Chapter 3 Bridge Loading & Distribution
Chapter 3 Bridge Loading & Distribution
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
_____________________________________________________________________________ 1
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
or more lanes of the vehicular live load, the pedestrian loads shall be taken to be one
loaded lane.
The m-factors specified below shall not be applied in conjunction with approximate load
distribution factors specified in Chapter 13: Approximate Methods of Analysis of ERA
design manual, except where the lever rule is used or where special requirements for
exterior beams in beam-slab bridges is applied.
The multiple presence factors have been included in the approximate equations for
distribution factors in Chapter 13: Approximate Methods of Analysis, both for single and
multiple loaded lanes. The equations are based on evaluation of several combinations of
loaded lanes with their appropriate multiple presence factors and are intended to account
for the worst case scenario. Where use of the lever rule is specified the Designer must
determine the number and location of vehicles and lanes, and, therefore, must include the
multiple presence. Stated another way, if a sketch is required to determine load
distribution, the Designer is responsible for including multiple presence factors and
selecting the worst design case. The factor 1.20 from Table 3-2 has already been included
in the approximate equations and should be removed for the purpose of fatigue
investigations.
If a component supported a sidewalk and one lane, it would be investigated for the
vehicular live load alone with m = 1.20, and for the pedestrian loads combined with the
vehicular live load with m = 1.0. If a component supported a sidewalk and two lanes of
vehicular live load, it would be investigated for:
One lane of vehicular live load, m = 1.20;
The greater of the more significant lane of vehicular live load and the pedestrian loads
or two lanes of vehicular live load, m = 1.0 applied to the governing case; and
Two lanes of vehicular live load and the pedestrian loads, m = 0.85.
The multiple presence factor of 1.20 for a single lane does not apply to the pedestrian
loads. Therefore, the case of the pedestrian loads without the vehicular live load is a
subset of the second bulleted item.
The multiple presence factors in Table 3.2 were developed based on an ADTT (Average
Daily Truck Traffic) of 5000 trucks in one direction. The force effect resulting from the
appropriate number of lanes shall be reduced for sites with lower ADTT as follows:
If 100 ADTT 1000; 95 % of the specified force effect shall be used; and
If ADTT < 100; 90 % of the specified force effect shall be used.
This adjustment is based on the reduced probability of attaining the design event during a
75-year design life with reduced truck volume.
_____________________________________________________________________________ 2
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
Design Truck
The weights and spacing of axles and wheels for the design truck shall be as specified in
Figure 2-1. A dynamic load allowance shall be considered as specified in the following
subchapter on Vehicular Dynamic Load Allowance.
4.3 m
4.3 –9.0 m
1.8 m
3.000 mm
FIGURE 3-1 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DESIGN TRUCK
Except as specified in following subchapters on the application of Design Vehicular Live
Loads and Fatigue Loads, the spacing between the two 145 kN axles shall be varied
between 4.3 and 9.0 m to produce extreme force effects.
Design Tandem
The design tandem used for Strategic Bridges shall consist of a pair of 110 kN axles
spaced 1.2 m apart. The transverse spacing of wheels shall be taken as 1.8 m. A dynamic
load allowance shall be considered as specified in a following subchapter. The spacing
and loading is illustrated in Figure 3-2
110 kN
1.2 m
110 kN
1.8 m
The factor to be applied to the static load shall be taken as: (1 + IM/100).
The dynamic load allowance shall not be applied to pedestrian loads or to the design lane
load.
Component IM
Deck Joints – All Limit States 75%
All Other Components
Fatigue and Fracture Limit State 15%
All Other Limit States 33%
_____________________________________________________________________________ 4
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
The dynamic load allowance shall be reduced for components, other than joints, if
justified by sufficient evidence, but in no case shall the dynamic load allowance used in
design be less than 50% of IM in the table above.
The dynamic load allowance (IM) in Table 3.3 is an increment to be applied to the static
wheel load to account for wheel load impact from moving vehicles.
BURIED COMPONENTS
The dynamic load allowance for culverts and other buried structures, in %, shall be taken
as:
WOOD COMPONENTS
Wood structures are known to experience reduced dynamic wheel load effects due to
internal friction between the components and the damping characteristics of wood.
For wood bridges and wood components of bridges, the dynamic load allowance values
specified in table of dynamic load allowance shall be reduced to 70 of the values
specified therein for IM.
