Article
Article
com
A PIVOTAL
POINT FOR
MILITARY PNT
The critical need for enhanced resiliency
DRIVING RESILIENCY | An exclusive interview with Col Matthew Spencer of the U.S. Space Force
NAVWAR TESTING | A simulation-based analysis of Locata’s non-GPS based positioning system for navigation testing at WSMR
ASSURED PNT | An update on the U.S. Army’s MAPS and DAPS Programs of Record
Coverage so much
greater than GNSS
A complete suite of precise positioning solutions
that will exceed your expectations
To you, it’s not ‘just’ GNSS. It’s way more than assured, uninterrupted
access to all signal bands and frequencies—with high-quality, high-
fidelity delivery—in challenging reception environments. Today, you need
confidence in seamless integration and interoperability across an expanding
stack of technologies, backed by a dedicated team with decades of proven
domain expertise who go the distance to make things work together.
LEARN MORE
[Link] | [Link]@[Link]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONTENTS
MAY/JUNE 2025 VOLUME 20 NUMBER 3
Published by utonomous Media
ON THE COVER
Table of Contents
BY THE NUMBERS
78 Resilient Navigation Alternatives
EDITORIAL
for GNSS-Denied Environments
10 Toward a More Resilient PNT: The Spoofing detection and mitigation through multi-sensor integration.
Push for a Layered Approach Miguel Ángel de Frutos Carro, Laura Train García, Sebastián Camilo Méndez Velásquez,
Jose Maria Pulido Fernandez, José Antonio Gutiérrez Rivilla, David Pinta Sierra
ARTICLES UAV Navigation-Grupo Oesía has developed several alternative solutions to
22 U.S. PNT: Driving Resilient enable UAVs to operate in GNSS-denied environments, providing spoofing
Navigation detection and mitigation through multi-sensor integration, including visual
28 U.S. PNT: U.S. Army Taking a navigation systems, IMUs and solar navigation.
Layered Approach to PNT
40 U.S. PNT: Ensuring High-Accuracy
Positioning in GPS-Denied 88
Environments
78 Resilient Navigation Alternatives
for GNSS-Denied Environments
88 Working Papers: LEO PNT:
A Fundamental Evolution to
Answer New Application Needs
COLUMNS/DEPARTMENTS
12 News
88 Working Papers
16 Washington View
56 Human Engineering
70 Beyond GNSS LEO PNT: A Fundamental Evolution to Answer New Application Needs
94 Brussels View Michel Monnerat, Hanaa Al Bitar
98 Timeline/Advertisers Index A look at the benefits of LEO PNT, and why developing a system-of-systems
approach with a multi-orbit space component—and doing so quickly—is
critical to meeting increasingly demanding performance requirements.
4 M AY/J U N E 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITORIAL DEPARTMENTS
10 The Time and the Place 12 News
Toward a More Resilient PNT: The U.S. PNT 56 Human Engineering
Push for a Layered Approach The Ascent of Karen Van Dyke
There is an urgency in the U.S. to develop and
deploy resilient, redundant PNT solutions, 70 Beyond GNSS
COLUMNS particularly for military purposes. This package Building more resilient PNT
of articles highlights some of those efforts. 98 Timeline /Advertisers Index
16
Washington SPONSORED CONTENT
View 22 Driving Resilient Navigation 20 Precision, Performance
U.S. Space Force Col. Matthew Spencer discusses GPS modernization,
Government
M-Code, OCX progress and the future of assured PNT in rare inverview.
and Integration
Turmoil and the PNT The ADIS16576 from Analog Devices.
Community 28 U.S. Army Taking a Layered Approach to PNT 26 Strengthening GNSS
By Dana Goward Updates on the MAPS and DAPS Programs of Record. Resilience at the Source
94 40 Ensuring High-Accuracy Positioning The critical role of GNSS antennas.
in GPS-Denined Environments 34 Assured Advantage
Brussels View Authors from 746th Test Squadron and Ansys Government
VIAVI’s integrated vision for PNT.
GNSS and PNT Initiatives detail a recent simulation-based analysis of Locata’s 52 Defending Against Spoofing
Resilience at the
Munich Satellite
non-GPS based positioing system for NavWar testing at WSMR. with GNSS Corrections
Swift Navigation’s Skylark.
Navigation Summit WHITE PAPER
By Peter Gutierrez 68 Defending GPS Integrity
60 Precision Under Fire UHU shaping PNT situational awareness.
BAE Systems details its Common APNT Package, a solution 76 Resilience at Scale
becoming mission-critical to combating spoofing and etherWhere’s chip-cloud ecosystem.
jamming threats in today’s highly contested battlespace.
COTS IMU
GNSS aided INS
Custom MOTS design
6 M AY/J U N E 2025
The World's Largest RTK Network
CHRISTOPHER K. WILSON
Vehicle data and technology consultant, California, USA Subscribe Online
FREE ONEYEAR SUBSCRIPTIONS to the print and/or digital versions are available
LINYUAN XIA
to qualified readers who work in GNSS-related companies, organizations, research
Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
institutes, government agencies, and the military services.
AKIO YASUDA
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan You may also change your address, renew, or unsubscribe online:
[Link]/SUBSCRIPTIONSERVICES
The future of anti-jamming
technology is mission-ready.
TA L LYS M A N ® C R 8 894 S X F + A N T I - JA M T E C H N O LO GY
Low SWaP Controlled Four-element GNSS CRPA Three nulls per band and eXtended Filtering
Reception Pattern for L1/L2, E1/E5b signals 20-40 dB null depth Plus (XF+) for superior
Antenna (CRPA) cross-band isolation
[Link]@[Link]
[Link]/GNSS
THE TIME AND THE PLACE
R
esiliency—more than a buzzword, it The 746th Test Squadron uses a non-
has become the defining priority across GPS band positioning system for high-
the PNT community. While GNSS accuracy navigation in GPS-denied
remains one of the most significant technological environments. Authors detail results of a
achievements of the modern era, its vulnerabilities simulation-based analysis at WSMR.
are no longer theoretical. From cyber threats BAE Systems is among manufacturers
and spoofing to contested environments and answering the call for resiliency, developing
congested spectrum, GNSS disruption is a a Common APNT Package (CAP) to combat
real and growing concern for defense, critical threats to Loitering Munitions and UAVs
infrastructure and commercial sectors alike. on the battlefield. Authors from BAE detail
RENEE KNIGHT The urgency to secure and sustain trusted PNT this essential technology and the Integrity
EDITOR
is driving a full-spectrum response—from policy Ring that not only fuses data from various
to platform. Assured PNT is no longer a specialized sensors, but validates each sensor’s input
capability; it is a foundational requirement. And before including it in the final PNT solution.
as this issue of Inside GNSS makes clear, achieving UAV Navigation-Grupo Oesía has developed
resiliency demands more than patchwork solutions several solutions to enable UAVs to operate
or one-off innovations. It calls for a layered, in GNSS-denied environments. Authors
modular and multi-domain approach. explain how these technologies provide
Resiliency is not one technology. It is a systems spoofing detection and mitigation through
architecture that combines complementary multi-sensor integration, including visual
capabilities across GNSS, non-GNSS alternatives, navigation systems, IMUs and solar navigation.
inertial systems, signals of opportunity, vision- There’s also been increased interest
based navigation, and emerging space and in the L5 signal, as it’s more resilient to
terrestrial layers. Working in concert, they create jamming than L1. oneNav has developed a
a robust, adaptive PNT ecosystem that can high-accuracy solution, not dependent on
operate through disruption, not merely around it. L1, that can serve as an anchor to a more
In this issue, we spotlight the growing range robust GNSS system. Co-founder Paul
of efforts to deliver that layered approach. From McBurney provides an overview of the
space-based alternatives and battlefield-capable solution and its benefits in Beyond GNSS.
sensor fusion to commercial innovations in New Washington View columnist Dana
high-accuracy positioning and visual navigation, Goward provides insight into how the current
these solutions reflect the future of PNT. administration’s efforts to revamp the
The U.S. Space Force is leading the way, with government could impact PNT, with updates
a strategy that integrates next-gen technologies on two stalled efforts and the new interest
while protecting GPS constellations. We recently from the FCC. He also recognizes several
spoke with Col. Matthew Spencer for an update on retiring industry leaders, including DOT’s
GPS modernization, OCX, M-Code deployment, Karen Van Dyke. She’s had a remarkable career
alternative PNT initiatives and the evolving role advocating for and advancing PNT, and is the
of LEO constellations in military navigation. focus of this issue’s Human Engineering.
The article kicks off our U.S. PNT package. In Working Papers, authors from
“Our job is to protect, evolve and sustain Thales Alenia Space detail how LEO PNT
GPS,” Spencer said. “At the same time, we must is poised to become part of a systems of
innovate to ensure that if GPS is ever denied, systems approach to meeting increasingly
our forces still have trusted alternatives.” demanding PNT performance requirements,
The U.S. Army is working with the industry while Peter Gutierrez takes us to the
to field assured PNT solutions for mounted Munich Satellite Navigation Summit.
and dismounted operations. That focus on This is a pivotal moment. We are no
PNT Modernization led to the development longer planning for hypothetical GPS
of the MAPS and DAPS Programs of denial—we are architecting systems to
Record. In a recent interview, the product endure it. That shift is evident throughout
managers provided updates on both. this issue and the industry itself.
SMA
SMALLER. S
SMARTER. PROVEN.
O + Alt: 2010.05
NAVIGATION
WITHOUT
WI OUT
COMPROMISE.
CO O S
VECTORNAV TACTICAL SERIES
Ź Tactical-Grade IMU
Ź Multi-Band GNSS Receivers
Ź < 0.1
0.1°° Heading, Pitch & Roll
Ź Support for External M-Code GPS
[Link]
+1.512.772.3615
NEWS
360 DEGREES
G S
CALGARY, ALBERTA
START YOUR
FREE TRIAL
TODAY
NEWS
contributions to Galileo In-Orbit reduces latency and boosts surveillance drones operating in high-
Validation Element-A (GIOVE-A), throughput. interference environments or robotic
the Open Service Navigation Message • UAVs: Delivery and surveillance systems requiring sub-decimeter repeat-
Authentication (OSNMA) authentica- drones that need to fly beyond visual ability can now benefit from integrated
tion protocol, and the Galileo Public line of sight (BVLOS) under strict solutions that were once out of reach.
Regulated Service (PRS) integration, power and weight constraints. Moreover, the acquisition positions
Septentrio brings not only technical • AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES: Fleets Hexagon to move faster in innovation
prowess but geopolitical relevance to requiring full situational cycles. The joint product roadmap
the Hexagon family. awareness even when GNSS signals ref lects not just harmonization, but
“Hexagon plans to leverage Septentrio’s are degraded or denied. acceleration—with clear lines of inte-
expertise in Galileo capabilities to enhance • AGRICULTURAL AUTOMATION: Smart gration for correction services, sensor
our positioning portfolio and align with tractors, sprayers and harvesters fusion, and advanced signal processing.
future Galileo developments,” Dale said. that rely on precise row-by-row
“By expanding our presence in Europe navigation across large fields. THE VALUE OF INTEGRATION—AND A
and continuing support for the Galileo COMMITMENT TO COLLABORATION
project, we aim to advance high-accuracy A PORTFOLIO BUILT FOR For current Septentrio customers, Dale
positioning technologies, making them THE FUTURE OF POSITIONING emphasized continuity and expanded
more accessible and easier to integrate into With Septentrio now under its wing, value. “We’re committed to preserving
new applications and markets.” Hexagon has gained more than technol- the strengths of the Septentrio brand
This move also supports Hexagon’s ogy—it has acquired momentum. The while enhancing its capabilities,” he said.
strategic goal of being globally rele- new combined portfolio significantly “Our partners and customers can expect
vant in every GNSS regime, including expands opportunities to serve mission- the same trusted solutions—but now
Europe’s Galileo, the U.S. GPS constel- critical applications in both legacy and with expanded development resources,
lation, and emerging regional systems. next-gen markets. It also brings addi- broader global support, and a wider
tional depth to Hexagon’s strategy for technology ecosystem.”
ACCELERATING AUTONOMY ACROSS software-defined GNSS, embedded He also noted Hexagon will continue to
HIGH-GROWTH MARKETS security, and vertical market integration. invest in Septentrio’s engineering talent,
At its core, the acquisition is a catalyst viewing the acquisition as a team expan-
for accelerating autonomy across sectors ”HEXAGON’S ACQUISITION OF sion as much as a technology one. The
that rely on resilient and scalable posi- SEPTENTRIO AIMS TO BOOST R&D roadmap now includes joint engi-
tioning. From drone-based delivery and OUR POSITIONING neering projects between Septentrio and
infrastructure inspection to field robotics NovAtel teams, aligning around shared
CAPABILITIES BY
and autonomous vehicles, high-precision goals in positioning accuracy, cyber resil-
GNSS is quickly becoming non-negotiable. ENHANCING ACCURACY, ience, and real-time situational awareness.
“By combining Hexagon’s a nd RELIABILITY AND SWaP.
Septentrio’s strengths, we aim to deliver THIS MOVE ALIGNS A PLATFORM FOR INDUSTRY
technology with the lowest SWaP with- WITH HEXAGON’S LONG-TERM VISION TRANSFORMATION
out compromising performance,” Dale OF ACHIEVING FULL AUTONOMY, Dale concluded the interview with a call
said. “This enables the development of to action—for integrators, developers
WHERE PRECISE POSITIONING IS A KEY
more reliable autonomous systems in and end users to rethink what’s possible
compact platforms that demand high BUILDING BLOCK.” when precision meets purpose.
accuracy and resilience.” Gordon Dale, president, Hexagon’s Autonomous Solutions division “This acquisition isn’t about status
The operational demands of robotic quo. It’s about enabling autonomy that’s
systems require more than just centimeter- “The increasing demand for compact, scalable, deployable and truly resilient,”
level accuracy. They need continuity, integ- mission-critical applications—especially he said. “As positioning becomes the
rity and reliability. Dale emphasized that in robotics and UAVs—drives our strat- foundation for smarter machines and
Hexagon’s expanded portfolio now offers egy,” Dale said. “By combining Hexagon intelligent infrastructure, the combined
the full stack: raw GNSS data, real-time and Septentrio’s solutions, we’ve made strengths of Hexagon and Septentrio
corrections, anti-jam mitigation, IMU significant advancements in form factor will help lead the way.”
integration and edge processing—all in and power efficiency without sacrificing With a reinforced portfolio, stronger
increasingly compact forms. performance.” presence in Europe, and a sharpened focus
This is particularly impactful for These improvements allow Hexagon to on compact, high-performance platforms,
sectors like: serve smaller, more agile platforms and Hexagon is positioning itself to define the
• ROBOTICS: Warehouse and extend into new application domains next chapter in GNSS innovation—one
industrial automation systems where larger GNSS receivers were that blends heritage, agility and vision to
where high-precision localization once a limiting factor. For example, meet the demands of the autonomy era.
Spectrum Use
SpaceX confirms Starlink operates in Ku- and Ka-band spec-
trum allocated for broadband services and is not proposing
new spectrum allocations for PNT-specific use.
T
he current administration’s vicinity. Consequently, this year’s
efforts to revamp the CGSIC event will not be held with
government could have a ION GNSS+ in Baltimore. No date
significant impact on the or location for the group’s next
PNT community. meeting has been announced.
