© IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp.

25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

MITIGATING INSURGENCY AND KIDNAPPING FOR

RANSOM IN NIGERIA: A STUDY OF ANAMBRA STATE

1Albert Ulutorti Green & 2Obinwa Onyebuchi Chidozie

1
Department if Religious Studies, University on the Niger
[Link]@[Link]/0009-0000-3641-3948
2
St. Paul’s Theological College Awka
ocbuchai@[Link]
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Article No.: 020

This descriptive analysis examines socio-economic, psychological and governance
Accepted Date: 21/06/2025 aspects that contribute to insurgency and ransom in Anambra State, Nigeria. Armed
violence, teenage cultism and abduction are rising in Anambra, once one of the
Published Date: 08/07/2025 Southeast's safest states. Mixing quantitative and qualitative methods, the research
collected data from a varied range of respondents from different backgrounds. To
Type: Research
explore the causes, community experiences, government interventions and long-
term remedies, a descriptive research was conducted. Fieldwork was done in rural
Orumba, Aguata, Ihiala and Anambra South and high-risk districts along the Enugu-
: Onitsha motorway. High-risk areas for highway assaults and ransomware were
chosen. A stratified and purposeful random sample of 150 people was taken from
one impacted community. Thirty community leaders, forty security force personnel,
forty citizens and company owners, twenty civil society representatives and twenty
kidnapped or affected women were sampled. An organised questionnaire was the
main data collection tool. This questionnaire was evaluated by two Nnamdi Azikiwe
University Criminology and Security Studies experts. In the nearby state of Enugu,
a pilot study had a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.84, indicating strong reliability. Data was
collected by qualified field assistants and analysed using descriptive statistics like
frequency tables, mean scores and standard deviations. Participants provided data
in-person and online. Data shows that poverty, unemployment and political
marginalisation are the main vulnerability factors. Youth gangs, ineffective border
control and security agency miscommunication worsen the problem. The
respondents found that kidnapping disrupts economic activity, affects victims'
families financially and causes long-term psychological distress. Local vigilante
groups and monitoring technologies are becoming effective mitigation techniques.
To restore peace and stability in Anambra State and beyond, the study suggests
competent governance, anti-corruption efforts, youth empowerment and
surveillance infrastructure investment.

Keyword: Mitigating Insurgency, Kidnapping, Ransom, Nigeria, Anambra state.

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 25

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

Introduction
Security challenges have long plagued Nigeria's stability and economy. Insurgency
and kidnapping for ransom are particularly harmful, destabilising communities, weakening
public trust in institutions and imposing high economic consequences. National security
debates have often focused on Nigeria's northern areas, afflicted by rebel activity and terrorism.
Recently, more kidnappings for ransom in other regions, particularly the Southeast, have raised
concerns about insecurity. Anambra State, formerly tranquil and secure, has seen a worrying
rise in these crimes, which affect urban and rural populations. This increase has upended many
residents' lives, made them feel less secure and caused severe problems for local administration
and law enforcement.
Nigeria has historically faced security issues, but insurgency and kidnapping-for-
ransom have become the biggest dangers (Ogunnubi & Idowu, 2024; Osemuyi & Festus, 2024).
These crises are caused by nation-historical socio-political, economic and ideological
variables. Kidnapping for ransom has spread across the country, with significant spikes in the
Northwest (Ogunnubi & Idowu, 2024; Oluwadele & Rahman, 2024; Onuche & Martins, 2024),
Southeast and South-South regions, creating complex and deeply intertwined insecurity.
Insurgency has mostly been concentrated in the north. This conceptual framework examines
the causes and drivers of these security issues in Anambra State, Nigeria.
IPOB, an Eastern Nigerian separatist group, wants Biafra to be independent (Nimfel
& Anjide, 2022; Okaisabor, 2023). This group's political stance resonates with many
Southeasterners, especially given Nigerian Civil War issues. The group's military component,
the Eastern Security Network (ESN), has raised regional tensions and fought security forces in
guerrilla warfare, resulting in many confrontations (Amnesty International, 2023; Onuoha,
2012 Because of this, many locals fear separatist groups and the security forces meant to stop
them. The Nigerian government has increased its military presence, worsening the state-
separatist conflict. Ransom kidnapping is a developing issue in Nigeria, impacting all regions
(Aleyomi & Olajubu, 2024). Ransom is demanded from abducted people, frequently from their
relatives or employers.
Kidnapping-for-ransom is most widespread in the Northwest, Southeast and South-
South (Ikechukwu & Agbo, 2022; Uloko et al., 2024). Northwest states Zamfara, Katsina and
Kaduna have seen school kidnappings and targeted attacks on famous people. In Anambra
State, religious leaders and businesses are kidnapped for ransom, a significant Southeast crime.
Niger Delta insurgents kidnap oil workers and conduct similar atrocities (Eze, 2020; Forest,
2012). These kidnappings have disrupted local economies and caused widespread fear and
instability, forcing many families and companies to pay large costs to release their loved ones
or employees (ACLED, 2022; Onuoha, 2012). (Nwokedi, 2025; Preya, 2022). These
organisations take advantage of victims' financial vulnerabilities and ineffective legal
enforcement. Law enforcement is finding it harder to discover and arrest perpetrators due to
cryptocurrency and ransom demand (Forest, 2012; Eze, 2020).
Statement of the Problem
Anambra State's geopolitical climate and proximity to major highways make it more
vulnerable to these crimes. The rise in rural and highway kidnappings, especially on the Enugu-
Onitsha motorway, is concerning. Due to the fear of ransom kidnappings, many families and

