0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views23 pages

Module 8 Fom Notes

The document explains various motivation theories including Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, McGregor's Theory X and Y, Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, McClelland's Three Need Theory, Goal-Setting Theory, and Reinforcement Theory. Each theory outlines different aspects of human motivation in the workplace, emphasizing the importance of understanding needs, goals, and consequences in driving employee behavior. The explanations are provided in both English and Roman Urdu for better accessibility.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views23 pages

Module 8 Fom Notes

The document explains various motivation theories including Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, McGregor's Theory X and Y, Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, McClelland's Three Need Theory, Goal-Setting Theory, and Reinforcement Theory. Each theory outlines different aspects of human motivation in the workplace, emphasizing the importance of understanding needs, goals, and consequences in driving employee behavior. The explanations are provided in both English and Roman Urdu for better accessibility.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Complete Motivation Theories Explanation

English & Roman Urdu

1. MASLOW'S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS

English Explanation:
Maslow proposed that human needs are arranged in a pyramid with five levels. People must
satisfy lower-level needs before they can move to higher-level needs. Once a need is satisfied,
it no longer motivates behavior.

The Five Levels (from bottom to top):

Level 1 Physiological Needs: Basic survival needs like food, water, shelter, sleep

Level 2 Safety Needs: Security, stability, protection from danger, job security

Level 3 Social/Belongingness Needs: Love, friendship, acceptance, being part of a group

Level 4 Esteem Needs: Self-respect, recognition, status, achievement, confidence

Level 5 Self-Actualization: Reaching your full potential, personal growth, creativity

Key Points:

You can't focus on friendship (level 3) if you're starving (level 1)


Lower-order needs = Physiological + Safety (external needs)

Higher-order needs = Social + Esteem + Self-actualization (internal needs)

Once satisfied, a need stops motivating


To motivate someone, identify which level they're currently on

“Lower-level needs are not satisfied, so higher-level rewards cannot motivate.”

Herzberg:
“Salary removes dissatisfaction but does not create motivation.”

Roman Urdu Explanation:

Maslow ne kaha ke insaan ki zarooraten ek pyramid ki tarah hain jismein paanch levels hain.
Neeche wali zarooraten pehle poori honi chahiye, phir upar wali zarooraten motivate karti hain.
Jab koi zaroorat puri ho jaye, to wo ab motivate nahi karti.

Paanch Levels (neeche se upar tak):

Physiological (Jismani Zarooraten): Khana, pani, ghar, neend - basic survival

Safety (Hifazat): Security, stability, khatron se bachao, job ki security

Social (Samaji/Mohabbat): Dosti, pyar, qubooliyat, group mein shamil hona

Esteem (Izzat/Ehteraam): Apni respect, pehchaan, status, kamyabi, confidence

Self-Actualization (Khud ki takmeel): Apni puri capability tak pahunchna, personal growth,
creativity

Ahmm Nuqaat: key points

Agar bhook lagi ho (level 1) to dosti (level 3) ki fikr nahi kar sakte

Lower-order = Physiological + Safety (bahar ki zarooraten)

Higher-order = Social + Esteem + Self-actualization (andar ki zarooraten)

Jab zaroorat puri ho jaye, motivation khatam

Kisi ko motivate karne ke liye, dekho wo kis level par hai pair motivate kro.
2. McGREGOR'S THEORY X AND THEORY Y
Claude Response:

English Explanation:

McGregor identified two contrasting sets of assumptions that managers hold about employees.

Theory X (Negative View): pessimistic view

Managers who believe:

Employees naturally dislike work and avoid it


Workers must be forced, controlled, or threatened to work
Employees avoid responsibility and prefer to be directed
Workers want security above all else
People are motivated mainly by lower-order needs (money, security)

Theory Y (Positive View): optimistic view

Managers who believe:

Work is as natural as play or rest


People can exercise self-direction and self-control

Commitment to objectives brings its own rewards

Workers can accept and seek responsibility

Creativity and problem-solving ability is widely distributed

People are motivated by higher-order needs (achievement, recognition)

Important Reality:

No scientific evidence proves either theory is correct

No proof that Theory Y management produces better results

Both are just assumptions managers makes

Chat gpt Response:


McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y explain two different sets of assumptions that managers
make about employees.