Forums in which administrations
previously sought input and The FCC Takes an Interest
advice have been put on hold, yet a At about the same time as these
vigorous discussion has sprung up two government outreach efforts
with the Federal Communications were paused, the FCC, an agency
Commission (FCC). At the same technically independent of the
time, long-serving government PNT administration, became very
experts have retired, each taking interested in national PNT issues.
decades of experience with them. This interest was likely at least
partially fueled by two petitions, one
Government Turmoil from NextNav and the other from the
National Association of Broadcasters
and the PNT Community (NAB), seeking to establish terrestrial
PNT systems. The one from NextNav
Two federal efforts have been put on hold and experts with years of expertise in the asks for approximately $5 billion
PNT industry have retired, all changes that could affect the industry moving forward. worth of spectrum to fund the
system, while NAB is just asking
DANA A. GOWARD Government Outreach for adoption of a new television
Two important federal efforts to signal format to be accelerated.
get public input on PNT issues At the FCC’s March open
have recently been put on hold. meeting, each of the commissioners,
The President’s National Space- led by Chair Brendan Carr,
Based PNT Advisory Board has expressed their concern about
met twice each year since its America’s over-dependence on GPS
inception in 2004, but the board’s and the need for complementary
charter expired on April 25. Future and alternative systems. This led
meetings are on hold while the new to a 27-page Notice of Inquiry
administration reviews the more (NOI) soliciting public input on
than 1,000 groups that have been a wide range of technical and
operating under the provisions of the policy issues. As of this writing,
Federal Advisory Committee Act. more than 80 individuals and
The charter for the Department of organizations submitted responses.
Dana A. Goward
Transportation’s Civil GPS Service
is President of the non- Interface Committee (CGSIC) “While many members
profit Resilient Navigation appears to still be in place. This of the PNT community
and Timing Foundation, forum is the federal government’s
a public benefit charity method of getting feedback and are heartened by the
advocating for policies and systems to protect GPS input from civil users across the FCC’s interest, some
satellites, signals and users. He is a member of the globe. In the past, the committee have observed that the
President’s National Space-Based Advisory Board, met immediately prior to, and at
and has received multiple international awards the same venue as, the Institute of agency’s authorities and
for his leadership and advocacy for resilient PNT Navigation (ION)’s GNSS+ annual responsibilities are not
architectures. Goward is a retired Coast Guard officer
conference. The synergy benefited well positioned to address
and helicopter pilot. In 2013, he retired from the
both events and attendees.
federal Senior Executive Service having served as the
We understand new federal national PNT resilience on
maritime navigation authority for the United States.
policy requires these kinds of its own.”
government meetings to be held in Dana Goward, president,
Washington, D.C. or its immediate Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation
Airborne UAS
Fixed Site
Land Mobile
Maritime
THE LEADER IN DETECTION AND MITIGATION OF GPS SPOOFING & QRC ANTENNAS
UHU1000
Our patented technology has proven Protected PNT Solution
to be impervious to spoofing—which > Spoof-Proof
guarantees business as usual. > Spatially Validated
> Jam Resistant
> RF Output for M-Code
Threat Detection
> Threat
Angle-of-Arrival
> Spoofer PNT
Threat Geolocation
> Successive
Angle-of-Arrival
> Collaborative GEO
[Link]
WASHINGTON VIEW
While many members of the “While we are sure James J. Miller was the Designated
PNT community are heartened Federal Officer for both the PNT
by the FCC’s interest, some have
dedicated government Advisory Board and the National
observed that the agency’s authorities personnel will make every Space Council’s User Advisory
and responsibilities are not well effort, the loss of these Group. Miller left a technology
positioned to address national PNT job with United Airlines for a
resilience on its own. They have
highly experienced PNT senior PNT position with the
urged for a whole-of-government experts in critical roles will Department of Transportation
approach in concert with the be difficult to overcome.” in 2003. In 2005, he became the
administration and Congress. PNT policy lead for NASA.
Dana Goward, president,
This and other recommendations Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation Jason Kim has served the
were included in a response to the government in a variety of PNT
NOI submitted by the Resilient for 25 years before serving roles since 1994. He supported
Navigation and Timing Foundation. another 17 years as the Executive NASA, the White House Office
Secretariat for DOT’s Civil GPS of Science and Technology Policy,
Loss of Government Expertise Service Interface Committee. and the Department of State,
and Experience Dr. A.J. Oria supported government and joined the Department of
In addition to changes in PNT programs from 1998 until this Commerce in 1998. Before retiring,
government outreach, the last few year as an aerospace engineer with he served as the Chief of Staff for
months have seen the retirement Overlook Systems Technologies Inc. the Office of Space Commerce.
of several long-serving full-time Oria’s advice and support to NASA Karen Van Dyke became the
experts. They represent a wealth over the last 22 years were essential Department of Transportation’s
of government PNT expertise and to the success of the National Space- (DOT) Volpe National
experience that will be difficult Based PNT Advisory Board. Transportation Systems Center’s
to replace. They include: Principal Technical Advisor for GPS
Mike Dunn, Technical Director in 1988. After serving 20 years at
GPS Wing, Space and Missile Volpe, she became DOT’s Director
Systems Center. Dunn has been of PNT and Spectrum Management
involved in space systems for in 2008. DOT leads national policy
more than 50 years and supported for civil GPS and PNT. Van Dyke
the GPS program at Los Angeles was the senior-most official with
Air Force Base for the last 27. in-depth GNSS technical and policy
Larry Hothem, Senior Physical expertise for most of her career.
Scientist, U. S. Geological Survey.
Hothem was the Department of Jamming and Moving Forward
Photo courtesy of John Hartzell.
Interior’s lead for GPS and GNSS issues. spoofing are growing The changes in how the federal
A past president of ION, he pioneered threats to GPS users. government interacts with the
the use of GNSS in remote sensing. public are concerning but may
Rick Hamilton was a U.S. not turn out to be exceptionally
Coast Guard hands-on navigator detrimental to the nation’s
overall PNT efforts. On the
other hand, people matter. They
The Need for Resiliency matter a lot. While we are sure
The FCC, recognizing a need for resiliency, issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) dedicated government personnel
for comments on complementary and alternative solutions to GPS in late will make every effort, the loss
March, with the comment period closing on April 28. of these highly experienced
The FCC “regularly addresses issues at the intersection of technological PNT experts in critical roles
innovation and national security and this Notice of Inquiry (NOI) holds the
will be difficult to overcome.
potential to make progress on both fronts,” Commissioner Geoffrey Starks
We send our best wishes to those
said in a statement, according to the NOI.
who recently retired, along with
“Positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) services underpin the modern
our thanks for their decades of
economy while providing a vital function for America’s military,” he said.
“Though the Global Positioning System (GPS) continues to serve its users service and good work. We also
effectively, the lack of alternative systems is a vulnerability that necessitates send best wishes to those who
action. As other countries make progress developing and deploying new will take their places—along with
PNT systems, it’s imperative that the United States keep pace.” our offer of whatever help and
support we are able to provide.
I
n the fast-moving world of autonomous outputs, leading to guidance anomalies, diagnostics—all of which combine to of-
systems and advanced navigation particularly in UAVs operating under in- fer a MEMS IMU that delivers not only
platforms, precision and reliability tense vibrational conditions. performance but also ease of integration.
are paramount. From unmanned aerial Another major innovation is the inclu-
vehicles (UAVs) to autonomous ground sion of a crystal oscillator—making the SIMPLIFYING INTEGRATION
vehicles (AGVs), the inertial measurement ADIS16576 the first compact MEMS IMU to THROUGH FACTORY CALIBRATION
unit (IMU) plays a vital role in providing the incorporate one. This addition enhances One of the recurring challenges devel-
critical data required for real-time naviga- sample clock precision by more than 100 opers face is the time and cost involved
tion, stabilization and system control. In times, allowing for more consistent and in calibrating IMUs for a specific system
a recent conversation with Inside GNSS, synchronized data acquisition. For devel- or platform. Analog Devices has tackled
Tzeno Galchev, director of MEMS market- opers working on tightly coupled navi- this head-on with an advanced factory
ing at Analog Devices, offered insight into gation systems, this precision translates calibration process that eliminates the
the next-generation capabilities of the directly into improved state estimation need for exhaustive, temperature-varied
ADIS16576 IMU and what sets it apart in and better overall performance. motion profiles during system integration.
a competitive landscape. The ADIS16576 also boasts a 10x in- “ADI’s factory calibration process is one
crease in serial communication through- of the most important ‘ease of use’ features
A LEAP FORWARD put, a deep FIFO buff er of 512 samples in the ADIS16576,” Galchev explained. “In
IN MEMS IMU PERFORMANCE per sensor, and signifi cantly expanded many cases, AGV/UAV platforms can align
“The ADIS16576 offers a substantial leap
forward in core sensor performance,”
Galchev said. One of the most impressive
advancements is its dramatically reduced
“ADI’S FACTORY CALIBRATION PROCESS is one
vibration rectification error (VRE): a 10x of the most important ‘ease of use’ features
improvement in gyroscope VRE and a stag-
gering 50x improvement in accelerometer
in the ADIS16576. In many cases, AGV/UAV
VRE compared to previous models. This is platforms can align the ADIS16576 with their
particularly significant because VRE has
long been a limiting factor in high-precision
inertial reference frames using very simple
navigation and stabilization applications. motion profiles, at a single temperature.”
VRE-induced errors can compromise gyro- Tzeno Galchev,
scope bias stability and skew accelerometer director of MEMS marketing, Analog Devices
More info:
[Link]/mosaic
Photos courtesy of Calian GNSS.
Strengthening GNSS Resilience
at the Source
The critical role of GNSS antennas.
I “A HIGH-PERFORMANCE
n an increasingly interconnec ted
world, the reliability of global naviga-
tion satellite system (GNSS) services ANTENNA CAN
suppor ts critical infrastructure, from SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE
aviation and maritime navigation to
telecommunications, agriculture and system resilience by ensuring
financial systems. As threats to GNSS only the desired GNSS
signals—ranging from unintentional
inter ference to deliberate jamming— frequencies are processed,
continue to grow, building resilience reducing the noise floor
into the system is no longer optional.
While sof t ware -based defenses and and increasing the signal-
downstream technologies get much of to-noise ratio (SNR).”
the attention, the first line of defense
is often overlooked: the GNSS antenna. Mohamed Emara,
PEng, Ph.D., Senior RF Engineer
Calian GNSS, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
THE ANTENNA: THE UNSUNG
HERO OF GNSS RESILIENCE
GNSS antennas are the gateway to space-
based navigation data. Every signal that antenna is the first—and often the most
fuels precision positioning, navigation and effective—layer of defense.
timing (PNT) solutions starts its journey
through an antenna. As such, the antenna’s ENVIRONMENTAL AND
design, performance and configuration MECHANICAL RESILIENCE
play a pivotal role in ensuring the integ- A resilient GNSS system also requires
rity, continuity and availability of GNSS antennas that can withs t and har sh
services. environments—extreme temperatures,
Modern threats to GNSS aren’t just physical shock, vibrations and electro-
about accidental interference—they’re magnetic threats. Ruggedized enclosures,
GNSS antennas serve as also about intentional jamming. Jamming weatherproofing and electromagnetic
the gateway to space-based devices can easily block GNSS signals that shielding ensure continuous operation in
navigation data. are already weak when they reach Earth. field conditions, whether on a remote oil rig,
In these hostile environments, a robust a military convoy or a satellite uplink station.
a Dismounted
Assured PNT programs, as well as a new initiative
System (DAPS) known as NorthStar.
on Nett Warrior.
Building Resiliency
for Dismounted Systems
R
el iable PN T i s c ent r a l to Such solutions deploy additional DAPS GEN II, which received Full-
American military operations, sensors to validate the integrity of any Rate Production (FRP) approval last
whether mounted or dismount- signal received and provide necessary August, offers dismounted soldiers as-
ed, making GPS a popular target for positioning data even when GPS isn’t sured PNT through integrity checks and
adversaries. As the spoofing and jam- available, Trzeciak said. These sensors access to multiple integrated sensors,
ming threat continues to grow, backup include inertial measurement units Product Manager Dismounted Assured
solutions that enable multi-domain (IMUs), wheel speed odometers and PNT, Lt. Col. Zach Denton said. The
operations—even when GPS is disrupted chip-scale atomic clocks. solution fuses inputs from M-Code,
or denied—are clearly needed. “When you pull multiple sensors to- inertial sensors and other PNT sources,
To that end, the U.S. Army is focused gether in a fusion engine,” Trzeciak said, including ALTNAV, allowing soldiers
on PNT Modernization and fielding “you have a powerful PNT device that to freely shoot, move and communicate
Assured PNT solutions. Program
Executive Office, Intelligence, Electronic
Warfare and Sensors (PEO IEW&S), “When you pull multiple sensors
which is made up of seven project man- together in a fusion engine, you
agers dedicated to advancing technol-
ogy for warfighters, is the organization
have a powerful PNT device
responsible for fielding the Army’s that can cut through significant
Assured PNT systems. spoofing and jamming and continue
The goal, Project Manager (PM)
Positioning, Navigation & Timing
to navigate.”
(PNT) Mike Trzeciak said, is to de- Mike Trzeciak, project manager, PNT
velop solutions for both mounted and The Mounted Assured PNT System (MAPS) provides PNT to
dismounted operations that don’t rely mounted Army platforms including vehicles, watercraft and
solely on GNSS signals. munition systems, even when GPS is denied.
Critical Solutions
B ot h mou nted a nd d i smou nted
warfighters need assured PNT for pre-
cise targeting and firing, Trzeciak said.
They’re making decisions based on the
coordinates their GPS gives them and
need to know they can accurately target
and fire munitions.
“To do that, you have to know what
the error is,” Trzeciak said. “The GPS
device is telling me I’m here, but what
is my potential error based on the EW
environment? So, it’s really critical to
make sure their position has integrity
and accuracy.”
The other critical element, Trzeciak Mounted Assured
said, is timing, which MAPS and DAPS PNT System (MAPS)
GEN II installation.
both provide to radio networks, mission
command as well as decision support
hardware to help calculate a firing mis-
sion, for example. Timing information is “We are on the precipice easily upgradeable to meet the different
communicated on Nett Warrior, which challenges in the threat environment.”
delivers situational awareness to dis-
of providing a system For any assured PNT solution, anti-
mounted leaders. to the warfighter. And jam performance and low cost remain
“When you take away time, that situ- much like with DAPS, we paramount, Trzeciak said. Many of
ational awareness goes away,” Trzeciak these technologies, still in their in-
said. “From a MAPS perspective, there
are constantly looking at fancy, are not yet in high rate produc-
are several dozen vehicle systems, from and evaluating cutting tion, making them more expensive. PM
the fire control system in an M1 Abrams edge technology to assure PNT remains on the lookout for low cost
tank to UAV flight control in the back solutions that are also low SWaP so they
of a Stryker, and the MAPS GEN II
we are staying ahead of any can be put in smaller cases and draw
system provides the timing needed to threats and enabling the less power off the soldier and vehicle,
make sure everything stays connected warfighter to have trusted but still provide the same performance
and accurate.” as other options.
