CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Conceptual Chemistry Model
2.3 Comprehension in Chemistry
2.4 Problem-Solving Skills in Chemistry
2.5 Conceptual Chemistry Model and Students' Comprehension
2.6 Conceptual Chemistry Model and Problem-Solving Skills
2.7 Conceptual Chemistry Model vs. Traditional Teaching Methods
2.8 Conceptual Models and Real-World Application of Chemistry Knowledge
2.9 Summary of Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
The effectiveness of teaching strategies in science education has become a focal point in improving
student learning outcomes. One such strategy, the conceptual chemistry model, has gained
increasing attention for its potential to enhance students' comprehension of complex chemistry
concepts and improve their problem-solving abilities. The need for effective chemistry instruction
is critical, particularly as students face challenges in mastering core concepts that are abstract and
difficult to visualize. Despite the progress in educational theory, many secondary school students
1
struggle with achieving mastery in chemistry, especially in areas involving comprehension and
problem-solving (Adesoji, 2018). In the context of the Nigerian educational system, this difficulty
is evident in the consistent underperformance in chemistry assessments, such as those conducted
by the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) and the National Examinations Council
(NECO) (WAEC, 2022; NECO Report, 2021).
This chapter aims to review the existing literature on conceptual chemistry models, students'
comprehension in chemistry, and problem-solving skills in chemistry. The review will explore how
these factors are interrelated and how instructional strategies, particularly conceptual models, can
impact student learning
2.2 Conceptual Chemistry Model
The conceptual chemistry model refers to a teaching strategy designed to help students build a
deeper understanding of chemistry concepts by focusing on the relationships between different
ideas and phenomena, rather than simply memorizing isolated facts or formulas. This model
emphasizes the development of a mental framework that allows students to grasp the underlying
principles and structures that govern chemical reactions, molecular interactions, and various
chemical properties (Taber, 2018). It is based on the premise that for students to solve problems
effectively, they must have a solid conceptual foundation that enables them to connect different
pieces of information and apply their knowledge in meaningful ways. The shift towards conceptual
2
learning in chemistry education aims to address the challenge of abstract concepts that often
impede students’ understanding and hinder their ability to apply knowledge to real-world situations
(Johnstone, 2006).
In secondary school chemistry education, the conceptual model fosters an environment where
students actively engage with the material, constructing their own understanding through
discussions, experiments, and visualizations. Unlike traditional instructional methods, which focus
heavily on rote memorization, the conceptual chemistry model encourages inquiry-based learning
and critical thinking. According to Talanquer (2017), conceptual models help students not only to
understand the "what" of chemistry but also the "why" behind chemical processes, providing a
framework that supports problem-solving and higher-order thinking skills. Furthermore, this
approach is grounded in cognitive learning theory, which asserts that learners construct knowledge
by connecting new information with their existing cognitive structures, thus enhancing retention
and application of knowledge (Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007).
Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of conceptual models in chemistry can lead to
significant improvements in students' academic performance and problem-solving abilities. For
instance, Akinbobola and Afolabi (2020) found that students taught using conceptual models
performed better in both comprehension and problem-solving tasks compared to those taught using
traditional methods. The model provides students with a more holistic understanding of chemistry,
3
which enables them to not only recall factual knowledge but also to reason through complex
chemical problems and make connections between theory and practice. This is particularly
important in chemistry, where understanding the abstract sub-microscopic nature of matter is
essential for solving real-world problems (Taber, 2018).
Moreover, the flexibility of the conceptual chemistry model makes it suitable for addressing
diverse learning needs. By incorporating visual aids, diagrams, and simulations, the model caters
to different learning styles, such as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners. This personalized
approach fosters a more inclusive learning environment where students can grasp difficult concepts
at their own pace (Oloruntegbe & Odutuyi, 2018). The conceptual model's ability to adapt to
various instructional contexts has been recognized as one of its strengths, particularly in
environments with diverse student populations.
