0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views13 pages

Lecture 2

The document discusses various finite difference methods for solving the one-dimensional heat equation, including Schmidt's explicit scheme, Euler's implicit scheme, the Crank-Nicolson scheme, Richardson's scheme, and the DuFort-Frankel explicit scheme. Each method is analyzed for stability, local truncation error, and computational stencil. Examples are provided to illustrate the application of these schemes with specific boundary and initial conditions.

Uploaded by

Bipin Attri
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views13 pages

Lecture 2

The document discusses various finite difference methods for solving the one-dimensional heat equation, including Schmidt's explicit scheme, Euler's implicit scheme, the Crank-Nicolson scheme, Richardson's scheme, and the DuFort-Frankel explicit scheme. Each method is analyzed for stability, local truncation error, and computational stencil. Examples are provided to illustrate the application of these schemes with specific boundary and initial conditions.

Uploaded by

Bipin Attri
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Finite Difference Methods for The Heat Equation

Rajen Kumar Sinha


Department of Mathematics
IIT Guwahati

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


Model Problem
Consider one-dimensional heat equation of the form

∂U ∂2U
= x ∈ (0, 1), t > 0
∂t ∂x 2
U(0, t) = U(1, t) = 0, t > 0 (Boundary conditions)
U(x, 0) = f (x), 0 ≤ x ≤ 1. (Initial condition)

Set xi = ih, (i = 0, 1, 2, . . .) and


tj = jk, (j = 0, 1, 2, . . .).
Let Uij be the true value of the
solution at the grid-point (xi , tj ).
Let uij denote finite difference
approximation to the true solution
at (xi , tj ).
uij ≈ Ui,j = U(xi , tj ).

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


Schmidt’s explicit scheme: Using forward time and central space (FTCS)
∂2U
schemes to approximate ∂U∂t = ∂x 2 at the grid-point (xi , tj ).

∂2U
   
∂U ui,j+1 − ui,j ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j
≈ , ≈ ,
∂t (xi ,tj ) k ∂x 2 (xi ,tj ) h2

ui,j+1 − ui,j ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j


=
k h2
k
=⇒ ui,j+1 = ui,j + 2 (ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j )
h
k
=⇒ ui,j+1 = ui,j + r (ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j ), r= ,
h2
=⇒ ui,j+1 = rui−1,j + (1 − 2r )ui,j + rui+1,j ,

FACT:
• It is a two-level explicit scheme.
• This scheme is conditionally stable (0 < r ≤ 12 ).
• The local truncation error is O(h2 ) + O(k).

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


(Computational stencil)

(Schmidt’s explicit scheme)

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


Example:
Ut = Uxx , 0 < x < 1, t > 0
U(0, t) = 0, U(1, t) = 10, t > 0
U(x, 0) = 10, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1
Choose h and k such that r = 1/2.
1
u1,1 = (u0,0 + u2,0 ) = 10
2
1
u2,1 = (u1,0 + u3,0 ) = 10
2
1
u1,2 = (u0,1 + u2,1 ) = 5
2
1
u2,2 = (u1,1 + u3,1 ) = 10
2

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


Euler’s implicit scheme: Use backward in time and central in space
(BTCS) schemes at the point (xi , tj ) to have
   2 
∂U ui,j − ui,j−1 ∂ U ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j
≈ , 2
≈ ,
∂t (xi ,tj ) k ∂x (xi ,tj ) h2

to obtain
ui,j − ui,j−1 ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j
=
k h2
k
=⇒ ui,j = ui,j−1 + r (ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j ), r= ,
h2
=⇒ −rui−1,j + (1 + 2r )ui,j − rui+1,j = ui,j−1

FACT:
• It is a two-level implicit scheme.
• At each time level, we are required to solve a linear system.
• This scheme is unconditionally stable (no restriction on r ).
• The local truncation error is O(h2 ) + O(k).

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


(Computational stencil)

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


Example:
Ut = Uxx , 0 < x < 1, t > 0
U(0, t) = 0, U(1, t) = 10, t > 0
U(x, 0) = 10, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1
Choose h and k such that r = 1/2.
1 1
− u0,1 + 2u1,1 − u2,1 = u1,0
2 2
1
=⇒ 2u1,1 − u2,1 = 10
2
1 1
− u1,1 + 2u2,1 − u3,1 = u2,0
2 2
1
=⇒ − u1,1 + 2u2,1 = 15
2

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


Crank-Nicolson scheme:
 
∂U ui,j+1 − ui,j
≈ ,
∂t (xi ,tj+1/2 ) k
 2  
∂ U 1 (ui−1,j+1 − 2ui,j+1 + ui+1,j+1 )

∂x 2 (xi ,tj+1/2 ) 2 h2

(ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j )
+ ,
h2
 
ui,j+1 − ui,j 1 ui−1,j+1 − 2ui,j+1 + ui+1,j+1 ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j
= + .
k 2 h2 h2
=⇒ −rui−1,j+1 +(2+2r )ui,j+1 −rui+1,j+1 = rui−1,j +(2−2r )ui,j +rui+1,j ,
k
where r = h2 .
FACT:
• It is a two-level implicit scheme.
• At each time level, we are required to solve a linear system.
• This scheme is unconditionally stable (no restriction on r ).
• The local truncation error is O(h2 ) + O(k 2 ).

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


(Crank-Nicolson scheme) (Computational stencil)

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


Richardson’s scheme: An application of central in time and central in
space (CTCS) approximation i.e.,
   2 
∂U ui,j+1 − ui,j−1 ∂ U ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j
≈ , ≈ ,
∂t (xi ,tj ) 2k ∂x 2 (xi ,tj ) h2

to obtain the resulting scheme


ui,j+1 − ui,j−1 ui−1,j − 2ui,j + ui+1,j
= (1)
2k h2
FACT:
• It is a three-level explicit scheme.
• This scheme is unstable (hence not recommended).
• The local truncation error is O(h2 ) + O(k 2 ).

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


DuFort-Frankel explicit scheme: A modification of (1) is as follows:
ui,j−1 + ui,j+1
ui,j = .
2

(ui,j−1 +ui,j+1 )
ui,j+1 − ui,j−1 ui−1,j − 2 2 + ui+1,j
=
2k h2
k
=⇒ ui,j+1 − ui,j−1 = 2r {ui−1,j − (ui,j−1 + ui,j+1 ) + ui+1,j }, r =
h2
=⇒ (1 + 2r )ui,j+1 = (1 − 2r )ui,j−1 + 2r (ui−1,j + ui+1,j )
(1 − 2r ) 2r
=⇒ ui,j+1 = ui,j−1 + (ui−1,j + ui+1,j )
(1 + 2r ) (1 + 2r )

FACT:
• It is a three-level explicit scheme.
• This scheme is unconditionally stable.
• The local truncation error is O(h2 ) + O(k 2 ).

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573


(Computational stencil)
*** Ends ***

Rajen Kumar Sinha MA573

You might also like