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 26

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

local businesses have experienced significant financial losses. These attacks have caused
physical harm and shattered daily life and economic activities by instilling fear and uncertainty.
Insurgency and ransom abduction in Anambra State are caused by sociopolitical, institutional
and economic factors, which this article examines. Assessing community and government
reactions will help this study identify gaps in current methods and suggest practical mitigation
measures. The report adds to Nigeria's security discourse, focusing on the Southeast, by
offering recommendations for legislators, security organisations and local communities to
restore peace and security.
Objectives of the Study
The aim of this study is to examine how to mitigate insurgency and kidnapping for
ransom in Nigeria: A study of Anambra State. The specific objectives of the study are:
1. To find out the causes of insurgency and kidnapping in Nigeria, particularly in Anambra
State.
2. To measure kidnapping's socioeconomic and psychological effects on victims and
communities.
3. To assess security measures' efficacy.
4. To suggest sustainable crime-reduction solutions.
Research Questions:
1) What causes insurgency and kidnapping for ransom in Nigeria, particularly in Anambra
State?
2) How does kidnapping affect Anambra State victims and communities socioeconomically
and psychologically?
3) How well do present security measures and policies combat insurgency and kidnapping for
ransom in Anambra State?
4) What sustainable methods can reduce insurgency and abduction for ransom in Anambra
State and Nigeria?

Theoretical Frameworks
Understanding Nigeria's complicated and multidimensional insurgency and
kidnapping-for-ransom problems necessitates a multi-theoretical approach. The Failed State
Theory and the Relative Deprivation Theory are two significant theoretical frameworks that
are pertinent to the analysis of these events.
Failed State Theory was propounded by Jean-François Bayart and other scholars,
popularized in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Failed State Theory argues that when a
government is unable to deliver essential services such as security, rule of law and economic
stability, it creates a vacuum where insurgency, organized crime and civil unrest can flourish.
In order to mitigate insurgency and kidnapping for ransom in Anambra State, this theory
emphasizes the need to strengthen local governance, improve trust in security agencies and
ensure that government institutions are visible, responsive and effective. The Failed State
Theory is particularly relevant to the escalating issues of insurgency and abduction in Anambra
State. The idea elucidates how feeble or ineffectual governmental institutions, inadequate
security frameworks and deficient service provision engender a power vacuum that is exploited
by insurgents and criminal organisations. The research findings for Anambra indicate a

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 27

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

deficiency in coordinated security responses, inadequate law enforcement presence in rural

regions and insufficient intelligence sharing—evident indicators of state fragility. These
vulnerabilities enable armed factions and abductors to prosper, occupying the void created by
deficient or incompetent governance. The theory emphasises the critical necessity for enhanced
state presence, superior police and improved governance frameworks to diminish opportunities
for criminal conduct.
Relative Deprivation Theory was propounded by Ted Robert Gurr in 1970. According
to the Relative Deprivation Theory, people are more likely to use violence when they feel like
they don't get what they deserve. When there are no peaceful solutions, this feeling of
unfairness or exclusion can rise to resentment, criminal activity, insurrection, or communal
violence. Relative Deprivation Theory explains why young Anambra State residents are
joining cults, insurgencies and kidnapping. The study found that poverty, unemployment and
perceived economic and political isolation cause insecurity. When persons or organisations feel
poor compared to others or their own aspirations, they may use violence or crime to express
their frustration. Many Anambra youths saw kidnapping or joining armed groups a way to
survive or gain power. Therefore, addressing the root causes of deprivation through young
employment, equitable resource distribution and democratic government is crucial to reducing
insecurity.