The tire pressure shall be assumed to be uniformly distributed over the contact area. The
tire pressure shall be assumed to be distributed as follows:
On continuous surfaces, uniformly over the specified contact area, and
On interrupted surfaces, uniformly over the actual contact area within the footprint
with the pressure increased in the ratio of the specified to actual contact areas.
_____________________________________________________________________________ 5
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
However, for all concrete decks including composite decks the length 200 mm shall be
used in Equation 3.1.
Unless otherwise specified, the extreme force effect shall be taken as the larger of the
following:
The effect of the design tandem combined with the effect of the design lane load, or
The effect of one design truck with the variable axle spacing specified in the
subchapter Multiple Presence of Live Load above, combined with the effect of the
design lane load, and
For both negative and positive moment between points of contraflexure under a
uniform load on all spans, and reaction at interior piers only, 90% of the effect of two
design trucks spaced a minimum of 15.0 m between the lead axle of one truck and the
rear axle of the other truck, combined with 90% of the effect of the design lane load.
The distance between the 145 kN axles of each truck shall be taken as 4.3 m.
The design truck or tandem shall be positioned transversely such that the center of any
wheel load is not closer than:
For the design of the deck overhang - 300 mm from the face of the curb or railing,
and
For the design of all other components - 600 mm from the edge of the design lane.
Unless otherwise specified, the lengths of design lanes, or parts thereof, that contribute to
the extreme force effect under consideration, shall be loaded with the design lane load.
The lane load is not interrupted to provide space for the axle sequences of the design
tandem or the design truck.
C = 4 v2
3 g*R
Highway design speed shall not be taken to be less than the value specified in the
Geometric Design Manual-2001, Chapter 5: Design Controls & Criteria, Section 5.8:
Design Speed. The multiple presence factors specified above in subchapter Multiple
_____________________________________________________________________________ 6
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
Presence of Live Load shall apply. Centrifugal forces shall be applied horizontally at a
distance 1.8 m above the roadway surface.
Lane load is neglected in computing the centrifugal force, as the spacing of vehicles at
high speed is assumed to be large, resulting in a low density of vehicles following and/or
preceding the design truck.
b = v2
2ga
where a = the length of uniform deceleration.
Calculations using a braking length of 122 m and a speed of 90 km/h (25 m/s) yield b =
0.26 for a horizontal force that will act for a period of about 10 seconds. The factor "b"
applies to all lanes in one direction because all vehicles may have reacted within this time
frame. Only the design truck or tandem is to be considered.
Braking forces shall be taken as 25 % of the axle weights of the design truck or tandem
per lane placed in all design lanes which are considered to be loaded in accordance with
above subchapter Number of Design Lanes, and which are carrying traffic headed in the
same direction. These forces shall be assumed to act horizontally at the level of the
roadway surface in either longitudinal direction to cause extreme force effects. All
design lanes shall be simultaneously loaded for bridges likely to become one-directional
in the future.
3.9 WIND LOAD (WL= WIND ON LIVE LOAD; WS= WIND LOAD ON STRUCTURE)
General
Pressures specified herein shall be assumed to be caused by a base design wind velocity,
VB, of 160 km/h (= 45 m/s).
Wind load shall be assumed to be uniformly distributed on the area exposed to the wind.
The exposed area shall be the sum of areas of all components, including floor system and
railing, as seen in elevation taken perpendicular to the assumed wind direction. This
direction shall be varied to determine the extreme force effect in the structure or in its
components. Areas that do not contribute to the extreme force effect under consideration
shall be neglected in the analysis.
For bridges or parts of bridges more than 10 m above low ground or water level, the
design wind velocity, VDZ (km/h), at design elevation, z, should be adjusted according to:
V 10 Z
VDZ 2.5 * Vo In
VB Zo
_____________________________________________________________________________ 7
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
where: V10 = wind velocity at 10 m above low ground or above design water level (km/h)
VB = base wind velocity of 160 km/h (45 m/s) at 10 m height, yielding design
pressures specified in following subchapters Wind Pressure on Structures
and Vertical Wind Pressure
Z = height of structure at which wind loads are being calculated as measured from
low ground, or from water level, > 10 m (m)
Vo = friction velocity, a meteorological wind characteristic taken, as specified in
Table 3-4, for various upwind surface characteristics (km/h)
Zo = friction length of upstream fetch, a meteorological wind characteristic taken
as specified in Table 3-4 below (m)
The following descriptions are for the terms "open country" and "suburban" in Table 3-4:
Open Country: Open terrain with scattered obstructions having heights generally less
than 10 m. This category includes flat open country and grasslands.
