The Effect of The Use of Authentic Reading Materials in Teaching English On Eleventh Grade EFL Students' Motivation
The Effect of The Use of Authentic Reading Materials in Teaching English On Eleventh Grade EFL Students' Motivation
3, pp 243-251
Abdallah Baniabdelrahman*
243
Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences
244
Baniabdelrahman
Furthermore, in a quasi-experimental study Lin teachers of English of the two schools involved in this
(2004) investigated the effect of using web-based study. The duration and purposes of the study were
authentic materials and non-authentic materials on explained to them.
motivation and reading achievement of EFL learners in Two schools were randomly selected from Al-
two classes at a college in Taiwan. The sample was 102 Kourah Directorate of Education/Jordan - one Eleventh
students. The students’ motivation level was measured Grade section was randomly chosen from each of the
against a self-reported learner motivation questionnaire two schools. The purpose of the study was explained to
as a repeated measure-design. The study was conducted the students. Then the students signed a consent form to
over a period of six weeks. Contrary to expectations, the agree to have their data included for analysis in the
results indicated that the motivation levels did not study.
change much across time. Even, the non-authentic This study is a quasi-experimental one using one
material group showed significantly higher motivation control group and one experimental group. The primary
than the web-based authentic material group. The variable was students’ motivation levels. The study was
findings implied that authentic and web-based authentic conducted over a period of twelve weeks (the beginning
materials did not have a positive effect on EFL learners’ of October/2004 – end of December/2004), five hours
motivation. per-week, with the group size and membership
As can be inferred, the above reviewed literature remaining constant.
shows a contradiction in the results of the different The Sample
studies regarding the effect of using authentic materials The sample of the study consisted of two eleventh
on EFL learners’ motivations. Some studies indicated grade student sections in Al-Kourah Directorate of
that authentic materials have a better effect than non- Education chosen randomly using the cluster sampling
authentic materials; and some did not indicate method. One of the two sections was randomly assigned
significant differences between the use of authentic and as the control group (37 male students) and the second
non-authentic materials. One study indicated that non- section was assigned as the experimental group (35
authentic materials had even a better effect on EFL male students). Then students’ motivation level was
learners’ motivation than web-based authentic materials. measured against a self-reported learner motivation
This contradiction requires more investigation and more questionnaire.
studies of larger samples of learners and different types To decrease the effect of outside factors, the
of authentic materials. The present study is an attempt in experimental and control groups were chosen from two
this direction. different schools using the cluster sampling method.
Statement of the Problem There were no homework assignments to be done
This study attempts to investigate the effect of outside the classroom. Moreover, t-test of independent
using English language authentic reading materials in samples was also used to ensure the equivalence and
teaching English on EFL students’ motivation. It homogeneity of the two groups (the control group and
addresses the following question: the experimental group) at the beginning of the study
1. Is there any significant difference in motivation (results are presented in table 1 below).
levels across time between Jordanian EFL students Table 1: Results of T-test of Independent Samples at
who use authentic materials and those who use non- the Beginning of the Experiment
authentic materials? Group N Mean SD Standard DF T- Pr>/t/
Error value
Definition of Terms Control 37 3.00 1.20 0.2349
Authentic materials: Materials that are obtained from 70 -0.63 0.53
Experimental 35 3.15 1.19 0.2256
real-life situations without being modified or
changed for pedagogical purposes (Spence-Brown, The results of the T-test of independent samples
2002). They are materials written by native show that there was no significant difference between
speakers of a language to be read by other native the motivation of the experimental group and that of the
speakers of the same language by various walks of control group (T, 70= -0.63, P= 0.53). This indicates
life. In this study authentic materials refer to that the two groups were equivalent and homogenous
English language materials produced by native with regard to their motivation towards foreign
speakers of English for native speakers of English language learning (FL) before starting the experiments.
and not for pedagogical purposes. Thus, any significant change in the students’ motivation
Non-authentic materials: English language materials would be attributed to the difference in the teaching
produced for pedagogical purposes. materials.
