Property Notes
Property Notes
Classification of Property
• Classify property as immovable or movable under Art. 415 with controlling tests.
• Distinguish “reclassification” from “conversion.”
• Apply the tests for machinery/against treating machinery as immovable.
Accession
• Apply the rules on accession discreta and continua (industrial and natural, civil).
• Resolve builder-planter-sower cases in good faith and bad faith (Arts. 448– 456).
• Determine rights over alluvium and avulsion.
Possession
• Distinguish possession from ownership and the degrees of possession.
• Apply rules on acquisitive and extinctive prescription over immovables.
1
Concept of Property and Ownership
1. Definition of Property
Note: While Articles 414–417 focus on ownership as a legal right, these attributes show
that ownership is not just possession, but control, enjoyment, and disposition of the
property.
2
3. Actions in Property Litigation
Classification of Property
○ Immovable: Land itself, buildings, trees, plants, or anything attached to the soil.
○ Movable: Property that can be physically moved without damage.
○ Example: A house built on land → immovable; a chair inside the house → movable.
○ Things attached to the land or building in a permanent way, which if removed would
cause damage → immovable.
○ Example: Doors, windows, plumbing fixtures embedded in the building.
3
2. Reclassification vs. Conversion
● Reclassification
● Conversion
○ Change in the use or actual nature of the property through human act.
○ Example: A rice field becomes a parking lot; the land is now converted to commercial
use.
Tip:
2. By Incorporation/Annexation
4
Public Dominion vs. Patrimonial Property
B. Patrimonial Property
● Property of the State that may be owned, used, and disposed of like private property.
● Can be sold, leased, mortgaged, or taxed.
● Examples:
○ Government-owned lands not used for public service, surplus lands, buildings leased
to private individuals.
Alienable No Yes
Prescriptible No Yes
Examples Highways, plazas, rivers Surplus lands, gov’t buildings for lease
Example: A road cannot be sold to a private developer; it must remain for public use.
5
3. Conversion into Patrimonial Property
1. By law or legal act – The legislature or competent authority may declare a public property
surplus or no longer needed for public use.
○ Example: A riverbed or public land no longer needed for navigation or public service.
2. By cessation of public purpose – When the property is no longer necessary for public use, it
may be administered like private property.
○ Example: Old government buildings converted into offices for lease.
Important Rule:
● Conversion requires a formal act or law, not just mere neglect or non-use.
Tip to remember:
● Public dominion → must serve the public → inalienable & imprescriptible
● Patrimonial → disposable like private property → can be sold, leased, or mortgaged
● Conversion happens only when the public use purpose ends by law.
Accession
1. Definition of Accession
Accession is the right of an owner of a principal thing to own everything that is produced by, united
with, or incorporated into it, whether naturally or artificially.
Subtypes:
6
● Civil Accession
General Rule: The owner of the principal thing generally owns the accessory thing (accessory follows
the principal).
Builder/Planter/Sower Entitled to reimbursement for May lose the thing and have
materials and labor if improvements no reimbursement
were made in good faith
Examples:
● Good faith: A person builds a house on another’s land, believing it is theirs → they may
recover the value of materials if the owner keeps the house.
● Bad faith: A person knowingly builds on someone else’s land → owner keeps the house
without obligation to reimburse.
Key Tip: Accessory generally follows the principal. But good faith may give the builder or
planter some compensation.
● Definition: Gradual and imperceptible increase of land along riverbanks or shores due to
deposits of soil or sand.
● Rule: Owner of the land owns the newly formed land automatically.
● Example: River gradually deposits soil along your property → you own it.
7
B. Avulsion (Sudden Accretion)
● Definition: Sudden and perceptible addition of land or change in the river’s course.
● Rule: The owner of the land retains title to their original property, but the new land may
belong to the river or former owner.
● Example: Flood causes sudden deposit of sand on your land → owner may or may not acquire
ownership depending on law.
Tip to remember:
Quieting of Title
Action to Quiet Title To establish ownership and Clears all clouds affecting
remove all doubts about title to title; ownership confirmed
property
Action to Remove Cloud To remove a specific Focuses only on the cloud, not
encumbrance or claim affecting ownership in general
the title
2. Prescription Rules
● Imprescriptible:
○ Quieting of title is generally not subject to prescription if based on ownership in good
faith and registered title.
● Prescriptive:
○ If based on unregistered ownership or adverse possession, ordinary prescription
rules may apply.
8
3. Four Requisites for Quieting of Title (Art. 1004, Civil Code)
1. Legal interest: Plaintiff must have an ownership or claim over the property.
2. Rightful ownership: Ownership must be disputed or threatened.
3. Cloud on title: There must be some encumbrance, adverse claim, or defect affecting title.
4. Absence of other adequate remedy: No other action is available to protect ownership.
Example: Your title to a lot is questioned by a neighbor claiming it’s theirs. You file a
quieting of title to remove doubt.
1. Sources of Co-Ownership
● By Law:
○ Inheritance (Art. 484), joint acquisition by spouses, etc.
● By Agreement:
○ Purchase or contract by two or more persons.