Literature Review
Empirical study has focused on Nigeria's social, political and economic factors
affecting insurgency and kidnapping. Researchers like Forest (2012) and Eze (2020) have
linked corruption, structural poverty, insurgency and kidnapping. Studies on Anambra State
show that criminal gangs, separatist groups and local militias worsen these issues and
complicate security. These studies have shown how governance and socioeconomic disparity
cause violence, but little is known about how successfully current security measures can
address these issues. The role of criminal syndicates and kidnapping profits have also been
overlooked. This study highlights the complexity of security challenges. Researchers have
linked these issues to political instability, poverty and poor governance, which foster crime and
violence. Boko Haram, ISWAP and local banditry have made several places unstable,
especially the Northeast and Northwest. Separatist groups like IPOB and ESN have fuelled
Southeast violence, complicating the matter. Kidnapping-for-ransom, driven by criminal
syndicates, has major social and economic effects nationwide. Empirical study on inequality
and governmental weakness that sustains insecurity has not assessed the effectiveness of
current security measures (Liu & Eisner, 2024). Understanding these factors is necessary to
develop successful security solutions. This section discusses Anambra State kidnapping and
insurgency causes and effects.
Several factors contribute to the prevalence of kidnapping and insurgency in Anambra
State. These include:
1. Economic Hardship: Socioeconomic deprivation, resulting in high youth unemployment and
poverty rates, is a significant driver of insurgency and kidnapping. According to the National
Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the unemployment rate in Nigeria was 33% in 2023, with many

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 28

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

young people struggling to find meaningful employment (NBS, 2023). This economic hardship
pushes youths into crime, including kidnapping and insurgency.
2. Weak Policing: Corruption and underfunding limit the effectiveness of law enforcement
agencies, creating an environment conducive to kidnapping and insurgency. Human Rights
Watch (2022) has highlighted the need for security sector reform to address these challenges.
3. Ransom Economy: The payment of ransoms to kidnappers has created a lucrative industry,
with an estimated $18 million paid in ransoms between 2016 and 2020 (SBM Intelligence,
2021). This ransom economy incentivizes kidnappers to continue their activities.
4. Political Violence: Election-related violence and weak democratic institutions contribute to
the insecurity in Anambra State. The lack of trust in the political system and the use of violence
to achieve political goals create an environment conducive to kidnapping and insurgency.
5. Poor Intelligence Gathering and Surveillance: Security agencies often lack the necessary
equipment and coordination to gather intelligence and conduct effective surveillance, making
it difficult to prevent and respond to kidnapping and insurgency.
6. Weak Border Control: The porous borders of Nigeria allow for the movement of weapons
and insurgents, exacerbating the security challenges in Anambra State.
7. Lack of Trust in Law Enforcement: Citizens are often reluctant to report crimes due to fear
of retaliation or police corruption, making it difficult for law enforcement agencies to
effectively address kidnapping and insurgency.
Impacts of Kidnapping and Insurgency
The impacts of kidnapping and insurgency in Anambra State are far-reaching and
devastating. These include:
1. Economic Loss: Kidnapping and insurgency substantially undermine local and regional
economy by fostering an atmosphere of fear and instability (Berebon, 2025).
Enterprises cease operations or move locations due to security apprehensions, resulting
in losses in tourism, commerce and investment. Local entrepreneurs and informal sector
workers suffer income loss, while families frequently face exorbitant ransom demands,
depleting both personal and communal resources. The economic growth of impacted
areas and the state is hindered over time.
2. Psychological Trauma: Kidnapping victims and their family frequently experience
enduring psychological repercussions, such as anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD), sadness and persistent fear (Abiola, & Fajimolu, 2024). The unpredictability
and aggression linked to these occurrences undermine the mental health of both direct
victims and community members who perpetually fear becoming targets. Trauma can
hinder individuals' capacity to operate adequately at home, in the workplace, or in
educational institutions.
3. Displacement: Insurgency and recurrent abductions compel individuals and families to
abandon their residences in pursuit of more secure surroundings (Anyaogu, 2024). This
internal displacement undermines social networks, livelihoods and access to vital
services such as healthcare and education. Displaced individuals frequently find
themselves in congested and inadequately equipped regions, with additional
vulnerabilities and adversities that exacerbate their distress and restrict their prospects
for rehabilitation.