Motivations: Students’ enthusiasm for the materials Materials
used in class and their active involvement in the The control group used the non-authentic materials
learning process. which Eleventh Grade students’ use in all Jordanian
Research Design and Procedures public schools. The experimental group used authentic
In order to obtain permission to conduct the present materials chosen by the researcher from magazines,
study, the researcher approached the director of Al- newspapers, and websites. The materials covered topics
Kourah Directorate of Education, the principals, and the
245
Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences
246
Baniabdelrahman
Interactionbetween
Interaction between Time
Timeand Groups
and groups
5
Level of Motivation
4
Control
3
Experimental
2
0
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3
Time
247
Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences
Table 9: Contrast Variable: Time 2 with Time 1 Table 12: Results of the Analysis of Variance between
Source DF Type III Mean F-Value Pr>F Groups in the Middle of the Experiment (Week 6)
SS Square Source DF Type III Mean F-Value Pr>F
Mean 1 4.11 4.11 25.32 <0.0001 SS Square
Error 34 5.53 0.16 Model 1 0.38 0.38 0.30 0.58
Table 10: Contrast Variable: Time 3 with 1 Error 70 85.58 1.27
Source DF Type III Mean F-Value Pr>F Corrected 71 88.96
SS Square Total
Mean 1 227.33 227.33 88.33 <0.0001 As indicated in table 12 after six weeks of
Error 34 87.51 2.57 treatment, the two groups continued expressing no
As shown in Tables 9 and 10 there were significant differences in their motivation. The results
statistically significant differences between the show that there was no statistically significant
motivation of the individual students of the difference between the motivation of the experimental
experimental group across time in favor of time 2 (after group and that of the control group (F (1, 70) = 0.30, P
six weeks) and time 3 (after 12 weeks of treatment). F- = 0.68).
values were (F (1, 34) = 25.32, P<0.0001) and (F (1, 34) Table 13: Results of Analysis of Variance between
=88.33, P<0.0001) respectively. Groups at the End of the Experiment (Week 12)
E: Effect of Groups: Tables 11, 12 and 13 below Source DF Type Mean F-Value Pr>F
present the results of the repeated measures analysis III SS Square
of variance between groups across time Model 1 64.20 64.20 41.44 <0.0001
Error 70 108.45 1.55
Table 11: Results of the Analysis of Variance between Corrected Total 71 172.66
the Two Groups at the Beginning of the Experiment The results of the analysis of variance between the
(Week 1) two groups at the end of the study (after 13 weeks of
Source DF Type III Sum F-Value Pr>F
SS Square treatment) show that there was a significant difference
Model I 0.46 0.46 0.32 0.57 between the motivation of the students of the
Error 70 99.35 1.42 experimental group and that of the control group (F(1,
Corrected 71 99.80 70) =41.44, P < 0.0001) in favor of the experimental
Total
group.
The results of the analysis of variance between the
Results Related to Items 11 & 12
two groups at the beginning of the study show that there
Items 11 & 12 in the questionnaire asked students
were no significant differences between the motivation
to identify the level of increase in their English
of the students of the experimental group and the
language knowledge and culture knowledge after 12
control group (F(1, 70) =0.32, P=0.57). This means that
weeks of treatment. Table 14 below presents the means
the two groups were equivalent at the beginning of the
and standard deviations of the students’ answers.
study.
Table 14: Means and Standard Deviations of the Students’ Responses on Items 11 and 12 across Time
Control Group Experimental Group
248
Baniabdelrahman
249
Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Learning and Schmidt, T. Y. (1994). Authenticity in ESL: A Study of
Teaching, (3rded.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice – Request. Research Paper. University of Southern
Hall. Illinois. (ERIC Reproduction Service No. 415686).
