0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views3 pages

4

The document describes a procedure for measuring penetration resistance and reconsolidating samples to the same effective confining stress, noting negligible volume changes. It details the cyclic loading of specimens under undrained conditions, using a pneumatic actuator and measuring various pressures and deformations. The methodology references previous work by Kokusho et al. (2005) regarding the cyclic stress ratio for liquefaction.

Uploaded by

DKN
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views3 pages

4

The document describes a procedure for measuring penetration resistance and reconsolidating samples to the same effective confining stress, noting negligible volume changes. It details the cyclic loading of specimens under undrained conditions, using a pneumatic actuator and measuring various pressures and deformations. The methodology references previous work by Kokusho et al. (2005) regarding the cyclic stress ratio for liquefaction.

Uploaded by

DKN
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

After the penetration resistance was measured, the samples were

reconsolidated together with the protruded cone rod to the same initial

effective confining stress. In all cases the resulting volume

change during reconsolidation was negligible, as indicated from

the variations in relative densities before penetration/liquefaction

tests listed in Tables 3 and 4. The specimens were then cyclically

loaded under undrained conditions with the minicone still inserted

in the sample. The load was stress-controlled and applied by a pneumatic

actuator at frequency of 0.1 Hz. The cell pressure and the porewater

pressure were measured with electric piezometers that had a

maximum capacity 500 kPa, and the axial deformation was measured

with linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) that

was outside the cell and had a maximum stroke of 50 mm. As shown

in Kokusho et al. (2005), the cyclic stress ratio for liquefaction wasAfter the
penetration resistance was measured, the samples were

reconsolidated together with the protruded cone rod to the same initial

effective confining stress. In all cases the resulting volume

change during reconsolidation was negligible, as indicated from

the variations in relative densities before penetration/liquefaction

tests listed in Tables 3 and 4. The specimens were then cyclically

loaded under undrained conditions with the minicone still inserted

in the sample. The load was stress-controlled and applied by a pneumatic

actuator at frequency of 0.1 Hz. The cell pressure and the porewater

pressure were measured with electric piezometers that had a

maximum capacity 500 kPa, and the axial deformation was measured

with linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) that

was outside the cell and had a maximum stroke of 50 mm. As shown
in Kokusho et al. (2005), the cyclic stress ratio for liquefaction wasAfter the
penetration resistance was measured, the samples were

reconsolidated together with the protruded cone rod to the same initial

effective confining stress. In all cases the resulting volume

change during reconsolidation was negligible, as indicated from

the variations in relative densities before penetration/liquefaction

tests listed in Tables 3 and 4. The specimens were then cyclically

loaded under undrained conditions with the minicone still inserted

in the sample. The load was stress-controlled and applied by a pneumatic

actuator at frequency of 0.1 Hz. The cell pressure and the porewater

pressure were measured with electric piezometers that had a

maximum capacity 500 kPa, and the axial deformation was measured

with linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) that

was outside the cell and had a maximum stroke of 50 mm. As shown

in Kokusho et al. (2005), the cyclic stress ratio for liquefaction wasAfter the
penetration resistance was measured, the samples were

reconsolidated together with the protruded cone rod to the same initial

effective confining stress. In all cases the resulting volume

change during reconsolidation was negligible, as indicated from

the variations in relative densities before penetration/liquefaction

tests listed in Tables 3 and 4. The specimens were then cyclically

loaded under undrained conditions with the minicone still inserted

in the sample. The load was stress-controlled and applied by a pneumatic

actuator at frequency of 0.1 Hz. The cell pressure and the porewater

pressure were measured with electric piezometers that had a

maximum capacity 500 kPa, and the axial deformation was measured

with linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) that


was outside the cell and had a maximum stroke of 50 mm. As shown

in Kokusho et al. (2005), the cyclic stress ratio for liquefaction was

You might also like