Theory X
Theory X assumes that:

Workers have little ambition


They dislike work
They avoid responsibility
They must be closely supervised and controlled

This theory believes that employees are mainly motivated by lower-order needs such as pay, job
security, and safety.

Management Style:

Strict supervision, control, and use of punishment.

Theory Y
Theory Y assumes that:

Workers can direct themselves


They accept and even seek responsibility
They see work as a natural activity, like play or rest

This theory believes that employees are motivated by higher-order needs such as achievement,
recognition, and self-development.

Management Style:
Trust, participation, and empowerment.

Important Point:
There is no strong evidence that either Theory X or Theory Y assumptions are always true.
There is also no clear evidence that managing employees using Theory Y automatically makes
them more motivated.

Roman Urdu Explanation:

McGregor ne do alag tarah ke theories diye jo managers apne employees ke baare mein sochte
hain.

Theory X (Negative Soch):


Jo managers yeh sochte hain:

Employees kaam se nafrat karte hain aur bach kar rehte hain

Workers ko force karna, control karna ya dhamkana parta hai Kaam karwane keliye.

Employees responsibility se bachte hain aur direction chahte hain

Workers sirf security chahte hain sab se zyada

Log sirf lower-order needs se motivate hote hain (paisa, security)

Theory Y (Positive Soch):

Jo managers yeh sochte hain:

Kaam karna natural hai jaise khelna ya aaraam karna

Log khud ko direct aur control kar sakte hain

Objectives ke saath commitment apna reward hai

Workers responsibility le sakte aur direction dhoond sakte hain

Creativity aur problem-solving ability har kisi mein hoti hai

Log higher-order needs se motivate hote hain (achievement, recognition)

Ahmm Haqeeqat: key points

Koi scientific saboot nahi ke dono mein se kaunsa sahi hai.

Koi saboot nahi ke Theory Y behtar results deta hai.

Dono sirf assumptions hain jo managers banate hain

3. HERZBERG'S TWO-FACTOR THEORY


(MOTIVATION-HYGIENE THEORY)

Herzberg discovered that job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction are NOT opposites - they are
separate dimensions caused by different factors.
Hygiene Factors (Extrinsic/Environmental):

These factors prevents dissatisfaction but DON'T motivate:

Company policies
Supervision quality
Relationship with supervisor and peers
Working conditions
Salary
Job security
Personal life
Relationship with peers
Status
Security

Effect: If absent → Dissatisfaction | If present → No dissatisfaction (but not motivation)

Motivators (Intrinsic/Psychological):

These factors create satisfaction and motivation:

Achievement
Recognition
The work itself
Responsibility
Advancement/promotion
Growth
Learning opportunities

Effect: If absent → No satisfaction | If present → Satisfaction and motivation

Key Understanding:

Good salary prevents complaints but doesn't make people work harder
Recognition and achievement make people genuinely motivated

You need BOTH: hygiene factors to prevent unhappiness + motivators to create motivation

Traditional view was wrong: satisfaction and dissatisfaction are NOT on one scale

Gpt Response:

Herzberg’s Motivation–Hygiene Theory (Two-Factor Theory):


Herzberg’s Motivation–Hygiene Theory explains that job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction
come from different factors, not from the same ones.

This theory says that:

Removing dissatisfaction does not automatically motivate employees.


Motivation and satisfaction are mainly created by intrinsic factors, not external ones.

Herzberg also tried to explain why job satisfaction does not always lead to higher performance.

1. Hygiene Factors (Extrinsic Factors):

Hygiene factors are related to the work environment.

They prevent job dissatisfaction, but do not motivate employees when present.

If hygiene factors are poor → employee becomes dissatisfied.

If hygiene factors are good → employee becomes neutral, not highly motivated.

Examples of Hygiene Factors:

Supervision
Company Policy
Relationship with Supervisor
Working Conditions
Salary
Relationship with Peers
Personal Life
Relationship with Subordinates
Status
Security

2. Motivators (Intrinsic Factors):

Motivators are related to the work itself and personal growth.

They create job satisfaction and motivation.

If motivators are present → employee becomes highly satisfied.

If motivators are absent → employee may feel neutral, not dissatisfied.

