Chapter 6
Why careful selection is Importnt
1. Organizational Performance
Employees are the driving force of a company.
Selecting the right people ensures that the organization has subordinates with
the correct skills, attributes, and qualifications.
A strong workforce directly contributes to higher productivity, better customer
service, and overall success.
2. High Costs of Recruiting and Hiring
The recruitment and hiring process is expensive and time-consuming.
Costs include advertising, agency fees, travel expenses for candidates,
interview time, and administrative costs.
Making a bad hire means you have to repeat the entire process (spending
the money again) and potentially deal with the costs of termination and
severance.
3. Legal Obligations and Liability
EEO Compliance: Companies must follow Equal Employment Opportunity
(EEO) laws. If selection procedures are not carefully designed, they may
discriminate against protected groups, leading to lawsuits and penalties.
Chapter 6 1
Negligent Hiring: Employers have a legal duty to protect their employees and
customers. If a company hires someone with a questionable background (e.g.,
history of violence) without proper screening, and that person causes harm,
the company can be held liable for negligent hiring.
Avoiding Negligent Hiring Claims
Concept: Negligent hiring occurs when an employer fails to check the
background of an employee who then injures someone. To avoid legal liability,
organizations must implement a rigorous screening process.
Key Practices to Prevent Claims:
Employers must carefully review employment applications for gaps,
inconsistencies, or altered dates that may indicate an attempt to hide past
issues.
Written authorization must be obtained from the applicant, followed by
thorough reference checks to verify qualifications and past behavior.
All records and information of the applicant should be saved to prove due
diligence if challenged in court.
Applicants should be automatically rejected if they provide false statements or
have criminal judgments that are directly relevant to the job duties.
Respect the applicant's privacy, but prioritize the safety of your current
employees and customers.
If an employee causes trouble after being hired, take action immediately to
stop it from getting worse and to protect the company from lawsuits.
Basic Testing Concepts
For a hiring test to be useful and legal, it must meet two basic requirements:
Reliability (it gives consistent results) and Validity (it actually predicts job
performance).
Reliability
Definition: Reliability refers to the consistency of scores obtained by the
same person when retested with the identical or alternate forms of the
Chapter 6 2
same test.
Core Question: Are the test results stable over time?
Significance: A test is useless if it yields wildly different results every time
it is taken. Reliability is a prerequisite for validity.
Validity
Definition: Validity indicates whether a test is measuring what it is
supposed to be measuring.
Core Question: Does the test accurately predict success or performance
on the job?
Significance: This is the most critical concept in testing. If a test is not
valid, it cannot effectively predict employee performance and may lead to
discriminatory hiring practices.
Chapter 6 3
When validating a test for employment, HR professionals rely on two primary
types of validity evidence:
Criterion Validity:
Description: This type of validity is established by demonstrating that
scores on a test (the predictor) are statistically correlated with actual job
performance (the criterion).
Example: A study shows that applicants who score high on a mechanical
aptitude test consistently perform better during their probationary period
than those who score low.
Chapter 6 4
Content Validity:
Description: This type of validity is demonstrated by showing that the test
contains a representative sample of the actual tasks, skills, or knowledge
required for the job.
Example: Using a typing test for an administrative assistant position or a
driving test for a delivery driver. It is logical, but must be based on a
thorough job analysis.
The Test Validation Process
According to evidence-based HR practices, validating a test is a systematic
process. The goal is to prove scientifically that the test predicts job success.
The Five Steps of Test Validation:
1. Job Analysis: The process begins by analyzing the job to identify specific
tasks and duties. This helps determine what should be measured (predictors,
Chapter 6 5
such as "attention to detail") and how to measure success (criteria, such as
"number of errors per week").
2. Choose the Tests: Based on the job analysis, management selects tests that
they believe will accurately measure the identified attributes (e.g., a cognitive
ability test or a personality inventory).
3. Run the Test: The chosen test is administered to a group of current employees
or a sample of applicants.
4. Relate Scores and Criteria: The test scores are statistically compared against
the actual performance metrics (criteria) of the test-takers. A statistical
relationship must be proven to establish criterion validity.
5. Cross-Validate: The test is administered to a different sample of individuals
(or new hires) and the results are compared again. This step confirms that the
original results were not a coincidence and that the test is valid for the broader
population.
Testing Program Guidelines
1. Use tests as additions – Tests should never be the sole basis for hiring
decisions. They must be used as supplementary tools alongside interviews,
application blanks, reference checks, and background verification to obtain a
complete and accurate picture of the candidate.
2. Validate the tests – It is essential to prove that tests are valid, meaning they
accurately measure what they intend to measure and have a proven
correlation with future job performance. Validation studies establish this link.
