Lecture Notes Part1 4dec
Lecture Notes Part1 4dec
OF
Mário G. Silveirinha
ii
Propagation and Radiation
Index
iv
Fundamental Concepts
classical electromagnetism. They were developed by the Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell
in the mid-19th century and represent a unification of various principles governing electric and
magnetic phenomena. In the 1820s and 1830s, Michael Faraday and André-Marie Ampère made
Faraday discovered electromagnetic induction, showing that a changing magnetic field could
induce an electric current, while Ampère formulated Ampère’s law, which relates electric current
to its associated magnetic field. Maxwell’s groundbreaking work not only synthesized existing
knowledge but also paved the way for profound advancements in physics and technology,
Maxwell’s theory was formulated between 1861 and 1862. The equations that bear his name
describe the behavior of electric E x, y, z , t and induction B x, y, z , t fields in space and time,
emphasizing the interdependence of these two phenomena. In free-space, the two key equations
read:
B
E B, j 0 E. (1.1)
t 0 t
vacuum permeability. The equation on the left is known as Faraday’s law and the equation on
1
Fundamental Concepts
The electromagnetic fields are created by charged particles. These are modelled by a charge
density , and by a current density j . The current density describes the transport of charge due
to physical motion. Charge conservation requires that j and are linked through a continuity
equation:
j t 0 . (1.2)
We use the shorthand notation t / t . Integrating the continuity equation over a volume V
with boundary surface one obtains with the help of the divergence theorem that:
dQ
j nˆ ds . (1.3)
dt
Here, Q dV is the total charge inside volume V and n̂ is the unit normal vector directed to
V
the exterior of . Thus, the continuity equation in integral form establishes that a variation of the
charge inside V is due to the flux of the current density j through the boundary surface . In
simple words, a variation of the charge in a volume can always be attributed to an electric
The Faraday’s and Ampère’s laws are complemented with the Gauss’s law for magnetic and
electric fields:
2
Fundamental Concepts
with D 0 E the electric displacement vector with units of C / m 2 .1 The units of electric field
are V / m , the units of the magnetic induction are Tesla [T] and the units of the current density
The Maxwell’s equations in free-space are linear. This means that the superposition principle
E, H E1 E2 , H1 H 2 .
E 0 H, H 0 E. (1.5)
t t
This determines a set of first-order coupled partial-differential equations in space and time. It is
possible to eliminate the magnetic field and obtain an equation that rules the dynamics of the
electric field alone. To this end, we differentiate in time both sides of the Ampère’s law
H 1
( 0 E ) and use Faraday’s law ( H E ) to eliminate the magnetic field.
t t t t 0
This yields:
2
E 0 0 E 0. (1.6)
t 2
1 As a side note, we point out that the Eqs. (1.4) are not fully independent of (1.1). For example, calculating the divergence of both members of
the Faraday’s law ( E B ) it follows that B 0 . We took into account that the divergence of the curl of a vector vanishes:
t t
E 0 . Thus, the constraint B 0 only needs to be enforced at initial time, as then it will be satisfied at any time instant
thereafter. Similar considerations hold true for the Gauss’s law D . Due to this reason, the two equations in (1.1) characterize fully the
time evolution of the electromagnetic field, whereas (1.4) may be regarded as initial time boundary conditions.
3
Fundamental Concepts
To proceed we use the vector identity E E 2 E . Taking into account that from
Gauss’s law 0 D 0 E , it follows that the electric field satisfies the so-called wave
equation:
2
E 0 0 2 E 0 .
2
(1.7)
t
Note that the wave equation is of second order has it involves two derivatives in the time and
2 2 2
space coordinates. In the above, 2 is the Laplacian. The wave equation may
x 2 y 2 z 2
2
2 Ex 0 0 Ex 0
t 2
2
2 E y 0 0 2 E y 0
t
...
In some simple cases the wave equation can be integrated explicitly. To illustrate this, let’s
E E z , t xˆ
This corresponds to a wave that oscillates along the x direction, but propagates along z. Since
2 E 1 2 E
0. (1.8)
z 2 v 2p t 2
where we introduced the parameter v p 1/ 0 0 , which has unities of velocity. The general
E z , t E z v p t E z v p t . (1.9)
4
Fundamental Concepts
Here, E u , E u are arbitrary functions of the single parameter u . Next, we check by direct
substitution that (1.9) satisfies the wave equation. Considering for simplicity that E 0 we
E
E z v p t u E u , 2 E u
E u E u
z z z 2
z
u
E u 2 E u
E u v p E u , v p E u v 2p E u
t t t 2
t
The prime denotes a derivative with respect to u. Thus, we have shown that
2 E 1 2 E 1
2 2 E 2 v 2p E 0
z 2
v p t vp
which confirms that (1.9) satisfies the wave equation for an arbitrary E .
Let us now physically interpret the terms E and E of the general solution of the wave
equation. For simplicity, we focus on the solution E and suppose again that E 0 . Then:
E z , t 0 E z
E z , t t0 E z v p t0
Thus, the function E defines the profile of the wave along the direction of propagation at
initial time (t=0). As seen, for later time instant ( t0 0 ) the wave suffers a translation in space
5
Fundamental Concepts
and the profile is recentered at the point z0 v p t0 . Thereby, E describes a wave that propagates
dz0
towards the +z-direction with velocity v p . A similar analysis shows that E describes a
dt0
wave that propagates along the –z-direction also with velocity v p . Usually the profiles E and
E are determined by the excitation, (e.g., by the format of the voltage signal applied to the
antenna that radiates the wave), and by the reflection of the wave on material bodies (e.g., a
mirror).
1 1
vp 3 108 m / s c
0 0 8.85 10 12
4 10 7
It is exactly the “speed of light” in the vacuum. Hence, the Maxwell’s equations predict the
propagation of a local disturbance of the electromagnetic field at speed c. As we shall see later in
the course, the analysis can be extended to fully 3D dimensional scenarios, with similar
conclusions.
The strength of the response of an isotropic medium is independent of the orientation of the
applied fields.