Chavez, M. M. (1998). Learner’s Perceptions on Spence – Brown, R. (2002). The Eye of the Beholder:
Authenticity. IRAL, 36(4): 273-306. Authenticity in an Embedded Assessment Task.
Chun, D. M. & Plass, J. C. (2000). Networked Language Testing 18(4): 463-481.
Motivation Environment for Second Language Shei, C. C. (1994). Using Authentic Materials for
Acquisition. In M. Wardhauer & R. Kem (Eds.), Listening Comprehension in TEFL Context of
Networked-Based Language Teaching: Concepts Taiwan: The Peng-Hu Experience. Unpublished
and Practice (pp. 151-170). New York, Cambridge doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal
Univerity Press. University, Taipei, Taiwan R. O. C.
Crooks & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Shei, C. C. (2001). Follow you! An Authentic Language
Reopening the Research Agenda. Language Lesson Generation System. Computer Assisted
Learning, 41: 469-512 Language Learning, 14(2): 129-144.
Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and Motivating in the Terwilliger, J. (1997). Semantics, Psychometrics and
Foreign Language Classroom. The Modern Assessment Reform: A Closer Look at Authentic
Language Journal, 78(3): 273-284. Assessment. Educational Researcher, 26(8): 24-27.
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Thanajaro, M. (2000). Using Authentic Materials to
Motivation. NY: Longman. Develop Listening Comprehension in English as a
Gonzalez, O. G. (1990). Teaching Language and Second Language Classroom. Dissertation
Culture with Authentic Materials. (Doctoral Abstracts International, 61(6): 2176, (UMI No.
dissertation, West Virginia Univerity, 1990). 9974216).
Dissertation Abstracts International, 52 (5): 1666. Tremblay, P. F. & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and Culture in Language Motivation Construct in Language Learning. The
Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Modern Language Journal, 79: 505-520.
Lee, W. (1995). Authenticity Revisited: Text Van Aachen, S. (1999). What Motivates L2 Learners in
Authenticity and Learner Authenticity. ELT Acquisition of Kanji Using CALL: A Case Study.
Journal, 49: 323-328 Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(2): 113-
Lin, Y. F. (2002). The Effect of Authentic Materials on 136.
the Motivation of EFL Learners in Taiwan. Final Walz, J. (1998). Meeting Standards for Foreign
Project Report 90A-38. The Overseas Chinese Language Learning with World Wide Web
Institute of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan R. O. C. Activities. Foreign Language Annals, 31(1): 103-
Retrieved from 114.
[Link]
Lin, Y. F. (2004). The Effect of Authentic Materials on
Motivation and Reading Achievement of EFL
(English as a Foreign Language) Learners in
Taiwan. Doctoral dissertation, La Seierra
University.
Lewkowicz, J. A. (2000). Authenticity in Language
Testing: Some Autstanding Questions. Language
Testing, 17(1): 43-64.
McCrann, T. O. (1998). Native English Speakers’
Reading Strategies for Japanese and Spanish: Are
They Same? A multiple Case Study. (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Nebraska at Lincoln,
USA).
Oxford, R. & Shearin, J. (1994). Language Learning
Motivation: Expanding the Theoretical Framework.
The Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 12 – 28.
Peacock, M. (1997). The Effect of Authentic Materials
on the Motivation of EFL [Link] Journal
51(2): 144-156.
Reakes, J. W. (1990). A Study to Assess the Effect of
Authentic Material on the Communicative
competence and on the Attitudes of Grade Give
Students Studying French as a Second Language.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(2): 452,
(UMI No. 9115136).
250
Baniabdelrahman
Appendix A
Self – Reported Learner Motivation, Language Knowledge, and Culture Knowledge Questionnaire (Adapted
from Peacock, 1997 & Lin, 2004)
Thank you for your participation in this study. Please complete the following questionnaire with directions preceding
each section.
Part III: The following two questions relate to the improvement of your language and cultural knowledge after
experiencing the materials.
251