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 29

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

4. Decline in Education: The pervasive climate of fear stemming from kidnapping and
insurgency frequently results in the shutdown of educational institutions, especially in
high-risk areas (Omuya, 2023). Parents may opt to retain their children at home to
mitigate the risk of abductions, while educators may evacuate hazardous areas. These
interruptions impair educational access and quality, elevate dropout rates and
undermine the long-term development of human capital in the impacted regions.
Current Security Measures and Their Limitations
The Anambra State government has initiated several programs to address security
challenges, including insurgency and kidnapping. However, these measures have limitations
that hinder their effectiveness.
Vigilante Groups
There has been some hope in the creation of the Anambra Vigilante Group (AVG) and
collaborations with federal security agencies for local police. But these organisations
frequently lack enough control and oversight, which can result in violations of human rights
and other problems (Ojakorotu, 2020). To solve this, the government may set up explicit rules
and supervision systems for vigilante organisations, guaranteeing that they follow the law.
Legislation
Although the Anti-Kidnapping Law is a positive move, it is not well enforced.
Nwagbara (2020) claims that a lack of political will, corruption and insufficient funding all
contribute to the law's ineffectiveness. The government might make sure that offenders are held
accountable, give security personnel training and capacity-building initiatives and boost
financing for law enforcement organisations in order to fortify the law.
Youth Empowerment Schemes
Youth empowerment programs have been implemented with the intention of reducing
unemployment, however their impact has been minimal. According to Egbo (2019), these
initiatives usually don't address the root reasons of unemployment and poverty and aren't
sustainable. To address this, the government might design programs that are tailored to the
needs of the state's young people and provide vocational training, employment development
and microfinance.
Surveillance Drones and Community Engagement Forums
Although there is potential, the use of community participation forums and
surveillance drones is not well-coordinated or coherent (Okeke, et al., 2024). For these
programs to be successful and focused, Nwankwo (2020) asserts that efficient coordination and
communication are necessary. To guarantee that these projects are properly thought out and
carried out, the government may set up a centralised coordination system.
Strategies for Effective Mitigation
Strengthening Local Intelligence Networks and Inter-Agency Collaboration
To avoid and respond to security threats, interagency cooperation and local
intelligence networks must be strengthened. Effective intelligence collection and exchange can
assist security authorities in anticipating and averting security situations, claims Ogbonna
(2018) and Albert (2024). The government might set up a forum for security services to
coordinate and exchange intelligence.

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 30

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

To avoid and respond to security threats, interagency cooperation and local

intelligence networks must be strengthened. Effective intelligence collection and exchange can
assist security authorities in anticipating and averting security situations, claims Ogbonna
(2018). The government might set up a forum for security services to coordinate and exchange
intelligence.
Expanding Economic Opportunities
Insurgency and kidnapping are frequently caused by poverty and unemployment,
which can be decreased by increasing economic opportunities through job development,
microfinance and youth empowerment initiatives. Ikelegbe (2019) asserts that communities
and individuals can become more robust to security threats through economic empowerment.
To meet the requirements of the state's youth, the government might create initiatives that offer
microfinance, job creation and vocational training.
Enhancing Public Trust in Security Institutions
Insurgency and kidnapping are frequently caused by poverty and unemployment,
which can be decreased by increasing economic opportunities through job development,
microfinance and youth empowerment initiatives. Ikelegbe (2019) asserts that communities
and individuals can become more robust to security threats through economic empowerment.
To meet the requirements of the state's youth, the government might create initiatives that offer
microfinance, job creation and vocational training.
Community Policing and Whistleblower Protection
Whistleblower protection and community policing can promote local intelligence and
security agency collaboration. Alemika (2018) asserts that community policing can contribute
to the development of public-security agency trust, which will result in improved security
outcomes. The government could protect whistleblowers and implement community policing
initiatives.
Legislation Targeting Ransom Payments and Financial Tracking
Disrupting the financial networks of kidnappers and rebels can be achieved by
legislation that targets ransom payments and the financial tracking of illicit earnings. Nwolise
(2019) asserts that stopping financial support can lessen security risks and stop additional
occurrences. Legislation targeting ransom payments and the financial tracking of illicit
proceeds could be passed by the government.
Technology-Driven Security
Technology like tracking systems, CCTV and drones can improve security response
and surveillance. Technology can help security agencies respond to security situations and
deliver real-time intelligence, claims Okoli (2020). To improve security results, the
government could spend money on technologically advanced security solutions (Albert, 2024).
Public Awareness Campaigns
Campaigns to raise public awareness can inform people about safety precautions and
the value of collaborating with law enforcement. Nwosu (2019) asserts that public awareness
initiatives can support the development of a cooperative and secure culture. To inform the
public about safety precautions and the value of collaborating with security authorities, the
government might start public awareness campaigns.
Methodology