PNT on their mounted Developing and fielding such solu-
What’s Next platform.” tions is going to take strong partnerships
While DAPS already has been fielded, Lt. Col. Damian Dixon, product manager, with the Department of Defense (DoD)
Trzeciak expects the first brigade to be Mounted Assured PNT and the PNT community, Trzeciak said.
fielded with MAPS this summer. He Those partnerships have already begun
also expects M-Code to fully replace to form, with everyone working to ef-
legacy devices and said the M-Code ficiently get more resilient PNT solutions
Increment 2 capability will provide even as needed, which is critical in today’s into the hands of the warfighter.
more advanced signal processing into evolving threat environment. “The ground domain has multiple
DAPS and MAPS. A solution with a Modular Open different requirements associated with
“SAASM [Selective Availability Anti- Systems Approach (MOSA) is also the dismounted and mounted environ-
Spoofing Module] was developed in the in the works. Known as NorthStar, ments while munitions have to handle
90s, and it’s no longer as resilient as it Trzeciak said industry white papers the g-forces of being fired out of a gun
once was,” Trzeciak said. “M-Code is are actively being evaluated for what and the associated vibrations,” Trzeciak
the next generation of military-only use will be a modular capability, low cost said. “And the aviation domain has to
GPS and has significant anti-jam and mounted system. meet the strict flight safety regulations.
anti-spoofing capabilities.” “It will be a modular, open system There’s no one solution that fits the bill
M-Code is iterative and will allow that will be able to incorporate sensors across the Army’s portfolio or the DoD’s
for software enhancements and “major and software and drive low integration portfolio…We will continue to look at
increment upgrades.” This approach will complexity,” he said. “The environment, what the community has that can build
make it possible to continually evolve as the Army looks at it, has multiple tiers increased resiliency into our assured
and advance M-Code’s capabilities of threat. We expect NorthStar to be PNT capabilities.”
RAND
DMU OM WA
41 A LK
: 0.02o/√
hr
L: 0.05
CRH0 m /s /√hr
3 A: 0
.005 o/√h
r
Assured Advantage:
VIAVI’s Integrated Vision for
Positioning, Navigation and Timing
As GNSS denial becomes a baseline condition across military and “The growing threats to GPS—both ac-
civilian operations, VIAVI Solutions is building a modular, multi- cidental and deliberate—require a new
approach to PNT,” Khaykin continued.
layered PNT ecosystem that integrates precision timing, inertial
“ VIAVI is addressing this challenge by
navigation and signal intelligence. With strategic acquisitions and
delivering modular, interoperable and
field-proven technology, VIAVI is redefining resilience at the edge— scalable solutions that support multiple
where assurance is not optional, and adaptability is mission-critical. layers of PNT resilience.”
F
This platform mindset builds on VIAVI’s
or Oleg Khaykin, President and CEO
“OUR MISSION IS TO long-standing strengths in test, valida-
of VIAVI Solutions, the company’s tion and network visibility, now applied
recent acquisitions in positioning, empower the to navigation and timing environments.
navigation and timing (PNT) represent
integrator. “Our heritage in test and measurement
more than tactical expansion—they mark means we understand how to ensure per-
a strategic alignment with the evolving de- Everything formance, reliability and interoperability
mands of modern defense and infrastruc-
we do is in complex systems,” he said. “This gives
ture. In an era shaped by contested signals, us a unique advantage as we scale PNT
electronic warfare (EW) and autonomy modular by design.” solutions across both defense and com-
at the edge, VIAVI is building a platform mercial applications.”
Jamie Marraccini
that not only withstands disruption but is Vice President, Inertial Labs Products, VIAVI And while national security applications
engineered to operate through it. remain a primary focus, Khaykin noted
“ T he acquisi t ion of Jack s on L abs the demand for resilient, verifiable time
Technologies [JLT], combined with Inertial these components function as part of a and navigation is growing rapidly in civilian
Labs, positions VIAVI as a leader in the reconfigurable system. sectors as well.
resilient PNT space,” Khaykin explained. “By bringing together the precision tim- “Resilient timing and navigation are
“We now offer complementary technolo- ing technologies of Jackson Labs with the becoming essential for critical infrastruc-
gies that enable us to provide complete inertial navigation solutions from Inertial ture, telecommunications and emerging
solutions addressing the entire PNT sig- Labs, we have created a comprehensive autonomy markets,” he said. “ VIAVI is
nal chain—from signal generation and PNT portfolio that few others can match,” building the technology foundation to
distribution to detection and validation.” Khaykin said. “This is especially important meet those needs.”
This “signal chain” view of PNT is central in applications where GNSS signals are
to VIAVI’s thesis. Inertial Labs contributes degraded or denied.” EDGE ENGINEERING:
leading sensor fusion and visual naviga- Khaykin was direct about the evolving VIAVI AND INERTIAL LABS
tion capabilities. Jackson Labs brings high- threat environment: GPS signals, once as- VIAVI’s strategic vision is built on more than
performance timing, holdover stability, and sumed secure, are now routinely denied, acquisition—it’s about integration with pur-
signal conversion through its transcoder spoofed or degraded—particularly in peer pose. That vision becomes tangible through
platform. But what matters most is how or near-peer conflict zones. VIAVI’s collaboration with Inertial Labs, where
the emphasis is on engineering at the edge: “MOSA ALLOWS CUSTOMERS that the customer can build from—tailored
leveraging onboard sensors, reusing exist- to their mission set.”
ing hardware, and delivering GNSS-resilient to define their Perhaps the most novel approach from
capabilities through sensor fusion, visual solution, using the Inertial Labs side is their philosophy of
odometry, and precise time alignment. sensor reuse. “A camera, already onboard
What sets VIAVI apart is not just its our fusion engine for visual targeting or surveillance, can
ability to survive signal denial—but its or plugging in double as an input for visual navigation,”
modular, sensor-fused approach that Marraccini said. “That is savings in both
adapts to each mission’s constraints and their own, they’re not cost and power. Same goes for radios—
maximizes what’s already onboard. locked into a black box.” already on the platform for comms, but
also usable for positioning via time-of-flight
The Challenge: GNSS Vulnerability Doug Russell measurements.”
Senior Vice President,
and the Path to Resilience Aerospace & Defense, VIAVI This reuse-centric design not only
In an era where EW saturation and GPS improves SWaP-C but also accelerates
denial are no longer hypothetical but deployment timelines by reducing inte-
expected conditions of the battlefi eld, This is not just sur vivabilit y under gration complexity.
traditional PNT systems are struggling threat—it’s assured performance, engi- One of the standout elements in this
to keep pace. Doug Russell of VIAVI cap- neered for contested space from the start. platform is the transcoder. “It allows you
tured the sentiment succinctly: “Even in a to disconnect an antenna and connect the
GPS-denied environment, our integrated Integration as Diff erentiator: output of the transcoder,” Marraccini said. “To
systems can still provide a robust signal A Platform Built for Modularity the legacy system, it appears as a standard
that looks like GPS for the rest of the ve- Jamie Marraccini, CEO of Inertial Labs, GPS L1 signal—but what it’s actually receiving
hicle’s systems to operate. That is a huge explained: “We start with what the platform is resilient, reconstructed navigation data.”
cost and capability advantage.” already has—radios, cameras, antennas— Russell added: “From a cost stand-
The operational landscape now assumes and reuse that data. That means better point, that’s enormous. You’re upgrading
degraded or denied environments as the SWaP-C and faster integration, especially without retrofitting the whole platform.”
baseline. M-Code, low Earth orbit (LEO) for UAVs and expeditionary systems.” The transcoder outputs GPS-compliant
constellations, and alternate navigation Russell emphasized how this vision signals derived from GNSS, inertial and
strategies are being prioritized by U.S. translates into practice: “For any given even visual navigation inputs, enabling
Department of Defense (DoD) moderniza- engagement, customers might need a legacy platforms to function effectively
tion efforts and critical infrastructure enti- GNSS receiver, maybe M-Code, maybe in contested environments. What makes
ties alike. The need for layered, modular not. They might prioritize holdover clock this platform especially future-ready is
and cost-effective solutions is pressing. performance or sensor fusion accuracy. the decision to push processing and data
What we provide is a menu of capabilities alignment capabilities to the edge.
Built for the D3SOE:
Resilience by Design LAYERS OF RELIABILITY
GNSS degradation as a possibility—they Position Error (m) MAXAR Mapping (5 m - 25 m) DTC ToF (20 m - 60 m)
T
he 746th Test Squadron (746 TS) performance, highlighting the benefits and effective testing methodologies
utilizes a non-GPS based posi- of this approach in mission planning becomes increasingly critical. NavWar
tioning system (NGBPS) devel- and post-mission analysis. The results testing ensures military systems can be
oped by Locata Corporation to provide of this simulation-based approach are properly evaluated in realistic denied
high-accuracy navigation solutions in presented, demonstrating the potential environments before deployment.
GPS-denied environments. The Locata for improved navigation system testing
system broadcasts signals that are pro- and evaluation at WSMR. Reference System Challenges
cessed by an onboard, airborne receiver The 746 TS uses an Ultra High Accuracy
during flight testing. Post-processing Full Spectrum PNT Testing Reference System (UHARS) to provide
techniques are applied to improve the and Evaluation time, space, position information (TSPI)
precision of the navigation solution. This Positioning, navigation and timing reference data to compare to the systems
unique infrastructure of ground pseu- (PNT) systems are critical components under test. This reference system must
dolites at White Sands Missile Range of modern military operations. With maintain accuracy levels approximately
(WSMR) provides a useful resource for increasing challenges to GPS availability 10 times better than the systems being
testing and evaluation in GPS-denied through Navigation Warfare (NavWar) tested (targeting an accuracy of <10 cm
scenarios by providing a localized, off- threats, the ability to test and evaluate per axis 1-sigma), even in GPS-denied
band signal for reference. However, navigation systems in realistic NavWar environments.
the availability of this high-accuracy environments has become essential. The UHARS incorporates multiple
solution is limited by the placement of The 746 TS, based at Holloman Air Force navigation subsystems including:
transmitters on range and the location Base in New Mexico, specializes in the • All in view GNSS civilian receiver
of the antenna on the aircraft as it tra- testing and evaluation of PNT systems with differential post processing
verses the field, emphasizing the need to support national defense operations (multiple constellations across
for careful mission planning. across all environments. multiple frequency bands)
To address these challenges, the 746 The squadron's mission is centered on • Military GPS signal receiver
TS has used the Ansys Government delivering agile, efficient, and reliable • High performance navigation
Initiatives (AGI) System Took Kit (STK), PNT and NavWar test and evaluation grade inertial navigation system
a software tool for modeling and analyz- services. This encompasses precision (INS)
ing systems, to simulate the performance
of the Locata system. By incorporating
flight profiles with attitude informa-
tion, STK enables the estimation of the
system’s performance. This simulation-
based approach has led to significant
improvements in mission planning
and post-mission analysis. The 746 TS
can ensure flight paths are optimized
for the Locata system, leveraging the
capabilities of STK to model the effects
of body masking and aircraft dynamics
to develop profiles that maximize the
accuracy and reliability of the Locata
navigation solution.
This article explores the application
FIGURE 1 Locata TimeLoc operations.
of STK in simulating the Locata system’s
Our tactical-grade
IMUs provide:
0.8°/ hr Bias Instability
0.03°/ √ hr Angle Random Walk
Delta Angle / Velocity Output
16mA Power Consumption
ITAR-Free
Epson is a registered trademark of Seiko Corporation. Copyright 2024 Epson America, Inc.
U.S. PNT
NAVWAR TESTING
FIGURE 4 Estimated body mask based on Locata antenna placement FIGURE 5 PDOP estimates for initial planned
(1 inch vertical difference). flight profiles.
STK Modeling Approach • Flight dynamics at different orientation of the aircraft during the
AGI has developed the STK set of speeds and altitudes. f light profile. It was discovered that
sof t wa re tools , wh ich prov ide a • Antenna placement. even small changes in the antenna loca-
comprehensive environment that • Signal masking due to aircraft tion relative to the aircraft body frame
enables high fidelity test environ- body during turns determined by played a significant role in the estimates
ment modeling of the test environ- C-12J flight characteristics. of what signals would be available. For
ment, including the test platform and 3. Flight Profiles: Planned flight paths example, moving the location verti-
Locata system. STK’s physics-based with detailed attitude information, cally down by 1 inch had a significant
modeling capabilities allow for ac- including banking angles during impact on the estimated body mask
curate representation of: turns. during banks (Figure 4).
• Aircraft dynamics and attitude For the initial setup, the pseudolite The goal of flight profile optimization
during flight network transmitters were modeled as is to maintain PDOP values below 3.0
• Signal propagation from single points at the appropriate coordi- throughout the flight to ensure con-
pseudolites to the airborne receiver nates of the transmit antennas. However, tinuous high-accuracy solutions. This
• Aircraft body masking effects on each LocLite site has two transmit anten- requires optimizing several parameters:
signal reception nas located near each other and initial • Flight altitude
• Antenna placement and radiation versions of the scenario only account • Airspeed
patterns for one of these. It turned out that this • Bank angle
• Computation of geometric impacted the PDOP estimates and a • Flight path geometry
parameters such as PDOP second antenna location was later added Initial flight profiles were planned
These capabilities enabled the 746 TS to each site. The current version of the at three altitudes: 24,500 feet, 17,000
and STK to partner together to create model does not account for the antenna feet and 10,000 feet MSL and included
a scenario within STK that simulated gain pattern of the transmit or receive both a racetrack and figure-eight type
a test flight for one of the primary 746 antennas, though this could easily be flight path at each altitude. These pro-
TS flight test platforms (C-12J) under added in the future using built in tools files were modeled in STK to evaluate
various flight conditions with the Locata within STK. PDOP performance when using STK’s
system present to investigate the esti- For the aircraft model, a 3D outer Aviator tool to estimate the appropri-
mated effects of the flight profile on the mold line of the C-12J was integrated. ate attitude of the flight test platform
Locata system performance. Using measurements from the actual based on the C-12J flight characteristics.
test platform, the Locata receive an- The initial estimated PDOP is shown
Model Development tenna was placed on the model at its in Figure 5.
The STK model developed for the Locata installed location relative to the nose Based on the initial results from the
system includes: of the model. Based on the antenna STK model, it became clear the planned
1. Pseudolite Network: Ground-based location, the STK software can esti- air speed and subsequent banking
transmitters placed at their actual mate a line-of-sight mask that indicates required to maintain turns at lower
surveyed locations on WSMR. the area above which signals would no altitudes would likely lead to a loss
2. Aircraft Model: Detailed longer be able to reach the antenna. in the ability to track certain Locata
representation of the test aircraft, This mask is used to estimate when sites. This led to an inf lation of the
including: the receiver would no longer be able PDOP above the required threshold.