Urban and Suburban: Urban and suburban areas, wooded areas, or other terrain
with numerous closely spaced obstructions having the size of single-family or larger
dwellings. Use of this category shall be limited to those areas for which
representative terrain prevails in the upwind direction at least 500 m.
Base design wind velocity varies significantly due to local conditions. For small and/or
low structures, wind usually does not govern. For large and/or tall bridges, however, the
local conditions should be investigated.
Pressures on windward and leeward sides are to be taken simultaneously in the assumed
direction of wind.
Typically, a bridge structure should be examined separately under wind pressures from
two or more different directions in order to ascertain those windward, leeward, and side
pressures producing the most critical loads on the structure.
The suggested wind speed V10 = 40 m/s should be compared with the Ethiopian Building
Code Standard, where V10 = 150 km/h (42 m/s) is used for the highest mountaintops. The
National Atlas of Ethiopia shows that the western parts of the country (Bahar Dar,
Nekemte, Gore, Jima, Awasa and Goba) have a wind speed (V10) that never exceeds 15
knots (equal to 30 m/s or 105 km/h). However, since the National Meteorological
_____________________________________________________________________________ 8
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
Services Agency has collected wind data only every 4 hours it is not certain that the
maximum wind speeds are given at the meteorological stations. Therefore, it is
recommended to make separate observations for large or wind-sensitive bridges.
Equation 3.2 below is based on boundary layer theory combined with empirical
observations and represents the most recent approach to defining wind speeds for various
conditions as used in meteorology. In the past, an exponential equation was sometimes
used to relate wind speed to heights above 10 m. This formulation was based solely on
empirical observations and had no theoretical basis.
Z
VDZ CV10 * (3.2)
10
The purpose of the term C and exponent "" was to adjust the equation for various
upstream surface conditions, similar to the use of Table 3-4 (further information can be
found in Refs.)
For large and/or light bridges the following shall apply. If justified by local conditions, a
different base design wind velocity shall be selected for load combinations not involving
wind on live load. The direction of the design wind shall be assumed horizontal, unless
otherwise specified in the following subchapter Aero elastic Instability. In the absence of
more precise data, design wind pressure, PD in kPa, shall be determined as:
2
VDZ
2
PD PB PB V DZ
VB 25600
Where PB = base wind pressure specified in Table 3-5 (kPa):
The wind loading shall not be taken less than 4.4 kN/m2 in the plane of a windward chord
and 2.2 kN/m2 in the plane of a leeward chord on truss and arch components, and not
less than 4.4 kN/m2 on beam or girder components.
Wind tunnel tests shall be used to provide more precise estimates of wind pressures. Such testing should be considered where wind is
a major design load.
Where the wind is not taken as normal to the structure, the base wind pressures, PB, for
various angles of wind direction shall be taken as specified in Table 2-6 and shall be
applied to a single place of exposed area. The skew angle shall be taken as measured
from a perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. The wind direction for design shall be that
_____________________________________________________________________________ 9
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
which produces the extreme force effect on the component under investigation. The
transverse and longitudinal pressures shall be applied simultaneously.
(kPa) Columns and Arches Girders
Skew Angle of Wind, Lateral Longitudinal Lateral Load Longitudinal
Degrees Load Load Load
0 3.6 0 2.4 0
15 3.4 0.6 2.1 0.3
30 3.1 1.3 2.0 0.6
45 2.3 2.0 1.6 0.8
60 1.1 2.4 0.8 0.9
Table 3-6 Base Wind Pressures, PB (kPa) for Various Angles of Attack VB=160 km/h.
For trusses, columns, and arches, the base wind pressures specified in Table 3-6 are the
sum of the pressures applied to both the windward and leeward areas.
The transverse and longitudinal forces to be applied directly to the substructure shall be
calculated from an assumed base wind pressure of 1.9 kPa. For wind directions taken
skewed to the substructure, this force shall be resolved into components perpendicular to
the end and front elevations of the substructure. The component perpendicular to the end
elevation shall act on the exposed substructure area as seen in end elevation, and the
component perpendicular to the front elevation shall act on the exposed areas and shall be
applied simultaneously with the wind loads from the superstructure.