For most purposes, a material can be regarded (from an electromagnetic point of view) as a
continuum – without any form of granularity. The medium response is determined by the
relation between the vectors D, B and the E, H fields. Typically, D only depends on the electric
6
Fundamental Concepts
described by the material permeability . The permittivity and permeability link the D, B fields
D E, B H . (1.10)
The permittivity and the permeability model the effect of microscopic currents induced inside the
read:
E B, H jext D. (1.11)
t t
Here, jext represents the current density due to currents external to the materials.
For a uniform isotropic material (with and independent of the space coordinates) the
2
E 2 E 0
2
t
1 c
vp . (1.12)
n
Here, n r r is the refractive index of the material. We introduced the relative permittivity
7
Fundamental Concepts
The interaction of the fields with the material constituents effectively reduces the wave
velocity. Due to this reason the refractive index of a nondispersive material satisfies n 1 . Thus,
8
Fundamental Concepts
2. Plane Waves
1 2
T .
f
The sinusoidal variation of the fields is typically inherited from the time variation of the
In time-harmonic regime the fields are mostly convenient described by complex amplitudes
or phasors. For example, the electric field E x, y, z , t is written in terms of a complex amplitude
E x, y, z such that:
E r, t Re E r e jt
9
Fundamental Concepts
For convenience, we denote a generic point in space x, y , z as r . The bar underneath the
electric field symbol indicates that we refer to the complex amplitude of the field. The above
Ex r, t Re E x r e jt
E y r, t Re E y r e jt
...
We used E Ex xˆ E y yˆ Ez zˆ and E E x xˆ E y yˆ E z zˆ .
The complex amplitudes of the fields satisfy the time-independent Maxwell’s equations.
These are obtained from (1.11) by replacing the fields by the corresponding phasors ( E E ,
E j B , H jext j D . (2.1)
As a side note, we point out that the above equations and the continuity equation imply that
B 0 and D ext . Thus, the Gauss’s laws for electricity and magnetism are redundant in
time-harmonic regime, i.e., they are embedded in Faraday’s and Ampère’s laws.
E E0 e jk r , H H 0 e jk r . (2.3)
The term e jk r is known as the propagation factor as it determines the spatial variation of the
fields. It is written in terms of the observation point coordinates r x, y, z and in terms of the
10
Fundamental Concepts
It is often convenient to write the wave vector in terms of a unit vector d̂ and a scalar k:
k kdˆ . The scalar k is the wave number. In standard isotropic media the vector d̂ determines
the direction of propagation of the wave. The propagation factor can be written as:
ˆ
e jk r e jkdr
The phase of the wave is kdˆ r . The set of space points wherein const. is known as a
wavefront. The fields oscillate in phase at any two points on the same wavefront. This means that
the corresponding field oscillations are synchronized, even though they take place at distinct
points of space.
Let us characterize the wavefronts of a plane wave. These correspond to the solutions of
const. :
We took into account that phases that differ by an integer multiple of 2 are indistinguishable.
For simplicity, we will focus on the solutions of 0 , i.e., on the wavefronts with zero-phase.
The parameter u dˆ r is the space coordinate measured along the direction d̂ . Thus, the
2
um with m=0, 1,...
k
These are planes perpendicular to the direction of propagation d̂ . The distance between adjacent
period that separates the wavefronts wherein the electromagnetic field oscillations are
synchronous.
11
Fundamental Concepts
The wave number has units of inverse length ( m 1 or rad m ). It can be written in terms of
2
k . (2.4)
k 1 1 meter
number of waves
2
12
Fundamental Concepts
Maxwell’s equations
E j H , H j E .
j kx x k y y kz z
The space variation of a plane wave is controlled by the propagation factor e jk r e .
xˆ yˆ zˆ jk x xˆ jk y yˆ jk z zˆ jk
x y z
k E H , k H E . (2.5)
The equation on the left implies that H is perpendicular to both k and E . Similarly, the
equation on the right shows that E is perpendicular to both k and H . Thus, the three vectors
are mutually perpendicular and we say that the wave is transverse electromagnetic (TEM). We
13
Fundamental Concepts
The equations (2.5) need to be satisfied self-consistently. As shown next, this determines a
constraint on the wave vector. In fact, by eliminating the magnetic field one finds that:
k k E 2 E 0 .
A B C B A C C A B .
shown that
k k E 0
2
2 k k k x2 k y2 k z2 . (2.7)
1
In particular, taking k kdˆ and noting that 0 0 r r 2 n 2 with n the refractive index of
c
k n, n r r . (2.8)
c
Thus, in a nondispersive medium the relation between the oscillation frequency and the wave
number is linear. The free-space wave number is typically denoted with the subscript “0”:
k0 / c .
14
Fundamental Concepts
The link between angular frequency and the wave number implies that there is also a link
between the time and space periods of the wave. In fact, we can write:
2 2 n n
T =
time period k c spatial period c
c
v p velocity of propagation . (2.9)
T n
The above formula can also be expressed as f v p with f the frequency in Hz.
Substituting k n into Eq. (2.5) and using k kdˆ , we obtain the following
c
explicit relation between the fields and the direction of propagation of the wave:
1ˆ
H dE , E H dˆ . (2.10)
The vector product effectively rotates the relevant field by 90º. In the above, / is the
intrinsic impedance (or wave impedance) of the material, which will be discussed in detail in the
following section. It is implicit that the fields are given by [Eq. (2.3)]:
ˆ ˆ
E E0 e jkdr , H H 0 e jkdr
with k . The complex amplitudes E0 and H 0 determine the fields at the origin ( r 0 ).
15
Fundamental Concepts
As E, H, dˆ are mutually perpendicular, it follows from the properties of the vector product that
E H. . (2.11)
Since the electric field has units of V/m and the magnetic field has units of A/m, it should be
0 r r
0 .
0 r r
0
0 377 120 .
0
The wave impedance relates the amplitudes of electric and magnetic fields of a plane wave.
In circuit theory a real-valued impedance occurs in dissipative scenarios when the energy is
absorbed in the form of heat. For example, the impedance of a resistor is positive and real-
valued. In contrast, the wave impedance is unrelated to Joule-type dissipation. In fact, it turns
out that nondispersive dielectrics do not absorb electromagnetic energy and are conservative
systems.