2. Essential Characteristics
● Improvements:
○ Co-owner who made useful or necessary improvements may be reimbursed upon
partition or sale.
● Repairs:
○ Each co-owner must contribute proportionally to necessary repairs.
● Partition:
○ Co-owners may demand partition at any time unless otherwise agreed.
○ Partition may be voluntary (mutual agreement) or judicial (court intervention).
● Proper:
○ Property is susceptible of division without material injury.
○ No special conditions restricting partition exist.
● Not Proper:
○ Property is indivisible without destruction or serious depreciation.
○ Example: A single large painting or industrial machinery installed for the business.
Tip to Remember:
9
Possession
Definition Physical control or detention of a thing Legal right to enjoy and dispose of a
with or without intention to own thing fully (Art. 414)
Enforcement Can be protected even if not the owner Can be enforced against anyone who
(e.g., possessory action) violates ownership (in rem)
Example Renting a house → tenant possesses but The landlord owns the house
does not own
Key Point: Possession is a factual relationship with a thing; ownership is a legal right over it.
2. Degrees of Possession
○ Obtained by force.
10
5. Civil Possession
B. Extinctive Prescription
● Rules:
○ Non-claim of ownership for the period prescribed by law may extinguish right to
reclaim.
Key Tip:
11
Usufruct & Easements
1. Usufruct
● Usufruct is a real right by which a person (usufructuary) may enjoy and derive fruits from the
property of another (naked owner) without altering its substance.
A. Distinctions
Right granted Use and enjoy Temporary use in Right to use or restrict use of
another’s property exchange for rent property for certain purpose
Usufructuary:
● Rights:
● Obligations:
○ Preserve property
○ Pay taxes, necessary expenses
○ Return property in original condition (Art. 547–548)
12
Naked Owner:
● Rights:
● Obligations:
Tip: Usufruct is personal right over property; cannot destroy the property’s substance.
2. Easements (Servitudes)
● Easement is a real right by which one land (dominant estate) benefits from another land
(servient estate) without possessing it.
A. Classification of Easements
13
Positive Allows certain act on neighbor’s land Right-of-way
● Creation:
● Extinguishment:
Example:
● Lot B is surrounded by private properties → Lot B owner may claim right-of-way over
neighboring Lot A, paying indemnity.
Tip to remember:
14
Co-Ownership Codal
CO-OWNERSHIP — GENERAL CONCEPT
Rule / Notes
● Co-ownership exists when ownership of an undivided thing or right belongs to two or more
persons.
● Each co-owner owns an ideal or abstract share, not a specific portion.
● In the absence of a contract or special law, Civil Code rules apply.
Principle
Rule / Notes
Principles
● Equality is presumed
● Equity in benefits and burdens
Rule / Notes
Principles
1
Article 487 — Action in Ejectment
Rule / Notes
Principle
Rule / Notes
Principles
● Contribution is compulsory
● Renunciation must not harm the common interest
Rule / Notes
Principle
● Preservation is favored
● Improvements require collective will
Article 490 Art. 490 is superseded by Condominium Law. Read the Condominium Law.
Rule / Notes
2
● Common parts are maintained pro rata.
● Each owner bears maintenance of his own floor.
Principle
Rule / Notes
Principle
Rule / Notes
Principles
● Democratic control
● Court as protector of minority interests
Rule / Notes
Principle
3
● Freedom to dispose
● Buyer steps into the shoes of the co-owner
TERMINATION OF CO-OWNERSHIP
Rule / Notes
Principles
● Co-ownership is temporary
● Favor partition
Rule / Notes
Principle
Rule / Notes
Principle
Rule / Notes
● Creditors may:
○ Participate in partition
○ Object to partition without their consent
4
● Partition already made cannot be attacked unless:
○ There is fraud
○ There was formal opposition ignored
Principle
Rule / Notes
Principle
● Equitable conversion
EFFECTS OF PARTITION
Rule / Notes
Principle
Rule / Notes
● Upon partition:
○ Accounting for benefits
○ Reimbursement for expenses
○ Liability for damages due to negligence or fraud
Principle
5
Article 501 — Warranty After Partition
Rule / Notes
● Co-owners warrant:
○ Title
○ Quality of the portions assigned
● Similar to warranty among sellers.
Principle
6
Possession Codal
ACQUISITION OF POSSESSION
👉 Key idea: Possession is both fact and intent, not just physical holding.
Article 532 – Who may acquire possession
📌 If acquired by a stranger:
● Possession is effective only after ratification
● Without prejudice to negotiorum gestio (helping someone’s affairs without permission, but in
good faith)
1
Article 536 – Possession cannot be acquired by force
👉 Tolerance ≠ possession
Article 538 – Preference in possession
If disputed:
EFFECTS OF POSSESSION
Only possession in the concept of owner can ripen into ownership (prescription).
2
Article 542 – Possession of movables
● Entitled to:
○ Reimbursement for cultivation
○ Share in net harvest (proportionate)
● Owner may allow possessor to finish cultivation as indemnity
● If no damage
● Unless owner opts to pay
● Not refundable
● May be removed if no injury
● Unless successor pays value
3
Article 549 – Possessor in bad faith
Improvements due to nature or time belong to the person who recovers possession.