Examples of Motivators:
Achievement
Recognition
Work Itself
Responsibility
Advancement
Growth

Job Satisfaction Scale (Herzberg’s View)


Extremely Satisfied → Motivators present
Neutral → Hygiene factors present but motivators absent
Extremely Dissatisfied → Hygiene factors absent

Growth
Exam Tip (Very Important):

Hygiene ≠ Motivation
No dissatisfaction ≠ Satisfaction
Learn examples by heart

4. McCLELLAND'S THREE NEED THEORY

English Explanation:

McClelland’s Three-Need Theory explains that people are motivated at work by three learned
(acquired) needs. These needs develop through life experiences and strongly affect how a
person behaves in the workplace.

1) Need for Achievement (nAch):

Drive to excel, accomplish goals, succeed


Prefers moderate challenges (not too easy, not impossible)

Wants clear, measurable goals


Desires immediate feedback
Likes personal responsibility for results

Examples: Entrepreneurs, sales people, individual contributors

2) Need for Power (nPow):

Desire to influence, control, or impact others


Wants to make an impact and be influential
People with high nPow:

Enjoys competition and winning


Prefers leadership positions
Enjoy making decisions
Wants authority and responsibility

Two types:

Personal power: Control for personal gain


Institutional power: Organize efforts for
organizational goals (better for managers)
Examples: Managers, politicians, leaders

3) Need for Affiliation (nAff):

Desire for friendly, close interpersonal relationships.

People with high nAff:

Wants to be liked and accepted Prefers co


Values collaboration and teamwork
Want acceptance and belonging
Avoid conflicts

Examples: Team players, HR professionals, counselors

Key Points:

Everyone has all three needs but in different proportions


One need usually dominates
Different jobs suit different need profiles
High nAch people make good individual performers but not always good managers
Good managers often have high nPow (institutional) and low nAff

Roman Urdu Explanation:


McClelland ne kaha ke log zindagi ke tajurbaat se teen bari zarooraten hasil karte hain, aur yeh
zarooraten kaam mein behavior ko motivate karti hain.

Need for Achievement/Kamyabi ki Zaroorat (nAch):

Behtareen hone, maqsad hasil karne, kamyab hone ki khwahish


Moderate challenges pasand karte hain (na bohot aasan, na namumkin)
Saaf, measurable goals chahte hain
Foran feedback chahte hain
Results ki personal responsibility lena pasand

Misaalain: Entrepreneurs, sales log, individual workers

Need for Power/Taqat ki Zaroorat (nPow):

Doosron ko influence karne, control karne ki khwahish


Impact banana chahte hain aur influential hona chahte hain
Competition aur jeetna pasand
Leadership positions chahte hain

Do qisam:
Personal power: Apne fayde ke liye control
Institutional power: Organization ke maqsad ke liye koshish (managers ke liye behtar)

Misaalain: Managers, politicians, leaders

Need for Affiliation/Rishton ki Zaroorat (nAff):

Dost-ana, qareeb rishton ki khwahish


Pasand kiye jane aur qubool kiye jane ki khwahish
Cooperation ko competition se zyada pasand
Takraar se bachte hain
Collaboration aur teamwork ki qadar

Misaalain: Team players, HR log, counselors

Ahmm Nuqaat:

Har kisi mein teenon zarooraten hain lekin alag alag quantity mein
Ek zaroorat aksar dominate karti hai
Alag alag jobs alag need profiles ke liye suit karti hain
High nAch log ache individual performers hain lekin hamesha ache managers nahi
Ache managers mein aksar high nPow (institutional) aur low nAff hota hai

5. GOAL-SETTING THEORY:

English Explanation:
This theory states that specific and challenging goals, along with appropriate feedback, lead to
higher performance.

Core Principles:

1) Specific Goals > Vague Goals

"Increase sales by 15%" is better than "do your best"


Clear targets give direction

2) Difficult Goals > Easy Goals:

Challenging goals (when accepted) produce higher performance


But must be achievable, not impossible

3) Participation Increases Acceptance:

Involving employees in goal-setting reduces resistance


Increases commitment to goals
Makes difficult goals more acceptable

4) Feedback is Essential

Regular feedback on progress keeps motivation high


Shows people where they stand

5) Goal Commitment Matters:

Goals must be accepted by the employee


Public goals increase commitment
Self-set goals are more accepted

Self-Efficacy (Related Concept):

Your belief in your ability to perform a task


High self-efficacy → More confidence → Better performance
Creates positive cycle: High efficacy → Engagement → Performance → Higher efficacy
Can be built through training, encouragement, past successes

Factors for Success:

Goals should be public (announced)


Person should have internal locus of control (believe they control outcomes)
Goals should be self-set or participatively set
Consider national culture differences

Gpt Response:

Goal-Setting Theory
Explanation in Simple English:

Goal-Setting Theory says that having clear goals is one of the strongest sources of motivation at
work.