What is then the explanation for a real-valued ? A circuit analogue is shown in the figure
below. The impedance may be understood as some sort of “radiation” impedance. It describes
the fact that the energy stored in some small material volume dV will be transported away from
dV due to the propagation of the wave. Such a process (from the point of view of the volume
16
Fundamental Concepts
consider an example:
E E0 xˆ e jk0 z , with k0 0 0 / c .
It corresponds to a plane wave that propagates along the +z-direction ( dˆ zˆ ) in free-space. The
electric field oscillates along the x-direction. The instantaneous electric field can be found using
E z , t E0 xˆ cos t k0 z
For simplicity, it was assumed that E0 is a real-valued number. The figure below shows several
time snapshots of the wave along the z-axis. As seen, in one time period the wave advances
exactly one wavelength towards the +z-direction. This type of wave is known as travelling wave.
distance 2 1
vp .
time T T 2 k
This result agrees with the formula for the wave velocity obtained from the wave equation.
17
Fundamental Concepts
1 ˆ
The magnetic field of the plane wave can be found with the help of H d E . For
0
nondispersive dielectrics the formula can used both for the complex amplitudes and
1 E0
H zˆ E0 xˆ cos t k0 z yˆ cos t k0 z .
0 0
The ratio of the field components is determined by the intrinsic impedance of the vacuum:
Ex / H y 0 . A 3D representation of the plane wave fields along the z-axis is shown below.
18
Fundamental Concepts
applied to the material. Such an interaction originates microscopic currents, which need to be
taken into account in the Maxwell’s equations. For this purpose, it is convenient to split the
electric current density as a sum of material (microscopic) currents and external (macroscopic)
currents:
P
jmic
E
M . (3.2)
conduction current t
magnetization current
polarization current
The first mechanism consists of the transport of free-electrons. The conduction electrons are
free to drift through the material under the influence of an applied field. The corresponding drift
(conduction) current is determined by the electric conductivity of the material with units of
S/m.
The second mechanism is determined by the excitation of bound electrons. Different from
the free electrons, the bound electrons are tightly attached to the atoms. The effect of an applied
field is to slightly separate the bound electrons from the atomic nucleus, i.e., to separate the
negative and positive charges, generating an electric dipole moment. A time-varying field will
Finally, the third mechanism is related to magnetization currents, which are associated with
time-varying magnetic dipoles. This mechanism will not be analyzed in detail in this course.
19
Fundamental Concepts
The polarization and magnetization currents are described by the polarization and
magnetization vectors P and M , which enter into the macroscopic Maxwell’s equations through
B
D 0E P , H M .
0
D
E B, H jext E . (3.3)
t t
The material (dipolar) response is “hidden” in the polarization and magnetization vectors P and
M , respectively.
D x, y , z , t E x, y , z , t , B x, y , z , t H x, y , z , t .
These constitutive relations assume that the response of the medium is instantaneous. For
example, a change in the electric field implies an instantaneous change in the polarization vector
20
Fundamental Concepts
immediately follows any variations in time of the electric field. Such a behaviour is physically
unrealistic. In fact, the polarization vector is proportional to the mean separation r0 between the
positive and negative charges of the atoms. As the electrons are massive particles their motion is
A better physical model for the electric dipole oscillations is based on the differential
equation:
2P P
02 P e2 0 E . (3.4)
t 2 t
restoring force electric force
damping force
left-hand side is proportional to the electron acceleration. The acceleration is determined by the
total force acting on the electron. It consists of three terms: a restoring force that acts to bring the
electron back to the equilibrium position ( r0 0 ), a damping force proportional to the velocity
which models the energy transferred to the ionic lattice, and the electric force due to the applied
field that drives the oscillation. The parameters 0 , e , have units of frequency.
For a time-harmonic oscillation, the polarization vector and the electric field are described by
complex vector amplitudes. Using / t j it is easily seen that the complex amplitudes
satisfy:
e2
P E.
02 2 j 0
Substituting this result into D 0 E P , we find that the electric displacement vector and the
electric field are linked in the frequency domain by a complex permittivity function:
D E . (3.5)
For the Drude-Lorentz oscillator model, the electric permittivity is given by:
21
Fundamental Concepts
e2
0 1 . (3.6)
0 j
2 2
When 0 the permittivity is nearly constant and identical to 0 1 e2 / 02 . However,
for high frequencies, particularly near the resonance 0 the permittivity is sensitive to
frequency variations. The imaginary part of the permittivity is linked to the damping parameter
Similar to D and E , the induction and magnetic fields are linked by a complex magnetic
macroscopic Maxwell’s equations [Eq. (3.3)] and switching to the frequency domain, one finds
that:
where e is an equivalent complex permittivity that includes the contributions from both the
e . (3.8)
j
22
Fundamental Concepts
It is often convenient to express the equivalent permittivity in terms of its real and imaginary
0 . The quantity
tan
is known as the loss tangent of the material. One may write e 1 j tan . A small (large)
parameters e and . For this purpose, it is convenient to write the propagation factor
where jk is the propagation constant. Thus, the fields of a plane wave are
ˆ ˆ
E E0 e dr , H H 0 e dr
being d̂ the direction of propagation. Similar to Sect. 2.3, in order that the plane-wave fields
satisfy the source-free Maxwell’s equations in the lossy medium [Eq. (3.7) with jext 0 ] it is
necessary that:
1ˆ
H dE, E H dˆ .
23
Fundamental Concepts
Note that these formulas imply that the fields are perpendicular to d̂ . For a dispersive material
. (3.9)
e
j
j e j . (3.10)
j
For lossy systems both and are complex-valued. A complex-valued implies that the
fields E and H do not oscillate in phase. On the other hand, as we shall discuss in detail in the
following subsection, a complex implies the attenuation of the wave along the direction of
j . (3.11)
The parameter is known as the attenuation constant and the parameter is the wave number
(or phase constant). Both parameters have units of inverse distance ( m 1 ). Similar to the
nondispersive case, the wave number determines the distance between adjacent wavefronts,
2
.
example. For simplicity, let us take the direction of propagation along z so that dˆ zˆ and
r dˆ z . For an electric field directed along x, the electric field associated with the plane wave is
of the type:
24
Fundamental Concepts
E xˆ E0 e z xˆ E0 e z e j z .
E E0 e z .
For simplicity, the parameter E0 is taken as a positive number. The amplitude E determines the
E z E z , t E z with E z E0 e z .