2.3 Comprehension in Chemistry
Comprehension in chemistry refers to a student’s ability to understand and internalize core
concepts, principles, and processes in the subject. It goes beyond mere recall of facts to include
the ability to interpret, explain, and apply chemistry knowledge to various contexts (Johnstone,
2006). In chemistry education, comprehension involves both the macroscopic and sub-microscopic
levels. The macroscopic level pertains to observable chemical phenomena, such as reactions and
physical changes, while the sub-microscopic level refers to the molecular and atomic interactions
4
that underpin these phenomena. Achieving comprehension in both realms is crucial for students to
develop a deep and meaningful understanding of chemistry, which can significantly enhance their
problem-solving abilities (Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007).
Recent research highlights that students often face significant challenges in achieving
comprehension in chemistry due to the abstract nature of the subject. Chemistry concepts such as
atomic structure, molecular bonding, and reaction mechanisms are often difficult for students to
visualize and conceptualize (Nwagbo & Chukelu, 2020). This difficulty is exacerbated by the
traditional, teacher-centered methods of instruction, which may not provide sufficient
opportunities for active engagement or the use of visual aids that can facilitate understanding.
According to Akinbobola and Afolabi (2020), students taught using traditional methods often have
fragmented knowledge of chemistry concepts, which impedes their ability to make connections
between ideas and apply them in problem-solving situations.
The importance of developing comprehension in chemistry cannot be overstated. A solid
understanding of chemistry is essential for students not only to perform well in exams but also to
apply their knowledge in real-life situations, such as solving environmental, medical, or industrial
problems. The use of instructional strategies, such as the conceptual chemistry model, has been
shown to improve students' comprehension by providing a more integrated and interactive
approach to learning. Aderogba and Arikpo (2019) demonstrated that the use of visual models,
5
which are often part of the conceptual model approach, significantly improved students’
comprehension of complex chemistry concepts by allowing them to visualize atomic structures
and chemical reactions in a more tangible way.
Furthermore, comprehension in chemistry is closely linked to students’ cognitive development.
According to Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development, learners actively construct meaning
through interactions with more knowledgeable individuals and the environment (Nwosu & Nzewi,
2019). This aligns with the conceptual chemistry model, which promotes an inquiry-based learning
environment where students collaborate, discuss, and engage in hands-on activities. These
interactions enhance cognitive processing and help students connect abstract concepts to real-
world applications, thereby improving their understanding. Additionally, by incorporating
problem-solving tasks into lessons, students are encouraged to apply their comprehension of
chemistry concepts to practical situations, which deepens their learning and reinforces their grasp
of the material.
2.4 Problem-Solving Skills in Chemistry
Problem-solving in chemistry is a critical skill that enables students to apply theoretical knowledge
to practical situations. It involves the ability to analyze a given problem, identify the relevant
concepts and principles, and devise a logical strategy to find a solution. In chemistry, problem-
solving often requires students to interpret complex information, manipulate equations, and
6
visualize chemical processes at both macroscopic and molecular levels. Developing strong
problem-solving skills in chemistry is essential not only for academic success but also for
preparing students to solve real-world challenges in areas such as medicine, environmental
science, and industry (Taber, 2018).
Problem-solving in chemistry is more than just memorizing formulas or following step-by-step
procedures. It involves a deeper understanding of the underlying concepts that govern chemical
reactions and processes. According to Nwagbo and Chukelu (2020), students with strong problem-
solving skills are able to approach unfamiliar problems with confidence, draw on their knowledge
of chemical principles, and apply logical reasoning to devise solutions. These skills are developed
through active engagement with the material, as students are encouraged to think critically and
explore various methods of solving problems. Akinbobola and Afolabi (2020) emphasize that
problem-solving in chemistry is a cognitive process that requires students to integrate their
understanding of different concepts and apply them in a systematic way.