When people intend to achieve a goal, they work harder and stay focused.

Specific goals improve performance more than vague goals.

Difficult goals, if accepted, lead to higher performance than easy goals.

Specific and hard goals (for example: “Increase sales by 20%”) produce better results than
general goals like “do your best.”

Participation in goal setting is helpful because:

It reduces resistance to difficult goals


It increases acceptance and commitment to goals

Example:
An employee performs better when given a clear and challenging target that they helped set.

Self-Efficacy (Social Cognitive / Social Learning Theory)

Self-efficacy means a person’s belief that they can successfully perform a task.

People with high self-efficacy have more confidence and try harder.

People with low self-efficacy are more likely to reduce effort or give up in difficult situations.

High self-efficacy creates a positive cycle:


More confidence → more effort → better performance → even more confidence

Example:

A student who believes “I can do this” studies harder and performs better.
6. REINFORCEMENT THEORY:

English Explanation:

Claude:

Based on behaviorism - behavior is shaped by its consequences. This theory says people will
repeat behaviors that are rewarded and avoid behaviors that are punished.

Gpt:
Reinforcement Theory says that a person’s behavior depends on what happens after the
behavior.
If an action is followed by a reward, the person is more likely to repeat it.
If an action is followed by punishment, the person is less likely to repeat it.

This theory explains that behavior can be shaped and controlled by managing its
consequences.

By using rewards (like praise, money, or grades) and punishments (like fines or warnings), we
can encourage good behavior and stop bad behavior.

Example:
An employee works harder because they receive a bonus.
A student stops coming late because they are punished.

Core Concept:

Behavior = Function of its consequences


How It Works:

By controlling consequences

(rewards/punishments), you can:


Reinforce desired behavior (encourage it)
Extinguish unwanted behavior (discourage it)

Four Types of Consequences:

1) Positive Reinforcement: Add something pleasant to encourage behavior

Example: Bonus for meeting targets

2) Negative Reinforcement: Remove something unpleasant to encourage behavior


Example: Stop nagging when work is done

3) Punishment: Add something unpleasant to discourage behavior

Example: Written warning for lateness

4) Extinction: Remove rewards to discourage behavior

Example: Stop praising poor quality work

Key Points:

Immediate consequences work best


Consistent application is crucial
Focus on behaviors, not attitudes
Positive reinforcement is most effective long-term
Ignores internal thoughts/feelings - only focuses on observable behavior

Roman Urdu Explanation:

Behaviorism par mabni ( built upon) - behavior uske consequences se shape hota hai. Yeh
theory kehti hai log wo behaviors dobara karenge jo reward kiye jayen aur jin ko punish kiya
jaye unse bachenge.

Buniyadi Tasawwur ( imagination‚ Conception) :

Behavior = Uske consequences ka function

Kaise Kaam Karta Hai:

Consequences ko control karke (rewards/punishments), aap yeh kar sakte hain:

Achi behavior ko reinforce karna (encourage karna)

Ghalat behavior ko khatam karna (discourage karna)

Char Qisam Ke Consequences:

Positive Reinforcement: Kuch acha add karna behavior encourage karne ke liye

Misaal: Target milne par bonus


Negative Reinforcement: Kuch bura hatana behavior encourage karne ke liye

Misaal: Jab kaam ho jaye to tang karna band karna

Punishment: Kuch bura add karna behavior discourage karne ke liye

Misaal: Der se aane par written warning

Extinction: Rewards hatana behavior discourage karne ke liye

Misaal: Kharab quality kaam ki tarif band karna

Ahmm Nuqaat: Key points :

Foran consequences sab se behtar kaam karte hain

Consistent application bohot zaroori hai


Behaviors par focus karo, attitudes par nahi

Positive reinforcement lambe waqt ke liye sab se effective hai

Internal soch/feelings ko ignore karta hai - sirf observable behavior par dhyan

7. JOB DESIGN THEORY:

English Explanation:

This focuses on how work is structured to increase motivation and satisfaction.

