DROPPED
OBJECT
STUDY
Presented by: Nur Alia Syazwani Nabila Bt Rani
OUTLINE
Introduction
Objective
Analysis of Methodology
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
Pipeline’s dropped object study focuses on providing a methodology for
assessing the risks and required protection from dropped crane loads and ship
impact to risers and pipeline systems within the safety zone of installations.
Two typical accidental loading scenarios that can lead to damage to riser,
pipelines and umbilical.
Impact due to dropped objects
Pull-over/hooking ; due to dragged trawl board or anchor
The acceptance criteria shall state the acceptable limits for the risks related to
human safety
environment
OBJECTIVE
Minimize the probability of pipeline impact damage.
To adequately protect the pipeline so that any object falling on the pipeline
will not produce a dent large enough to affect the service or impair routine
pigging operations.
To ensure no release of hydrocarbons during the operation of the pipeline
system.
ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGY
This methodology provides a structured process to assess risks, evaluate impacts, and
implement protective measures for pipeline safety.
Categorization of objects
Drop Location
Hit Probability
Hit Frequency and
Energy
Damage and Frequency
CATEGORIZATION OF OBJECTS
OUTPUT;
List of object lifted &
dimension
Frequency of the object
lifted per year
Crane radius
Material Handling Study
DROPPED OBJECT DATA
Drag Coeffiecients Value
DROPPED OBJECT DATA
Object Classification
Drop Frequency
DROPPED OBJECT
LOCATION
By Ring method
Consideration
Pipeline Approach
Vessel Approach
Crane Radius
PVEP Project- KM DD
DAMAGE CLASSIFICATION
Pipeline Condition Hydrocarbon Release
Minor Damage- D1 No Release- R0
Moderate Damage- D2 Small Release- D2
Major Damage- D3 Major Release- D3
HIT PROBABILITY
To calculate the conditional probability of object to fall on the seabed
To calculate the probability of object to hit the pipeline or riser within
10m radius by considering the length in the covered radius
To calculate the hit frequency, including the no. of lift/ year
HIT FREQUENCY VS ENERGY
To calculate the hit frequency for different impact of energy level
Conditional probabilities of impact energy
DAMAGE CAPACITY VS ENERGY
Considering the condition of the pipeline
Steel pipe only
Steel pipe with concrete coating
DAMAGE VS FREQUENCY
Determined by combining the “hit frequency vs energy" and “damage capacity vs energy”
Note:
[Link] class D1 is not considered to give damage leading to failure.
CONCLUSION
No additional mechanical protection required for
failure frequency that within allowable limit, dropped
object event can considered negligible
For additional protection, Concrete Mattress can be
considered for protection against dropped object
REFERENCE
DNV-RP-F107 ; Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection
DNV-ST-F201 ; Dynamic Risers
DNV-ST-F101 ; Submarine Pipeline Systems
THANK
YOU