When wind on vehicles is not taken as normal to the structure, the components of normal
and parallel force applied to the live load shall be taken as specified in Table 3-7 with the
skew angle taken as referenced normal to the surface.
Based on practical experience, maximum live loads are not expected to be present on the
bridge when the wind velocity exceeds 90 km/h. The load factor corresponding to the
treatment of wind on structure only in Load Combination Strength III would be
_____________________________________________________________________________ 10
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
(90/145)2*1.4 = 0.54, which has been rounded to 0.5 in the Strength IV Load
Combination. This load factor corresponds to 0.3 in Service 1.
STREAM PRESSURE
Longitudinal
For the purpose of this chapter, the longitudinal direction refers to the major axis of a
substructure unit.
The pressure of flowing water acting in the longitudinal direction of substructures shall
be taken as:
_____________________________________________________________________________ 11
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
The longitudinal drag force shall be taken as the product of longitudinal stream pressure
and the projected surface exposed thereto.
Floating logs, roots, and other debris may accumulate at piers and, by blocking parts of
the waterway, increase stream pressure load on the pier. Such accumulation is a function
of the availability of such debris and level of maintenance efforts by which it is removed.
It shall be accounted for by the judicious increase in both the exposed surface and the
velocity of water.
The following provision (Ref. 2) shall be used as guidance in the absence of site-specific
criteria:
Where a significant amount of driftwood is carried, water pressure shall also be
allowed for on a driftwood raft lodged against the pier. The size of the raft is a matter
of judgment, but as a guide, Dimension A in Figure 3-3 should be half the water
depth, but not greater than 3m. Dimension B should be half the sum of adjacent span
lengths, but no greater than 14 m. Pressure shall be calculated using Equation 3.3,
with CD = 0.5.
Lateral
_____________________________________________________________________________ 12
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
PL = 5.14 x 10-4CLV2
The lateral drag force shall be taken as the product of the lateral stream pressure and the
surface exposed thereto.
GENERAL
Earthquake loads shall be taken to be horizontal force effects determined on the basis of
the elastic response coefficient, Csm and the equivalent weight of the superstructure,
adjusted by the response modification factor, R.
ACCELERATION COEFFICIENT
The coefficient, "A", to be used in the application of these provisions shall be determined
from the contour map of Ethiopia in Figure 3-5. Linear interpolation shall be used for
sites located between contour lines or between a contour line and a local maximum or
minimum.
_____________________________________________________________________________ 13
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
IMPORTANCE CATEGORIES
The bridges within Zone 4 (mainly Rift Valley) shall be classified into one of three
importance categories as follows:
Critical bridges,
Essential bridges, or
Other bridges.
The basis of classification shall include social/survival and security/defense requirements.
In classifying a bridge, consideration should be given to possible future changes in
conditions and requirements.
Essential bridges are generally those that should, as a minimum, be open to emergency
vehicles and for security/defense purposes immediately after the design earthquake, i.e., a
475-year return period event. However, some bridges must remain open to all traffic after
the design earthquake and be usable by emergency vehicles and for security/defense
purposes immediately after a large earthquake, e.g., a 2500 year return period event.
These bridges should be regarded as critical structures.
_____________________________________________________________________________ 14
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
ACCELERATION COEFFICIENTS
Each bridge shall be assigned to one of the seismic zones in accordance with Table 2-10
below:
Site effects shall be included in the determination of seismic loads for bridges. Site
effects on structural response are due to the soil conditions. Four soil profiles are used in
_____________________________________________________________________________ 15
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
The site coefficient, S, is used to include the effect of site conditions on the elastic
seismic response coefficient as specified in the following subchapter.
The site coefficient, S, specified in Table 2-11 (below), shall be based upon soil profile
types defined below.
In locations where the soil properties are not known in sufficient detail to determine the
soil profile type, or where the profile does not fit any of the four types, the site coefficient
for Soil Profile Type II shall be used.
A soil profile shall be taken as Type I if composed of rock of any description, either
shale-like or crystalline in nature, or stiff soils where the soil depth is less than 60 m, and
the soil types overlying the rock are stable deposits of sands, gravels, or stiff clays.
