0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views7 pages

Chapter 9

Chapter 9 discusses optimization techniques for functions of one variable, focusing on critical points, relative and global extrema, and the use of first and second derivative tests. It explains how to determine maximum and minimum values using necessary and sufficient conditions, including profit maximization in economics. Additionally, the chapter introduces the Taylor series for approximating functions near a point, emphasizing the importance of derivatives in this process.

Uploaded by

jiaayi.lee0316
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views7 pages

Chapter 9

Chapter 9 discusses optimization techniques for functions of one variable, focusing on critical points, relative and global extrema, and the use of first and second derivative tests. It explains how to determine maximum and minimum values using necessary and sufficient conditions, including profit maximization in economics. Additionally, the chapter introduces the Taylor series for approximating functions near a point, emphasizing the importance of derivatives in this process.

Uploaded by

jiaayi.lee0316
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 9: Optimization

1 Optimization of One Variable


1.1 Critical Points
A critical point occurs whenever the first derivative of a function is equal to zero, namely

If y = f (x)
dy
Then = f 0 (x) = 0 is a critical point
dx

A critical point is a “stationary” value of the function (flat spot). A critical point can be:
(a) some maximum point;
(b) some minimum point;
(c) an inflection point, which is neither a max or a min.

1.2 Relative versus Global Points

1.3 The First Derivative Test for a Relative Extremum


f 0 (x) = 0 is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition to establish an extremum.
Test: if, x = x0 , f 0 (x) = 0, then the value of f (x) will be:
(a) Relative Maximum

If f 0 (x) > 0 for x < x0


and f 0 (x) < 0 for x > x0

1
(b) Relative Minimum

If f 0 (x) < 0 for x < x0


and f 0 (x) > 0 for x > x0

(c) Inflection Point

if f 0 (x) has the same sign for x > x0 and x < x0

To find the relative maximum or minimum of a given function, the procedure should be first
to find the stationary values of the function where the condition f 0 (x) = 0 is satisfied, and then
to apply the first-derivative test to determine whether each of the stationary values is a relative
maximum, a relative minimum, or either.
Example: Total Revenue

Let T R = 10q − q 2
dT R
Then M R = = 10 − 2q where M R = 0 at q = 5
dq
AR = T R/q
AR = (10q − q 2 )/q = 10 − q

1.4 Second and Higher Derivatives

Given y = f (x) is a function of x


dy
Then = f 0 (x) is also a function of x
dx
dy
d( dx ) d2 y
We can find the derivative of f 0 (x) : dx = dx2
= f 00 (x) is the second derivative of y = f 00 (x).

1.5 Interpretation of the Second Derivative


For a function y = (x)
f 0 (x) measures the rate of change of the function; f 00 (x) measures the rate of change of the
rate of change of the function.
Evaluated at x = x0
f 0 (x0 ) > 0 means that the value of the function increases;
f 0 (x0 ) < 0 means that the value of the function decreases;
whereas:
f 00 (x0 ) > 0 means that the slope of the curve increases;

2
f 00 (x0 ) < 0 means that the slope of the curve decreases;
Example: t = time

if Distance = f (t)
then Velocity = f 0 (t)
and Acceleration = f 00 (t)

1.5.1 Concavity and Convexity

f 00 < 0 ⇔ Slope of the function always decreases;


f 00 > 0 ⇔ Slope of the function always increases;

1.6 Second Derivative Test


Test:

Given y = f (x) and x = x0


If f 0 (x0 ) = 0

Then: f (x0 ) will be:

(a) a relative maximum if f 00 (x0 ) < 0


(b) a relative minimum if f 00 (x0 ) > 0
(c) either a maximum, or a minimum, or an inflection point if f 00 (x0 ) = 0

If (c) then uses either the first derivative test or some other test.
In economics, the second derivative is sufficient 99% of the time.

1.6.1 Profit Maximization

Suppose a certain producer is a monopolist

Let : R = R(Q) be his total revenue function


and let : C = C(Q) be his total cost function
Therefore, profits (π) are : π(Q) = R(Q) − C(Q)

Necessary condition for profit maximization


= R0 (Q) − C 0 (Q) = 0
dQ
or R0 (Q) = C 0 (Q) M R = M C (Min or Max)

3
Sufficient condition for profit maximization

d2 π
= R00 (Q) − C 00 (Q) < 0
dQ2
or R00 < C 00

The necessary and sufficient check that ensures profit maximization (the steps to obtain profit-
maximizing outcome):
First derivative test (necessary)

π = π(Q) = R(Q) − C(Q)



= π 0 = R0 (Q) − C 0 (Q) = 0
dQ
or R0 (Q) = C 0 (Q) MR=MC

Second derivative test

d2 π
= R00 (Q) − C 00 (Q) < 0
dQ2
or R00 (Q) < C 00 (Q)