The peak amplitude decays exponentially along the direction of propagation due to the
absorption of the wave energy by the material. The absorbed energy is dissipated as heat.
The skin depth or penetration depth is defined as the distance that the wave needs to
propagate in order that its amplitude decays to 37% of the original amplitude: E z 0.37 E z 0 .
E0 e e 1 E0 .
25
Fundamental Concepts
1
. (3.12)
The skin depth provides a rough estimate of the distance that a wave can penetrate inside a lossy
A few time snapshots of the electric field are shown in the figure below. The wavelength
2 / determines the distance between adjacent wavefronts, i.e., the surfaces where the
The phase velocity is determined by the dynamics of the wavefronts. It is given by:
distance 2
vph .
time T T 2
For dispersive materials, the phase velocity depends on the oscillation frequency.
coincident with the propagation velocity. This is because the shape of a signal that propagates in
2
1 The amplitude of a complex vector is defined as E E E* Ex Ey Ez .
2 2
26
Fundamental Concepts
a dispersive material changes with the propagation distance. This is illustrated in the figure
below, tracking the energy associated with a certain wave “parcel” (shaded in blue) in a medium.
In the nondispersive case, the shape of the wave parcel remains unchanged after propagation.
In contrast, in a dispersive medium the shape of the parcel can change. In the example of the
figure, the field associated with the parcel is weaker at t t0 than at t 0 . The change in
amplitude of the parcel is due to the fact that the wave exchanges continuously energy with the
medium. Hence, at some points, it gives away energy to the medium, while at other points, it
receives energy that had been previously stored in the medium at an earlier time instant. Thus,
the shape of a certain energy parcel changes over time, even in a time-harmonic regime. For this
reason, in a dispersive medium, the wave peaks are not good reference points to calculate the
propagation velocity.
27
Fundamental Concepts
The propagation velocity in the dispersive medium is determined by the so-called group
velocity. To introduce this concept, consider an amplitude modulated signal described by:
The real-valued amplitude E0 t (the envelope) varies slowly in time. The envelope is the
Suppose that this signal propagates a distance z inside a dispersive material. We want to
determine the corresponding output signal Eout t . For convenience, we write the input signal
as:
It is convenient to switch to the Fourier domain. The Fourier transform of Ein,C t is written in
Ein,C t is peaked at the carrier frequency. After propagation of a distance z, the output signal is
d
c , c c c .
d
28
Fundamental Concepts
Note that we use a zero-order approximation for the attenuation constant and a more refined
first-order Taylor approximation for the phase constant. This is justified by the fact that the
parameter controls the propagation time. Using the above formulas, one gets:
d
j c z
Eout,C e c z j c z
e e d
Ein,C ,
with the shorthand notations c c and c c . Next, we switch back to the time-
j c c
z
z c z j c z j t z
Eout,C t e
c z vg
e
Ein,C t e e e c E0 t ,
v v
g g
1
d d
vg , (3.13)
d d
is known as the group velocity. The group velocity is given by the slope of the phase constant
.
For a real-valued input signal, Ein t Re Ein,C t , the corresponding output is simply
z
Eout t e c z cos c t c z E0 t . (3.14)
v
g
The above equation confirms that the shape of the input pulse changes with the propagation
distance. In fact, Eout t is not simply a time-delayed attenuated version of the input field
Ein t . This is so because the carrier signal ( cos c t c z ) is controlled by the phase velocity
vph c / c , whereas the envelope ( E0 ) is controlled by the group velocity vg . As the profile of
the field is ruled by two different velocities, it changes with the propagation distance. The
29
Fundamental Concepts
propagation time of the envelope (i.e., the information signal) is determined by the group delay
z / vg .
The group velocity is forcibly less than the speed of light in vacuum c. In contrast, the
amplitude (and sign) of the phase velocity are unconstrained because the spatial variations of the
fields in the medium are dictated not only by the time profile of the input field but also by the
exchange of energy between the wave and the medium, as already discussed in the beginning of
this subsection. This means that there is no exact correspondence between adjacent wave peaks
in the time domain at a fixed z and adjacent wave peaks in the space domain at a fixed t. Thus,
for dispersive materials, the phase velocity may be rather different from the actual propagation
speed. For nondispersive materials, the group and phase velocity are coincident.
Let us consider the particular case where the dispersion of , is negligible so that the
propagation constant and intrinsic impedance of the material can be written as:
j j r r 1
j c j
30
Fundamental Concepts
1
,
1
j j
As seen, both the impedance and the propagation constant are ruled by the parameter 1 .
j
The dissipation is fully controlled by the material conductivity. If 0 the material becomes
x
When 0 but 1 the material is a “good dielectric”. Using 1 x 1 one finds
2
good j r r 1 j j r r ,
dielectric c 2 2 c
good 1 j ,
dielectric 2
Conversely, when 1 the material is said to be a good conductor. Metals are the typical
j 4
1 e 1 j .
j j 2
This yields the following approximate formulas for the propagation constant and impedance:
good 1 j
conductor 2
good 1 j
conductor 2
1 2
good .
conductor
31
Fundamental Concepts
impenetrable by light, 0 , and behave as perfect mirrors, i.e., perfect reflectors. The intrinsic
32
Fundamental Concepts
4. Wave Polarization
the oscillation, and by an amplitude, which determines how strong is the oscillation. For
example, an acoustic wave in air is due to a local perturbation of the density of air molecules.
The sound pressure describes the deviation from the equilibrium atmospheric pressure. The
oscillation at a certain point in space is fully characterized by the pressure amplitude and by the
oscillation frequency.
Different from acoustic waves in air, an oscillation of the electromagnetic field is not fully
determined by the field amplitude. Due to the vector nature of the field, there is an additional
degree of freedom related to the direction of space along which the field oscillates. Such degree
In time-harmonic regime, the instantaneous electric field at a certain point of space is related
E t Re E e jt .
