0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views5 pages

References

The document is a comprehensive list of references related to building construction, seismic design, and earthquake engineering, including codes, guidelines, and research studies. It covers various aspects of structural safety, performance-based design, and seismic hazard assessment, particularly in the context of the Philippines. The sources range from government publications to academic papers and industry standards.

Uploaded by

stnorcube
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views5 pages

References

The document is a comprehensive list of references related to building construction, seismic design, and earthquake engineering, including codes, guidelines, and research studies. It covers various aspects of structural safety, performance-based design, and seismic hazard assessment, particularly in the context of the Philippines. The sources range from government publications to academic papers and industry standards.

Uploaded by

stnorcube
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2019). Building. Encyclopaedia Britannica.

[Link]
National Building Code of the Philippines. (2015). Presidential Decree No. 1096: National
Building Code of the Philippines. Department of Public Works and Highways.
Bolt, & A, B. (2025, October 3). Earthquake | Definition, Causes, Effects, & facts. Encyclopedia
Britannica. [Link]
Peñarubia, M. G., Lagmay, A. M. F., & Eco, R. (2020). Seismic hazard analysis model for the
Philippines. geoDRR. Retrieved October 7, 2025, from
[Link]
Khamkar, S. D. K., & Pujari, A. B. P. (2022). Performance Based Approach for Seismic Design
of Tall Building Diaphragms. International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology (IRJET), 09(05), 2395–0056.
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2022). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for
buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-05). ASCE.
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. (2015). National structural code of the
Philippines, volume 1: Buildings, towers, and other vertical structures (7th ed.). ASEP.
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. (1997). Uniform building code for
building structures (UBC-97). ASEP.
Dusenberry, D. O. (2019, February). Performance-based design is the future. Civil Engineering
Magazine, 89(2). American Society of Civil Engineers.
Golesorkhi, R., Joseph, L., Klemencic, R., Shook, D. & Viise, J. (2017). Performance-Based
Seismic Design for Tall Buildings: An output of the CTBUH Performance-Based Seismic
Design Working Group. Chicago: Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat.
Ballagh, R. H. (2024). Time history analysis is easy, and you should do it: Here's how. Paper
presented at the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Conference.
Lagaros, N. D., Mitropoulou, C. C., & Papadrakakis, M. (2013). Time history seismic analysis.
In Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering (pp. 1–20). Springer.
[Link]
Orallo, R. (2011). Disaster risk profile of the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Environmental
Science, 10(1), 45–52.
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS). (2025). Seismic Hazard
Assessment Program. Department of Science and Technology.
[Link]
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC). (2013, 2022). Bohol
and Abra Earthquake Situation Report [Link]
Narafu, T., Yanev, P., & Yanev, B. (2015). Post-earthquake damage assessment in Bohol,
Philippines. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) Reconnaissance Report.
[Link]
PAGASA. (2013, 2025). Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) Report. Philippine Atmospheric,
Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration. [Link]
Build Change. (2014). Post-disaster damage assessment: Typhoon Yolanda and Bohol
Earthquake. Build Change Philippines Report. [Link]
Perez, R. T., Santos, J. M., & Dela Cruz, M. A. (2023). Structural damage assessment of the
2022 Abra Earthquake. Journal of Philippine Infrastructure and Disaster Studies, 5(1),
22–34.
Department of Science and Technology - Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology.
(2024). Seismic Hazard Atlas for the Design Earthquake of the Philippines: Maximum
Considered Earthquake (MCE) Ground Motion Maps for Spectral Design Criteria. In
[Link] (ISBN: 978-621-8345-15-7). DOST-PHIVOLCS.
Retrieved December 6, 2025, from
[Link]
Dempsey, M. (2025, July 15). Seismic Hazard assessment: methodologies, risk factors, and
mitigation approaches - [Link]. WordPress.
[Link]
ion-approaches/
Lagmay, A. M. F., Ramos, E. G., & Soria, J. L. A. (2005). Hazard mapping of the Philippine
Fault Zone and its implications for seismic risk reduction. Philippine Journal of Science,
134(2), 133–145.
Naiel, M. A., Cruz, J. P., & Villanueva, R. G. (2024). Fragility modeling and seismic risk
assessment of mid-rise buildings in Metro Manila. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering,
25(2), 115–130.
Ali, N., Aggarwal, S., Khursheed, S., & Paul, V. K. (2025). Earthquake resilient construction
techniques in Mid-Rise building. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear
Research). [Link]
Tingatinga, A., Cruz, M. A., & Villanueva, R. G. (2019). Urban seismic vulnerability and
building performance in Metro Manila. Philippine Journal of Civil Engineering, 44(3),
215–228.
University of Memphis. (2013). How earthquakes affect buildings. Center for Earthquake
Research and Information. [Link]
Rupakhety, R., & Gautam, D. (2024). Seismic behavior of mid-rise buildings under cyclic
ground motion. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 18(2),
89–104.