3. Monitor your testing/selection program – Organizations must continuously
monitor their testing program to ensure it remains fair and unbiased. This
involves regularly checking for adverse impact against protected groups and
confirming that tests continue to predict success effectively.
4. Keep accurate records – Detailed records of all test scores, candidate
information, hiring decisions, and validation studies must be maintained. This
documentation is critical for defending the selection process if it is ever
challenged legally.
Chapter 6 6
5. Use a certified psychologist – The selection, administration, and
interpretation of psychological tests require specialized expertise. Involving a
qualified industrial/organizational psychologist ensures the tests are
appropriate for the job and are used correctly.
6. Manage test conditions – Standardize testing environments so all candidates
have the same conditions and no external factors influence scores.
7. Revalidate periodically – Update validation studies over time to ensure tests
remain relevant as jobs and requirements evolve.
Types of Selection Tests
Selection tests are objective and standardized measures of a sample of behavior.
They are designed to predict job performance by assessing a candidate's skills,
abilities, interests, or personality. According to testing guidelines, tests should be
used as a supplementary device; scores should always be verified through other
methods like interviews and reference checks.
The main types of selection tests are as follows:
A. Aptitude Tests
Description: Aptitude tests measure a candidate's potential or capacity to learn a
job if adequate training is provided. They focus on future performance rather than
existing knowledge.
Example: Testing a candidate’s reasoning ability to see if they could learn to
code, even if they have never coded before.
Aptitude tests can be divided into four sub-categories:
1. Intelligence Tests:
Description: These measure a candidate's general intellectual capacity
(IQ). They assess abilities such as comprehension, reasoning, memory,
word fluency, and verbal comprehension.
Example: A test requiring a candidate to complete analogies, solve
puzzles, or rearrange pictures to form a logical story.
2. Mechanical Aptitude Tests:
Chapter 6 7
Description: These measure the capacity to understand mechanical
principles and physical forces. They assess spatial visualization,
perceptual speed, and knowledge of mechanical concepts.
Example: A test showing pictures of gears and asking which direction the
final gear will turn; useful for selecting apprentices, technicians, or skilled
mechanical employees.
3. Psychomotor Tests:
Description: These measure abilities related to physical movement and
coordination, such as manual dexterity, motor ability, and eye-hand
coordination.
Example: A test requiring a candidate to assemble small parts quickly or
use tweezers to place pins in holes; useful for selecting semi-skilled
workers or those performing repetitive operations like packaging or watch
assembly.
4. Clerical Aptitude Tests:
Description: These measure specific capacities involved in office and
administrative work.
Example: A test assessing speed and accuracy in checking lists for errors,
filing, spelling, or basic computation.
B. Achievement Tests
Description: Unlike aptitude tests (which measure potential), achievement tests
measure what a person can do right now. They are designed to determine the
specific skills or knowledge a candidate has already acquired through training or
job experience.
Example: Testing an experienced accountant on their knowledge of tax
software or asking a driver to operate a specific vehicle during the interview
process.
Achievement tests are classified into two types:
1. Job Knowledge Tests (Trade Tests):
Chapter 6 8
Description: These tests measure the candidate's theoretical knowledge
necessary for the job. They can be oral or written.
Example: A written exam for a typist involving shorthand transcription; or
a test for a mechanic asking them to explain how an engine cooling system
works.
2. Work Sample Tests:
Description: Under this test, a portion of the actual job tasks is given to
the candidate to perform. This is often considered one of the most valid
forms of testing as it directly observes the candidate doing the work.
Example: Asking a candidate for a graphic design position to create a
sample brochure; asking a programmer to write a small piece of code.
C. Situational Tests
Description: These tests evaluate a candidate by placing them in a simulated real-
life situation that mirrors the challenges of the job. The focus is on observing
actual behavior under realistic pressures.
1. Group Discussion:
Description: Candidates are assembled into a group and asked to discuss
and solve a specific problem. They are observed on their ability to initiate
conversation, lead, persuade others, communicate orally, and coordinate
to reach a conclusion.
Example: Giving a group of management trainees a case study about a
company losing money and asking them to come up with a consensus
solution within 30 minutes.
2. In-Basket Exercise:
Description: The candidate is given a basket (physical or digital)
containing letters, emails, memos, telephone messages, and reports that a
manager would typically face. The candidate must prioritize and make
decisions on how to handle each item within a limited time.
Chapter 6 9
Example: Providing a candidate with items like "An employee complains
about a colleague," "A client emails about a missed deadline," and "A
request for budget approval," and observing how they prioritize and
respond.
D. Interest Tests
Description: These are inventories designed to measure a candidate's likes and
dislikes regarding work, occupations, hobbies, and recreational activities.
Purpose: To determine whether a candidate is genuinely interested in the job
they are applying for and to identify which occupational areas align with their
passions.