● Good faith: not liable but liable only if fraudulent or negligent after summons
● Bad faith: liable in all cases, even fortuitous events
1. Abandonment
2. Transfer
3. Destruction or loss
4. Possession by another for more than one year
Possession not lost for prescription unless registered under land laws.
4
Article 558 – Mere holder
● Authorized, or
● Ratified
5
KEYPOINTS: Quieting, Co-ownership,
Possession
Quieting of Title
If you are actually occupying and continuously possessing the land, the law allows you to go
to court at any time to remove any cloud or doubt over your ownership. Even if many years have
passed, your right to file an action to quiet title does not expire.
If plaintiff is not in possession. A void instrument produces no legal effect from the beginning. Action
is still imprescriptible. The law does not protect something that never had legal existence.
Voidable or valid instruments produce legal effects until annulled. Action prescribes (usually 10
years) because they have legal effect, the law requires the owner to act within a period.
When a buyer (vendee) of an immovable property has taken possession of the land, the sale
is deemed consummated by the delivery of the object, and ownership has been transferred. A
subsequent action filed by the buyer to compel the seller (vendor) to execute the formal deed of
conveyance (which is ordinarily called "Specific Performance") is not an action to enforce a contract.
Instead, the action is, in effect, one to quiet title (or remove a cloud upon the title) because its primary
objective is to clear the cloud cast upon the buyer’s ownership by the seller’s refusal to recognize the
sale and formalize the title.
If you are in possession, it is imprescriptible. This is because you are presumed to be the owner. The
ownership is imprescriptible and not the action to quiet title.
Acts of administration and possession by a co-owner do not constitute an adverse claim nor
create a cloud on title that may be the subject of an action for quieting of title, absent a clear
repudiation of the co-ownership, disputes between them are resolved through partition and
accounting, not quieting of title.
Under Articles 494 and 498 of the Civil Code, no co-owner is obliged to remain in
co-ownership, and any co-owner may demand partition of the property. When the property is
indivisible or the co-owners cannot agree on its allotment, it may be sold and the proceeds divided
among them.
A sale by a co-owner of a definite portion of co-owned property is valid to the extent of his
ideal share, and long, uninterrupted possession coupled with fraud in registration warrants
reconveyance despite a Torrens title. Estoppel by deed binds not only the party but also his heirs.
Accion Interdictal: Recovery of physical possession (de facto); jurisdiction is with MTC (filed
within 1 year), which is provisional only
1
Accion Publiciana: Recovery of better right of possession (de jure); jurisdiction is with
RTC/MTC (based on the assessed value), which is provisional only
Accion Reivindicatoria: Recovery of ownership; jurisdiction is with RTC/MTC (based on the
assessed value); which is final and conclusive
An action to quiet title is filed to remove a cloud or doubt over ownership of real property and the
issue involved is title or ownership rather than possession.
Accion reivindicatoria is an action to recover both ownership and possession of real property and is
filed when the plaintiff is the owner but is not in possession of the property.
Accion publiciana is an action to recover the right to possess real property when dispossession has
lasted for more than one year and ownership is not the main issue.
Accion interdictal is an action to recover physical or material possession of property and must be
filed within one year from dispossession and it includes forcible entry and unlawful detainer.
Ejectment is the summary action covering forcible entry and unlawful detainer and is used to recover
physical possession of property within one year from dispossession.
In practice, ejectment cases are accion interdictal actions, and ejectment specifically refers to the
two kinds of accion interdictal, namely forcible entry and unlawful detainer. Both must be filed within
one year from dispossession, both involve only physical possession and not ownership, and both are
filed before the Municipal Trial Court through a summary proceeding.
In forcible entry cases, the sole issue is prior physical possession (possession de facto);
ownership, title, or the existence of a prior unlawful detainer judgment is immaterial, and even the
rightful owner or a party with a favorable ejectment judgment may not resort to force to recover
possession, but must enforce such judgment only through lawful judicial processes.
Unlawful detainer is unlawful retention of property after lawful possession has expired. One
year from the time of demand. No demand is equal to tolerance.
Quieting of title and accion reivindicatoria can go together in filing such action.
Quieting of title and cancellation of torrens title cannot be filed together. It needs to have a separate
special proceeding.
This means that a marriage that is void from the very beginning is treated as if it never
existed in the eyes of the law. Because it is void ab initio, it does not create valid property relations,
such as conjugal or absolute community property, for purposes of criminal liability.
In simple terms, you cannot use property consequences like sharing of property or cohabitation to
prove that a valid marriage existed. Since there was no legally subsisting marriage, those civil or
property arrangements cannot be relied upon to establish the crime of bigamy, which requires proof
of a valid and existing first marriage.
2
Possession in good faith ends when the possessor becomes aware that they hold the
property improperly or wrongfully.
Acts of alienation refer to acts by which a person transfers or disposes of his rights or
ownership over property in favor of another.
In simple terms, these are acts that remove the property from the owner and place it in someone
else’s hands.