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 31

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

This descriptive survey examines Anambra State's insurgency and abduction for
ransom sources, effects and mitigation initiatives using quantitative and qualitative approaches.
The descriptive design enables for data collection from a varied range of respondents to
understand underlying reasons, community experiences, government responses and sustainable
solutions. The study covers Anambra State in Nigeria's southeast geopolitical zone. Samples
are taken in the Enugu-Onitsha motorway corridor, rural Orumba, Aguata, Ihiala and Anambra
South districts threatened by insurgency and kidnapping. Due to recent security threats,
highway attacks and ransom demands, these places were picked.
Purposive and stratified random sampling will be used. 150 people will be sampled
proportionally across affected local governments. The strata will include 30 community
leaders, 40 security professionals, 40 local residents/businesses, 20 civil society actors and 20
kidnap victims/families. Main data collecting tool is structured questionnaire. Two Nnamdi
Azikiwe University Criminology and Security Studies specialists face and content validated
the questionnaire. To guarantee clarity, relevance and research aims, experts provided
feedback. The internal consistency of a pilot survey with 20 respondents in neighbouring
Enugu State was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha, obtaining a reliability coefficient of 0.84,
indicating high reliability.
The researchers will deliver questionnaires in person and online when possible.
Anonymous and confidential responses are guaranteed. Language- or security-challenged areas
will have trained field helpers. Descriptive statistics include frequency tables, mean scores and
standard deviations will analyse data. Results will be interpreted to address research questions.
Qualitative open-ended responses and interviews will be analysed thematically.

Results

Table 1: Causes of Insurgency and Kidnapping in Anambra State

S/N ITEM SA A D SD Score Mean
score
1 Poverty and unemployment are major drivers 40 40 40 30 3840 7.38
of insurgency and kidnapping.
2 Political marginalization and weak 147 0 0 3 1788 11.92
governance contribute to insecurity.
3 Availability of arms and porous borders 150 0 0 0 1800 12.00
increase kidnapping activities.
4 Youth involvement in cultism and gangs 80 60 8 2 1696 10.60
fuels insurgent activities.

Items 2, 3 and 4 scored very high mean values (>10), suggesting strong agreement that political
marginalization, arms availability and cultism contribute significantly to insecurity. Item 1 had
a relatively lower mean (7.38), indicating a more mixed perception of poverty and
unemployment as the primary drivers.
Table 2: Socio-Economic and Psychological Impacts of Kidnapping

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 32

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

S/N ITEM SAA D SD SCORE MEAN

SCORE
5 Kidnapping causes long-term 150 0 0 0 1800 12.00
psychological trauma.
6 Local businesses and economy are 147 3 0 0 1776 11.84
negatively affected by insecurity.
7 Families face financial strain paying 150 0 0 0 1800 12.00
ransoms.
8 Fear of kidnapping limits community 150 0 0 0 1800 12.00
mobility and social life.

All items in this section scored extremely high (11.84–12.00), showing overwhelming
consensus on the devastating socio-economic and psychological effects of kidnapping.

Table 3: Effectiveness of Current Security Measures

S/N ITEM SA A DSD SCORE MEAN
SCORE
9 Government measures have 40 30 40 40 1300 6.93
significantly reduced kidnapping.
10 Inadequate coordination among 145 1 3 1 1778 11.85
security agencies.
11 Vigilante groups have helped mitigate 130 10 7 3 1714 11.43
insecurity.
12 Poor intelligence sharing limits 120 25 4 1 1738 11.59
security success.