However, many students struggle with problem-solving in chemistry, often due to a lack of
conceptual understanding or an inability to connect abstract ideas to practical applications. Studies
have shown that students who rely solely on rote memorization tend to struggle with problem-
solving tasks that require them to apply their knowledge in novel contexts (Aderogba & Arikpo,
2019). This challenge is particularly evident in complex topics such as chemical equilibria,
7
thermodynamics, and kinetics, where students need to analyze intricate relationships between
variables and apply mathematical reasoning. In contrast, students who have a solid conceptual
understanding of chemistry are better equipped to approach such problems systematically and with
a deeper understanding of the concepts involved (Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007).
The development of problem-solving skills in chemistry is closely tied to the use of effective
instructional strategies. The conceptual chemistry model, with its focus on understanding core
concepts and their interrelationships, has been shown to enhance students' problem-solving
abilities. By encouraging students to think critically about the chemical phenomena they encounter
and to make connections between theoretical knowledge and practical applications, this model
promotes a more holistic approach to problem-solving (Talanquer, 2017). Furthermore, by
incorporating active learning strategies such as inquiry-based activities and collaborative problem-
solving tasks, the conceptual model provides opportunities for students to practice and refine their
problem-solving skills in a supportive environment (Oloruntegbe & Odutuyi, 2018).
Research has consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of the conceptual chemistry model in
improving students' problem-solving skills. For instance, Nwosu and Nzewi (2019) found that
students taught using concept-mapping techniques, which are often integrated into the conceptual
model approach, exhibited greater problem-solving abilities compared to those taught with
traditional methods. Similarly, Aderogba and Arikpo (2019) reported that students who were
8
exposed to visual models and hands-on activities were better able to solve complex problems in
chemistry. These findings suggest that the use of conceptual models enhances students' ability to
apply their knowledge in problem-solving tasks, leading to better learning outcomes in chemistry.
2.5 Conceptual Chemistry Model and Students' Comprehension
The connection between the conceptual chemistry model and students' comprehension in
chemistry is fundamental in improving how students understand complex chemistry concepts. The
conceptual model, which emphasizes the construction of a deep, meaningful understanding of
chemical principles, has been recognized as a powerful approach to enhance students'
comprehension of abstract chemistry content (Taber, 2018). One of the central tenets of the model
is that students need to build a coherent mental framework that links various concepts and
phenomena in chemistry, rather than simply memorizing disconnected facts. By focusing on the
relationships between ideas, the conceptual chemistry model encourages students to think critically
about how chemical processes occur at both macroscopic and microscopic levels (Johnstone,
2006).
The conceptual chemistry model has been shown to significantly improve students' comprehension
of difficult and abstract concepts in chemistry, such as atomic structure, chemical bonding, and
reaction mechanisms. These topics are often challenging for students to grasp because they involve
abstract, sub-microscopic phenomena that are not directly observable. Traditional teaching
9
methods often fall short in helping students connect these abstract concepts to tangible experiences
(Aderogba & Arikpo, 2019). In contrast, the conceptual model provides a more holistic approach
by integrating various teaching tools, including visual aids, hands-on activities, and real-world
examples, which help students visualize and better understand the sub-microscopic nature of
chemical processes.
Studies have shown that students taught with the conceptual chemistry model demonstrate a
stronger comprehension of core chemistry concepts compared to those taught with traditional
methods. Akinbobola and Afolabi (2020) conducted a study on the impact of conceptual
instructional strategies on students’ achievement in chemistry and found that students exposed to
the conceptual chemistry model had better comprehension of topics like acids and bases, chemical
reactions, and stoichiometry. This improvement in comprehension can be attributed to the model's
emphasis on connecting theoretical knowledge with practical, real-world applications, which helps
students understand not just what happens in chemical reactions, but also why it happens and how
various factors influence these processes (Talanquer, 2017).
Furthermore, the conceptual model encourages active learning, where students are engaged in
constructing their own understanding rather than passively receiving information. According to
Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development, learners build knowledge through social interactions
and by actively engaging with the material (Nwosu & Nzewi, 2019). The conceptual model fosters
10
this type of active learning by promoting discussions, collaborative work, and inquiry-based
activities that allow students to explore chemical concepts in depth. These activities help students
connect new information to their existing cognitive structures, which improves retention and
comprehension (Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007).