The closed curve determined by the time evolution of E t in a full time cycle (with period
T 2 / ) is the polarization curve. It is simple to show that the polarization curve is always
planar as it lies in the plane generated by the vectors E Re E and E Im E . In general,
The polarization curve is generically an ellipse, with the particular (degenerate) cases of a
circumference and of a line segment. The polarization of the wave at a certain point P of space is
33
Fundamental Concepts
said to be elliptical (circular, linear) when the corresponding polarization curve is an ellipse
For the cases of elliptical and circular polarization, there are two different polarization states for
the same polarization curve. Indeed, there are two possible trajectories for the electric field,
For plane wave, the field polarization is independent of the observation point. Furthermore,
as the plane waves in isotropic media are transverse waves ( E dˆ 0 ), the polarization curve is
perpendicular to the direction of propagation ( d̂ ). In this case, the sense of rotation of the
electric field is classified with respect to d̂ , as either to the “left” or to the “right”. The sense of
rotation is found using the right-hand rule by imitating the trajectory of the electric field with the
“right-hand” and finding its orientation with the “thumb”. When the “thumb” direction is
coincident with the direction of propagation ( d̂ ), the field is said to rotate to the “right”.
For example, the first panel of the figure below corresponds to a “right” elliptical
polarization, whereas the second panel to a “left” circular polarization. A simple way to find the
sense of rotation is to determine the time evolution (trajectory) of the electric field on the
34
Fundamental Concepts
vacuum along the z-direction. Suppose that the complex field vector is:
E E0 xˆ 2 jyˆ e jk0 z .
From the propagation factor it is evident that the direction of propagation is along –z: dˆ zˆ .
E t Re E0 xˆ 2 jyˆ e
j t k0 z
E cos t xˆ 2E cos t 2 yˆ ,
0 0
where we denoted k0 z and assumed that E0 0 . The instantaneous electric field lies in the
xoy plane perpendicular to d̂ . The x and y components of the field may be written as:
Ex E0 cos t
E y 2 E0 sin t
The trajectory of the field can be found by eliminating t. This can be done by noting that:
2 2
Ex E y
1,
E0 2 E0
which corresponds to the equation of an ellipse with major axis along y and minor axis along x.
Thus, the field polarization is elliptical. The sense of rotation of the curve is determined from the
dynamics in time of the electric field. For convenience, let us consider the time instant for which
35
Fundamental Concepts
t 0 and another slightly larger time instant for which t 0 . The electric field
Ex E0 Ex E0 cos 0 E0
t 0 , t 0
E y 0
E y 2 E0 sin 0 0
The figure below shows the polarization curve and represents the electric field vectors at the two
relevant time instants. The sense of rotation of the polarization curve is indicated by the blue
arrows. The right-hand rule yields a direction that is anti-parallel to d̂ . Thus, the wave is
propagation with dˆ uˆ 1 uˆ 2 .
36
Fundamental Concepts
E2
p p e j . (4.2)
E1
The amplitude ( p ) and phase of the polarization ratio determine completely the wave
If none of the above holds true, then the polarization state is elliptical.
state is linear.
If none of the above holds true, then the polarization state is elliptical.
Furthermore, the angle controls the sense of rotation, such that for 0º 180º the wave is
polarized to the left, whereas for 180º 0º the wave is polarized to the right. It is
underlined that this result holds true only when the direction of propagation is dˆ uˆ 1 uˆ 2 .
37
Fundamental Concepts
38
Fundamental Concepts
arbitrary materials. The volume V may enclose some field sources, modelled by an external
Let us define EM t as the stored energy of the electromagnetic field in volume V at time t.
The energy EM t may vary in time due to different gain/dissipation mechanisms:
d EM
pext pdis p . (5.1)
dt
The first term, pext , describes the power pumped into the volume V due to the external sources
within V, and contributes to increase the energy within V. The second term pdis describes the
energy dissipated (per unit of time) in the materials in the form of heat. Finally, p models the
net flow of power from V to the outside region through the boundary . If p is positive there is
a net flow of energy exiting V, whereas if p is negative there is a net flow of energy entering
volume V. In the following subsections, we will use the Maxwell’s equations to identify the
different terms.
39
Fundamental Concepts
us consider a single point charge with velocity v . In the presence of a field, the particle is
pfield charge qE v
Let us now consider some volume dV in the source region. The total charge inside dV is given
by dQ ext dV with ext the electric charge density. Hence, the power transferred from the
The current density is related to the charge density as jext ext v . This shows that
dpext dV E jext . The total power transferred from the external sources to the electromagnetic
field is obtained by integrating dpext dV E jext over the entire volume:
40
Fundamental Concepts
equation [Eq. (5.1)]. For simplicity, it is assumed that all the materials are nondispersive ( ,
are frequency independent), but we allow for conduction currents characterized by the electric
conductivity . Thus, the time evolution of the electromagnetic field is ruled by:
H E
E , H jext E.
t t
The trick to obtain an energy conservation law is to evaluate the divergence of the E H .
This vector was originally introduced by J. H. Poynting and bears his name, the “Poynting
S E H . (5.3)
E H H E E H ,
which holds true for any two vectors. Substituting the Maxwell’s equations into the vector
41
Fundamental Concepts
H E
S H E E jext E E
t t
. (5.4)
WEM E jext E E,
t
with
1 1
WEM E E H H . (5.5)
2 2
Next, we integrate both members of Eq. (5.4) over the volume V. This gives:
d
S dV dt W EM dV pext t E E dV ,
V V V
In the last step, we use Gauss’ divergence law to transform the volume integral on the left-
S dV S nˆ dA .
V
Here, n̂ is the unit vector normal to the surface and directed to the exterior of V. Combining the
last two equations and rearranging the terms we obtain the “Poynting theorem”:
d
dt V
WEM dV pext E E dV S nˆ dA . (5.6)
V
Interestingly, Poynting’s result has exactly the same structure as the power balance law
discussed in the beginning of this Chapter [Eq. (5.1)]. Thus, we may identify the electromagnetic
pdis E E dV . (5.8)
V
42
Fundamental Concepts
p S nˆ dA . (5.9)
1 1
In particular, it is seen that WEM E E H H may be understood as the density of
2 2
electromagnetic energy in the medium. It has units of Joule m 3 . Furthermore, as expected, the
Remarkably, the net power exiting volume V ( p ) is given by the flux of the Poynting vector
through the boundary [Eq. (5.9)]. Thus, S has a rather powerful physical meaning: it determines
how the electromagnetic energy flows in space, i.e., it is some sort of electromagnetic energy
“current”. The units of S are Watt m 2 . When S is uniform and perpendicular to the surface, the
power that transverses the surface is given by p S A with A the area of the surface.