• Outer mold line geometry. to track a LocLite signal based on the Investigating different altitudes, it was
estimated that flying at an altitude at on how changes in air speed might that would surpass the desired PDOP
or above 11,000 feet MSL would lead affect performance. By increasing the threshold (Figure 7).
to more consistent performance and air speed, the required bank angle to
reduce the risk of exceeding the desired maintain the turn would increase and Flight Test Results
PDOP threshold (Figure 6). Based on therefore there was a greater risk of Test Execution
the feedback from the modeling efforts, losing track of sites that enable the In April, a dedicated f light test was
the actual mission flew at 11,500 feet PDOP geometry to stay below the de- conducted to demonstrate perfor-
MSL altitdue. sired threshold. As an example, at mance of the Locata system. Given
In addition to modeling altitude 12,000 feet and an airspeed of 202 the results from the modeling effort,
effects on estimated Locata perfor- knots, STK estimated there were sig- the racetrack and figure-eight f light
mance, STK also enabled exploration nificant sections of the f light path profiles were f lown at altitudes of
FIGURE 6 PDOP estimates for 10,000 and 11,000 feet MSL altitudes (two antenna per site).
FIGURE 7 PDOP estimates for 12,000 feet MSL altitude at 202 knots IAS.
11,500 feet, 17,000 feet and 24,000 to two Locata sites in the north because could further predict performance. One
feet MSL (Figure 8). signals fell above the estimated body specific parameter of interest was the ac-
mask. This behavior was reflected in tual number of tracked and used LocLite
PDOP Performance the actual Locata receiver data from signals as reported by the Locata receiver.
In post-flight analysis, the actual as- that turn (Figures 10-13). This was compared to the STK estimate
flown trajectory of the flight was input The successful maintenance of PDOP of which sites would have line-of-sight
into STK to determine the estimated below 3.0 throughout the flight con- as shown in Figure 14. While the STK
PDOP values. Within STK, the pre- firmed the effectiveness of the STK- model uses a rigid masking approach,
dicted PDOP values were time-aligned based mission planning approach. the real-world Locata system likely ex-
directly with the actual PDOP values This result is particularly significant periences a bit of diffraction and may
reported by the Locata receiver during as it demonstrates the proper tools for track LocLite signals outside of when the
the flight and compared. The results mission planning enabled a continu- STK model predicts that it will maintain
showed good correlation between ous high-accuracy positioning using a track. While overall, the signal tracking
predicted and actual PDOP values as non-GPS based positioning system. This pattern matched relatively well between
shown in Figure 9, with all values re- tool will greatly improve the ability to STK prediction and reality, there were
maining below the critical threshold provide a high-accuracy position solu- significant periods of the flight profile
of 3.0 throughout the flight. tion even in a GPS denied environment where fewer LocLites were tracked and
The turns revealed the major contrib- for future test events. used than what should have had line-
utor to the changes in PDOP during the of-sight based on the STK model. This
mission was the attitude of the aircraft Signals Tracked Performance does indicate there are potentially some
and that STK modeled this well. During Other performance parameters of the unmodeled effects such as the time it
a 15.6-degree bank-angle turn, the Locata system were compared to simi- takes for the receiver to track a signal
model predicted a loss of line-of-sight lar values from STK to see if the model when it regains line-of-sight or how it
FIGURE 10 STK PDOP estimates versus Locata receiver reported values through turn (pt1).
[Link]
U.S. PNT
NAVWAR TESTING
determines whether the signal is used several areas for development have incorporate detailed f light charac-
in the solution. been identified to enhance mission teristics and antenna placement to
planning and post-mission analysis improve model fidelity. Additionally,
Future Work capabilities. The development of the inclusion of antenna gain pat-
Following validation of the STK mod- more sophisticated aircraft models terns will enable the simulation of
eling approach with the C-12 platform, is a key area of focus, with plans to receive power levels, providing a more
FIGURE 11 STK PDOP estimates versus Locata receiver reported values through turn (pt2).
FIGURE 12 STK PDOP estimates versus Locata receiver reported values through turn (pt3).
FIGURE 13 STK PDOP estimates versus Locata receiver reported values through turn (pt4).
G
lobal Navigation Satellite Systems extend to ground-based positioning as Using proprietary atmospheric model-
(GNSS) underpin modern position- well. GNSS-dependent systems—including ing, Skylark corrects GNSS errors caused by
ing, navigation and timing (PNT), autonomous vehicles, industrial robots, ionospheric disturbances, clock drift and
enabling precise positioning for applications and fleet management solutions—can orbital inaccuracies, improving positioning
ranging from aviation and autonomous driv- experience severe disruptions if spoofed precision from several meters to just a few
ing to logistics and infrastructure monitor- signals cause drift, position jumps, or centimeters. Its carrier-grade network of
ing. However, GNSS spoofing—a technique complete navigation failures. reference stations is built and operated in
where attackers manipulate positioning To understand the full scope of GNSS partnership with mobile network operators
data to mislead receivers—has become spoofing, this article examines four major who secure and maintain them as critical
an increasing threat. Once considered a categories of spoofing attacks: infrastructure, including their backhaul
niche concern, spoofing incidents are now • RF spoofing at receivers: Directly connectivity. By continuously validating
rising because of the availability of low- misleading user devices. satellite data and leveraging its secure,
cost software-defined radios (SDRs), open- • RF spoofing at Continuously AWS-based cloud infrastructure, Skylark
source spoofing tools, and their increasing Operating Reference Stations detects and rejects spoofed signals before
use in geopolitical conflicts. (CORS): Compromising reference they can impact users, ensuring robust
The impact extends beyond military stations to distribute false corrections. and trustworthy positioning in contested
targets and into commercial aviation, • Correction data tampering: environments.
autonomous driving and logistics, where Intercepting and modifying correction
secure and reliable positioning is critical. streams. RF SPOOFING AT RECEIVER:
Recent events underscore the severity of • Server data injection: Injecting false DIRECTLY ATTACKING USER GNSS
this issue. GNSS disruptions in Ukraine have GNSS observations into correction EQUIPMENT
reportedly been used to jam and mislead processing servers. Attack Overview
military drones and aircraft, as well as com- We will explore how GNSS correction RF spoofing involves broadcasting counter-
mercial vessels navigating the Black Sea. services like Swift Navigation’s Skylark feit GNSS signals to override real satellite
In the Middle East, airspace over Lebanon, Precise Positioning Service play a vital role transmissions. This can mislead standalone
Syria, Jordan and Israel has experienced in mitigating spoofing attacks and securing receivers in vehicles, aircraft or mobile
GNSS anomalies, forcing pilots to switch to navigation systems against the growing devices into computing incorrect positions.
alternative navigation methods and raising risk of signal manipulation. Skylark is a The most basic approach is meaconing,
concerns over aviation safety in the region. real-time, cloud-based GNSS correction a passive form of RF spoofing that replays
While these attacks often target aerial service designed for accuracy, reliability genuine GNSS signals without modifica-
and maritime navigation, their effects and safety at a global scale. tion. This technique does not require the
attacker to generate satellite navigation frequencies, forcing the receiver to track RF SPOOFING AT CORS: ATTACKING
data—only to record and rebroadcast it. the spoofed signal. GNSS REFERENCE STATIONS
More elaborate approaches involve gen- Attack Overview
erating new, artificial GNSS signals rather Possible Defenses Instead of targeting a single user device,
than replaying old ones. This requires: • A uthenticated ephemeris: an attacker could spoof GNSS signals at
• Custom signal generation: Advanced correction services, a CORS used in correction services such
Attackers must create satellite-like such as Skylark, provide verified as Real-Time Kinematic (RTK). This could
signals that match the expected ephemeris data, allowing receivers to result in the widespread distribution of
structure while leading the receiver detect mismatches between real and erroneous corrections, impacting indus-
to a false position or time. This spoofed signals. tries such as autonomous navigation,
includes using the most up-to- • Sensor fusion: If GNSS-based land surveying, and fleet management—
date real ephemerides to maintain velocity and position contradict IMU potentially causing significant financial
credibility. and odometry data, a sophisticated and operational disruptions.
• Real-time adaptation: To effectively positioning engine, such as Swift A compromised CORS also could enable
spoof a moving target, attackers Navigation’s Starling PE, will identify the more targeted attacks, such as misleading
must continuously adjust the spoofed inconsistency and report the event. law enforcement tracking, manipulating high-
signal’s timing and Doppler shift, • Multi-constellation protection: frequency trading timestamps, or disrupting
mimicking real satellite motion. Spoofing multiple GNSS systems a competitor’s GNSS-based services.
Where motion sensors are included in simultaneously is extremely difficult. A n at t acker c an spoof a COR S by
an integrated solution, the spoofing High-end receivers validate signals manipulating different aspects of the GNSS
must also mimic the actual motion of across multiple constellations, signals it receives. While large deviations
the target as observed by the sensors. prioritizing trusted signals and in a station’s reported position are easily
• Multi-frequency complexity: High- rejecting anomalies. detected—because its location is fixed and
end receivers rely on multiple GNSS • Future authentication measures: known—more subtle attacks can be more
signals (L1/L2/L5, multi-constellation), Services like Galileo Open Service difficult to identify. By modifying satellite
making it exponentially more difficult Navigation Message Authentication ephemerides and clock data while keeping
to spoof all of them consistently. (OSNMA) will allow receivers the CORS’s reported position unchanged,
Regardless of the method, RF spoofing to cryptographically verify that an attacker can introduce hard-to-detect
typically involves amplifying the counter- ephemeris data originates from errors that propagate through correction
feit signal to overpower authentic GNSS authentic satellites, making spoofing streams, misleading all users dependent
signals while also jamming unspoofed even more difficult. on that station's corrections.
Server Data Inject false GNSS Cloud services Secure Cloud: Skylark runs on AWS with encryption and security.
Injection observations with weak Redundant Compute: Skylark’s AWS instances
into the security controls use diverse environments for redundancy.
correction are vulnerable Fault Isolation: AWS Availability Zones
computation to unauthorized prevent widespread disruptions.
servers data injection
ISO 26262-Certified Safety: Skylark ensures its
corrections remain secure and functionally safe.
TABLE 1 Summary of Attack Types and Defenses
+1-703-256-8900 • 800-628-0885
[Link]
ION 80s Themed Event with Rudy Kalafus and John Lavrakas.
Shepherd explained. “That’s a powerful “Vision improves SATNAV, ARCHITECTING FOR THE FIGHT
place to be when GPS is denied.” WE KNOW IS COMING
and SATNAV enables The Common APNT Package isn’t simply
MODULARITY AND SCALE: vision. That’s the a technical response to a sensor prob-
COMMON APNT ACROSS ALL symbiosis we exploit.” lem—it’s a system-level rethink of how
CLASSES PNT is delivered and trusted in the most
Mike Shepherd, Director of APNT Strategy, Navigation and Sensor
The Integrity Ring and its surrounding System Business, BAE Systems hostile environments imaginable.
architec ture are not limited to large “Don’t wait for the threat to teach you
platforms. In fact, the CAP concept was but because RF is being jammed,” Shepherd the lesson,” Shepherd warned. “Assured
developed with scalability in mind. Rather said. “If that doesn’t underscore the need PNT isn’t about redundancy—it’s about
than embedding PNT logic in each payload, for assured PNT, I don’t know what does.” integrity. And that has to be built in from
BAE advocates for a platform-level archi- To counter spoofing, the CAP system the start.”
tecture shared across all mission variants. includes multiple defense layers: M-Code Shepherd, with a final call to action:
“We’re not pushing a $50K box for a authentication, radio frequency (RF) anom- “ We’re saying: Star t with the threat ,
$5K drone,” Shepherd said. “We’re scal- aly detection, cold-start checks, and cross- build for sur vivabilit y, and make in-
ing the same architectural logic across sensor validation. “We’re not betting on tegrity the default. The white paper is
all classes, from expendables to Group any single trick,” Shepherd emphasized. a blueprint. Adapt it. Build on it. But
5 UAVs, using modular components and “We’re building a robust web of trust.” don’t ignore it.”
common interfaces.”
This modularity aligns tightly with the
Department of Defense (DoD)’s push for
a Modular Open Systems Architecture
Notional UAV and Loitering Munitions
(MOSA). Shepherd noted the added benefit APNT Requirements
of continuity in an acquisition environment
Assured Position Navigation and Timing (APNT) System Requirements:
marked by rapid leadership turnover.
1. A PNT system shall maintain a degraded PNT solution through a SATNAV
“Program leads change every 12 to 18
months. Without a standard, you’re re- outage to support SATNAV reacquisition after outage termination.
inventing the wheel with every rotation. 2. A PNT system shall comply with MIL-STD-810 environmental testing methodologies.
CAP creates that consistency.” 3. A PNT system shall comply with MIL-STD-464 environmental testing methodologies.
Shepherd pointed to existing prototypes
4. A PNT system shall provide an APNT solution in a jamming and spoofing threat environment.
as proof of concept. “We’ve got “MILGPS”
based systems flying today in many preci- 5. A PNT system shall provide a MOSA compliant distribution interface for PNT data.
sion weapons. They’re meeting, or exceed- 6. A PNT system shall provide a MOSA compliant sensor interface
ing jamming and spoofing requirements.” for integrating with additional sensors.
7. A PNT system shall perform dead reckoning with no absolute position source.
SURVIVABILITY IN A JAMMED
AND SPOOFED BATTLESPACE SATNAV Requirements
All of these architectural choices converge
8. S ATNAV system shall provide an assured PNT solution.
on a single battlefield reality: the need to
operate in the presence of adversarial 9. S ATNAV system shall provide capability to track encrypted military codes.
interference. In the white paper, BAE mod- 10. S ATNAV system shall mitigate jamming in contested environments.
eled identified benefits of M-Code and AJ/
11. Note: The SATNAV System will provide mitigation against multiple types of
AS techniques. The results are dramatic.
jammers. (contact BAE Navigation & Sensor Systems for details)
GPS receivers can be rendered inoper-
able while still a significant distance from 12. S ATNAV system shall include a multi-element antenna system.
the interference source. In contrast, mod- 13. S ATNAV system shall provide mitigation for multiple spatially unique
ern CAP-equipped UAVs with antijam (AJ) jamming sources. (contact BAE Navigation & Sensor Systems for details)
antennas and M-Code capability can retain 14. S ATNAV system shall provide X dB of anti-Jam Improvement.
full Quadrant D precisionfor operation
(contact BAE Navigation & Sensor Systems for details)
closer to the interference.
15. S ATNAV system shall provide pseudorange and deltarange measurements to the host platform.
Real world scenarios are even more ur-
gent. “We’ve seen in Ukraine that fiber-optic 16. S ATNAV system shall provide synchronous pseudorange and
cable is being laid across contested ter- carrier phase information to the host platform.
rain—not because of bandwidth demand,
vision system, PNT is degraded to just PN PNT solution when vision outages become to cover the mission types and determine
(no time). Likewise, without GPS to initial- long or permanent. breakpoints between platform types for:
ize platform location, vision-based PNT • Expendable
may struggle to operate or fail to operate PROPOSED UAV AND LOITERING • Attritable
altogether. Additionally, without GPS, PN MUNITIONS ARCHITECTURE • Survivable
performance will be degraded as outages We propose optimization of the UAV and Figure 7 shows our understanding of the
extend to long time periods. So, all rows Loitering Munitions architecture to minimize current breakdown of UAV and Loitering
benefit from GPS/SATNAV precise position CPSM across the missions of a given plat- Munitions platforms. The better we all
and time and the two lowest rows benefit form and across platforms. We recommend understand the breakdown of planned
by having access to a Precision Absolute defining a minimum viable set of platforms platforms, the better we can optimize
solutions to provide the best performance
at the lowest cost.