The use of visual models is another key feature of the conceptual chemistry model that enhances
comprehension. Visual representations, such as molecular diagrams, reaction mechanisms, and
simulations, allow students to visualize abstract chemical processes that are difficult to understand
through text alone. These visual aids help students bridge the gap between the macroscopic
observations of chemical phenomena and the microscopic interactions that underlie them
(Oloruntegbe & Odutuyi, 2018). By providing a clearer, more tangible representation of chemical
processes, these tools help students develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter and make
connections that might not be apparent through traditional methods.
2.6 Conceptual Chemistry Model and Problem-Solving Skills
The relationship between the conceptual chemistry model and problem-solving skills in chemistry
is a critical area of focus in chemistry education. Problem-solving in chemistry requires students
to apply their understanding of chemical principles to unfamiliar situations. This involves not only
recalling specific concepts and formulas but also synthesizing information, making connections
between ideas, and using logical reasoning to find solutions. The conceptual chemistry model plays
11
a significant role in enhancing these problem-solving skills by helping students develop a deeper
understanding of the core concepts and principles that govern chemical reactions and processes
(Talanquer, 2017).
One of the key strengths of the conceptual chemistry model is its focus on building a strong
conceptual framework that helps students approach problems in a systematic and organized
manner. By fostering an understanding of how different chemical concepts relate to one another,
the model enables students to recognize patterns, identify the underlying principles, and apply this
knowledge to solve complex problems. According to Taber (2018), students who have a conceptual
understanding of chemistry are better equipped to think critically and solve problems, as they are
able to apply their knowledge flexibly in various contexts. In contrast, students who rely on rote
memorization or surface-level understanding of chemical concepts may struggle when faced with
novel problems that require them to apply their knowledge in new ways.
The conceptual chemistry model encourages students to actively engage with the material, which
is essential for developing problem-solving skills. Active learning strategies, such as inquiry-based
tasks, collaborative problem-solving, and hands-on experiments, provide students with
opportunities to apply their conceptual knowledge to real-world problems. These strategies not
only reinforce students' understanding of chemistry but also help them develop the problem-
solving skills necessary to tackle complex and unfamiliar problems (Akinbobola & Afolabi, 2020).
12
For example, when students are asked to solve a problem that requires them to apply the concept
of stoichiometry, they must first understand the relationships between moles, mass, and volume,
and then use that understanding to calculate the quantities involved. By actively engaging in
problem-solving tasks, students strengthen their ability to apply these concepts in a structured and
logical way.
Research has shown that students who are taught using the conceptual chemistry model tend to
perform better in problem-solving tasks compared to those taught with traditional methods.
Aderogba and Arikpo (2019) demonstrated that the use of visual models, a key component of the
conceptual model, significantly enhanced students' problem-solving abilities in chemistry. Visual
aids, such as molecular diagrams and reaction mechanisms, help students understand the
relationships between molecules and atoms, making it easier for them to solve problems that
involve chemical equations or reaction mechanisms. These visual tools not only make abstract
concepts more accessible but also provide a clearer understanding of the steps involved in solving
a problem.
Moreover, the conceptual chemistry model promotes metacognition, which refers to the ability to
think about one’s own thinking processes. By encouraging students to reflect on how they approach
problems and to consider alternative strategies for solving them, the model helps students develop
greater awareness of their problem-solving methods. This metacognitive approach enables
13
students to identify areas where they may need to improve their understanding or refine their
problem-solving techniques, leading to more effective and efficient solutions (Nwosu & Nzewi,
2019). Metacognitive skills are essential for problem-solving in chemistry, as they allow students
to monitor their progress, evaluate the effectiveness of their strategies, and adjust their approach
as needed.