1
E Re E e jt E e jt E* e jt
2
The symbol “*” denotes complex conjugation. Similarly, the magnetic field can be written as:
43
Fundamental Concepts
1
H H e jt H* e jt
2
1 1
S E e jt E* e jt H e jt H* e jt
2 2
Expanding the product one obtains 4 terms. Two terms are independent of time, whereas the
1 1
S E H* E* H E He j 2t E* H*e j 2t . (5.10)
4 4
The time-averaged Poynting vector is obtained by integrating the Poynting vector over one
oscillation cycle ( T 2 / ):
T
1
S av S t dt . (5.11)
T 0
The time-averaged Poynting vector determines the time-averaged power flow. For example, the
p ,av S av nˆ dA . (5.12)
1
From Eq. (5.10) it is evident that S av E H* E* H , which may also be written as:
4
S av
1
2
*
Re E H . (5.13)
1ˆ
E H dˆ , H dE.
44
Fundamental Concepts
1 1 ˆ *
S av Re E * d E .
2
1 ˆ 1 *
transverse ( E dˆ 0 E dˆ ) one finds that S av
*
Re d E E , which can also be expressed
2 *
as:
1 1 2 ˆ 1
Re E d Re H dˆ .
2
S av (5.14)
2 2
We took into account that Re 1/ Re 1/ * . The second identity is a consequence of the
relation E H . For lossless materials the intrinsic impedance is real-valued and thereby the
11 2ˆ 1
E d H dˆ ,
2
S av (lossless materials). (5.15)
2 2
As intuitively expected, the Poynting vector is aligned with d̂ . Thus, in isotropic materials the
energy flows along the direction normal to the wavefronts. The Poynting vector lines may be
45
Fundamental Concepts
46
Fundamental Concepts
some components of the electromagnetic field, typically the components perpendicular to the
interface. On the other hand, for standard materials the electric and magnetic field components
tangential to the interface remain continuous. This means that the fields on the two sides of a
The subscript “tan” refers to the tangential fields. For example, E tan can be expressed in terms of
E tan E E nˆ nˆ .
Note that the second term on the right-hand side is the normal component of the field.
47
Fundamental Concepts
It is relevant to note that the continuity of the tangential fields at an interface guarantees the
conductor (PEC). A perfect electric conductor is an idealized material with infinite electric
conductivity . As the conduction current is jcond E , the electric field inside a perfect
conductor must vanish. Thus, an ideal PEC material behaves as a perfect mirror and is
impenetrable by light. Consequently, the electric field at the interface with a PEC material must
vanish:
The tangential magnetic field H1,tan (evaluated immediately outside the material) does not need
two different media. For now, we restrict our attention to the case where the direction of
propagation of the incoming wave ( dˆ i ) is perpendicular to the interface, i.e., to the case of
“normal incidence”. Without loss of generality, the interface is taken as the plane z 0 and
1 ˆi
E0 e 1z , d E0 e 1z .
inc inc inc inc
E H
1
We used the formula H dˆ E / that links the electromagnetic fields of a plane wave. In the
above, 1 j 11 and 1 1 / 1 are the propagation constant and intrinsic impedance of
region 1. Note that the permittivity and permeability may be complex-valued and depend on
48
Fundamental Concepts
frequency. If the electric conductivity is nontrivial then the permittivity 1 must be replaced by
1 1 1 / j .
As intuitively expected, the incoming wave will generate a transmitted wave in region 2 and
The fields associated with these waves can be explicitly written as:
1 ˆr
E0 e 1 z , d E0 e 1z .
ref ref ref
E H ref
1
1 ˆt
E E0 e 2 z , d E0 e 2 z ,
tx tx tx
H tx
2
where 2 j 2 2 and 2 2 / 2 .
The complex amplitudes of the transmitted and reflected fields are determined by the
boundary conditions [Eq. (6.1)] at the interface ( z 0 ). The total fields in regions 1 and 2 are:
Note that the field in region 1 is a superposition of the incident and reflected waves. Since the
plane waves are transverse, both E and H are parallel (tangential) to the interface. Thus, Eq.
49
Fundamental Concepts
inc
E0 E0 E0 ,
ref tx
zˆ
1
E1
inc
0 E0
ref
zˆ 1 E
2
tx
0 .
The cross-product by ẑ may be dropped in the second equation. Thus, the problem reduces to:
inc ref
E0 E0 E0 ,
tx 1
E
1
inc
0 E0
ref
1 E 2
tx
0 . (6.3)
Solving this system of equations with respect to the reflected and transmitted fields, one easily
finds that:
E0 E0 , E0 E0 ,
ref inc tx inc
(6.4)
with the reflection and transmission coefficients and ruled by the contrast of the intrinsic
2 1 22
, 1 . (6.5)
2 1 2 1
inc ref tx
Note that E0 , E0 , E0 are precisely the fields evaluated at the interface ( z 0 ).
When the impedances of the two materials are identical (2 1 ), there is no reflected wave
and the incoming wave is fully transmitted to the second medium. In such a case, one says that
The opposite situation occurs when the medium 2 is a perfect electric conductor (PEC). As
the intrinsic impedance of a perfect conductor vanishes (PEC 2 0 ), the reflection coefficient
in such a case becomes PEC 1 . This confirms that a perfect conductor behaves as a perfect
mirror.
As a final observation, we note that for normal incidence the reflection and transmission
50
Fundamental Concepts
oblique direction. The incident angle i is determined by the normal to the interface n̂ and by
the direction of propagation of the incoming wave dˆ i , as illustrated in the figure. It can be found
using dˆ i nˆ cos i . By definition, the plane generated by dˆ i and n̂ is designated as the
incidence plane.
convenient to introduce two unit vectors, uˆ and uˆ ||i , that generate this plane. By construction,
uˆ ||i uˆ dˆ i . (6.6)
Note that the vector uˆ is perpendicular to the incidence plane, whereas the vector uˆ ||i is parallel
to the incidence plane, consistent with the notations. The incident field can be written in terms of
inc i i
E E ||uˆ ||i E uˆ . (6.7)
i i
The coefficients E || , E are referred to as the parallel and perpendicular field components,
respectively.