ARCHITECTURE OF KEY
UAV SYSTEMS
To optimize CPSM, we recommend incorpo-
rating a Common APNT Package (CAP) that
is part of the UAV platform, not mission
payload, but distinct from the navigation/
guidance package. We recommend that all
mission payloads that require PNT receive
it from the Common APNT package.
For purposes of this discussion, we are
defining platform to include all elements
of the UAV that remain constant across
all mission types. We are defi ning mis-
Merged SATNAV & Vision Map Matching threat sion payload as those elements that may
environment with vision-only solution approach. change based on the selected mission.
Figure 6: Merged SATNAV and Vision Map Matching threat We recommend the CAP incorporate an
environment with vision-only solution approach. APNT multi-sensor package that meets
mission skyline requirements for a given
platform, including:
• M-Code GPS
• Anti-jam
• Anti-spoof
• Assured sensor fusion
• Dead reckoning (including inertial,
velocity, altitude, etc. sensors)
Figure 7: Taxonomy of UAVs with key data.
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
(JAMMING/SPOOFING) FOR UAVS
AND LOITERING MUNITIONS
To illustrate performance of the proposed
Assurance Is Key Aspect ofMulti-Sensor Fusion Architecture
architecture in a GPS jamming environ-
ment, Figure 11 shows the relative per- Figure 10: Proposed APNT Architecture Model for UAVs and Loitering
formance of various GPS configurations, Munitions.
including current GPS as well as improve-
ment using different generations of GPS This allows operation closer to the jammer continuous assured PNT. In a corner con-
M-Code, and M-Code with Regional Military while maintaining Quadrant D precision dition where both GPS is denied and the
Protection (RMP). As shown in Figure 11, absolute position and time. non-GPS augmentation is unavailable, an
current M-Code GPS receivers provide For the small area of operation where outage of PNT is possible (Figure 5).
better anti-jam performance than the GPS is potentially denied, non-GPS aug- In addition to GPS jamming, GPS spoof-
legacy military GPS receivers and much mentation technology such as inertial ing is an impor tant consideration for
better than commercial GPS receivers dead reckoning or vision navigation can operation in a threat environment. The
currently used by many UAV platforms. supplement the PNT solution to provide most robust navigation systems include
• Angle-of-Arrival Threat Localization: said. “Our systems bring clarity to the field
Displays the direction and magnitude immediately.”
of threats to enhance operational
decision-making. A VISION FOR BROADER PNT
• Remote RF Disconnect: Automatically RESILIENCE: AVIATION, ENERGY Northstar
protects external GPS receivers by AND MARITIME Northstar brings robust PNT
isolating corrupted signals. With civil aviation, maritime and power Situational Awareness to civil
• Event-Based I/Q Recorder: Enables in- grid operators now confronting growing infrastructure, giving operators the
ability to see what’s happening in
depth analysis for sustained PNT SA GPS vulnerabilities, UHU Technologies is
their GPS environment in real time.
improvements. expanding the reach of its PNT Situational
With a user interface designed around Awareness solutions.
Sky View, Map View and Time Machine re- Sanders cited a recent incident at a
plays, Northstar transforms GPS-dependent major airport where GPS interference dis-
UHU 1000
facilities into PNT-aware operations hubs. rupted navigation, forcing pilots to revert The 7-channel system is designed to
“Northstar isn’t just monitoring the sky,” to Instrument Landing Systems (ILS) and combat advanced GPS attacks while
Sanders emphasized. “It’s giving opera- causing operational delays. simultaneously locating their source.
tors a window into the PNT battlespace.” “Without real-time PNT SA, critical in-
Photos courtesy of UHU Technologies.
frastructure becomes reactive rather than
REAL-WORLD IMPACT: proactive,” Sanders said. “Our mission is
ENHANCING PNT SA AT PORTS, to change that.” a model of after-the-fact vulnerability
BORDERS AND AIRPORTS Upcoming demonstrations, including at assessment to a proactive, resilient pos-
Sanders recounted real-world deploy- NAVFEST, will showcase how UHU’s sys- ture—ensuring continuous mission as-
ments where enhanced PNT situational tems can be networked across facilities surance even in PNT contested or denied
awareness made a critical difference. At a for distributed, collaborative PNT threat environments.
major U.S. port, a rogue refrigeration unit detection.
was emitting interference, crippling GPS PNT SA AS A CORE OPERATIONAL
container tracking. A UHU rapid deploy- INTEGRATING PNT SA INTO DOD CAPABILITY
ment kit quickly located and isolated the PROGRAMS OF RECORD Reflecting on UHU Technologies’ strategy,
source, restoring operational stability. As GPS jamming and spoofing incidents Sanders summarized the new reality:
“PNT SA is about understanding dis- escalate worldwide, the future of military “You can’t defend GPS today without
ruptions before they become operational navigation will depend heavily on inte- superior PNT Situational Awareness. It’s no
crises,” Sanders explained. grated PNT Situational Awareness. Key longer about responding to disruption—it’s
“Knowing when, where and how GPS is Department of Defense (DoD) Programs of about knowing disruption is happening
being attacked along a sensitive border Record, particularly in areas such as resil- before it impacts your mission.”
isn’t just a bonus—it ’s critical for mis- ient communications, aviation command With the UHU 1000 and Northstar, UHU
sion success and international safety,” and control, autonomous systems, and Technologies is redefining the standard for
Sanders said. expeditionary logistics, are increasingly resilient, real-time awareness—transform-
recognizing the need to incorporate field- ing PNT from a passive dependency into
RAPID DEPLOYMENT: proven technologies like UHU’s. Real-time an active operational advantage.
DELIVERING IMMEDIATE PNT detection, localization and mitigation of As the global GNSS landscape grows
AWARENESS PNT threats must become intrinsic to more contested, UHU Technologies en-
Both the UHU 1000 and Northstar were platform and mission system designs. sures operators across sectors will not
designed from the ground up to provide By integrating UHU’s advanced capa- only survive—but thrive—with trusted
rapid, on-the-move situational awareness: bilities, these programs can move from PNT.
• Installation: Fully operational
within one hour.
• Mobility: Easily mounted on vehicles About UHU Technologies
using magnetic mounts and stowed Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, UHU Technologies specializes in
in low-profile duffel bags. advanced navigation warfare (NAVWAR) and assured PNT Situational
• Real-Time Data Streaming: Secure Awareness solutions. Its products are deployed across government, military
transmission over VPN- and critical infrastructure sectors, providing unmatched defense against
enhanced cellular networks. spoofing, jamming and GNSS interference.
“Fast, reliable PNT SA shouldn’t require Learn more at [Link].
a full engineering team on site,” Sanders
WHILE GNSS IS AN EXTRAORDINARY TECHNOLOGY, it is not without its limitations and vulnerabilities.
With the rise of increasingly sophisticated spoofing and jamming threats targeting critical infrastructure, the need for
complementary solutions to toughen and augment GNSS has never been more apparent. A layered approach to positioning,
navigation and timing (PNT) is essential for resilience. In this column, we explore emerging PNT solutions, their role in
strengthening system reliability and resilience, and their implications for the future of PNT.
FIGURE 3B: At 14.65 half-chip correlator spacing, the FIGURE 3C: The half chip L1 correlators are 146.5 meters apart. To
L5 signal is 10x more precise. The L5-direct receiver select the peak, L1 receivers sum up all signals received within
identifies and removes reflections from the solution. the correlator distance and shift the correlator peaks to the right.
using L5-band signals, but not with the Leveraging the Tools We Have receivers will coherently process a specific
L1-band. To paraphrase a statement made two set of the P(Y), M-Code, and C/A on L1 and
To compare the performance of L5- decades ago by a famous Secretary of L2. Knowing they come from the same sat-
direct and L1 receivers in urban canyons, State, we combat threats with the tools ellite, they’re combined to improve overall
oneNav recorded sample location data we have, not with the tools we might GPS performance. This new system must
in the San Francisco Financial District one day have. Because interference is a include L5 signal transmission capability
using a pedestrian wristwatch antenna. present-day problem, it calls for imme- for maximum resilience.
The data revealed two reflections after the diate solutions using the best available oneNav is optimistic GPS L5 will
true signal delayed by 45 and 60 meters. resources. L5 is the most resilient GNSS become officially operational in 2025,
Because the half-chip spacing for the signal, and L5-direct, through direct helping the defense and commercial
L1 channel is 146.5 meters, construc- acquisition, can help build a more sectors harness the advantages of the
tive combining of the correlation peak resilient Assured-PNT in civilian and modern signals. EW is a real threat,
in an L1 receiver typically (Figure 3b) military domains. but with resilient GNSS and direct
produces an artificially high SNR. The The Resilient-GPS (R-GPS) satellite acquisition of the L5 signals, we can
resulting multipath error incorrectly program currently being planned in the be prepared. L5-direct is ready to be
shifts the peak to the right. The 14.5- U.S. is an effort to improve resilience by implemented in all devices as a stand-
meter L5 half-chip spacing (Figure 3c) is adding more satellites to the U.S. fleet. The alone solution or an augmentation to
10x more precise. L5-direct can identify program would launch new, small satel- existing solutions. With the resilience
and eliminate dense urban reflections, lites with Y-M-CA codes to address space of L5-direct protecting us against EW,
resulting in more precise location. EW and satellite viability. The Y-M-CA I will happily retire.
Vision-RTK Pro
The RTK solu�on that works
where others go blind
CRPA chip-level
innovations with a cloud-
based infrastructure
built for high-volume
deployments.
F
This decision is as strategic as it is techni-
rom jamming and spoofing to de- sovereign timing systems, the company cal. By aligning with Export Administration
graded signals in dense environ- is helping reshape how organizations think Regulations (EAR) rather than International
ments, these threats are real—and about GNSS reliability and flexibility. Tra f f ic in A r ms Re g ula t ions ( I TA R) ,
they require resilient, scalable and intel- etherWhere’s solutions are accessible to
ligent solutions. EMBEDDED RESILIENCE both domestic and international partners.
That ’s where etherwhere comes in. THROUGH CRPA And with growing demand from civil, de-
Marrying controlled reception pattern At the heart of etherWhere’s approach is fense and commercial sectors for multi-
antenna (CRPA) chip-level innovations a CRPA architecture integrated directly at layered PNT protection, board-level CRPA
with a cloud-based infrastructure built for the board level—enhancing the ability to gives developers a head start in achieving
high-volume deployments, Etherwhere is mitigate jamming and spoofing without re- compliance and reliability.
solving mission-critical PNT challenges at quiring external modules or signal chains.
scale. Whether it’s tracking cattle in the “ The value of board-level CRPA is CLOUD-BACKED CUSTOMIZATION
Amazon, monitoring global pallet networks, that it delivers resilience as a default— etherWhere isn’t just a chip company—it’s
automating retail logistics, or building baked into the system design rather than a vertically integrated platform provider.
The same chip that receives satellite sig-
nals also syncs with a cloud backend that
compliance regulations. The tags operate in and autonomy without sacrificing reliability
harsh, signal-limited environments—under or flexibility.
trees, across miles of terrain, and without
guaranteed human interaction. BUILDING A TIME-SOVEREIGN
“ We built cloud-managed modes of FUTURE
operation that adapt signal acquisition As discussions about sovereign timing
strategies based on terrain, movement grow louder in the halls of government
and activity patterns,” Raam said. “The “RESILIENT TIME IS JUST AS and telecom operators, etherWhere’s
tag knows how to behave based on its
IMPORTANT AS RESILIENT blend of low-jitter timing, multi-signal
context.” redundancy, and cloud-backed configu-
Other clients use etherWhere’s solu- POSITION. And we’re ration is gaining traction.
tion to track pallets globally, register re-
helping customers build “Resilient time is just as important as
tail appliances automatically, or deliver resilient position,” Raam said. “And we’re
redundant timing services combining GPS that foundation without helping customers build that foundation
and Iridium. While the domains differ, the
needing GPS to be infallible.” without needing GPS to be infallible.”
core system—chip, firmware and cloud— This message aligns with global PNT
remains modular and tunable. Michael Raam, CEO, etherWhere policy discussions—particularly in Five
“We’re focused on use cases where the Eyes and NATO nations—about the need
volume justifies customization. That means for more robust alternatives to GNSS, espe-
chip, tag and cloud all working together “Customization slows time to market— cially in contested or denied environments.
for the mission.” but at scale, it becomes a competitive
advantage.” WHAT COMES NEXT
VOLUME-FIRST STRATEGY With a planned controlled reception pat-
Unlike traditional solution providers who BROAD MARKET RELEVANCE tern antenna (CRPA) strategy at the board
optimize for niche integrations or bespoke While the cattle tracking use case may level and cloud-enabled customization
systems, etherWhere’s sweet spot lies in serve as an accessible entry point, it ’s across millions of devices, etherWhere is
high-volume environments—specifically far from unique. etherWhere’s chips are redefining what GNSS resiliency means
those with at least a million units per also being tested in tracking radioac- for real-world autonomy and asset track-
year or those that can justify disposable tive medical materials, where chain-of- ing—from agriculture and infrastructure
infrastructure. custody and compliance are paramount. to logistics and timing.
In one application, a leading electronics In another vertical, their precise timing With the Joint Navigation Conference
company uses etherWhere’s tag to auto- solutions are enabling more resilient ( JNC) approaching, etherWhere plans to
mate warranty and ownership registra- communications infrastructure by com- expand its message to a broader cross-
tion for appliances. In another, their chips bining GPS with alternate constellations section of stakeholders—from defense
track automobiles from manufacturer to for redundancy. program leads and commercial integrators
dealership, eliminating costly misplace- Raam also teased the company’s next- to satellite infrastructure providers and
ments and improving delivery visibility. generation solution: a “ tag in a chip” timing authorities.
The approach enables etherWhere to architecture that integrates low-power As Raam puts it: “Whether you’re track-
support custom solutions through non- multi-band GNSS, software-defined radio ing a cow, a crate or a critical signal, you
recurring engineering (NRE) fees, while and cloud-native orchestration—all in a need systems that deliver certainty—
generating revenue through chip sales single package. This evolution represents not just accurac y. That ’s what we’re
and cloud subscriptions. etherWhere’s push toward miniaturization building.”