Items 10, 11 and 12 scored very high (>11), indicating widespread belief that coordination,
community involvement and intelligence sharing are key issues. Item 9 scored the lowest
(6.93), suggesting that current government security measures are not perceived as effective.
Table 4: Sustainable Mitigation Strategies
S/N ITEM SA A D SD SCORE MEAN
SCORE
13 Invest more in youth employment and 130 10 4 6 1696 11.18
poverty reduction.
14 Community-police partnership is key 100 30 15 5 1590 10.60
to combating rural kidnapping.
15 Improved surveillance technology will 150 0 0 0 1800 12.00
boost security efforts.
16 Addressing corruption and weak justice 100 40 6 4 1664 11.09
systems is key to lasting peace.
All items show strong agreement on the need for sustainable strategies, with item 15
(surveillance technology) achieving a perfect score (12.00). There is clear support for systemic
reform, youth empowerment and community partnership in tackling kidnapping.

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 33

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

Discussion of Findings
The study found that political marginalization, the proliferation of arms and youth
involvement in cultism are significant drivers of insurgency and kidnapping in Anambra State,
with all three scoring mean values above 10. This aligns with the findings of Nwosu (2019),
who emphasized that political exclusion and ineffective governance create breeding grounds
for extremist ideologies and criminal activities. In particular, Nwosu highlighted how
marginalized youths often become tools for violence due to disenfranchisement, a trend evident
in the strong agreement among respondents regarding the role of cultism and gang activities.
Furthermore, the socio-economic and psychological toll of kidnapping is
overwhelmingly acknowledged by respondents, with all relevant items scoring between 11.84
and 12.00. These findings are consistent with Okoli (2020), who asserted that victims of
kidnapping suffer from chronic trauma, while communities experience long-term economic
setbacks due to decreased investments, restricted mobility and extortionate ransom demands.
Their study, which focused on the psychological impacts of insecurity in Southeast Nigeria,
mirrors the present study’s revelation of widespread fear and economic disruption among
residents of Anambra State.
With regard to the effectiveness of current security measures, the study revealed that
government interventions are largely seen as inadequate, while better coordination, community
vigilance and intelligence sharing are perceived as critical to improved security. This finding
supports the work of Eze (2020), who argued that Nigeria's security response is hindered by
inter-agency rivalry and fragmented intelligence operations. Eze emphasized that real-time
intelligence and grassroots engagement—especially through local vigilante support—are
crucial for effectively curbing insurgency and abductions.
Finally, the respondents strongly endorsed sustainable mitigation strategies such as
youth employment, anti-corruption reforms and the deployment of surveillance technology,
with the use of modern technology scoring a perfect mean of 12.00. This is in line with Onuoha
(2012), who recommended a multi-dimensional approach combining economic empowerment,
institutional reform and technological investment as a path to long-term peace and security.
Onuoha's analysis affirms the belief that without addressing the root causes—particularly
poverty and institutional weakness—short-term measures will continue to fall short in
resolving Nigeria’s insecurity crisis.
Summary of Analysis
1. Arms availability, weak governance, cultism and poor intelligence sharing are major
insecurity drivers.
2. Psychological and economic impacts of kidnapping are severely felt in the
communities.
3. Government's current efforts are widely seen as inadequate.
4. Community-based security, technology and structural reform are highly supported
mitigation strategies.
5. The only item with mixed responses was the role of poverty and unemployment (mean
= 7.38), suggesting this is not universally accepted as a primary cause.
Conclusions