Ozmen HB, Inel M, Demirtas Y. Evaluation of different cases of soft story formation for midrise
RC buildings. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater., 2020; 6(3): 229-240.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the
seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356). Washington, DC: FEMA.
Nastri, E., & Pisapia, A. (2025). Performance-Based seismic design. Applied Sciences, 15(5),
2254. [Link]
Krawinkler, H., Krawinkler, Luth and Associates, & Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. (1998). Pros and
cons analysis of seismic evaluation of a pushover performance. In Engineering Structures
(Vols. 20–20, Issue Nos 4-6, pp. 452–464). Elsevier Science Ltd.
[Link]
Moehle, P. (2015). Seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings. New York : McGraw-Hill
Education. [Link]
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). (2010). Guidelines for
performance-based seismic design of tall buildings. Berkeley, CA: University of
California.
Moehle, J., & Deierlein, G. G. (2004). A framework methodology for performance-based
earthquake engineering. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No.
679
Priestley, M. J. N. (2000). Performance-Based Seismic Design. Bulletin of the New Zealand
Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(3), 325–346.
[Link]
Deierlein, G. G. (2011). Performance-based design for earthquake engineering. In Proceedings of
the 9th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand: New
Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Hamburger, R. O. (2007). Development of Next-Generation Procedures for Performance-Based
Earthquake Engineering. In Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc., Ninth Canadian
Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
[Link]
Kasai, K., et al. (2013). Performance-based seismic design of high-rise buildings in Japan.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(2), 271–289
Elnashai, A. S., & Di Sarno, L. (2008). Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering.
[Link]
Aurelio, R., & et al. (2019). Seismic performance assessment of mid-rise RC buildings in the
Philippines. Philippine Engineering Journal, 42(2), 45–62.
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2023). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing
buildings. [Link]
Ghasemi, S. H., Lee, J. Y., & Nowak, A. S. (2024). A new generation of DCR by introducing
reliability-survivability safety measure. Structures, 62, 106154.
[Link]
Gutierrez-Lopez, A., Valenzuela-Beltran, F., Leal-Graciano, J. M., & Bojorquez, J. (2025).
Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of a representative Soft-First-Story
building in an Earthquake-Prone region. CivilEng, 6(4), 64.
[Link]
Cheng, S., He, H., Guo, H., & Gao, X. (2024). Performance enhancement analysis of
seismic-damaged RC columns repaired with fiber-reinforced concrete and carbon textile.
Journal of Building Engineering, 98, 111431. [Link]
Folić, R. (2015, April 24). Performance-based seismic design of concrete buildings structures –
bases*.Proceedings of the 41st Anniversary of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, Subotica,
Serbia. [Link]
Chopra, K. (2017). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering
(5th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
[Link]
CAAJ&redir_esc=y
Chopra, A. K., & McKenna, F. (2011). Modeling and analysis of structural systems for
earthquake engineering. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(12),
1197–1217. [Link]
Grutas, R. (2024, November 21). DOST-PHIVOLCS TO LAUNCH SEISMIC HAZARD ATLAS
FOR THE DESIGN EARTHQUAKE OF THE PHILIPPINES [Press release].
[Link]
tlas-for-the-design-earthquake-of-the-philippines/
Computers and Structures Inc. (2023). ETABS: Integrated analysis, design, and drafting of
building systems. Computers and Structures Inc. Retrieved December 6, 2025, from
[Link]
Gagalang, N. J. L. A., & Arcigal, N. R. J. (2021). HAND CALCULATION AND EXTENDED
THREE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS (ETABS) SOFTWARE: AN
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR a THREE (3) STORY BUILDINGS. EPRA
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 57–59.
[Link]
Seismosoft. (2023). Company information. Seismosoft. Retrieved December 6, 2025, from
[Link]
Vielma-Quintero, J. C., Carvallo, J., & Vielma, J. C. (2023). Comparative assessment of
Performance-Based Design Methodologies applied to a R.C. Shear-Wall building. In
Asimina Athanatopoulou-Kyriakou & Konstantinos Kostinakis (Eds.), Buildings (Vol. 13,
p. 1492). [Link]
thestructuralworld. (2018, February 9). Seismic Analysis: UBC-97 Code Provisions. The
Structural World. Retrieved October 29, 2025, from
[Link]
Carandang, C. S. L. B., Co, J. J., Patio, R. N., & Quinsaat, N. M. V. (2020). Comparison of
structural designs of a low-rise building using NSCP 2010 versus NSCP 2015. Colegio de
San Juan de Letran Research Manila. [Link]
Kamalakannan, R., Rajkumar, D., & Prakash, R. (2021). Retrofitting of existing structures using
innovative materials and techniques. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 1234–1240.
[Link]
Bedi, R., & Nagpur, A. (2013). Retrofitting techniques for reinforced concrete structures.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(5), 112–117.
Jmartinos. (2024, June 14). ASCE 41-23: Significant updates to seismic evaluation and retrofit of
existing buildings. Seismosoft.
[Link]
of-existing-buildings/
Ghosh, S. K. & American Society of Civil Engineers. (2014). Significant Changes from ASCE
7-05 to ASCE 7-10, Part 1: Seismic Design Provisions. In PCI Journal.
[Link]
changes%20from%20ASCE%207-05%20to%20ASCE%207-10%20part%201%20-%20S
eismic%20design%[Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