Unleash the low power and sensitivity of our solution in a diverse set of applications
T
he use of GNSS for unmanned false signal, while sophisticated spoof- enhance the resilience and reliability
navigation has become ubiqui- ing generates multiple false signals that of its navigation solutions.
tous in modern UAS operations. closely mimic the timing and structure of By integrating inertial systems, visual
However, the low power of GNSS signals authentic ones. The latter is significantly navigation, and alternative methods such
makes them susceptible to interference more difficult to detect and can lead to as solar-based heading determination,
and spoofing. Spoofing attacks can mis- severe navigational errors. the company offers a robust, redundant
lead a GNSS receiver into calculating In contrast, GNSS jamming involves architecture that ensures operational
incorrect positions, velocities and times, the deliberate transmission of radio continuity even in GNSS-denied envi-
potentially leading to mission failure frequency signals that overwhelm or ronments. These technologies not only
or loss of the UAS. As the geopolitical disrupt GNSS receivers by raising the detect interference or spoofing attempts
landscape becomes more complex, the noise floor, effectively denying access to but also actively mitigate their impact
need for robust navigation systems that satellite signals. Unlike spoofing, which through independent sources of posi-
can withstand spoofing attacks is critical. aims to manipulate the receiver’s posi- tioning, significantly improving the
This article presents advancements in tion estimate, jamming prevents it from safety and autonomy of unmanned
spoofing detection and mitigation tech- acquiring or maintaining a satellite lock platforms during critical missions.
nologies developed by UAV Navigation- altogether. This loss of signal results in
Grupo Oesía. By integrating multiple degraded or failed navigation capabil- Robust and Precise Inertial
navigation systems and employing ity, especially in systems that rely solely Navigation Systems
advanced detection algorithms, UAV on GNSS. The autopilots developed by UAV
Navigation-Grupo Oesía provides a Traditional methods for detect- Navigation-Grupo Oesía integrate a so-
comprehensive solution to ensure the ing spoofing include signal strength phisticated, in-house designed Attitude
reliability and accuracy of UAS opera- monitoring, time-of-arrival analysis, and Heading Reference System (AHRS),
tions in GNSS-denied environments. and consistency checks with onboard forming the core of their precise in-
sensors. Signal strength monitoring ertial navigation solution. This AHRS
The Growing Threats to GNSS looks for abrupt fluctuations that may employs a combination of accelerom-
GNSS spoofing and jamming are two signal spoofing activity. Time-of-arrival eters, gyroscopes and magnetometers
major threats to the reliability of satel- techniques compare the arrival timing of to estimate the aircraft’s attitude and
lite-based navigation. GNSS spoofing GNSS signals to detect anomalies, while heading, enabling the calculation of its
involves the transmission of false GNSS consistency checks cross-reference GNSS position based on the last known co-
signals that imitate legitimate ones, de- data with inputs from inertial measure- ordinates. When GNSS data becomes
ceiving the receiver into calculating in- ment units (IMUs), barometers, or other unavailable or unreliable, the system
correct positions. Spoofing attacks can be sensors to identify discrepancies. seamlessly continues navigating using
categorized as simplistic or sophisticated. Emerging technologies for spoofing these inertial estimates, ensuring short-
Simplistic spoofing transmits a single and jamming mitigation include machine term positional continuity.
To address increasingly common UAV Navigation-Grupo Oesía’s signal availability: GNSS-aided mode,
threats such as GNSS spoofing, jamming autopilots have been tested under MIL- enhancing accuracy during normal op-
and electronic interference, the AHRS STD-810F (environmental conditions) and eration; GNSS-denied navigation over
has undergone rigorous validation. It MIL-STD-461F (electromagnetic com- known terrain using terrain recogni-
has been tested extensively by special- patibility) standards, certifying both the tion; and navigation over unknown areas
ized military units under high-intensity hardware robustness and system reliabil- through visual odometry (VO).
electronic warfare scenarios, including ity. In field trials and real-world missions, One of the core challenges in GNSS-
exposure to spoofing attacks and counter- the AHRS/INS system has demonstrated denied navigation is the drift generated by
UAS (C-UAS) systems. These demanding performance comparable to fiber optic inertial dead reckoning. This drift results
tests confirmed the system’s ability to gyroscope (FOG) based systems, despite from the continuous integration of ac-
maintain mission continuity, even when being built on MEMS technology. This celerometer and gyroscope data, which
confronted with intentional disruptions. represents a significant achievement in accumulates errors over time. The VNS01
In one notable operational deploy- size, weight and cost optimization. mitigates this problem by creating a visual
ment, UAV Navigation-Grupo Oesía’s Even in fully GNSS-denied and map of the environment during flight.
autopilot successfully completed a highly dynamic flight conditions, the AHRS By recognizing patterns and comparing
sophisticated mission through an area has proven capable of maintaining stable successive images, the system can con-
protected by a “ jamming curtain.” and accurate attitude and heading es- tinuously adjust the estimated position
Despite the intentional GNSS denial, timation, ensuring the continuity and and orientation of the UAV, significantly
the system maintained control, com- safety of autonomous UAV operations reducing navigational drift.
pleted its objectives, and even executed in the most challenging and hostile The VNS01 was launched by UAV
coordinated flight maneuvers as part of environments. Navigation-Grupo Oesía more than four
a swarming operation, underscoring its years ago and has since undergone ex-
capabilities in autonomous navigation Visual Navigation Systems tensive testing in real-world operational
under contested conditions. The VNS01 system is an advanced scenarios. These tests have consistently
A key system feature is its abil- visual navigation solution designed to validated its effectiveness, especially in
ity to detect and assess navigational enhance the accuracy and reliability of GPS-contested or denied environments.
threats, dynamically identifying poten- UAV operations, particularly in GNSS- Under optimal conditions, the system
tially compromised data sources and denied environments. Leveraging ar- achieves a final positional error of less
prioritizing alternative, trusted sources. tificial intelligence (AI) and advanced than 1% of the total distance traveled,
This allows the autopilot to preserve computer vision techniques, the VNS01 making it a highly reliable tool for preci-
navigational integrity and continue the significantly reduces inertial drift, sion navigation in complex missions.
mission effectively and autonomously. thereby improving overall navigation This year, UAV Navigation-Grupo
This resilient behavior is supported by performance when satellite signals are Oesía plans to release a new version of
a robust architectural design based on unavailable or unreliable. the VNS capable of operating in low-
multi-sensor data fusion, advanced algo- The system operates by capturing light and nighttime conditions, signifi-
rithms, and internal logic that intelligently real-time images of the terrain using cantly extending mission windows and
weighs and combines inputs from vari- an onboard camera. These images are operational flexibility. Additionally, the
ous subsystems. This includes data from processed to extract environmental fea- upcoming version will incorporate digi-
the integrated Air Data System (ADS), tures, which are then used to estimate the tal cartography and public map sources
which supplies critical variables such as aircraft’s position and velocity. VNS01 using deep neural networks to enhance
airspeed and barometric altitude, further supports three operational modes de- navigation over known areas, even in
refining inertial navigation calculations. pending on mission requirements and degraded visual conditions.
resilience, ensuring the system remains false signals. The systems are equipped Inertial and Visual Navigation System
operational and precise even when one or with advanced algorithms designed to Performance Analysis
more sources of data are compromised. identify interference and prioritize trust- The performance of UAV Navigation’s
Ultimately, this holistic approach offers a worthy data sources, ensuring mission INS and VNS has been rigorously evalu-
more robust, adaptable and fault-tolerant success despite active attempts to disrupt ated through both real-world operational
navigation solution, suitable for a wide navigation. These results demonstrate feedback and structured testing proce-
range of missions and environments. the systems are highly resilient and dures. The extensive hours of flight accu-
capable of functioning even when GNSS mulated in actual missions have provided
Performance Analysis, Results signals are unreliable or compromised. invaluable insights into the performance
and Discussion The solar navigation system has been in contested environments. This opera-
UAV Navigation-Grupo Oesía has car- successfully tested in trial flights, dem- tional feedback has been crucial in the
ried out rigorous testing of its navigation onstrating its potential for precise navi- continuous improvement and refinement
systems. These flight logs have provided gation even in the absence of traditional of the navigation technologies, ensur-
invaluable data, enabling the company GNSS signals. The testing was conducted ing their robustness and adaptability
to refine and enhance the systems, on UAV platforms with a maximum take- to evolving mission requirements. The
creating a solution rooted in a philoso- off weight (MTOW) of 10 kg, equipped accumulated data from real-world flights
phy of continuous improvement. with the solar navigation system. These has been systematically incorporated
The systems have undergone exten- tests have proven the effectiveness of the into the system’s development cycle,
sive testing in real-world operational system in real-world conditions, further facilitating the ongoing enhancement
scenarios and have received significant validating its reliability as an alternative of the system’s capabilities.
validation through military-grade as- solution in contested environments. The company has also conducted non-
sessments. Specialized military units An essential aspect of the develop- destructive operational tests designed
have subjected the systems to rigorous ment process for these systems is the to simulate realistic mission scenarios.
scenarios, including deliberate jamming continuous improvement cycle, which These tests included the use of mission
and spoofing attacks. Despite these in- is driven by ongoing feedback from op- configuration, control, guidance and
tense conditions, the systems consistently erators and end users in the field. The navigation systems, with auxiliary
demonstrated their ability to maintain company regularly updates its systems systems integrated to simulate GNSS
mission continuity and successfully based on this feedback, ensuring they jamming or spoofing attacks. The ability
complete objectives even under hostile evolve to meet the challenges of increas- to detect and reject such interference in
interference. These results underline the ingly complex operational conditions. a timely manner is key to maintaining
systems’ ability to withstand and operate This user-driven approach ensures the reliable navigation during compromised
effectively in contested environments, systems remain reliable and effective, GNSS conditions. This capacity allows
offering critical performance when reli- particularly in environments where the system to continue using the avail-
ability is paramount. GNSS signals are compromised or sub- able GNSS signal for as long as possible,
A critical part of the system’s evalua- jected to interference. The integration but to reject it before it compromises
tion is its performance under jamming of real-time performance data allows for the system’s integrity.
and spoofing attacks. Rigorous testing the identification of potential system The system demonstrated its capa-
in environments with active electronic improvements and the implementa- bility during flights in GNSS-denied
interference has shown these systems tion of these enhancements in future conditions, flying over previously un-
can effectively detect, reject and mitigate iterations. explored areas to assess its performance
Topnet Live is a real-time GNSS correction service that delivers high-quality data to GNSS receivers
around the globe. Sold through aftermarket, system integrators and OEM channels, the service can be
used in a variety of applications including survey, construction, GIS, mapping, and agriculture.
Test Distance traveled Description Drift (%) To address this, UAV Navigation-Grupo
Flight without GNSS Oesía is exploring sensors that detect the
1 20 km 0%
with pattern recognition ultraviolet (UV) spectrum, which could
Flight without GNSS allow for continuous operation even
2 20 km 0.5%
with visual odometry under adverse atmospheric conditions.
TABLE 1 Dead-Reckoning Drift Figures. The proposed system is summarized
in Figure 4, which includes all elements
when GNSS signals were unavailable. In face limitations due to environmental involved in the navigation system. The
these tests, the system’s performance was interference or operational constraints. section marked in red highlights the com-
evaluated based on three key indicators Typically, an aircraft’s heading is de- ponents that are active during a GNSS-
as shown in Figures 2a and 2b: rived by fusing data from gyroscopes denied operation. The Air Data, Attitude,
• The raw GNSS position (circle), and magnetometers, or through solu- Heading Reference System (ADAHRS)
representing the last known GNSS tions like dual GNSS, which calculates architecture provides a complete, GNSS-
location. the phase difference between signals independent solution based on a robust
• The estimated position from the from two receivers. However, magnetic attitude estimator and advanced visual
VNS (arrow), derived from visual sensors are sensitive to ferrous materi- navigation techniques. Incorporating the
odometry and terrain pattern als and electromagnetic fields, limiting solar sensor adds a precise and reliable
recognition. their use on naval platforms, electri- observable for the aircraft’s yaw angle,
• The final combined estimation cally driven engines, or in areas with further enhancing the system’s perfor-
from both the INS and VNS strong interference. Magnetometers mance in GNSS-denied environments.
systems (blue aircraft). also require calibration for each air- Figures 4a and 4b outline both the
Figure 2b shows the system success- craft configuration, complicating opera- ADAHRS architecture and the solar
fully navigated over several kilometers tions, particularly for larger platforms. peripheral architecture. Position and
in GNSS-denied conditions. The final Though techniques exist to calibrate UTC time inputs are used as external
combined position (blue aircraft) re- magnetometers in-f light, they often sources to the predictive model. No high
mained highly accurate, demonstrating focus on visual navigation systems. precision is required for these inputs, as
the effectiveness of the INS and VNS Dual GNSS provides precise solutions the sun appears stationary to the observer
systems working together to provide but fails in GNSS-denied conditions. on the ground during short periods, and
continuous, precise navigation even in In contrast, solar navigation elimi- the angular perspective from the sun
the absence of GNSS signals. nates the need for onboard calibration, relative to two separate points on the
simplifying operations and installation, platform remains relatively constant. At
Solar Navigation Performance Analysis with the only requirement being that the this point, we must say factory calibra-
Solar navigation has emerged as a prom- sensor has visibility to the sun. However, tion of the sensors plays a fundamental
ising technology to further improve the it has limitations, such as only being role, as it guarantees optimum perfor-
robustness and safety of unmanned plat- usable during daylight hours and fac- mance within the sensor’s field of view
form operations. While current systems ing challenges during sunrise, sunset or and minimizes assembly errors.
deliver excellent results in contested en- in high-latitude regions during winter. Figure 5 illustrates the comparison be-
vironments, solar navigation provides a Additionally, the sensor operates in the tween the heading estimated by the solar
complementary method to enhance system visible and infrared spectrum, meaning device, which is subjected to radiation
resilience, especially when other sensors cloud cover can obstruct the solar signal. changes on a day alternating between
FIGURE 3 UAS platform with solar navigation system installed for flight testing.
INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION
ION GNSS+
September 8-12, 2025
Exhibit Hall: September 10 and 11
Hilton Baltimore Inner Harbor
Baltimore, Maryland
20
25
sunny and cloudy conditions, and the The results obtained from the tests benef it of not requiring in-f light
Dual GNSS Compass. The average dif- indicate the solar navigation technol- calibration.
ference between the two sources is less ogy shows promising potential as an This study provides proof of con-
than 2 degrees. Additionally, Figure 6 alternative solution for heading sta- cept for integrating astronavigation
compares the three heading sources bility in UAS platforms. The system, techniques into UAS guidance, navi-
during level flight, where the magne- through preliminary validation on the gation and control systems. The re-
tometer signal exhibits the highest noise ground and in f light, demonstrated sults highlight the viability of solar
density, while both the solar peripheral low size, weight and power consump- navigation systems as independent
and the Dual GNSS Compass provide tion (SWaP-C), good precision and alternatives to GNSS, with signifi-
much more stable signals. ease of integration, with the added cant potential for the defense sector,
P
positioning shall be associated to the
ositioning, Navigation and Timing In this article, we ana lyze new capacity of exchanging the positions of
(PNT) services currently rely trends in PNT application demands, the user with a third party application
almost exclusively on GNSS in the evolution of PNT systems and the or just to exchange position-related
medium Earth orbit (MEO). The first rise of LEO PNT, putting user needs data (location based services).
GPS system (NAVSTAR), developed at the center of future technological Ubiquity: Operations anytime,
in the 1980s by the U.S. Department advancements. everywhere, in diverse and harsh
of Defense, was followed by several environments is more and more
other constellations such as Galileo, The New PNT Drivers mandatory.
GLONASS, BeiDou, and QZSS, pro- The use of GPS by the general public,
viding end users with a vast array of benefiting from the development of Quantifying these performance
navigation signals capable of supporting digital boards, marked the first miles- elements, or related Key Performance
a wide range of applications. tone in the adoption of satellite navi- Indicators (KPIs), in a unified man-
The market adoption of such capa- gation in daily life. ner for different application domains
bilities went tremendously fast. Today, In the early 2000s, the technical re- is very challenging, as the operational
PNT is an integral part of our day-to-day quirements related to emergency calls domains, and their purposes, vary from
lives, impacting critical infrastructure, (E911 in the United States and E112 in one application to another, and within
asset tracking, agriculture and Industry Europe) played a truly catalytic role in the same application.