Example 1

R(Q) = 1200Q − Q2
C(Q) = Q3 − 61.25Q2 + 1528.5Q + 2000
π(Q) = R(Q) − C(Q)
= −Q3 + 59.25Q2 − 328.5Q − 2000

necessary condition: = −3Q2 + 118.5Q − 328.5 = 0
dQ
2 solutions Q = 3, 36.5
Second derivative test:
(
d2 π >0 Q=3 (relative minimum)
= −6Q + 118 =
dQ2 < 0 Q = 36.5 (relative maximum)

1.7 Nth Derivative Test


Suppose at x = x0 , f 0 (x0 ) = 0 and at x = x0 , f 00 (x0 ) = 0. How to determine the maxi-
mum/minimum for this function?
Test: Keep differentiating until you come to the first NONZERO derivative. This derivative
will be the Nth derivative of f (x0 ). Then f (x0 ) will be

4
(a) a relative maximum if N is even and f N (x0 ) < 0;
(b) a relative minimum if N is even and f N (x0 ) > 0;
(c) an inflection point if N is odd.
Example Evaluate y = (7 − x)4 at x = 7

⇒f 0 (x) = −4(7 − x)3 ⇒ f 0 (7) = 0


⇒f 00 (x) = 12(7 − x)2 ⇒ f 00 (7) = 0
⇒f 3 (x) = −24(7 − x) ⇒ f 3 (7) = 0
⇒f 4 (x) ⇒ f 4 (7) = 24

Since N = 4 is even and f 4 (7) = 24 > 0, then f (7) is a relative minimum.

1.8 Taylor Series


Consider the function
f (x) = a + bx + cx2 + dx3 + ex4

Evaluate f (x) and its derivatives at the point x = 0.

f (x) = a + bx + cx2 + dx3 + ex4 ⇒ f (0) = a


f 0 (x) = b + 2cx + 3dx2 + 4ex3 ⇒ f 0 (0) = b
f 00 (x) = 2c + 6dx + 12ex2 ⇒ f 00 (0) = 2c
f 3 (x) = 6d + 24ex ⇒ f 3 (0) = 6d
f 4 (x) = 24e ⇒ f 4 (0) = 24e

f 00 (0) f 3 (0) f 4 (0)


or a = f (0), b = f 0 (0), c = 2 , d= 6 , e= 24
Now substitute into f (x) the values of a, b, c, d, e

f (x) = a + bx + cx2 + dx3 + ex4


f 00 (0) 2 f 3 (0) 3 f 4 (0) 4
f (x) = f (0) + f 0 (0)x + x + x + x
2 6 24

Recall factorials:

n! = n × (n − 1) × (n − 2) × . . . × 3 × 2 × 1
2! = 2 × 1 = 2
3! = 3 × 2 × 1 = 6
4! = 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 24
etc.

5
Therefore
f 00 (0) 2 f 3 (0) 3 f 4 (0) 4
f (x) = f (0) + f 0 (0)x + x + x + x
2! 3! 4!
Taylor Series Expansion
1. In the neighborhood of x = x0 , we can approximate some function g(x) with a polynomial
function f (x);
2. At point x = x0 , the approximation should have certain properties that are common to g(x),
specifically at

x = x0
f (x0 ) = g(x0 )
f 0 (x0 ) = g 0 (x0 )
f 00 (x0 ) = g 00 (x0 )
f 3 (x0 ) = g 3 (x0 )
···
f n (x0 ) = g n (x0 )

3. Even though we do not know the exact form of g(x), if we know the properties of g(x) at x = x0 ,
then we can approximate g(x) with a polynomial.

1.8.1 Polynomial Approximation of g(x) around x = x0

g(x0 ) ≈ f (x) = a + bx + cx2 + dx3 + . . .


The full approximation
c d
a b z }| { z }| {
g 00 (x0 ) g 3 (x0 )
z }| { z }| { 
0 2
f (x) = (g(x0 )) + (g (x0 ))(x − x0 ) + (x − x0 ) + (x − x0 )3 + . . .
2! 3!

If x = x0 , then
g 00 (x0 )
 
0
f (x0 ) = g(x0 ) + g (x0 )(0) + (0) + . . .
2!
Then, to evaluate f 0 (x), treat g, g 0 , g 00 , g 3 etc. as constants

2g 00 (x0 ) g 3 (x0 )
   
0 0
f (x0 ) = g (x0 ) + (x − x0 ) + 3 (x − x0 )2 + . . .
2! 3!

6
To evaluate f 0 (x) at x = x0

f 0 (x0 ) = g 0 (x0 ), and the higher order terms are dropped out

Then, to evaluate f 00 (x):

g 3 (x0 )
 
00 00
f (x) = g (x0 ) + 6 (x − x0 )
3!

To evaluate f 00 (x) at x = x0

f 00 (x0 ) = g 00 (x0 ), and the higher order terms are dropped out

You might also like