Similar, to the case of normal incidence, the scattering of the incoming wave by the interface
ref
generates a reflected plane wave, described by the field E , and a transmitted or refracted
tx
wave, described by the field E . It will be demonstrated in the next subsection that the
directions of propagation of these waves, dˆ r and dˆ t , are also contained in the incidence plane.
Similar to the incident wave, it is convenient to introduce unit vectors uˆ ||r and uˆ ||t such that:
The reflected and transmitted electric fields can be written in terms of its parallel and
These angles can be found by imposing the boundary conditions [Eq. (6.1)] at the material
interface. For this purpose, we write explicitly the fields associated with the incident, reflected
inc i i ref r r tx t t
E E0 e jk r , E E0 e jk r , E E0 e jk r .
52
Fundamental Concepts
where k i , k r , k t are the wave vectors associated with the different waves. For convenience, we
k l k xl , k yl , k zl , l=i,r,t.
Imposing the continuity of the electric field components tangent to the interface it is found
that:
where t̂ is a generic direction parallel to the interface. This formula is equivalent to:
Eint e jk r E0 e j k r E0 e jk r tˆ 0 .
i ref r tx t
(6.10)
0
It must hold true for generic interface point r . To illustrate the discussion, let us suppose that the
interface is the z 0 plane, so that r is a point of the form r x, y, 0 . Then, the boundary
The only way that the above equation can be satisfied (for nontrivial fields) for all the points x
and y is if all the exponentials are identical! Thus, it follows that the projections of the wave
vector on the interface are the same for the three waves:
k xi k xr k xt , k yi k yr k yt . (6.12)
To see the implications of this result let us write the wave vectors in terms of the directions of
propagation:
For simplicity, we restrict our attention to lossless materials. The propagation constants are
illustrated in the figure below. Clearly, the result (6.12) implies that dˆ r and dˆ t cannot have a y-
53
Fundamental Concepts
component, and thereby dˆ i , dˆ r and dˆ t must all lie on the same plane, i.e., they must lie on the
incidence plane (in this example the xoz plane). The result is known as the Snell’s first law.
The directions of propagation can be written in terms of the angles shown in the figure as:
Using this result and Eq. (6.13) in k xi k xr k xt [Eq. (6.12)], it follows that:
refractive indices of the materials. This simplification yield the Snell’s sine (second) law:
Snell’s sine law establishes that the incidence and reflected angles are identical and that the
refraction angle is controlled by the contrast of the refractive indices of the two media:
n1
From sin t sin i it is clear that t i when n1 n2 and that t i when n1 n2 . The two
n2
54
Fundamental Concepts
from the polarization of the incident wave. For example, an incident circularly polarized wave
typically originates elliptically polarized reflected and transmitted waves. Moreover, the
handedness (i.e., the sense of rotation) of the field typically changes after the wave interacts with
the interface. This last property holds true even for normal incidence. For example, a left
circularly polarized wave that illuminates a dielectric interface along the normal direction
There are two particular polarization states that are preserved by the interactions with the
interface. For these special cases, the polarization of the reflected and transmitted waves is
identical to the polarization of the incoming wave. The two eigen-polarizations are referred to as
parallel (||) and perpendicular (). By definition, a wave has parallel (perpendicular) polarization
when the incident electric field is parallel (perpendicular) to the incidence plane. When the
incident wave has parallel (perpendicular) polarization, the corresponding reflected and
transmitted waves have the same property1. A wave with parallel (perpendicular) polarization is
1The perpendicular polarization is also known as the transverse electric (TE) polarization, whereas the parallel
polarization is also referred to as the transverse magnetic (TM) polarization.
55
Fundamental Concepts
It should be evident that the parallel and perpendicular polarizations correspond to a linear
polarization such that the electric field either oscillates along a direction parallel or perpendicular
The complex amplitudes of the || and components of the scattered fields may be related to
the || and components of the incident wave through reflection and transmission coefficients:
E || || E || , E || || E || ,
r i t i
(at the interface) (6.16a)
E E , E E ,
r i t i
(at the interface). (6.16b)
The reflection and transmission coefficients depend on the polarization and will be determined in
A generic incident wave can always be regarded as a superposition of a wave with parallel
polarization with a wave with perpendicular polarization. Thereby, in the general case the
56
Fundamental Concepts
E
inc
i
i
E 0||uˆ ||i E 0uˆ e jk1d r ,
ˆi
E uˆ E uˆ e jk1dˆ r r
ref i r i
E || 0|| || 0 , (6.17)
E uˆ E uˆ e jk2dˆ t r
tx i t i
E || 0|| || 0 .
Without loss of generality, it is supposed that the origin of the coordinate system is contained at
found by matching the field projections at the interface. To illustrate the idea, let us focus on a
The electric fields are tangent to the interface. Hence, the boundary condition
1 .
We evaluated the field at the origin ( r 0 ) which is assumed to lie on the interface.
i
Furthermore, for simplicity we suppose that E 0 1 [V/m]. On the other hand, taking into
account the geometric relation between the electric and magnetic fields (see the figure on the
previous page), one sees that the second boundary condition H H H tan reduces to:
inc ref tx
tan
1 1 1
cos i cos r cos t
1 1 2
The cosine terms appear in the formula because of the projection of the magnetic field on the
interface. Solving the two previous equations with respect to , and using r i one
2 cos i 1 cos t
, 1 . (6.18)
2 cos i 1 cos t
57
Fundamental Concepts
Thus, the reflection and transmission coefficients depend on the intrinsic impedances and on the
incidence angle. In the limit i 0 , one recovers the normal incidence result [Eq. (6.5)] because
t 0 .
The analysis for parallel polarization is completely analogous. In this case, the boundary
1 1 1
|| || .