4.0, as well as intelligent transport sys- the adoption of GNSS in the market, Several sources of such KPI implemen-
tems. The evolution of the application providing precise and fast location of tations can be found in the state of the
ecosystem is pushing PNT systems to distress calls made from mobile phones. art solutions being developed like [1-3].
the limits of their capacity, generating The E911 mandate required an accuracy
highly dynamic research efforts to meet target of 50 meters at 67% despite the Why Satellites Are Still the Cornerstone
growing needs as effectively and swiftly challenges of integrating a GNSS receiver Satellite positioning remains the back-
as possible. Low Earth orbit (LEO) PNT into a mobile phone. bone of all these techniques and is the
has become a critical factor in making Today, satellite navigation is com- most widely used among numerous
that happen. monly and routinely used in both positioning technologies. What makes
88 M AY/J U N E 2025
GET INSIDE THE
AUTONOMOUS FUTURE
FREE
Subscription Offer [Link]
[Link]
INSIDE [Link]
satellites stand apart from all the existing their geometry varies slowly, making answer to the question of resilience and
and emerging positioning technologies? multipaths virtually stationary or an availability. However, it is not a suffi-
First, satellites offer key technical evolution of measurements that is not cient answer to counter the stationarity
differentiators that are essential for favorable for quick ambiguity resolution of multipath effect or the need for low
many applications: when aiming to rapidly converge to a power consumption. This approach is,
high-precision position. Another limiting therefore, often complemented by the
• Worldwide coverage factor is the low power of signals received combined use of additional sensors
• Consistent performance on the ground (around -155dBW), which at user level (inertial sensors, LiDAR,
• An absolute reference makes them vulnerable to jamming, cameras, etc.). However, hybridiza-
• Resilience to meteorological and space whether intended or not, and spoofing. tion is often not enough, either. The
weather conditions Finally, the medium-orbit layer rep- multiplication of sensors still suffers
resents the secure backbone required from problems of reliability (integrity),
Secondly, the satellite is part of a glo- by its strategic aspect, which requires a coherence and the ability to have an
bal approach that can withstand any complex design. Service evolution cycles absolute reference in a masked or blurred
local event or disaster, with independent can hinder the dynamism of application environment. To meet the need for high
operation from the number of users. requirements. accuracy in a fast convergence time,
The use of multiple GNSS constella- availability and resilience while pro-
Toward a Multi-Orbit Constellation? tions and multiple frequencies is one viding an absolute reference, solutions
It is important to highlight that some
PNT requirements for the applications
considered, when taken alone, may be
reachable with a medium Earth orbit
constellation by adjusting the signal
and constellation geometry. However,
the combined need for enhanced per-
formance, increased robustness, AND
integrity for safety is the challenge.
To meet these challenges, we need a
multi-orbit vision.
Although very efficient in their design,
constellations in MEO, around 20,000
km, suffer from a number of limitations,
often the downside of their advantages.
The first one is the relatively low dyna- FIGURE 1 Satellite positioning remains the most widely used
mic range of the satellites, which means among many positioning technologies.
90 M AY/J U N E 2025
are moving toward adding a LEO com- for enhanced performances, mainly in As the link budget is also favorable
ponent to MEO systems. terms of accuracy and time-to-first-fix. because of the low altitude of the orbits,
It is important to highlight the However, low Earth orbit requires a LEO PNT satellites do not require a
European Space Agency’s (ESA) LEO- higher number of satellites than medium high-power chain onboard for the same
PNT In-Orbit Demonstrator within the Earth orbit for an equivalent number power received on the ground.
FutureNAV program [4], which aims to of visible satellites. Typically, to ensure As a result, small, quasi-autonomous
demonstrate how to provide resilience four satellites are visible from any point satellites can be considered, and in a New
and augment Galileo with a low-Earth on the Earth's surface, a constellation Space approach, micro-satellite based.
orbit layer; the BeiDou program's sta- of about 300 satellites is needed at an LEO also benefits from a favorable ra-
tement along the same lines from ini- altitude of 600 km. Until now, the cost diation balance compared with MEO,
tiatives in China; and Geely Geespace's of such a constellation to guarantee real- enabling the use of commercial off the
initiative to provide a PNT low-Earth time positioning of about 300 satellites shelf (COTS) components. However,
orbit constellation to support its own in LEO compared to 30 in MEO has been these COTS components require ap-
autonomous car development, showing prohibitive. There are several reasons propriate implementation and specific
just how central PNT is to autonomous for this. know-how to achieve the required level
car concerns. The first is an isolated constellation in of performance and reliability (radiation
LEO requires a dense ground segment protection, redundancy scheme, on-bo-
LEO PNT: A Game-Changer and precise clocks on board the satellites. ard power management, reconfiguration
The deployment of PNT systems in These clocks have a volume and mass strategy, etc.). Recently, systems such as
LEO has been studied for many years, that require large satellites. This first Kinéis [7] have demonstrated the ability
both as dedicated constellations and limitation is lifted as soon as we consider of these small satellites to achieve levels
onboard payloads [5,6]. The immediate a layer in low orbit that relies on the of reliability and performance compa-
advantages of LEO PNT lie in a favo- layer in medium orbit that carries the tible with critical commercial missions.
rable link budget, due to its proximity precise clocks. The same applies to orbit The dynamism of the sector and the
to the Earth's surface, but also in a calculation which, instead of requiring proximity of low-Earth orbit have also
greater dynamic range offering natural a dense ground segment, also can be led to many micro launcher initiatives
multipath filtering and a rapid phase based on measurements from MEO and opportunities for low-cost launches.
ambiguity resolution capability useful satellite signals. These arguments make a LEO cons-
tellation economically viable, even for
large constellations. Several ongoing
projects such as CentiSpace [8], Xona
Space Systems [9], GNSSaS [10], as
well as the European Space Agency’s
FutureNAV Program [4], are examples
of the regained worldwide interest in
the LEO PNT concept.
The value of a LEO PNT solution is
now well established and is often based
on the addition of greater flexibility and
degrees of freedom, as well as the ability
FIGURE 4: Various companies and organizations are developing and demonstrating to evolve rapidly:
LEO PNT solutions [13-15].
Increased accuracy and rapid
convergence: This is made possible
by faster resolution of carrier
phase ambiguity in a Precise Point
Positioning (PPP) solution.
Increased robustness: LEO PNT
provides alternative measurements,
often with higher received power and
frequency diversity than GNSS MEO
systems, in the event of localized
GNSS interference or jamming.
Improved availability: LEO PNT
provides a diversity of signals (SiS)
FIGURE 5: Advantages brought by LEO PNT satellites. and frequencies that helps improve
M AY/J U N E 2025 91
WORKING PAPERS
availability in urban or indoor all use cases). The business model system could provide a major assistance
environments. may also be different in that access to the telecommunication function by
Enhanced flexibility and to the navigation resource is linked assisting the terminals to connect to the
scalability: Offering shorter to access to the main mission and communication services.
development and evolution cycles, potentially subject to a charge. The attractiveness of LEO PNT is il-
LEO PNT is natively highly scalable, lustrated in Table 1, providing a view
as the constellation can be deployed The 5G Non-Terrestrial Networks of the main LEO PNT systems being
and optimized according to (NTN), and the work currently being developed. These figures and, more ge-
application needs. carried out by 3GPP, are the most rele- nerally speaking, the LEO constellations
Two-way connectivity: The altitude vant examples of the search for a fusion are still under constant evolution. More
is ideal for an uplink path that between communication and navigation details can be found in [11].
consumes very little energy for missions. Joint optimization remains a
terminals. It also offers greater major complexity, which suggests it will A Need for Hybridization and Reliability
capacity for disseminating be difficult to achieve the same level of Although LEO PNT offers the perspec-
information by regionalizing accuracy, availability, coverage and tive of a significant improvement in the
transmission. suitability for all types of users, as can provision of an absolute position, it must
be obtained with a dedicated LEO PNT be considered in the frame of a hybrid
The LEO PNT implementation pers- constellation. Reversely, a dedicated LEO PNT solutions context, involving MEO,
pectives vary today according to three PNT constellation operating in the same LEO, terrestrial and non-terrestrial
distinct axes: frequency band as the telecommunication telecom networks, as well as user sensors.
1. Dedicated LEO PNT constellations. Constellation Main Mission Altitude Inclination Frequency
Such constellations offer a dedicated, Starlink (Opportunity) Telecom
>500 km–
53°, 97°, 70° Ku-Ka
defined signal that’s optimized for <650 km
navigation. This type of constellation Lightspeed (Opportunity) Telecom 1,015–1,325 km 98°, 51° Ku–Ka
offers frequency diversity while Kuiper (COMNAV) Telecom 600 km 33°, 42°, 51° Ku–Ka
remaining in the low L, S or C band for OneWeb (COMNAV) Telecom 1,200 km 40°, 55°, 88° Ku–Ka
user segment and usage compatibility. Xona System (Dedicated) LEO PNT 1,080 km 53°, ~97° L, C bands
2. Constellations of opportunity. These TrustPoint (Dedicated) LEO PNT <700 km TBC C-band
are constellations in low orbit, so the
1,175 km (72 sat), 1174 MHz,
mission does not natively include SATNET (Dedicated) LEO PNT
1,150 km (432 sat)
86.5°, 50°
1202 MHz
navigation. Navigation signals are GNSSaS (Dedicated) LEO PNT 500–600 km — L/S bands
added opportunistically. This type of
Jaxa LEO PNT 975 55° C-band
approach offers frequency diversity,
GeelySpace LEO PNT ~650 km TBC L-band
but the accuracy is naturally
degraded compared to what’s ESA’s FutureNAV In-Orbit
LEO PNT ~500-600 km Polar UHF, L, S, C
Demonstrator (Dedicated)
obtained with a signal and a system
geometry designed for navigation. The IRIS2 (LEO/MEO)
Telecom 1200 km 58.2° Ku, Ka, X
(LEO data reported here)
geometry of onboard antenna patterns
TABLE 1 Summary of constellations that may provide LEO PNT services
is often ill-suited to navigation, not to
mention atomic clocks.
3. Merged communication and
navigation constellations. This is
the case with telecommunications
constellations with signals that take
into account the need to provide
a navigation service in addition
to communication services. The
trade-off seems attractive from an
economic point of view, but the
performances are not comparable
to those obtained with dedicated
constellations. Often, the frequencies
used are high, which makes the user
segment more complex (more robust FIGURE 6: Integrity for guaranteed safety: From civil aviation to new safety-critical
applications.
to interference but not suitable for
92 M AY/J U N E 2025
Reliability is also key for adoption for Radio Access Network; Study propre-constellation-de-satellites-pour-
safety critical applications like intelligent on NR positioning support. [Link]
transport. It is driven by integrity and (4) [Link] Authors
continuity targets. Satellite_navigation/LEO-PNT
The concept of positioning integrity Hanaa Al Bitar is the
(5) P. K. Enge, B. Ferrell, J. Bennett, user segment and
was originally developed for civil aviation
D. A. Whelan, G. M. Gutt, and D. G. augmentations manager
applications. New safety-critical auto- Lawrence, “Orbital Diversity for Satellite
nomous transport applications, such as at Thales Alenia Space
Navigation,” Nashville, TN, Sep. 2012. France (TAS-F), Bids and
cars, drones and trains, require a major
(6) T. G. Reid, A. M. Neish, T. F. Walter, Advanced Projects
adaptation of this heritage. In such envi- department. She
ronments (urban canyons, interference, and P. K. Enge, “Leveraging Commercial
Broadband LEO Constellations for received her Ph.D. in Radio Navigation
etc.), integrity must be shared between signal processing in 2007 form the Ecole
Navigating,” Portland, Oregon, Nov. 2016,
the space system and the user segment. pp. 2300–2314. doi: 10.33012/2016.14729. Nationale de l’Aviation Civile in France.
Global and regional threats are She joined Thales Alenia Space in 2012.
addressed at system level. This is done (7) [Link] Her activities focused on GNSS receiver
through the definition of a new GNSS en/spatial-iot-connectivity/ signal processing, EGNOS Land Earth
high accuracy and integrity service. (8) Y. Long, “The Centispace-1: Stations (NLES) signal processing and
Local effects, on the other hand, are A LEO Satellite-Based design, and technical management of
addressed at the level of the user's on- Augmentation System,” 2019. end to end demonstrators over EGNOS
GEO satellites in 2015 and 2017. Since 2023,
board unit [12]. (9) “LEO Successor to GNSS Comes she has managed the business and
Knocking,” Jun. 2020. [Link] technical roadmap for developing highly
Conclusion com/leo-successor-to-gnss-comes- reliable and precise positioning solutions
GNSS-based PNT technologies are now knocking/(accessed Jan. 26, 2022). for autonomous transport applications.
the backbone of a multitude of innova-
(10) H. Am, A. K, A.-E. O, and M. Mi, Michel Monnerat is
tive applications. These systems have
“NSSTC capabilities and the GNSSaS the Director of Bids and
made considerable progress in recent satellite project,” Aeronaut. Aerosp. Open
years, particularly since the arrival of Advanced Projects at
Access J., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 156–159, Nov. Thales Alenia Space
Galileo, which offers new, more powerful 2020, doi: 10.15406/aaoaj.2020.04.00117. (TAS-F Navigation
signals and services such as decimetric
(11) FrontierSI State of Market Report Domain). He is a senior
accuracy and anti-blur authentication. expert at Thales Group
on Low Earth Orbit Positioning
All these new applications have one in Space Navigation System and has more
Navigation and Timing (LEO
thing in common: They call for pro- PNT)—2024, [Link] than 50 patents in space systems. He is
gress in terms of precision, continuity, au/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ also Director of the Navigation Advanced
resilience and security. These needs are FrontierSI-State-of-Market-Report- projects department in Thales Alenia
driving R&D and producing major [Link]. Space with more than 25 years of
developments. experience in space systems
(12) “Integrity Complementing development. He has worked on many
The introduction of a constellation
High Accuracy Service via EGNSS for space-based radar programs within
of LEO PNT satellites is key to meeting Autonomous Driving—ICHASE project
the needs identified, while respecting Alcatel Space and was in charge of
results,” Hanaa Al Bitar, Tristan Planchais, developing payloads like ARGOS/SARSAT.
economic imperatives. To provide a Rami Ali Ahmad, Anne-Marie Tobie, from He has been involved in Galileo and
complete response, it must be designed Thales Alenia Space, Ni Zhu, Miguel Ortiz, EGNOS since 1998 as system architect,
and used in a multi-sensor context. from University Gustave Eiffel, Antonella signal designer, performances manager,
Di Fazio, from FDC, Silvia Porfili, Javier regulation manager for ITU and
References Ostolaza, Gerarda De Pasquale, European Engineering Director. With his new
(1) ETSI TR 101 593, Satellite Earth Union Agency for the Space Programme. functions within Thales Alenia Space he is
Stations and Systems (SES); Global in charge of developing innovative
(13) [Link]
Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) upstream and downstream technologies
chinas-geely-first-batch-of-leo-satellites-
based location systems; Minimum and services in the navigation sector, with
for-autonomous-vehicles-launched/
performance and features a worldwide customers portfolio that’s
(14) [Link] both civil and military. He is also in charge
(2) ETSI TR 103 183, Satellite Earth
com/telecom-technology/satellite- of developing New Space programs
Stations and Systems (SES); Global
communications-networks/16165- essentially based on constellations of
Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) based
china-s-geespace-launches-next-batch- satellites (Internet of things, Earth
applications and standardisation needs
[Link] navigation augmentation) as well as space
(3) 3GPP TR 38.855, 3rd exploration systems.