NSCP and UBC-97 both provide guidelines for seismic design, with NSCP specifically tailored for local conditions and seismic risks in the Philippines . UBC-97, on the other hand, is an international model code that offers a broad set of seismic design provisions applicable globally. The NSCP incorporates elements from UBC-97 while including specific considerations for local seismicity and building practices, allowing engineers to design safer and more resilient structures in earthquake-prone regions like the Philippines .

The advantages of performance-based seismic design for tall buildings in Japan include precise targeting of building performance levels, potentially leading to cost savings and optimization of structural elements . This methodology allows for innovative design solutions tailored to complex seismic environments. However, challenges include the need for advanced analytical and computational capabilities, as well as a comprehensive understanding of seismic behavior and local geological conditions to ensure accurate modeling .

Performance-based seismic design focuses on achieving specific building performance objectives using detailed nonlinear analyses rather than following prescriptive code requirements . Unlike traditional methods, which rely on linear-elastic assumptions, performance-based design evaluates building responses under actual earthquake scenarios. This approach allows for more tailored solutions and improved performance predictions for high-rise buildings, offering enhanced safety margins and optimization of materials and costs .

Time history analysis is considered superior to static analysis because it simulates the building's dynamic response to actual or synthetic ground motion records, providing a more comprehensive assessment of seismic performance . By capturing the temporal variation of loads and nonlinear behavior of structures, time history analysis yields detailed insights into potential failure mechanisms under seismic events, thereby allowing for more accurate predictions of building performance and safety .

The post-earthquake damage assessment of the Bohol earthquake highlights the importance of accurate pre-disaster risk assessments and the need for comprehensive post-disaster evaluations to guide rebuilding efforts . Lessons drawn include the necessity for robust construction practices, improved building codes, and enhanced public awareness about structural safety . Subsequent disaster response improvements should focus on faster mobilization of resources, integrated risk management approaches, and the use of advanced technologies in damage assessment and reconstruction planning .

Fragility models contribute to seismic risk assessment by quantifying the probability of building damage given a specific seismic intensity, helping urban planners and engineers identify vulnerable structures and prioritize retrofitting efforts in urban areas like Metro Manila . These models utilize statistical distributions to predict damage states across different building classes. However, their limitations include uncertainties in model parameters, reliance on accurate data inputs, and potential oversimplifications that may not fully capture real-world complexities .

The National Building Code of the Philippines establishes minimum safety standards for construction, incorporating provisions for earthquake-resistant design to account for local seismic risks . By mandating compliance with these standards, the code plays a crucial role in disaster risk reduction, minimizing potential building damage and loss of life during earthquakes . It ensures that structures are built to withstand seismic forces, contributing significantly to the overall resilience of communities against such disasters .

Key factors contributing to seismic vulnerability in Metro Manila's mid-rise buildings include inadequate structural designs, poor construction materials, and insufficient enforcement of building codes . To mitigate these vulnerabilities, implementation of earthquake-resilient construction techniques such as the use of reinforced concrete and appropriate seismic retrofitting methods is essential . Furthermore, adherence to updated and rigorous building codes, regular structural assessments, and performance-based seismic design principles can significantly enhance resilience .

Hazard mapping of the Philippine Fault Zone allows for targeted seismic risk reduction strategies by identifying high-risk areas and informing land-use planning and building code enforcement . By providing detailed data on fault locations and potential seismic hazards, the mapping enables authorities and developers to implement appropriate mitigation measures, such as stricter construction regulations and emergency preparedness plans, significantly reducing the potential impacts of earthquakes in these regions .

Seismic retrofitting techniques, such as adding shear walls, base isolators, and fiber-reinforced concrete, have proven effective in enhancing the structural resilience of existing reinforced concrete buildings by increasing their capacity to withstand seismic forces . These methods improve strength, ductility, and energy dissipation of buildings, effectively reducing the risk of catastrophic collapse during earthquakes . Challenges include cost considerations and technical complexities involved in retrofitting older structures, but the overall benefits in terms of safety and longevity are significant .

You might also like