Assumption: The test operates on the assumption that there is a high
correlation between a person's interest in a job and their eventual success and
satisfaction in that job. A person who loves detail-oriented work is more likely
to succeed as an editor than someone who prefers outdoor physical activity.
E. Personality Tests
Description: These tests probe deeply to discover clues to an individual's value
system, emotional reactions, maturity, and characteristic mood. They measure
traits such as self-confidence, sociability, conscientiousness, emotional stability,
and decisiveness. Personality is often crucial for jobs involving teamwork,
customer service, or leadership.
Personality tests are administered in two main ways:
1. Objective Tests:
Description: These are paper-and-pencil or computerized tests that can
be scored objectively. They are suitable for group testing and have
standardized scoring keys.
Example: A multiple-choice questionnaire asking candidates to rate how
much they agree with statements like "I enjoy meeting new people" or "I
prefer to plan rather than act spontaneously." (e.g., The Big Five
Inventory).
2. Projective Tests:
Chapter 6 10
Description: Candidates are asked to project their own interpretations
onto ambiguous stimuli. There are no right or wrong answers; the idea is
that the candidate will unconsciously reveal their true feelings, fears, and
motives in their response.
Example: Showing a candidate an ambiguous picture (like a person
looking out a window) and asking them to tell a story about what is
happening in the picture. Their story reveals their own emotional state and
outlook. (e.g., The Thematic Apperception Test).
Social Media's Role in the HR Selection Process
Social media plays a crucial role in modern HR selection by expanding candidate
reach, showcasing company culture, and enabling deeper candidate vetting,
allowing
recruiters to post jobs broadly, find passive talent via professional networks like
LinkedIn, verify resume claims, gauge communication style, and identify red flags,
though it introduces risks of bias and privacy concerns. It helps attract talent,
streamline processes, and connect with diverse candidates, but requires careful,
ethical use to avoid legal pitfalls.
Key Roles in Recruitment and Selection
1. Sourcing and Attraction:
Wider Reach: Job postings on platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook, and X
(Twitter) reach vast and diverse audiences beyond traditional job boards.
Targeted Ads: Social media allows HR to pinpoint specific skills, locations, or
demographics to attract ideal candidates through targeted advertising.
Employer Branding: Organizations showcase their company culture, values,
and employee experiences to attract talent that aligns with their identity.
Passive Candidate Engagement: Recruiters can identify and engage with
professionals who are not actively job-hunting but may be open to new
opportunities.
2. Screening and Vetting:
Chapter 6 11
Verification: Social media profiles help confirm information provided on
resumes, such as work experience, qualifications, and claimed expertise.
Cultural Fit: Recruiters assess a candidate's personality, professionalism, and
alignment with company values through their online presence.
Communication Skills: Evaluating tone, language, and engagement in posts or
discussions provides insight into the candidate's communication style.
Red Flag Identification: Unprofessional behavior, inappropriate content, or
discrepancies in background can be identified early in the process.
3. Engagement and Process Management:
Direct Communication: Platforms enable real-time chat, updates, and
personalized interaction with candidates throughout the hiring process.
Employee Advocacy: Leveraging employees' professional networks boosts
the reach and authenticity of job postings and employer branding.
Analytics: Social media provides data and insights that help HR refine
recruitment strategies and measure the effectiveness of their outreach.
Advantages for HR
Access to a Larger, More Diverse Talent Pool: Social media breaks
geographical and demographic barriers, connecting employers with
candidates worldwide.
Reduced Time and Cost for Sourcing: Posting on social platforms is often
faster and more cost-effective than traditional methods like job fairs or
agencies.
Better Insight into Candidate's Real-World Persona: HR gains a more holistic
view of the candidate beyond the formal resume, revealing interests, values,
and interpersonal style.
Challenges and Risks
Chapter 6 12
Bias: Access to personal information (race, age, religion, marital status) can
lead to unconscious bias, intentionally or unintentionally influencing hiring
decisions.
Legal Issues: Using irrelevant or protected characteristics as a basis for
rejection creates significant legal liability under EEO laws.
Privacy Concerns: Many candidates find employer screening of personal
social media accounts unethical, which can damage the company's reputation
and employer brand.
Best Practices for Using Social Media in Selection
Use Platforms Appropriately: Primarily use LinkedIn for professional roles and
professional vetting. Other platforms may be used for broader reach but with
caution.
Focus on Job-Relevant Information: Only seek and consider information
directly related to the candidate's qualifications, skills, and professional
behavior. Avoid personal details that could lead to bias.
Be Transparent: Clearly communicate to candidates how social media will be
used in the selection process, preferably in the job posting or during initial
communication.
Maintain Consistency: Apply the same social media screening practices to all
candidates to avoid claims of discriminatory treatment.
Chapter 6 13