A buyer or assignee of a condominium unit who has not fully paid the purchase price does
not yet acquire ownership of the unit, nor the corresponding shares or membership in the
condominium corporation. Ownership transfers only upon full payment, as expressly required by the
Condominium Act, the Master Deed, and the Contract to Buy and Sell.
An initially invalid sale of a specific portion of a property can be validated once the seller
acquires full ownership, and that the buyer’s ownership is limited to the segregated portion actually
sold..
The doctrine of constructive possession is a principle that says a person can be considered
in possession of a property even if he is not physically occupying it, as long as he has the intent and
the legal means to control it.
Mapping contracts refer to agreements entered into by the government with private entities or
contractors for the preparation of maps, usually for general reference or planning purposes.
Cadastral surveys are official land surveys conducted by the government to identify, define, and
determine the boundaries and ownership of land parcels.
A person who occupies land without title, consent, or legal basis acquires no ownership or
legal right over it, and their possession, even if long continued, does not prevent the lawful owner from
reclaiming the property. Such a person’s continued occupation is tolerated at most and becomes
unlawful upon demand to vacate, making ejectment the proper remedy.
Possession, no matter how long, cannot defeat ownership evidenced by a Torrens title. A
possessor’s good faith ends upon judicial notice of the owner’s adverse claim, after which liability for
fruits attaches under Article 549 of the Civil Code.
● It is executed in writing (preferably public instrument) specifying the debt, the pledge, and the
terms (Art. 1857, Civil Code), and
● The pledged property is delivered to a third person (depositary) or the pledgee, or
symbolically delivered (e.g., keys to the warehouse), even if the pledgor remains the nominal
owner.
3
The possession of movable property acquired in good faith is equivalent to a title. One who has lost
any movable or has been unlawfully deprived thereof may recover it from the person in possession,
but this "unlawful deprivation" refers to cases like theft or robbery.
A possessor in good faith—one who is unaware of any flaw in his title or in the manner of
acquisition—may lawfully enjoy the fruits of mortgaged improvements and is entitled to
indemnification for such improvements, even if certain conditions of the contract are later found
illegal.
Ownership rights prevail over good faith possession when property is unlawfully taken. The
right of the owner to recover personal property acquired in good faith by another, is based on his
being dispossessed without his consent.
In legal disputes where evidence is contradictory and leaves the judge in doubt, the general
principle of law is that the condition of the possessor is the better one (In dubio pro possessore).
Since Lizares was the one in physical control of the land, the burden was on the plaintiffs to prove a
superior right, which they failed to do.
Under Art. 448, this is a critical rule in property law. If you occupy land and treat it as your own (paying
taxes, farming it, etc.), the law presumes you have a legal right to be there. You do not have to "prove"
your title to every person who asks; instead, the person challenging you must "prove" that your title is
invalid.
Acquisitive prescription
Acquisitive prescription means acquiring ownership because you have possessed the property for a
long time in the manner required by law.
- Occupation/seizure
- By Law
- Donation
- Tratiton/ Delivery
- Intellectual Creation
- Prescription
- Succession
● Requires:
○ Good faith
○ Just title
● Period:
○ 10 years (immovables)
● Legal basis: Art. 1134
● Requires:
○ No good faith required
○ No just title required
● Period:
○ 30 years (immovables)
● Legal basis: Art. 1137
4
CONDOMINIUM ACT
THE CONDOMINIUM ACT
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 4726 – THE CONDOMINIUM ACT (June 18, 1966)
● Defines condominium
● Establishes requirements for its creation
● Governs the rights, duties, and incidents of condominium ownership
I. Short Title
1. Condominium =
Requirements:
1
THE CONDOMINIUM ACT
2. Excluded from Unit – bearing walls, columns, foundations, roofs, lobbies, stairways, elevators,
utility installations
3. Appurtenant Easements – exclusive air space, ingress/egress through common areas
● Remain undivided
● Provides:
2
THE CONDOMINIUM ACT
● Condominium Corporation:
● Determines:
3
THE CONDOMINIUM ACT
7. Assessments are liens on the unit; labor/materials for common areas → collective
responsibility
4
Doctrine of the cases
Quieting & Co-ownership 28 cases – Doctrine List
1. Heirs of Olviga v. CA (1993): An action to quiet title or reconvey property is imprescriptible when
the claimant is in actual possession; Torrens title does not protect against fraud.
2. Pingol v. CA (1993): Ownership transfers upon delivery; a contract labeled as absolute sale is
effective if no reservation exists; quieting of title is imprescriptible during possession.
3. Pardell v. Bartolome (1912): Possession by one co-owner is presumed for all; prescription does not
run without clear repudiation.
4. Aguilar v. CA (2003): Nemo dat quod non habet – one cannot sell what one does not own.
5. Spouses Del Campo v. CA (2001): A co-owner may sell only his undivided share; long possession
may result in implied or de facto partition.
6. Cullado v. Gutierrez (2019): The earlier Torrens title issued in good faith prevails; subsequent titles
are void.
7. Titong v. CA: Quieting of title applies only when an instrument clouds ownership; boundary
disputes require real actions.