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 34

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

From the facts, insurgency and kidnapping in Anambra State are caused by a complex
interaction of socio-political and economic elements. Political marginalisation, youth cultism,
armaments proliferation and porous borders were strongly cited as major causes of increased
insecurity by many respondents. Poverty and unemployment were key issues, but inadequate
government systems and criminal gang activities were more important. The strong consensus
that arms proliferation (mean score = 12.00) and poor security agency coordination (mean score
= 11.85) are crucial highlights the need to address structural weaknesses in the state's security
architecture. This shows that overcoming Anambra State's insecurity crisis needs addressing
deep-rooted political and institutional issues. Kidnapping is also widely recognised as
destructive psychologically and socioeconomically. All respondents agreed that victims were
traumatised, families were financially strained, businesses were disrupted and communities
were afraid. The lowest mean score of 6.93 shows that government security measures are
ineffective. Community-based remedies like vigilante groups, improved monitoring
technologies and youth-focused poverty alleviation programs are widely believed to work.
These findings suggest a multidimensional and sustainable strategy that combines government
reform, technology and intelligence investment, community policing collaborations and social
welfare measures. Without these purposeful and concerted actions, Anambra State's insecurity
will undermine economic development, social cohesion and public trust in governance.
Recommendations
In light of the findings, the following recommendations are put forth:
1. To tackle the fundamental causes of insecurity, poverty and unemployment, the government
ought to execute focused youth empowerment efforts, skills acquisition programs and job
development schemes.
2. The accessibility of weapons and permeable borders were identified as the primary factors
contributing to insecurity. Consequently, both state and federal governments must augment
initiatives to fortify borders via adequately equipped security installations and sophisticated
surveillance technologies. Moreover, more stringent arms control regulations and ongoing
surveillance must be implemented to diminish the proliferation of illicit firearms.
3. The ineffectiveness of existing security measures arises from inadequate inter-agency
collaboration. A centralised security intelligence system must be established to facilitate
prompt and coordinated responses to threats. Security agencies must to engage in collaborative
training and frameworks must be established for effective communication and strategy
execution.
4. The results robustly endorse the significance of vigilante organisations and contemporary
security technologies (e.g., CCTV, drones) in augmenting safety. The state government ought
to institutionalise and endorse community policing frameworks, guaranteeing their adherence
to ethical and legal criteria. Concurrently, funding must be allocated to implement digital
monitoring in important locations, especially in rural and high-risk areas, to effectively monitor
and deter criminal activities.

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 35

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

References
Abiola, T., & Fajimolu, O. O. (2024). Kidnapping-Induced Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in
an Elderly Nigerian Woman: Biopsychosocial Insights and Cognitive Processing
Therapy Outcomes. Rwanda Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 7(2), 380-385.
Acled. (2022). Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project: Nigeria.
Adeiyza, A. (2022). Implications Of Boko Haram Insurgency In Borno State, Nigeria
University Of Education, Winneba].
Albert, U. G., (2024) Bridging the Gap: Overcoming Barriers to Inter-Agency Cooperation in
the Face of Multidimensional Security Threats. Paper presented on the Institute of
Security and Strategic Studies September Security Summit at Abuja Nigeria.
Alemika, E. E. O. (2018). Policing and Security in Nigeria. African Journal 0f Criminology
and Justice Studies, 11(1), 1-15.
Aleyomi, M. B., & Olajubu, A. (2024). Kidnapping For Ransom In Nigeria. In The Political
Economy Of Kidnapping And Insecurity In Nigeria: Beyond News And Rumours (Pp.
135-150). Springer.
Amnesty International. (2023). Human Rights and Security Challenges in Southeast Nigeria.
Anyaogu, J. C. (2024). Unknown gunmen activities as a new trend of kidnapping in some
communities in Anambra State: a search for solutions. Rajpath: Journal of Economics,
Political Science, Education and Humanities, 1(1), 72-86.
Berebon, C. (2025). The Nexus Between Security, Human Development and Economic
Stability: Addressing Insecurity as a Threat to National Growth in Nigeria. Advances
in Law, Pedagogy and Multidisciplinary Humanities, 3(1), 28-47.
Egbo, O. (2019). Youth Unemployment and Poverty in Nigeria: A Threat to National Security.
Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, 42, 1-9.
Eze, C. (2020). Understanding Kidnapping for Ransom in Nigeria: A Socio-Political Analysis.
African Journal of Criminology, 58(2), 114-132.
Forest, J. J. F. (2012). The Handbook of Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Concepts And Issues.
Routledge.
Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton University Press.
Human Rights Watch. (2022). Nigeria: Security Sector Reform Needed to Address Insecurity.
Icg. (2020). Nigeria: The Boko Haram Insurgency and Its Regional Consequences.
International Crisis Group.
Ikechukwu, A. K. O. & Agbo, M. N. (2022). Kidnapping And Nigeria's National Security:
North-Central In Perspective. Journal Of African Studies And Sustainable
Development.
Ikelegbe, A. (2019). Economic Empowerment and Security in Nigeria. Journal of Security
Studies, 18(2), 1-12.
Liu, L., & Eisner, M. (2024). Why Insurgents Engage In Kidnappings: A Coercive Strategy In
Quasi-State Governance And Control? Journal Of Peace Research,
00223433241254983.
National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Nigeria's Unemployment Rate.
Nbs (2023). Nigeria Unemployment Report. National Bureau of Statistics.

