0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

Tutorial Solution For Risk Management

The document discusses risk management in engineering, focusing on various exercises related to structural systems, water supply, organizational management, fire safety, and health hazards. It emphasizes the importance of identifying potential failure scenarios and conducting risk analyses to enhance safety and economic feasibility. Additionally, it provides calculations for economic risks associated with foodborne illnesses and automobile accidents, highlighting the need for effective risk assessment strategies.

Uploaded by

Dhruv Thakkar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

Tutorial Solution For Risk Management

The document discusses risk management in engineering, focusing on various exercises related to structural systems, water supply, organizational management, fire safety, and health hazards. It emphasizes the importance of identifying potential failure scenarios and conducting risk analyses to enhance safety and economic feasibility. Additionally, it provides calculations for economic risks associated with foodborne illnesses and automobile accidents, highlighting the need for effective risk assessment strategies.

Uploaded by

Dhruv Thakkar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Faculty of Engineering and IT

Risk Management in Engineering (49006)


Subject Coordinator and Instructor: Dr. Emily Canda

Risk Terminology Tutorial - Solution

Exercise 1
A truss as shown in figure below can be viewed as a structural system that must be designed to an
acceptable safety level to support traffic loads on a bridge. The system in this case can be thought of as
a system in series, meaning that if 1 out of 29 members fails, then the entire system would fail to
function properly and may collapse. The failure potential is a serious matter that designers consider
carefully in the design stage of the truss. Please share your ideas about any potential modes of failure
and how you can manage the risks.

Solution
The design stage includes studying the possible scenarios of failure of the members in order to enhance
the design and manage the risks. For example, a design could be enhanced to allow for partial failures
instead of catastrophic failures and to introduce redundancy through the addition of other members to
work as standby or load-sharing members to critical members in the structure. The benefits of such
enhancements, which are intended to reduce the likelihood of failure, could include increasing design
and construction costs to such an extent that the structure becomes economically unfeasible. Bridge
failure consequences may be included in this analysis. Trade-off analyses can be performed to make the
structure economically feasible and achieve the acceptable safety levels. This example demonstrates
the potential of risk analyses during the design process to provide the acceptable risk levels.
Exercise 2
The primary water supply system of a city is shown in figure below. The water delivery system of city
C has two sources, A and B, from which water passes through a pumping station. Pipelines (branches
1–3) are used to transport water as shown in the figure. Assuming that either source alone is sufficient
to supply the city with water, failure can happen in branch 1, 2, or 3. Designers and planners of the
pipeline system, therefore, have to identify possible water loss scenarios to assess the associated risks.
Please develop scenarios and determine associated consequences for this case.

1|Page
Faculty of Engineering and IT
Risk Management in Engineering (49006)
Subject Coordinator and Instructor: Dr. Emily Canda

Risk Terminology Tutorial - Solution

Solution
The simplistic failure scenarios given in table below can be used for risk analysis studies of the supply
pipelines. The table is limited only to cases where total failure happens in each of the three branches.
The table can be expanded to include partial failures of a branch including water loss from leaks.

Exercise 3
Risk methods can be used to analyze potential failures in managing an organization due to errors,
inappropriate decision, or incorrect decisions. Organizational failures can lead to significant adverse
consequences. Executives and managers of organizations are responsible for designing the hierarchical
structure of their organization. They should rigorously study the implications for designing their
organizational structure as a system with in-series, in-parallel, or mixed series–parallel lines of authority
and communications among departments and management levels. These lines represent the flow of
instructions and the feedback channels that could fail and potentially lead to damage to the entire
organization. For the series–parallel structure shown in figure below, you need to analyze the risks
associated with the structure and perform failure analysis.

Solution
Performing qualitative failure analysis in organizational management systems poses a unique challenge,
as managed departments are not mechanical devices that show a crisp transition from a functioning state
to a failure state but rather exhibit partial failures and blurred transitions from one state to another.
Therefore, in analyzing such structures, the percentage of failure at every management level has to be
assessed through brainstorming and interviewing sessions. The qualitative analyses are usually a
prelude to quantitative analyses to quantify these partial to disruptive failures as shown in table below.

2|Page
Faculty of Engineering and IT
Risk Management in Engineering (49006)
Subject Coordinator and Instructor: Dr. Emily Canda

Risk Terminology Tutorial - Solution

Exercise 4
In the event of a fire in an apartment that is equipped with a smoke detector, the potential consequences
of the fire to occupants may be analyzed using qualitative risk analysis methods. The consequences of
the fire depend on whether the smoke detector operates successfully during the fire and whether the
occupants are able to escape. Develop the possible scenarios and assess the consequences.
Solution
The table shows possible qualitative scenarios that can be thought of as results of a fire. The table can
be extended further to perform quantitative risk analyses by assigning probability values to the various
events in paths (i.e., rows of the table). An additional column before the last column can be inserted to
calculate the total path probability of each scenario. Such an analysis can assist planners and designers
in computing the overall probability of each consequence for the purpose of planning, designing, and
constructing escape routes more efficiently. Such analysis can reduce risks and increase safety to
occupants of the apartments, leading to reduction in insurance premiums and enhancement of market
values of the apartments.

Exercise 5
Consider health hazards of Salmonella enteritidis (ES), which is the second most common cause of food
poisoning after Campylobacter. It has been found primarily in unpasteurized milk, eggs, egg products,
meat, and poultry. ES can survive if food is not cooked properly. In the U.S., there are 19 ES-related
human illnesses per 106 shell eggs consumed, 710 deaths per million ES-related illnesses, 47 billion

3|Page
Faculty of Engineering and IT
Risk Management in Engineering (49006)
Subject Coordinator and Instructor: Dr. Emily Canda

Risk Terminology Tutorial - Solution

shell eggs consumed per year, the average cost of the illness is US$ 400 per case. Calculate economic
risk (expected losses) caused by ES illnesses and mortality risks due to consumption of shell eggs in
the U.S.
Solution
Frequency of illness: (19/106)*(47*109)=893,000 illnesses per year
Magnitude of death: 710 deaths per million illnesses (0.07% per illness)
Mortality risk value (expected losses): 893,000*(710/106)=634 deaths/year
Cost per illness (regardless of outcome): US$ 400
Economic risk value (expected losses): 893,000*$400=US$ 357,200,000 per year.
Exercise 6
According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, in 2003, there were 6.3 million automobile
accidents: 1 in 3 of such accidents resulted in injury, and 1 in 165 resulting in death. Assuming average
loss of US$ 450,000 per death and US$ 25,000 of property damage for accidents involving fatality;
average loss of US$ 15,000 per injury and property loss of US $10,000 for accidents involving injury;
average property loss of US$ 3,000 for all other accidents, calculate the total monetary risk (expected
losses) of automobile accidents per driver in the U.S. Assume that the U.S. population exposed to
automobile accidents is 250 million.
Solution

Case Study Tasks:


1. What was the main hazard in the case study?
2. What are the main functions of the process in the case study?
3. Are you able to estimate the likelihood and severity of the hazard?
Solution
1. The main hazard was overflow vapor in the production room.
2. The main functions of the system included heating, mixing, and ventilation.
3. At this stage, the likelihood and severity can be expressed qualitatively. The likelihood was low,
and the severity was very high.

4|Page

You might also like