8. Spouses Portic v. Cristobal (2005): Tax declarations alone are insufficient to establish ownership.
9. Pulido v. People (2021): Claims of ownership must be supported by lawful title; mere assertion is
not enough.
10. Heirs of Proceso Bautista v. Sps. Barza (1992): Rights to public land depend on legal release;
prior occupation alone does not confer ownership.
11. Serman Cooperative v. Montarde (2020): Substance over form controls employment and
possessory relationships; documentation alone is insufficient.
12. Abobon v. Abobon (2012): Co-ownership continues until partition; exclusive possession does not
extinguish others’ rights.
13. Punzalan v. Boon Liat: Ownership passes only if the seller possessed the property; nemo dat quod
non habet.
14. Gatchalian v. CIR: Ownership transfers upon delivery and registration, not mere execution of a
deed.
15. Diversified Credit Corp. v. Rosado: In a contract to sell, ownership remains with seller until full
payment; possession does not confer ownership.
16. Melencio v. Dy Tiao Lay: Ownership prevails over possession; partial consent or ratification by
co-owners cannot transfer full ownership.
17. Siari Valley Estates v. Lucasan (1955): Possessory trust or management does not transfer
ownership; wrongful disposition is actionable.
18. Twin Towers Condominium Corp. v. CA (2003): Ownership of condominium units and corporate
rights vest only upon full payment.
19. Sunset View Condominium v. Campos (1981): Same as above; full payment required for
shareholder rights and assessment liability.
20. Estoque v. Pajimula (1955): Legal redemption applies only within scope of undivided interests;
co-owners cannot redeem portions already conveyed.
21. Clarin v. CA (1997): Torrens titles are conclusive except in cases of fraud or error; possession
allows reconveyance.
1
22. Pamplona v. Moreto (1992): Laches or estoppel may prevent co-owners from asserting rights
after long inaction.
23. Carvajal v. CA: Tax declarations are weak evidence; ownership must be proven by title.
24. Oliveras v. Lopez: Sales of portions of undivided property may terminate co-ownership after legal
period; long possession affects dominion.
25. Tuason v. Tuason: Co-ownership rights are protected unless explicitly waived; prescription
requires clear repudiation.
26. Deiparine v. CA: Registered Torrens land is imprescriptible; possession alone does not confer
ownership.
27. Ramirez v. Ramirez: Right to partition among co-owners is imprescriptible.
28. Mariano v. CA (1993): Ownership prevails over mere possession; Torrens title is protected unless
fraud or mistake is shown.
Under Article 422 of the Civil Code, there must be an express declaration by the State (through law or
presidential proclamation) that the property is no longer intended for public use or the development of
national wealth, only then does prescription run. Mere classification of land as A&D does not make it
patrimonial property. In this case, even though the land was A&D in 1982, there was no express
declaration that it was no longer intended for public service. Even if such a declaration existed in
1982, Malabanan only had 16 years of possession (1982 to 1998), which fails the 30-year requirement
for extraordinary prescription.
2. Ventura v. Abuda In relationships where parties are incapacitated to marry, co-ownership over real
property arises only upon proof of actual joint contribution; mere cohabitation does not create
ownership rights.
3. Carbonell v. Court of Appeals Between successive buyers of the same immovable property, the
buyer who is first in time and in good faith acquires a superior right; registration does not validate a
sale made in bad faith.
4. EDCA Publishing v. Santos Ownership of property passes upon delivery when the transaction is
consensual, and possession acquired in good faith is protected by law; recovery must be pursued
through lawful judicial means.
5. Edgar M. Rico v. Castillo In forcible entry cases, the sole issue is prior physical possession, not
ownership or title, and a person unlawfully deprived of possession is entitled to its restoration.
6. Ortiz v. Fuentebella Possession by mere tolerance, no matter how long, is not possession in the
concept of an owner and cannot ripen into ownership or defeat title.
2
7. Ramos v. Director of Lands Open, continuous, exclusive, and notorious possession of land since
time immemorial raises the presumption that the land has become private property and is registrable
under the Torrens system.
8. Director of Lands v. Court of Appeals Alienable and disposable public land does not become
private property by mere lapse of time; ownership may be acquired only in the manner provided by
law.
9. Cachuela v. Francisco Ownership does not justify forcible dispossession; prior peaceful possession
is protected by law regardless of claims of ownership.
10. Cordero v. Cabral Possession in the concept of an owner must be continuous, adverse, and
unequivocal; casual or sporadic acts do not establish ownership.
11. El Banco Español-Filipino v. Peterson Possession exercised openly and in good faith is presumed
to be possession in the concept of an owner and produces legal effects until lawfully defeated.
12. Astudillo v. PHHC Public land cannot be acquired by prescription, and possession thereof,
however long, does not vest ownership absent a valid grant from the State.
13. Yu v. Honrado Good faith is presumed in possession and exists when the possessor is unaware
of defects in his title; such possession is protected until bad faith is proven.
14. Kasilag v. Roque A possessor who relies on a title believed to be valid is a possessor in good faith,
even if the title later turns out to be defective.