(15) [Link]
Generation Partnership Project;
volkswagen-et-porsche-vont-lancer-leur-
Technical Specification Group
M AY/J U N E 2025 93
BRUSSELS VIEW
R
and multinational, or it risks esilience was on the minds and “Resilience is not just a slogan.
becoming no future at all. lips of participants at this year’s It is the foundation
Munich Satellite Navigation of how we
Summit. Christoph Kautz, director for
satellite navigation and Earth obser-
protect critical
vation at the European Commission infrastructure
(EC), set the tone: “Resilience is not just and maintain
a slogan. It is the foundation of how our strategic autonomy in an
we protect critical infrastructure and increasingly uncertain world.”
maintain our strategic autonomy in an
increasingly uncertain world.” Christoph Kautz, director for satellite navigation and Earth
observation, European Commission
The summit took place against the
backdrop of heightened geopolitical
PETER GUTIERREZ, tensions, mounting cyber threats and
Inside GNSS’s European persistent interference challenges facing said, “We are lucky to have Galileo as
correspondent, is a senior global positioning, navigation and tim- an autonomous European navigation
reporter and editor based in ing (PNT) systems. GNSS, once viewed system, but we must make it even more
Brussels, Belgium, who has as an untouchable pillar of technology, resilient against spoofing, jamming and
written about Europe’s GNSS now must evolve or risk becoming the cyber threats.” The urgency is real—
programs for many years. weak link in the chain. “Our systems are resilience must turn from aspiration to
He received his bachelor’s designed to take resilience into account,” implementation, and fast. Governments
degree from the University
said Francisco-Javier Benedicto Ruiz, must integrate resilience into all levels of
of Texas at Austin and a MS
director of navigation at the European PNT infrastructure, from system design
degree from the University
of Massachusetts at Amherst. Space Agency (ESA), “but the chal- to user equipment security, to ensure
lenge is higher today, and we need to continued operational reliability.
respond with more agility, robustness
and diversification.” Beyond Established GNSS
It’s no secret. Every aspect of modern Complementary PNT, alternative
life, from emergency services to energy PNT, and particularly low Earth orbit
grids, now depends on PNT. Kautz (LEO) PNT systems were major topics
Nations disaster communication goals, “Galileo is not just a PNT across all military services and enhanc-
it enables national authorities to broad- ing GPS accuracy and resilience through
system. We are introducing
cast alerts about natural disasters and a combination of commercial partner-
other emergencies. Testing by member safety-of-life ships and small satellite augmentations.”
states has been positive, and smartphone services, real- The new generation of cyber-hardened
app integration is expected to widen time timing ground stations is slated for full deploy-
the service’s reach by the end of 2025. performance ment this year.
“Galileo is not just a PNT system,” alerts, and
Alcantarilla said. “We are introducing
enhanced search-and-rescue New Approach to GPS Resilience
safety-of-life services, real-time tim- One of the most innovative new pro-
ing performance alerts, and enhanced capabilities like remote grams coming out of the U.S. is the
search-and-rescue capabilities like beacon activation and distress Resilient GPS (R-GPS) initiative. “We
remote beacon activation and distress message relays.” are piloting rapid-deployment micro-
message relays. It’s an ecosystem of ser- Ignacio Alcantarilla Medina, head of sector Galileo and EGNOS,
constellations to augment PNT services
vices designed to save lives and ensure European Commission in the event of widespread jamming or
security.” In the near future, Galileo will satellite loss,” Spencer said. These small,
enable remote activation of beacons, seen quickly launched satellites, leveraging
as a major advancement, especially for can seriously disrupt GPS signals, commercial innovations from com-
locating lost aircraft or ships. with potentially life-threatening con- panies like TeraSense, Xairos, Trident
Performance-wise, Galileo remains at sequences in sectors like aviation and Sensing, and Xona, focus on specific
the top of the GNSS field. Open service emergency response. The U.S. continues mission subsets rather than duplicating
positioning accuracy remains better to invest heavily in maintaining and the entire GPS functionality.
than 1.5 meters 95% of the time, and modernizing the system. The GPS III “Each mini constellation can reach
ranging accuracy reaches 20 centime- constellation, delivering four enhanced operational strength in just three years”
ters. “We are still outperforming other civil signals (L1 C/A, L1C, L2C, L5) Spencer said, “compared to the decade
systems by a wide margin,” Alcantarilla and four military signals (L1/L2 P(Y), or more required to build out tradi-
said. Timing accuracy remains at the L1/L2M including the new encrypted tional GPS satellites.” Importantly, the
nanosecond level, typically better than M-Code), is growing steadily. payloads are interoperable with current
±5 ns. “Galileo’s sub-meter accuracy and The constellation currently includes military receivers and can be adapted for
phase stability have consistently led the 31 satellites, significantly outperforming civilian use through software upgrades.
market since 2017,” he said. original expectations in both lifetime The Space Force aims to launch these
Finally, work on the EGNOS augmen- and accuracy, delivering better-than- augmentation satellites starting around
tation system continues. EGNOS V2 is published performance even on the 2028, layering additional resilience atop
rolling out improvements now, while worst days. “Some of our satellites have the core constellation.
EGNOS V3, supporting multi-constel- been in service longer than I have,” Spencer also highlighted continued
lation, multi-frequency augmentation Spencer quipped. The latest GPS III commitment to international coop-
and extending safety-critical services satellite was launched in December, with eration under Space Policy Directive
to Galileo signals, should be ready by another slated for launch this summer. 7 (SPD-7), which formalized U.S.
2028 or 2029. This will greatly enhance Looking ahead, next-generation GPS goals for PNT resilience, protection
integrity monitoring for critical sectors III Follow On (GPS IIIF) satellites are against jamming and spoofing, and
such as aviation, rail and maritime. now on deck, with the first launches international partnerships. “The cur-
scheduled for 2027. “These will feature rent policy that we’re living under
GPS Remains Indispensable advanced anti-jam capabilities, in-orbit came into fruition under the first
Representing the U.S. Space Force, reprogrammability, regional military administration of President Trump,”
Colonel Matthew Spencer said, “Despite protection enhancements, laser retro- Spencer said, “and I see no indica-
its robustness, GPS is vulnerable to reflectors for improved ground tracking, tion that this policy will change,”
interference, cyberattacks and even and broadcast the full suite of modern- Bilateral and multilateral forums
solar weather events. It remains a cor- ized signals,” Spencer said. “GPS IIIF is like the International Committee
nerstone of modern life, a foundational designed with resilience in mind from on GNSS (ICG), he said, remain key
technology for both civilian and military the start. It’s not just an upgrade; it’s a avenues for best-practices sharing
infrastructure worldwide, but that very transformation.” and standards development.
centrality demands we make it more In parallel, robust ground system Finally, the GPS program is also
resilient than ever.” upgrades are also underway. “We are leveraging commercial innovation
Spencer said both unintentional hardening ground stations with cyberse- through programs like AFWER X
and deliberate jamming, along with curity upgrades,” Spencer said, “deploy- and SpaceWERX. In response to a
the growing threat of digital attacks, ing M-Code-capable user equipment recent alternative PNT challenge, the
to interference,
in 2029, and global operational capabil- cyberattacks ESA’s “Moonlight” program, aimed
ity by 2035. at establishing communication and
and even solar
The next-generation BeiDou archi- navigation services around the Moon,
tecture w i l l integrate high-orbit weather events. is another step into the next frontier.
GEO, MEO and LEO segments to It remains a “Navigation technologies must not just
optimize coverage and reliability, cornerstone of modern life, serve Earth but extend to cislunar and
supported by ground networks fea- a foundational technology deep-space operations,” ESA’s Benedicto
turing AI-enhanced data fusion. So, for both civilian and military said. New lunar navigation infrastruc-
the BeiDou vision has a lot in com- tures like Loran Moon are expected to
infrastructure worldwide, but
mon with the multilayer GNSS concept be operational within this decade.
emerging out of Europe. that very centrality demands In Europe, initiatives like ESA’s
Japa n’s QZ S S s y stem ha s a lso we make it more resilient than Navigation Innovation and Support
advanced signif icantly, with new ever.” Program (NAVISP), the new EU Space
satellites and services coming online. Colonel Matthew Spencer, Commander and Senior Materiel Leader, Act proposals, and expanded budget
Satoshi Hosoda from QZSS highlighted PNT Systems Delta, Space Systems Command allocations in the Union’s 2028 financial
the operational rollout of authenti- framework will further stimulate GNSS
cation (QZNMA) and precise point industry innovations from both sides and PNT innovation. Kautz noted the
positioning (MADOCA-PPP) services of the Atlantic,” Spencer said, mention- European Commission’s drive to “cre-
in 2024, bolstering resilience across ing joint initiatives to test and invest in ate an internal market for space” and
the Asia-Pacific region. Full constel- commercial alternative PNT technolo- “foster competitiveness,” aided by stra-
lation completion, achieving seven gies. ESA and NASA collaborations on tegic proposals to enhance sovereignty,
operational satellites, is expected by lunar navigation initiatives are another resilience and industrial leadership.
the end of 2025. example of durable partnerships tran- The world is entering a new era
QZSS innovations include robust sup- scending political divides. where GNSS and PNT resilience are
port for early warning satellite services Still, the realities of political dynamics not optional luxuries but existential
(EWSS) targeting natural disaster alerts cannot be ignored. Karen Van Dyke from necessities. One message coming out
across Asia, again mirroring develop- the U.S. Department of Transportation of Munich was crystal clear: user-
ments in Europe, and improved cross- emphasized the importance of “protect- driven design along with adaptabil-
authentication of GNSS signals via dual- ing spectrum from harmful interfer- ity and agile development cycles, a
constellation protection mechanisms. ence” and “cyber-toughening receivers,” la SpaceX, will define success in the
Future QZSS expansion is expected essential tasks to ensure GNSS resil- coming decades. Monnerat concluded,
to add LEO assets for enhanced urban ience, especially in contested or hostile “Navigation must move from mono-
navigation support by 2028. environments. Executive Orders like the lithic to dynamic.”
2025
INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION
LEO constellations offer distinct advantages over traditional MEO and GEO constellations by delivering higher signal power and reduced latency, which enhances GNSS capabilities in urban environments where signal blockage is frequent. Their proximity to Earth results in stronger signals and more frequent signal updates, improving resilience against interference. However, they require more frequent tracking and reacquisition of signals due to their fast orbital speeds. These characteristics make LEO-based systems suitable for complementing traditional GNSS infrastructures by providing additional redundancy and robustness against jamming and spoofing .
LEO-based navigation services offer higher received power and closer proximity than traditional GNSS, providing opportunities for military navigation by enhancing signal strength and reducing latency. This makes LEO systems particularly useful in urban environments where signal obstruction is common. However, the fast-moving nature of LEO satellites presents challenges in terms of maintaining continuous signal acquisition, requiring more frequent updates and reacquisition of signals. Despite these challenges, initiatives like the Air Force’s AFWERX are exploring these opportunities by funding research into LEO PNT possibilities, emphasizing the importance of a secure signal architecture to meet military requirements .
VIAVI's PNT platform's modular design allows for adaptable integration of various sensors and technologies, maximizing the use of onboard equipment to maintain GNSS resilience. This includes leveraging visual odometry, sensor fusion, and precise time alignment technologies, enabling the system to maintain a pseudo-GPS signal for vehicles even under GNSS-denied conditions. Reflecting current defense strategies, such modular and layered designs align with the DoD's approach to the D3SOE (Denied, Degraded, and Disrupted Space Operational Environment), where space-based systems face regular disruption from jamming and spoofing attempts, thus providing continuity of operations and reinforcing strategic autonomy .
The GPS Operational Control Segment (OCX) has progressed to support both GPS III and GPS IIIF constellations with OCX Block 1 and Block 2 milestones. These advancements allow the military to deliver capabilities faster and more responsively. M-Code activation across the GPS constellation is a significant milestone, providing full global coverage and enabling robust anti-jam and anti-spoof capabilities. With 25 space vehicles broadcasting the secure, high power M-Code signal, military users now have a more resilient signal environment, enhancing the security and interoperability of military navigation systems .
The Resilient GPS (R-GPS) initiative aims to augment existing GPS capabilities through the deployment of small, rapidly deployable satellite constellations. These micro-constellations can be quickly launched, achieving operational capability in approximately three years. They enhance resilience by providing mission-specific capabilities and integrating efficiently with existing military receivers. The initiative allows for adaptive solutions to jamming and satellite loss, potentially revolutionizing global navigation by providing flexible, rapid response capabilities, thereby enhancing both military and civilian GNSS resilience and interoperability .
Solar navigation systems significantly enhance UAV operations in GNSS-denied environments by providing a robust, calibration-free alternative to traditional magnetometers. They are immune to electromagnetic interference and offer reliable heading information based on the sun's position. However, challenges include limited operation during low sunlight conditions such as dusk, dawn, or overcast conditions, reducing their effectiveness in consistently challenging environments. Despite these challenges, when integrated with other navigation systems, solar navigation contributes to multi-layered navigation resilience, critical for maintaining UAV autonomy and operational capability during missions .
Open systems architecture is crucial in modern defense strategies as it allows for modular, flexible integration of new technologies, ensuring that PNT platforms can quickly adapt to evolving threat environments. This approach fosters innovation by enabling the incorporation of various sensory inputs and supporting systems, such as visual navigation and alternate PNT sources. However, challenges include ensuring compatibility and security across diverse hardware and software components. Navigating intellectual property considerations and maintaining system integrity while allowing broad access and customization further complicate implementation. Despite these challenges, open architecture's adaptability is essential for future-proofing defense systems .
Artificial intelligence and advanced algorithms play a crucial role in enhancing PNT systems' performance by enabling real-time adaptation and decision-making capabilities in contested environments. These technologies facilitate the detection, assessment, and response to navigational threats such as spoofing and jamming. AI-driven data fusion from multiple sensors ensures the selection and prioritization of the most reliable data sources, allowing for continued operation and mission success even when primary navigation channels are compromised. These advanced capabilities significantly bolster the resilience of PNT systems against evolving electronic warfare threats .
The activation of the M-Code signal provides a more resilient signal environment, which has generated strong international interest from allied nations due to its enhanced security features. M-Code provides robust anti-jam and anti-spoof capabilities, essential for modern military operations. The secure signal facilitates better interoperability among allies and enables joint operations under contested environmental conditions. This collaboration potential presents allies with strategic advantages by integrating a more reliable navigation system into their military infrastructure, further enhancing global security and interoperability .
Integrating alternative navigation systems like solar and visual navigation into UAVs aim to enhance their operational resilience against GNSS disruptions. Solar navigation offers a robust heading determination method immune to magnetic interference and does not require onboard calibration, making it suitable for urban and military environments. Visual navigation systems complement inertial navigation by leveraging visual odometry and pattern recognition, ensuring continued position accuracy in GNSS-denied settings. Collectively, these systems provide a multi-layered navigation approach that improves reliability and operation continuity, essential for missions operating in contested environments that challenge traditional GNSS-based navigation .