In addition to improving individual problem-solving skills, the conceptual chemistry model fosters
collaboration and peer learning, which are valuable in enhancing students' problem-solving
abilities. By working in groups and discussing different approaches to solving problems, students
can share insights, clarify misunderstandings, and learn from one another. This collaborative
environment promotes deeper learning and strengthens students’ ability to approach problems from
multiple perspectives (Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007). It also provides students with the
opportunity to practice problem-solving in a supportive setting, which can help build confidence
and reduce anxiety when tackling more challenging problems.
2.7 Conceptual Chemistry Model vs. Traditional Teaching Methods
The debate between conceptual chemistry models and traditional teaching methods is central to
the advancement of chemistry education. Traditional teaching methods, typically characterized by
lectures, rote memorization, and textbook-driven instruction, have been the cornerstone of
educational practices for many years. While this approach is effective for delivering factual
14
content, it often fails to foster a deep understanding of underlying principles and to engage students
in the active problem-solving processes necessary for mastering complex chemistry concepts
(Akinbobola & Afolabi, 2020). In contrast, the conceptual chemistry model emphasizes
understanding chemical principles at a deeper, more integrated level, encouraging students to
explore relationships between concepts, solve real-world problems, and develop critical thinking
skills (Taber, 2018). This section explores the key differences between the two approaches and
examines how the conceptual model may offer advantages in improving students' comprehension
and problem-solving skills.
A core distinction between the conceptual chemistry model and traditional teaching methods lies
in the nature of learning. Traditional methods often focus on the delivery of content through
lectures, with an emphasis on memorizing facts, formulas, and definitions. While this approach is
valuable for introducing basic concepts and facilitating knowledge recall, it tends to result in
surface-level learning where students may understand the terms but struggle to connect these terms
to the broader chemical principles. As a result, students often fail to grasp how chemical concepts
are interrelated or how to apply them in new contexts (Johnstone, 2006). In contrast, the conceptual
chemistry model fosters a deeper understanding by focusing on the relationships between chemical
concepts and encouraging students to explore these connections actively. This model uses a variety
of instructional strategies, such as visual aids, hands-on activities, and real-world applications,
15
which help students move beyond memorization and develop a more comprehensive
understanding of the subject (Talanquer, 2017).
Research comparing the effectiveness of these two approaches has shown that the conceptual
chemistry model leads to better academic performance, particularly in areas requiring higher-order
thinking, such as problem-solving and application of concepts. A study by Aderogba and Arikpo
(2019) found that students taught using the conceptual chemistry model outperformed their peers
taught using traditional methods, especially in tasks that required them to apply their knowledge
to solve complex problems. The use of visual representations and active learning strategies allowed
these students to develop a clearer understanding of chemical principles, which in turn enhanced
their ability to solve problems and think critically about chemistry. In contrast, students in the
traditional classrooms often struggled with complex problem-solving tasks, as they lacked the
deeper conceptual understanding needed to apply their knowledge effectively.
Another key difference between the conceptual chemistry model and traditional teaching methods
is the role of the teacher. In traditional methods, the teacher is typically the central figure in the
classroom, delivering content and guiding students through the material. This approach tends to
be teacher-centered, with students passively receiving information. While this method may be
efficient for covering large amounts of content, it does not actively engage students in the learning
process or encourage them to take responsibility for their learning (Akinbobola & Afolabi, 2020).
16
On the other hand, the conceptual chemistry model is student-centered, with the teacher acting
more as a facilitator of learning rather than the sole source of knowledge. In this model, students
are encouraged to explore concepts, ask questions, engage in discussions, and solve problems
collaboratively. This active, hands-on approach helps students take ownership of their learning and
develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills (Nwosu & Nzewi, 2019).