15. MWSS v. Court of Appeals Property of the public dominion devoted to public use or service is
outside the commerce of man and cannot be acquired by prescription.
16. Calagan v. Court of First Instance In possessory actions, courts are limited to determining
material possession, and questions of ownership may be considered only provisionally.
17. Dizon v. Suntay Possession as a fact is independent of ownership and cannot be disturbed by
force, even by one who claims to be the owner.
18. Cruz v. Pahati Possession by tolerance negates adverse possession and cannot serve as a basis
for ownership or acquisitive prescription.
19. Heirs of Jumero v. Lizares To confer rights, possession must be open, continuous, exclusive, and
in the concept of an owner; ambiguous or permissive acts do not establish ownership.
3
Usufruct Codal
TITLE VI – USUFRUCT
Core rule:
Usufruct is the right to enjoy the property of another with the obligation of preserving its form and
substance, unless the title constituting it or the law provides otherwise.
Notes
Usufruct involves:
The property must be returned to the owner at the end of the usufruct in substantially the same
condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted.
Exception:
If the law or the constituting title allows it, the usufructuary may be permitted to consume or alter the
property (e.g., in usufruct over consumable things).
1. By law
● Contract
● Donation with reservation or grant of usufruct
3. By prescription
Usufruct may be acquired through continuous and uninterrupted possession for the period required by
law.
1
Article 564 – Extent and Object of Usufruct
4. Conditionally
The usufruct may depend on the happening of a future and uncertain event.
○ Strictly personal
○ Intransmissible
Example: Usufruct over a credit is allowed, but not over rights that are purely personal.
The rights and obligations of the usufructuary are determined in this order:
Principle:
The intention of the person creating the usufruct prevails, subject to legal limitations.
2
Chapter 2: Rights of the Usufructuary (Arts. 566–582)
Hidden treasure:
The usufructuary is considered a stranger, so treasure rules on finders apply, not ownership rights.
Expenses rule:
● Usufructuary need not reimburse owner for prior cultivation expenses at the start
If the usufructuary leased the property and the usufruct ends before the lease:
Civil fruits (rent, interest) accrue day by day and belong to the usufructuary proportionally to the
duration of usufruct.
If usufruct is over:
● Right to receive rent, pension, interest, or securities → each payment is treated as fruit
● Business or industrial profits (with no fixed distribution date) → also treated as fruits
3
Article 571 – Right to Benefits and Accession
But:
If appraised at delivery:
If not appraised:
4
Article 575 – Fruit-Bearing Trees
● Dead trunks
● Trees cut or uprooted by accident
If trees/shrubs are destroyed in large numbers by calamity and replacement is too hard:
In nurseries:
Cannot cut trees except to restore or improve property, and must notify owner first
If property is recovered:
● Useful improvements
● Pleasure improvements
5
As long as form and substance are not altered.
But:
● No right to indemnity
● May remove improvements if no damage is caused
Usufructuary may offset value of improvements against damages he may owe to the owner.
But cannot:
If co-ownership is divided:
6
Chapter 3: Obligations of the Usufructuary (Arts. 583–602)
○ Includes:
■ Appraisal of movables
■ Description of condition of immovables
But:
The income or interest still belongs to the usufructuary.
Alternatively, the owner may keep the property as administrator and deliver net proceeds to the
usufructuary.
7
Article 587 – Exceptions Even Without Security
● Necessary furniture
● Use of a house for the usufructuary and family
● Tools for livelihood
Owner may retain sentimental or artistic movables but must give security for legal interest on their
value.
Once security is given, the usufructuary is entitled to fruits retroactively from the time the usufruct
legally began.
The usufructuary must take care of the property as a good father of a family
(Ordinary diligence).
If the usufructuary leases or transfers his right, he is liable for damage caused by the fault or
negligence of the substitute.
IV. Repairs
8
Article 593 – Extraordinary Repairs
If owner pays:
● No prejudice to usufructuary
● No reduction in value of usufruct
9
Article 600 – Mortgaged Property
10
Chapter 4: Extinguishment of Usufruct (Arts. 603–612)
3. Merger
When ownership and usufruct become vested in the same person.
4. Renunciation
Voluntary waiver by the usufructuary.
6. Termination of the right of the person who constituted the usufruct
Example: A usufruct granted by a lessee ends when the lease ends.
7. Prescription
Loss of the usufruct through non-use for the period required by law.
If only part of the property is lost, the usufruct continues over the remaining part.