These materials shall be characterized by a shear wave velocity greater than 765 m/s.
A profile with stiff cohesive or deep cohesionless soils where the soil depth exceeds 60 m
and the soil types overlying the rock are stable deposits of sands, gravels, or stiff clays
shall be taken as Type II.
A profile with soft to medium-stiff clays and sands, characterized by 9 m or more of soft
to medium-stiff clays with or without intervening layers of sand or other cohesionless
soils shall be taken as Type III.
A profile with soft clays or silts greater than 12 m in depth shall be taken as Type IV.
These materials shall be characterized by a shear wave velocity of less than 152 m/s and
might include loose natural deposits or manmade, nonengineered fill.
Unless specified otherwise as exceptions in this subchapter, the elastic seismic response
coefficient, Csm, for the mth mode of vibration shall be taken as:
1.2AS
Csm 2.5A
Tm 2 / 3
where:Tm = period of vibration of the mth mode (s)
_____________________________________________________________________________ 16
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
Figure 3-6 Seismic Response Coefficients, Csm for Various Soil Profiles,
Normalized with Respect to Acceleration Coefficient "A" (Csm on the left
axis)
For bridges on soil profiles III or IV, Csm need not exceed 2.0*A.
For soil profiles III and IV, and for modes other than the fundamental mode, that have
periods less than 0.3 s, Csm shall be taken as:
If the period of vibration for any mode exceeds 4.0 s, the value of C sm for that mode
shall be taken as:
Csm = 3AS
Tm4/3
_____________________________________________________________________________ 17
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
General
Bridges in Seismic Zone 1-3 need not be analyzed for seismic loads, regardless of their
importance and geometry.
Single-Span Bridges
Seismic analysis is not required for single-span bridges, regardless of seismic zone.
Multispan Bridges
For multispan structures, the minimum analysis requirements shall be as specified below:
_____________________________________________________________________________ 18
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
where:
i= load modifier (a factor relating to ductility, redundancy and operational
importance)
Qi = force effects from loads specified herein
i = load factors
Ductility, redundancy, and operational importance are significant aspects affecting the
margin of safety of bridges. Whereas the first two directly relate to physical strength, the
last concerns the consequences of the bridge being out of service.
DUCTILITY
The response of structural components or connections beyond the elastic limit can be
characterized by either brittle or ductile behavior. Under repeated seismic loading, large
reversed cycles of inelastic deformation dissipate energy and have a beneficial effect on
structural survival.
If, by means of confinement or other measures, a structural component or connection
made of brittle materials can sustain inelastic deformations without significant loss of
load-carrying capacity, this component can be considered ductile. Such ductile
performance shall be verified by testing.
The structural system of a bridge shall be proportioned and detailed to ensure the
development of significant and visible inelastic deformations at the strength and extreme
event limit states prior to failure.
For the strength limit state, the ductility factor
D 1.05 for non-ductile components and connections
D = 1.00 for conventional designs and details complying with these
Specifications
_____________________________________________________________________________ 19
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
REDUNDANCY
Main elements and components whose failure is expected to cause the collapse of the
bridge shall be designated as failure-critical and the associated structural system as non-
redundant. Alternatively, failure-critical members in tension shall be designated fracture-
critical.
Those elements and components whose failure is not expected to cause collapse of the
bridge shall be designated as non-failure-critical and the associated structural system as
redundant.
For the strength limit state:
R 1.05 for non-redundant members
= 1.00 for conventional levels of redundancy
0.95 for exceptional levels of redundancy
For all other limit states:
R = 1.00
For each load combination and limit state under consideration, member redundancy
classification (redundant or non-redundant) should be based upon the member
contribution to the bridge safety.
OPERATIONAL IMPORTANCE
This definition shall apply to the strength and extreme event limit states only. Some
bridges or structural components and connections shall be declared to be of operational
importance.
Such classification should be based on social/survival and/or security/defense
requirements.
Three levels of importance are specified with respect to seismic design: "critical,"
"essential," and "other." Bridges classified as "critical" or "essential" should be
considered of "operational importance."
For the strength limit state:
l 1.05 for important bridges
= 1.00 for typical bridges
0.95 for relatively less important bridges
For all other limit states:
l = 1.00
2.12 LIMIT STATES
Extensive distress and structural damage may occur under strength limit state, but overall
structural integrity is expected to be maintained.