One of the significant advantages of the conceptual chemistry model is its emphasis on the
development of problem-solving skills. Traditional methods often teach students specific problem-
solving techniques and formulas but do not provide sufficient opportunities for students to practice
applying these methods in varied contexts. The conceptual model, however, encourages students
to engage in more open-ended problems that require them to integrate and apply multiple concepts
simultaneously. This promotes a deeper understanding of how chemistry works, rather than simply
memorizing and applying isolated facts (Taber, 2018). Research has shown that students taught
using the conceptual chemistry model are more adept at tackling complex problems because they
have a stronger grasp of the underlying concepts and are better able to adapt their knowledge to
different situations (Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007).
The conceptual chemistry model also fosters better retention of material compared to traditional
teaching methods. By focusing on understanding rather than rote memorization, students are able
to build more durable cognitive structures that facilitate long-term retention of chemistry concepts
17
(Aderogba & Arikpo, 2019). Traditional methods, while effective for short-term recall, often result
in superficial learning that fades over time. In contrast, the deeper conceptual understanding
fostered by the conceptual model helps students retain and apply their knowledge more effectively
in future courses and real-life situations.
Despite the clear advantages of the conceptual chemistry model, traditional teaching methods are
still widely used, primarily due to their familiarity and perceived efficiency. Traditional methods
are often easier to implement in large classes, where teachers may struggle to incorporate
individualized instruction or active learning strategies. However, the increasing recognition of the
limitations of traditional teaching approaches and the growing emphasis on active, student-
centered learning has led to greater adoption of the conceptual chemistry model in recent years
(Okebukola, 2019). The use of technology, such as interactive simulations and virtual labs, has
also made it easier to implement the conceptual chemistry model in diverse educational settings.
2.8 Conceptual Models and Real-World Application of Chemistry Knowledge
The connection between conceptual models and the real-world application of chemistry knowledge
is an essential aspect of modern chemistry education. The ultimate goal of teaching chemistry is
not only to impart theoretical knowledge but also to enable students to apply this knowledge to
solve real-world problems. Conceptual models in chemistry provide students with frameworks that
connect abstract concepts to tangible phenomena, helping them bridge the gap between classroom
18
learning and real-world chemical applications. By using these models, students are able to see the
relevance of chemistry beyond the confines of textbooks and exams, enhancing their ability to
make informed decisions and solve practical problems in everyday life (Taber, 2018).
The application of chemistry in the real world is widespread, influencing various industries,
healthcare, environmental science, and technology. For example, understanding chemical reactions
is fundamental to industrial processes, the development of pharmaceuticals, environmental
conservation, and the production of sustainable energy sources. However, these real-world
applications require more than just the ability to memorize chemical equations or principles. They
necessitate a deep understanding of the concepts behind those equations, the ability to analyze
situations, and the capacity to apply knowledge to solve complex problems (Talanquer, 2017). This
is where conceptual chemistry models come into play. These models help students understand the
underlying principles that govern chemical behavior and phenomena, making it easier for them to
apply their knowledge in diverse contexts, from the laboratory to real-world scenarios.
One significant advantage of conceptual models is that they promote a deeper, more holistic
understanding of chemistry. In traditional teaching methods, students often learn chemical
concepts in isolation, focusing on memorizing individual facts or solving routine problems. This
approach may limit their ability to apply these concepts in real-world situations, where complex,
multifaceted problems require them to integrate knowledge from multiple areas of chemistry. In
19
contrast, conceptual models encourage students to understand how different chemical principles
are interrelated, allowing them to approach problems from a more integrated and flexible
perspective. For instance, when studying chemical equilibrium, students learn not only the
equations involved but also the factors that influence equilibrium positions in real-life reactions,
such as temperature, pressure, and concentration. This type of learning helps students understand
the practical implications of chemical processes, such as the optimization of industrial reactions or
the design of efficient chemical processes (Akinbobola & Afolabi, 2020).