● It lasts for the number of years specified, even if the third person dies earlier
● Exception: if the usufruct was clearly granted only because of that person’s existence
11
Article 607 – Destruction of Building
2. Pay usufructuary legal interest on the indemnity for the duration of the usufruct (with
security)
12
Article 612 – Delivery Upon Termination
● Reimbursable taxes
● Extraordinary expenses
After delivery:
It ends by:
Natural causes
● Death
● Expiration of term
● Condition fulfilled
Legal causes
● Merger
● Renunciation
● Prescription
Physical causes
● Total loss
● Expropriation
● Destruction (special rules apply)
Special rules
13
Usufruct Notes
1. Distinction: Usufruct vs Lease vs Easement
Definition Right to use and enjoy Right to use Right to use another’s
another’s property and take property in property in a limited way,
its fruits, without owning it exchange for rent without possession
Duration Usually life or fixed term Fixed term per Usually permanent or by
contract law/agreement
Usufructuary
Rights:
Obligations:
Naked Owner
Rights:
Obligations:
1
3. Extinguishment of Usufruct
4. Classification of Easements
Negative Entitles holder to prevent owner from doing something (e.g., blocking
construction)
Creation:
● By law
● By contract/act of owner
● By necessity or prescription
Extinguishment:
2
6. Compulsory Right-of-Way (Easement)
3
KEYPOINTS: Usufruct and Easment
🌿 USUFRUCT vs 🛣️ EASEMENT (Overview)
👉
Both are real rights over another person’s property
Meaning: You don’t own the property, but you have a legal right to use it in some way.
🌿 USUFRUCT
📌 What is Usufruct?
Usufruct is the right to use another person’s property and enjoy its fruits, with the obligation to
preserve its form and substance.
In simple terms:
“You can use it and benefit from it, but you must not destroy or change what it is.”
👥 Parties Involved
Person Role
Naked owner The real owner, but cannot use/enjoy for now
❌
They cannot:
❌
Destroy it
❌
Change its essential nature
Treat it as their own
🏠 Example
A father gives his daughter usufruct over a house.
1
🧠 Key Idea
👉 Usufruct is about BENEFIT and ENJOYMENT of the whole property It is active use of the property.
🛣️ EASEMENT (Servitude)
📌 What is an Easement?
An easement is a real right over another person’s land, where the owner of one property is allowed to
use or limit the use of another property for the benefit of his own land.
In simple terms:
Examples:
● Right of way
● Right to drain water
● Right to light and view
● Prohibition to build above certain height
2
🔥 MAIN DIFFERENCES (Very Important)
USUFRUCT EASEMENT
Right to use and enjoy fruits of property Right to limited use of another’s land
Covers almost the whole property Covers only a specific burden or use
Can exist over movable or immovable property Generally over immovable property (land)
Involves usufructuary & naked owner Involves dominant & servient estates
Example: Live in house and collect rent Example: Pass through neighbor’s land
🧠 Memory Trick
🌿 Usufruct = Use + Fruits
🛣️ Easement = Passage or Limited Use
3
CLASS DISCUSSIONS
4
Easement
USUFRUCT AND EASEMENTS – STUDY NOTES
I. USUFRUCT
A. Concept of Usufruct
● Usufruct is the right to enjoy the property of another with the obligation of preserving its
form and substance, unless the title or law provides otherwise.
● Ownership is divided into:
○ Usufructuary – has the right to use and enjoy
○ Naked owner – retains ownership but without use and enjoyment
Usufruct Lease
Usufruct Easement
Covers use and enjoyment of the property Limited right over another’s property
1
● Make an inventory of the property
● Give security, unless exempted
● Retains ownership
● Can alienate the property (subject to usufruct)
● Obligated to make extraordinary repairs
● Cannot impair the usufructuary’s rights
F. Extinguishment of Usufruct
A. Concept of Easement
● An easement is a burden imposed upon a property (servient estate) for the benefit of another
property (dominant estate) or a person.
● It is a real right, inseparable from the property.
B. Classification of Easements
2
● Discontinuous – needs human action
Example: right of way
C. Creation of Easements
1. Law
2. Will
3. Contract
4. Prescription (for continuous and apparent easements)
D. Extinguishment of Easements
A. Requisites
3
A compulsory easement of right of way exists when:
B. Important Rule
4
Easement Video
Distinctions Between Easement and Lease
Classifications of Easements
● Continuous: The easement is continuous if its use does not depend upon the acts of man.
● Examples include drainage, abutment of a dam, and light and view.
● Discontinuous: The easement is used at intervals and depends upon human intervention.
● A right-of-way is discontinuous because it depends on a person walking through it.
● Apparent: The easement has an external sign that continually keeps it in view and reveals its
use.
● A permanent road for a right-of-way is an example of an apparent easement.
● Non-apparent: There is no visible indication of the easement's existence.
● The easement of altius non tollendi (prohibiting building beyond a certain height) is
non-apparent because nothing physically indicates the restriction.
● Positive: Imposes an obligation on the owner of the servient estate to allow something to be
done or to do it themselves.
● An opening for light and view on a party wall is a positive easement.
● Negative: Prohibits the owner of the servient estate from doing something they could
otherwise lawfully do.
● Opening a window on your own wall facing another's property becomes a negative easement
once you serve a notarial prohibition preventing them from blocking your light and view.
Acquisition of Easements
● Easements are inseparable from the estate to which they actively or passively belong.
● You cannot alienate an easement separately from its estate.
● Easements can be acquired either by title or by prescription.
● Only continuous and apparent easements may be acquired by prescription.
● Discontinuous or non-apparent easements can only be acquired by title.
● An easement of right-of-way cannot be acquired by prescription because it is always
discontinuous.