Key Concepts:

Job Design: The way tasks are combined to form complete jobs

Job Scope: The number of different tasks in a job and how often they repeat

Wide scope = many different tasks


Narrow scope = few repetitive tasks

Job Enlargement: Horizontal expansion


Adding more tasks at the same level
Increases variety but not complexity.
Example: Cashier also stocks shelves

Job Enrichment: Vertical expansion


Adding higher-level responsibilities
Adding planning, decision-making, and evaluating increases responsibility and autonomy.

Example: Cashier also manages inventory, trains new staff

Job Depth: How much control employees have over their work

High depth = more autonomy, decision-making

Low depth = close supervision, little control

Benefits:

Reduces boredom from repetitive work.


Increases skill variety.
Gives sense of meaningfulness.
Increases motivation and satisfaction.
But not everyone wants enriched jobs - individual differences matter

Roman Urdu Explanation:

Yeh focus karta hai ke kaam ko kaise structure kiya jaye motivation aur satisfaction barhane ke
liye.

Key concepts Ahmm Tasawwurat:

Job Design: Tasks ko jama karke mukammal jobs banane ka tareeqa

Job Scope: Job mein kitne alag alag tasks hain aur kitni dafa dobara hote hain
Wide scope = bohot saare alag tasks
Narrow scope = kam dobara hone wale tasks

Job Enlargement: Horizontal expansion


Same level par zyada tasks add karna
Variety barhti hai lekin complexity nahi

Misaal: Cashier shelves bhi stock karta hai

Job Enrichment: Vertical expansion


Higher-level zimmedariyan add karna
Planning, decision-making, evaluating add karna Zimmedari aur autonomy barhti hai

Misaal: Cashier inventory bhi manage karta hai, naye staff ko train karta hai

Job Depth: Employees ko apne kaam par kitna control hai

High depth = zyada autonomy, decision-making

Low depth = qareeb se supervision, kam control

Fayde:

Dobara hone wale kaam se boredom kam hoti hai


Skill variety barhti hai
Meaningfulness ka ehsaas milta hai
Motivation aur satisfaction barhti hai
Lekin har koi enriched jobs nahi chahta - individual differences matter karti hain

8. EQUITY THEORY:

English Explanation:

People compare their work inputs and outcomes with others to determine if they're being treated
fairly.

The Comparison Process:

Your Ratio: Your Outcomes / Your Inputs

Other's Ratio: Other's Outcomes / Other's Inputs

Inputs (What you contribute):

Effort
Experience
Education
Skills
Time
Loyalty

Outcomes (What you receive):


Salary
Benefits
Recognition
Promotion
Job security
Status

Three Possible Perceptions:

Equity (Fair):

Your ratio = Other's ratio


Feel satisfied
Continue current behavior

Inequity - Underrewarded:

Your ratio < Other's ratio


Feel angry, cheated
May reduce effort, ask for raise, leave job, sabotage

Inequity - Overrewarded:

Your ratio > Other's ratio


May feel guilty (or rationalize it)
Rarely reduces own outcomes

Key Points:

It's about PERCEPTION, not objective reality.

People choose their own comparison to others (co-workers, friends, industry standards).

When inequity is felt, people take action to restore balance.

Communication and transparency help prevent perceived inequity.

Money isn't everything - recognition, respect also matter

Roman Urdu Explanation:

Log apne kaam ke inputs aur outcomes ko doosron se compare karte hain yeh dekhne ke liye
ke unke saath insaaf ho raha hai ya nahi.
Comparison Ka Process:

Aapka Ratio: Aapke Outcomes / Aapke Inputs

Doosre Ka Ratio: Doosre Ke Outcomes / Doosre Ke Inputs

Inputs (Jo aap contribute karte hain):

Mehnat
Tajurba
Taleem
Skills
Waqt
Wafadari

Outcomes (Jo aap hasil karte hain):

Tankhwah
Benefits
Pehchaan
Taraqi
Job security
Status

Teen Mumkin Perceptions:

Equity (Insaaf):