1 1 2
1 cos i 2 cos t 2
||
1 cos i 2 cos t
, ||
1
1 || . (6.19)
It is interesting to analyze how the reflection coefficients || and vary with the incidence
angle. For this purpose, we consider an interface between air (medium 1) and a lossless dielectric
with relative permittivity 10 (medium 2). As seen in the figure below, the amplitude of the two
reflection coefficients is identical for normal incidence i 0 , but follows different trends for
the two polarizations. Whereas for perpendicular polarization the reflection coefficient increases
monotonically with i , for parallel polarization one observes a reduction of the reflection level
up to some angle B , known as the Brewster angle. At the Brewster angle the reflection
coefficient || is exactly zero (in the absence of material loss). For i B , the coefficient ||
1 We note in passing that || i 0º i 0º . The reason for the awkward minus sign is related to the fact that
uˆ ||i and uˆ ||r become anti-parallel ( uˆ ||r uˆ ||i ) in the limit i 0 . In that case || relates field components along anti-
parallel directions!
58
Fundamental Concepts
increases monotonically with i . For grazing incidence ( i 90º ), both || and approach
the unity so that the wave is fully reflected by the interface. In general, the level of reflections
increases as the refractive index of medium 2 increases (not shown). The Brewster angle is
It is useful to characterize || and when the medium 2 is a perfect electric conductor. As
previously discussed, a perfect conductor has impedance PEC 2 0 . Thereby, for a perfect
conductor the two reflection coefficients are independent of the incidence angle:
( 0 ), the reflection coefficient for parallel polarization vanishes for the Brewster angle. An
explicit formula for B can be found by solving || 0 with respect to i . From Eq. (6.19),
1 cos i 2 cos t 0 .
59
Fundamental Concepts
For media with 0 the intrinsic impedance can be written in terms of the refractive index n
as 0 / n . Thus, the condition that determines the Brewster angle reduces to:
1 1
cos i cos t .
n1 n2
Evidently, the transmission and incidence angles are linked by Snell’s second law:
n1 sin i n2 sin t . By squaring both sides of the previous two formulas and using the
1 1
2
cos 2 i 2 cos 2 t , n12 1 cos 2 i n22 1 cos 2 t .
n1 n2
n122 1 n2
cos 2 i 2 12 ,
1 n12 1
n122 2
n12
n12 1
where n122 . Thus, our analysis shows that the Brewster angle is such that:
n22 2
1
cos 2 B .
1 2
1
1
Finally, using the trigonometric relation 1 tan 2 , the Brewster angle can be expressed
cos
2
as:
2
tan B . (6.21)
1
One curious geometric relation is that for i B the vectors dˆ r and uˆ ||t are parallel, as
illustrated in the figure below. This can be verified noting that Brewster’s condition may be
expressed as n1 sin B n2 cos B . From Snell’s second law, n1 sin B n2 sin t . Thereby,
60
Fundamental Concepts
Brewster’s condition implies that cos B sin t , which is possible only if B 90º t . Since
we conclude that dˆ r uˆ ||t for the Brewster angle. The intermediate steps use B 90º t and
i r B .
The geometric condition leads to an interesting physical interpretation. The transmitted wave
generates polarization currents inside medium 2, sketched with gray arrows in the figure. The
reflected wave can be attributed to the radiation from these polarization currents. Interestingly, as
we shall see in a later Chapter, a point electric dipole cannot radiate along the direction of the
oscillation. As the electric field inside medium 2 oscillates along uˆ ||t , the polarization currents
cannot emit electromagnetic energy along that direction, i.e., cannot emit radiation along dˆ r .
This property explains why for the Brewster angle it is impossible to generate a reflected wave.
61
Fundamental Concepts
dense medium (e.g., air), n1 n2 , the transmission angle is greater than the incidence angle,
t i . This raises two interesting questions: Is there an angle ( i c ) for which the
transmitted ray propagates along a direction parallel to the interface, t 90º ? If so, what
The answer to the first question is affirmative. The incidence angle i c for which
t 90º is designated as the critical angle. It can be readily found with the help of Snell’s
second law:
n2
c arcsin , (for n1 n2 ). (6.22)
n1
Let us now turn to the second question. For i c the transmission angle is determined by:
62
Fundamental Concepts
n1 n
sin t sin i 1 sin c 1 .
n2 n2
We used the fact that sin i is a monotonically increasing function in the interval 0 i 90º .
The above expression shows that for i c , the sine of the transmission angle exceeds 1! Thus,
t does not have an immediate geometrical meaning, it is actually a complex imaginary number.
n12
cos t 1 sin 2 t 1 sin 2 i .
n22
For i c , the radicand is a negative number. This implies that for an incidence angle that
n12
cos t jC , with C sin 2 i 1 0 .
n22
ˆt
To make sense of this, let us analyze the propagation factor of the refracted plane wave e jk2d r .
From the geometry of the figure below, dˆ t r sin t x cos t z . Hence, the propagation factor
satisfies:
ˆt jk2 sin t x cost z
e jk2d r e e jk1 sin i x e jk2 cost z .
We used Snell’s second law in the middle identity. Here, k1 n1 / c and k2 n2 / c are the
wave numbers in the medium 1 and 2, respectively. Clearly, when i c the variation of the
field along z exhibits a (real) exponential behaviour because cos t jC . The sign that
corresponds to an exponential growth with z must be rejected on physical grounds. Thus, the
ˆt n12
e jk2d r e jk1 sin i x e k2 C z , with C sin 2 i 1 0 . (6.23)
n22
63
Fundamental Concepts
In particular, it follows that the amplitude of the transmitted field decays exponentially with
z:
E
tx
E
tx
z 0 e k C z .
2
(6.24)
Due to the exponential decay, the wave in the medium 2 is said to be evanescent. An evanescent
plane wave is associated with trivial Poynting vector: there is no power flow from medium 1 to
medium 2. Even though, medium 2 is “transparent” (in the sense that it supports wave
propagation) it is impossible to transmit a wave from medium 1 to medium 2 when the incidence
angle exceeds the critical angle! The wave suffers total internal reflection, so that all the
incoming energy is fully reflected back to medium 1. The superposition of the incoming wave
with the reflected wave in medium 1 creates a stationary wave pattern where the wave maxima
For i c , the reflection coefficients (for lossless materials) have exactly unity amplitude
64
Fundamental Concepts
Let us demonstrate this result for perpendicular polarization. Substituting cos t jC in Eq.
2 cos i 1 jC
.
2 cos i 1 jC
As the numerator and denominator of the fraction are related by complex conjunction it is
immediate that 1 .
65
Fundamental Concepts
66