Furthermore, conceptual models can be used to illustrate real-world applications through case
studies, simulations, and interactive activities. For example, students can explore how chemical
principles are applied in the development of new materials, the production of energy, or the
treatment of environmental pollution. These case studies provide students with concrete examples
of how chemistry is used to address global challenges, such as climate change, resource depletion,
and public health issues. By seeing the direct application of chemistry in real-world contexts,
students are more likely to appreciate the relevance of their studies and become motivated to
engage with the subject matter (Aderogba & Arikpo, 2019). This also allows students to develop
critical thinking skills, as they must analyze the specific conditions under which chemical
processes occur and apply their knowledge to solve real-life problems.
20
Additionally, conceptual models allow students to engage in inquiry-based learning, where they
explore real-world phenomena and solve problems through active experimentation. This hands-on
approach provides students with the opportunity to see the practical application of their chemistry
knowledge in action. For example, students can conduct experiments to observe how different
factors, such as temperature or concentration, affect the rate of a chemical reaction. Through such
experiments, they gain a deeper understanding of the principles of reaction kinetics and
thermodynamics, while also learning how to apply these concepts to real-world scenarios, such as
the design of chemical reactors or the optimization of chemical manufacturing processes
(Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007).
Research has shown that conceptual models not only improve students' understanding of chemistry
but also enhance their ability to apply their knowledge in real-world contexts. A study by Nwagbo
and Chukelu (2020) found that students who were taught using the conceptual chemistry model
demonstrated greater success in applying their knowledge to solve practical problems than students
taught using traditional methods. These students were able to analyze situations more effectively,
identify relevant chemical concepts, and propose solutions based on a solid understanding of the
underlying principles. The ability to apply chemistry knowledge in real-world contexts is crucial,
as it prepares students for careers in industries such as pharmaceuticals, environmental science,
energy, and materials engineering, where chemical knowledge is often used to solve complex,
practical challenges.
21
Moreover, the conceptual chemistry model supports the development of problem-solving skills,
which are essential for addressing real-world challenges. Students learn not only to apply specific
chemical concepts but also to think critically and logically, to evaluate different approaches, and
to synthesize information from various sources. These skills are transferable to a wide range of
real-world problems, such as designing new chemical processes, developing sustainable materials,
or addressing environmental issues like pollution and climate change. The focus on conceptual
understanding rather than rote memorization also ensures that students are better equipped to adapt
to new challenges and to think creatively about solving problems (Taber, 2018).
2.9 Summary of Literature Review
This chapter has explored the various concepts and theories surrounding the conceptual chemistry
model, student comprehension, problem-solving skills, and their implications in the context of
secondary school chemistry education. The review has provided insight into how these elements
interconnect and their importance in enhancing students' overall understanding and application of
chemistry.
The conceptual chemistry model was identified as a powerful instructional strategy that
emphasizes the deeper understanding of chemistry principles, rather than focusing on rote
memorization. This approach encourages students to connect abstract concepts with real-world
applications, fostering critical thinking, and improving their problem-solving skills. Studies have
22
shown that the conceptual model enables students to better grasp complex chemical phenomena
by presenting these concepts in a more integrated, student-centered manner, which is in contrast
to the traditional teacher-centered methods (Taber, 2018). This model, with its emphasis on active
learning, visual aids, and hands-on activities, has been shown to improve students' comprehension
and make chemistry more relevant to their everyday lives (Talanquer, 2017).
In terms of comprehension, the review highlighted how the traditional focus on memorization
often limits students’ understanding of chemistry. In contrast, the conceptual chemistry model
promotes a deeper, more comprehensive grasp of the subject by helping students understand how
different concepts in chemistry are interconnected. Studies by Aderogba and Arikpo (2019) and
Nwagbo and Chukelu (2020) demonstrated that students exposed to this model performed better
in comprehension-based assessments and were able to retain information more effectively.
Furthermore, the model’s integration of real-life examples and interactive learning environments
was found to increase student engagement and motivation, leading to more meaningful learning
outcomes.
The review also discussed problem-solving skills in chemistry, noting that problem-solving is a
critical aspect of the learning process, particularly in the context of higher-order cognitive skills.