● The prescriptive period for acquiring an easement is ten years.
● For positive easements, the prescriptive period begins on the day the dominant estate starts
exercising it upon the servient estate.
● For negative easements, the period begins on the date a notarial prohibition is served on the
owner of the servient estate.
● Under Article 624, if an owner establishes an apparent sign of an easement between two
estates and later alienates one or both without removing the sign or stating otherwise in the
contract, the sign acts as a title allowing the easement to continue.
● Under Article 626, the dominant estate cannot use the easement for movables not originally
contemplated, nor can it be exercised in a manner different from what was established.
1
Rights, Obligations, and Extinguishment
● Expenses for maintaining the easement must be borne by the owner of the dominant estate.
● If the easement's location or manner of use becomes very inconvenient, the owner of the
servient estate may propose a change.
● A permanent merger of the ownership of the dominant and servient estates extinguishes the
easement.
● A temporary merger, such as a sale under pacto de retro, only suspends the easement until
the right of repurchase is exercised.
● Other modes of extinguishment include renunciation by the dominant estate, non-use for ten
years, or the estates falling into a condition where the easement cannot be used.
Relating to Waters
● Lower estates are obliged to receive water flowing naturally from higher estates without
human intervention.
● If human intervention causes excess water to fall to the lower estate, there is an obligation to
pay indemnity.
● Under the Water Code, easements on riverbanks for recreation, navigation, floatage, fishing,
and salvage vary by area: 3 meters in urban areas, 20 meters in agricultural areas, and 40
meters in forest areas.
Right of Way
● You can demand a right-of-way if your estate is surrounded by other immovables and has no
adequate outlet to a public highway.
● Mere inconvenience, such as a muddy road, does not justify demanding a right-of-way if an
outlet already exists.
● For a permanent right-of-way, indemnity equals the value of the land occupied plus
consequential damages.
● The location of the right-of-way considers distance and the amount of damage to the servient
estate, with preference given to minimizing damage.
● If a seller's remaining property becomes isolated after a sale, they can demand a right-of-way
but must pay indemnity.
● If isolation occurs via donation, the donor demands the right-of-way without paying indemnity.
● If a buyer's property is isolated by the seller's lands, the buyer can demand a right-of-way
without paying indemnity.
● If a donee's property is isolated by the donor's lands, the donee must pay indemnity to
demand a right-of-way.
● If a new public road opens, the easement is not automatically terminated.
● Termination is at the option of the servient estate owner, who must then return the original
indemnity.
2
Party Wall
● There is a presumption that a dividing wall between two estates is a party wall, barring
external signs indicating otherwise.
● The servient estate is the wall itself, while the dominant estates are the adjoining owners.
● Both adjoining owners must contribute proportionately to the maintenance of the party wall.
● An adjoining owner can increase the height or width of the wall but must shoulder the
additional maintenance expenses and provide the extra land needed.
● Tall trees must be planted at least 2 meters from the boundary line.
● Small trees must be planted at least 50 centimeters from the boundary line.
● You cannot cut encroaching branches yourself; you must demand your neighbor to cut them.
● You are allowed to independently cut off roots that invade your property.
● Lateral support applies when properties are on the same level, while subjacent support
applies when one property is below another.
Voluntary Easements
3
Easement Codal
📘 TITLE VII – EASEMENTS OR SERVITUDES
🔹 CHAPTER 1: EASEMENTS IN GENERAL
I. Definition (Art. 613–614)
📌 Concept
An easement (servitude) is:
📌 Estates Involved
● Dominant Estate → benefits from the easement
● Servient Estate → burdened by the easement
● A community
● One or more persons (not necessarily another property)
Type Meaning
Type Meaning
1
C. According to Origin (Art. 619)
Type Source
● Acquired by:
○ Title, or
○ Prescription of 10 years
● Continuous nonapparent
● All discontinuous easements
➡ These require title only
2
D. Other Important Rules
○ Deed of recognition
● Apparent sign between estates owned by same person becomes title upon separation (Art.
624)
● Establishment includes all necessary rights (Art. 625)
● Use must be limited to original purpose (Art. 626)
Rights:
Limitations:
Duties:
Rights:
3
🔹 SECTION 4: EXTINGUISHMENT (Art. 631)
Easements are extinguished by:
1. Merger
2. Nonuse for 10 years
○ Discontinuous → from last use
○ Continuous → from contrary act
Additional rules:
Legal easements:
Governed by:
● Special laws
● Civil Code (suppletory)
4
III. Aqueduct & Water Flow (Arts. 642–646)
Right to:
Aqueduct:
II. Rules
Costs:
● Shared proportionally
● Owner may renounce part-ownership (with exceptions)
Raising Wall:
● At own expense
● Others may later acquire part-ownership
5
🔹 SECTION 5: LIGHT AND VIEW
Key Rules (Arts. 667–673)
6
🔹 CHAPTER 3: VOLUNTARY EASEMENTS
Key Rules (Arts. 688–693)
● If usufruct exists:
○ Naked owner may impose easement if usufruct not injured
● On co-owned property:
○ Consent of all co-owners required