0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views3 pages

Case Study

CHED Memorandum Order No. 75, series of 2017, introduces a transformative shift in teacher education in the Philippines from an input-based to an outcomes-based education model. This change emphasizes competencies and skills that future teachers must demonstrate, aligning education with national and global standards while fostering learner-centered instruction. The reform aims to produce reflective practitioners capable of adapting to diverse learning environments and responding to educational changes.

Uploaded by

dudasjofrance57
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views3 pages

Case Study

CHED Memorandum Order No. 75, series of 2017, introduces a transformative shift in teacher education in the Philippines from an input-based to an outcomes-based education model. This change emphasizes competencies and skills that future teachers must demonstrate, aligning education with national and global standards while fostering learner-centered instruction. The reform aims to produce reflective practitioners capable of adapting to diverse learning environments and responding to educational changes.

Uploaded by

dudasjofrance57
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1

CHED MEMORANDUM ORDER No. 75 Series of 2017.

I. INTRODUCTION.

II. KEY CONCEPT.

III. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION.

The CHED Memorandum Order (CMO) No. 75, series of 2017, represents a

significant transformation in the philosophy and structure of teacher education in the

Philippines. This shift from a traditional, input-based curriculum to a learner-

centered, outcomes-based education (OBE) model marks a move away from

simply focusing on what teachers teach toward emphasizing what students are able

to do after instruction.

In an input-based model, the emphasis was primarily on the completion of

prescribed courses, hours, and academic requirements. Success was often

measured by the quantity of instruction delivered rather than the quality of learning

achieved. Teachers were viewed as the central source of knowledge, and students

were passive recipients of information. This system, while structured, limited the

development of critical and creative thinking skills and often failed to prepare

graduates for the complex realities of the modern classroom.


In contrast, the outcomes-based approach promoted by CMO No. 75

focuses on the competencies, skills, and attitudes that future teachers must

demonstrate. It aligns teacher education with national and global standards, ensuring

that BSEd graduates possess not only theoretical knowledge but also the ability to

apply it effectively in diverse learning environments. The curriculum now centers on

producing teachers who can design learner-centered instruction, use evidence-

based assessment strategies, and integrate technology and inclusive practices

into teaching.

This paradigm shift also redefines the role of the teacher—from being a mere

transmitter of knowledge to an active facilitator of learning. Teachers are

expected to guide students in constructing their own understanding, adapt to various

learning styles, and respond to the cultural and contextual differences within

classrooms. By focusing on learning outcomes, the CMO ensures that graduates are

reflective practitioners, capable of continuous professional growth and responsive

to educational change.

This change reflects a broader movement toward 21st-century education,

where adaptability, innovation, and learner empowerment are prioritized. It positions

teacher education as a dynamic process—one that continuously evolves to meet the

demands of globalization, technological advancement, and inclusive education. In

essence, CMO No. 75 s. 2017 not only reforms what future teachers learn but also

reshapes how they learn and teach, ensuring that the Philippine education system
3

produces educators who can meaningfully influence and transform learning

communities.

The (CMO) emphasizes a dynamic and outcome-oriented teacher education

system. Curricular flexibility allows HEIs to design responsive programs that reflect

their unique missions and local contexts. Alignment with national frameworks

such as PPST, PQF, and K–12 ensures coherence and progression within the overall

education system. Professional competence is developed through a

comprehensive curriculum that integrates ICT, research, ethics, and cultural

sensitivity, preparing teachers for diverse learning environments. Finally, quality

assurance mechanisms like the CHED OBE Handbook and ISA framework

institutionalize accountability and foster continuous improvement in teacher

education.

IV. CONCLUSION.

You might also like