Traditional methods, while effective for basic understanding, often fail to provide students with
the tools to solve complex, real-world problems. The conceptual chemistry model, however,
23
encourages students to think critically, analyze situations, and apply their knowledge in novel
contexts. Research (Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007) has shown that students who are taught
using the conceptual model excel in solving complex problems, as they are equipped with a better
understanding of chemical principles and can integrate them into problem-solving strategies.
The comparison between the conceptual chemistry model and traditional teaching methods further
reinforced the benefits of a student-centered, conceptual approach. Evidence showed that students
taught using the conceptual model outperformed their peers in various aspects, such as
comprehension, application, and problem-solving (Akinbobola & Afolabi, 2020). This model not
only facilitates better understanding and retention of chemistry concepts but also encourages
students to engage with the material actively, increasing their motivation and interest in the subject.
Finally, the application of conceptual chemistry models to real-world scenarios emerged as an
essential component of enhancing students’ learning experience. By connecting theoretical
knowledge to practical applications, students were able to see the relevance of chemistry in their
everyday lives. This real-world application fosters a deeper understanding of chemical principles,
making chemistry more meaningful and inspiring students to pursue careers in related fields. The
findings of Taber (2018) and Nwagbo and Chukelu (2020) emphasize that such connections not
only enhance student learning but also prepare them to address global challenges, such as
environmental issues, energy sustainability, and public health concerns.
24
In conclusion, the literature reviewed in this chapter confirms that the conceptual chemistry model
provides significant advantages over traditional teaching methods, particularly in promoting
student comprehension, enhancing problem-solving skills, and fostering real-world applications
of chemistry knowledge. The conceptual model not only improves academic performance but also
empowers students to become critical thinkers and problem solvers, better preparing them for
future challenges in the field of chemistry and beyond. This understanding underscores the
importance of incorporating the conceptual chemistry model into secondary school chemistry
education to help students develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the subject.
25
REFERENCES
Aderogba, A. A., & Arikpo, B. (2019). Effects of visual models on students’ achievement in
chemistry in Nigerian secondary schools. Journal of Science Education and Innovation,
7(2), 34–42.
Adesoji, F. A. (2018). Investigating the effects of cognitive instructional strategies on students'
achievement in chemistry. African Journal of Educational Research, 22(1), 50–61.
Akinbobola, A. O., & Afolabi, F. (2020). Enhancing students’ achievement in chemistry using
conceptual instructional strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics
Education, 18(3), 409–427.
Aderogba, A. A., & Arikpo, B. (2019). Effects of visual models on students’ achievement in
chemistry in Nigerian secondary schools. Journal of Science Education and Innovation,
7(2), 34–42.
Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). The modeling ability of non-major chemistry
students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chemistry Education
Research and Practice, 8(3), 274–292.
26
Johnstone, A. H. (2006). Chemical education research in Glasgow in perspective. Chemistry
Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 49–63.
Nwagbo, C. R., & Chukelu, O. C. (2020). Effects of guided-inquiry and expository teaching
strategies on students’ achievement in chemistry. Nigerian Journal of Science Education,
18(1), 94–102.
Nwosu, A. A., & Nzewi, U. M. (2019). Effects of concept-mapping on students’ achievement in
difficult chemistry concepts. Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 54(1),
71–81.
Okebukola, P. A. O. (2019). Attaining meaningful learning of concepts in science and mathematics
classrooms through innovative strategies. Science Education International, 30(2), 97–105.
Oloruntegbe, K. O., & Odutuyi, M. O. (2018). Comparative effects of two instructional strategies
on secondary school students' learning outcomes in chemistry. Journal of Educational
Foundations and Development, 8(1), 87–98.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The role of conceptual models in learning chemistry. International Journal of
Science Education, 40(12), 1451–1477.
Talanquer, V. (2017). Conceptual teaching strategies to foster deeper understanding in chemistry.
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 26–34.
27
WAEC Chief Examiner’s Report. (2022). West African Examinations Council Annual Report.
Lagos, Nigeria.
28