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 36

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

Nimfel, C. E., & Anjide, S. T. (2022). Framing, Separatist Agitation And The Nigerian State:
A Study Of The Indigenous People Of Biafra (Ipob). Socialscientia: Journal Of Social
Sciences And Humanities, 7(4).
Nwagbara, U. C. (2020). Anti-Kidnapping Law in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects. Journal
of Law and Governance, 15(1), 1-10.
Nwankwo, C. F. (2020). Surveillance Drones and Security in Nigeria. Journal of Security and
Safety Technologies, 8(1), 1-9.
Nwolise, O. B. C. (2019). Cutting Off Financial Support to Terrorist Groups in Nigeria. Journal
of Terrorism Research, 10(2), 1-12.
Nwosu, I. (2019). Public Awareness Campaigns and Security in Nigeria. Journal of
Communication and Media Research, 11(1), 1-9.
Nwokedi, G. O., Green, A. U., Felix-Joe, C. J., Chiazo, N. G., Okechukwu, U. P., Molokwu,
V., & Chidebem, G. (2025). Recent Cult Related Killings In Awka Metropolis (2022-
2024) And The Implications On The Society. Sprin Journal Of Arts, Humanities And
Social Sciences, 4(5), 24-30.
Ogbonna, C. N. (2018). Intelligence-Led Policing in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects.
Journal of Intelligence and National Security, 33(2), 1-15.
Ogunnubi, O., & Idowu, D. L. (2024). Kidnapping For Ransom (K4r) And The Challenges Of
Nigeria’s International Image. In The Political Economy Of Kidnapping And Insecurity
In Nigeria: Beyond News And Rumours (Pp. 245-263). Springer.
Ojakorotu, V. (2020). Vigilantism and Security in Nigeria. Journal of Security Studies, 19(1),
1-12.
Okaisabor, J. O. (2023). An Identity In Quests For Self-Determination: The Case Of Indigenous
People Of Biafra Separatist Movement In Nigeria. Nationalism And Ethnic Politics,
29(2), 242-265.
Okeke, O. E., Agbonghae, B. E., & Green, A. U. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Security of
the People in Nigeria. Journal of Public and Human Rights Law, 1(2), 158-167.
Okoli, A. C. (2020). Technology-Driven Security in Nigeria. Journal of Security and Safety
Technologies, 8(2), 1-9.
Oluwadele, B. L., & Rahman, S. O. (2024). Kidnapping And Human Security In Nigeria. In
Understanding Contemporary Security Challenges In Nigeria (Pp. 49-66). Springer.
Omuya, M. S. (2023). Effect of Armed Banditry and Insecurity on Nigeria's Educational
System. Lapai Journal of Humanities, 14(2), 44-57.
Onuche, O. I., & Martins, E. R. (2024). Banditry And Kidnapping In Nigeria: Exploring Non-
Traditional Approaches To Enhance Security Reliability. World Journal Of Advanced
Research And Reviews, 23(1), 612-619.
Onuoha, F. C., Nwangwu, C., & Ugwueze, M. I. (2023). Counterinsurgency Operations Of The
Nigerian Military and Boko Haram Insurgency: Expounding The Viscid Manacle. In
Ten Years Of Boko Haram in Nigeria: The Dynamics And Counterinsurgency
Challenges (Pp. 69-94). Springer.
Onuoha, F. (2012). Boko Haram and the Dilemma of Counterterrorism in Nigeria. Journal of
Terrorism Research, 3(2), 45-59.

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 37

[Link]
 © IIJP 2025 | Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 25-38| ISSN: 2636-4484

Osemuyi, O. C., & Festus, A. F. (2024). Fragile State and The Challenge Of Insurgency In
Nigeria. African And Global Issues Quarterly, 4(2), 6-22.
Pérouse De Montclos, M. A. (2014). Boko Haram: Islamism, Politics, Security and The State
in Nigeria. African Studies Centre.
Sbm Intelligence. (2021). Kidnapping in Nigeria: A $18 Million Industry.
Uloko, M., Gomment, T. I., & Yunusa, E. (2024). Public Perception Of Kidnapping In Dekina
Local Government Area Of Kogi State.

IMPACT INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND PUBLICATIONS 38

[Link]