although the importance of academic subjects continues to grow, sacrificing

sports classes in high school would be a mistake. A balanced approach that values both
academics and extracurricular activities is essential for nurturing healthy, well-rounded, and
high-achieving students.