Aapka ratio = Doosre ka ratio


Khush mehsoos karte hain
Current behavior jaari rakhte hain

Inequity - Kam Inaam:

Aapka ratio < Doosre ka ratio


Gussa, dhoka mehsoos karte hain
Mehnat kam kar sakte hain, raise maang sakte hain, job chor sakte hain, sabotage kar sakte
hain

Inequity - Zyada Inaam:

Aapka ratio > Doosre ka ratio


Shayad guilty mehsoos karen (ya rationalize karen)
Kam hi apne outcomes kam karte hain
Ahmm Nuqaat: Key points

PERCEPTION ka muamla hai, objective haqeeqat ka nahi

Log apne comparison doosre khud chunte hain (co-workers, dost, industry standards)

Jab inequity mehsoos ho, log balance restore karne ke liye action lete hain

Communication aur transparency

perceived inequity rokne mein madad karti hai

Sirf paisa sab kuch nahi - pehchaan, izzat bhi matter karti hai

9. EXPECTANCY THEORY

English Explanation:

People are motivated when they believe their effort will lead to good performance, that
performance will be rewarded, and they value those rewards.

In short: people do things because they expect a reward or a desired outcome.

Three Key Components (Linkages):

1. Expectancy (Effort → Performance)


"If I try hard, will I succeed?"
Belief that effort leads to performance

Affected by:

Self-confidence
Training
Resources available
Past experience

2. Instrumentality (Performance → Reward)

"If I perform well, will I be rewarded?"


Belief that performance leads to outcomes
Affected by:

Trust in management
Past promises kept/broken
Clarity of reward system

3. Valence (Value of Reward):

"Do I actually want this reward?"


How attractive the reward is to you
Different people value different things

Affected by:

Personal preferences
Current needs
Alternatives available

The Formula:

Motivation = Expectancy × Instrumentality × Valence

Critical Understanding:

If ANY component is ZERO, motivation is ZERO

All three must be positive for motivation


Multiplication means all three matter equally

Examples of Problems:

Low Expectancy: "The target is impossible, why try?"

Low Instrumentality: "They never give the promised bonuses anyway"

Low Valence: "I don't care about 'Employee of the Month' - I need money"

How to Increase Motivation:

Build Expectancy: Training, resources, support, clear instructions

Build Instrumentality: Keep promises, transparent system, consistent rewards


Increase Valence: Offer rewards people actually want, give choices

Roman Urdu Explanation:

Log tab motivated hote hain jab unka yakeen ho ke unki mehnat achi performance laayegi,
performance ko reward kiya jayega, aur wo rewards ki qadar karte hain.

Teen Ahmm Components (Linkages):

1. Expectancy (Mehnat → Performance)

"Agar main koshish karun, kya kamyab hounga?"


Yakeen ke mehnat performance laati hai
Mutaasir hota hai:

Self-confidence se
Training se
Mojood resources se
Pichle tajurbe se

2. Instrumentality (Performance → Reward)

"Agar acha perform karun, kya mujhe reward milega?" Yakeen ke performance outcomes laata
hai

Mutaasir hota hai:

Management par bharose se


Pehle ke wade jo rakhe/tore gaye
Reward system ki safai se

3. Valence (Reward Ki Qadar):

"Kya main sachhi yeh reward chahta hoon?"


Reward aapke liye kitna acha hai
Alag log alag cheezain value karte hain
Mutaasir hota hai:
Shakhsi pasand se
Current zarooraton se
Mojood alternatives se

Formula:

Motivation = Expectancy × Instrumentality × Valence


Ahmm Samajh:

Agar KOI BHI component ZERO hai, motivation ZERO hai

Teenon positive hone chahiye motivation ke liye

Multiplication ka matlab teenon barabar zaroori hain

Maslon Ki Misaalain:

Low Expectancy: "Target namumkin hai, koshish kyun karun?"

Low Instrumentality: "Woh kabhi promised bonus dete hi nahi"

Low Valence: "Mujhe 'Employee of the

Month' se koi faraq nahi - mujhe paise chahiye"

Motivation Kaise Barhayen:

Expectancy Barhayen: Training, resources, support, saaf instructions


Instrumentality Barhayen: Wade rakhein, transparent system, consistent rewards
Valence Barhayen: Jo log chahte hain wo rewards den, choices den

You might also like