Limit States
STRENGTH I Basic load combination relating to the normal vehicular use of the bridge without wind.
STRENGTH II Load combination relating to the use of the bridge by ERA-specified special design or
permit vehicles, without wind.
STRENGTH III Load combination relating to the bridge exposed to wind velocity exceeding 90 km/h.
STRENGTH IV Load combination relating to very high dead load to live load force effect ratios.
STRENGTH V Load combination relating to normal vehicular use of the bridge with wind of 90 km/h
(25 m/s) velocity
EXTREME Load combination including earthquake
EVENT
SERVICE I Load combination relating to the normal operational use of the bridge with a 90 km/h
(25 m/s) wind and all loads taken at their nominal values. Also related to deflection
control in buried metal structures, tunnel liner plate, and thermoplastic pipe and to
control crack width in reinforced concrete structures. This load combination should also
be used for the investigation of slope stability.
Compression in prestressed concrete components is investigated using this load
combination. Service III is used to investigate tensile stresses in prestressed concrete
components.
SERVICE II Load combination intended to control yielding of steel structures and slip of slip
critical connections due to vehicular live load.
This load combination corresponds to the overload provision for steel structures, and it
_____________________________________________________________________________ 21
Fundamentals of bridge design
Department of Civil Engineering
______________________________________________________________Chapter 3_
is applicable only to steel structures. From the point of view of load level, this
combination is approximately halfway between that used for Service I and Strength I
Limit States.
SERVICE III Load combination relating only to tension in prestressed concrete structures with the
objective of crack control.
FATIGUE Fatigue and fracture load combination relating to repetitive gravitational vehicular live
load and dynamic responses under a single design truck having a constant axle spacing
of 9.0 m between 145 kN axles.
The load factor, applied to a single design truck, reflects a load level found to be
representative of the truck population with respect to a large number of return cycles of
stresses and to their cumulative effects in steel elements, components, and connections.
The load factors for various loads comprising a design load combination shall be taken as
specified in the following table. All relevant subsets of the load combinations shall be
investigated. For each load combination, every load that is indicated to be taken into
account and that is germane to the component being designed, including all significant
effects due to distortion, shall be multiplied by the appropriate load factor and multiple
presence factor, if applicable. The products shall be summed as specified in Equation 3.4
and multiplied by the load modifiers.
The factors shall be selected to produce the total extreme factored force effect. For each
load combination, both positive and negative extremes shall be investigated.
In load combinations where one force effect decreases another effect, the minimum value
shall be applied to the load reducing the force effect. For permanent force effects, the
load factor that produces the more critical combination shall be selected from the
following table. Where the permanent load increases the stability or load-carrying
capacity of a component or bridge, the minimum value of the load factor for that
permanent load shall also be investigated.
The larger of the two values provided for load factors of Uniform Temperature (TU),
Creep (CR), and Shrinkage (SH) shall be used for deformations and the smaller values
for all other effects.
In the application of permanent loads, force effects for each of the specified six load
types should be computed separately. It is unnecessary to assume that one type of load
varies by span, length, or component within a bridge.
Consider the investigation of uplift. Where a permanent load produces uplift, that load
would be multiplied by the maximum load factor, regardless of the span in which it is
located. If another permanent load reduces the uplift, it would be multiplied by the
minimum load factor, regardless of the span in which it is located. For example, at
Strength I Limit State where the permanent load reaction is positive and live load can
cause a negative reaction, the load combination would be:
0.9DC + 0.65DW + 1.75(LL+IM)
If both reactions were negative, the load combination would be:
1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.75(LL+IM).
For each force effect, both extreme combinations may need to be investigated by
applying either the high or the low load factor as appropriate. The algebraic sums of these
products are the total force effects for which the bridge and its components should be
designed.
LOAD FACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION LOADS
Load factors for the weight of the structure and appurtenances shall not be taken to be
less than 1.25.
Unless otherwise specified by ERA, the load factor for construction loads, for equipment
and for dynamic effects shall not be less than 1.5. The load factor for wind shall not be
less than 1.25. All other load factors shall be taken as 1.0.
The load factors presented here should not relieve the contractor of responsibility for
safety and damage control during construction.
_____________________________________________________________________________ 24
Fundamentals of bridge design