0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views8 pages

Week 2

The document discusses differentiation, including the product rule and Leibniz rule for differentiating products multiple times. It provides examples of parametric differentiation and methods for finding stationary points, including the use of first and second derivatives to classify these points. Additionally, it outlines a systematic approach for curve sketching, emphasizing the importance of asymptotes and stationary points.

Uploaded by

goldfire345
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views8 pages

Week 2

The document discusses differentiation, including the product rule and Leibniz rule for differentiating products multiple times. It provides examples of parametric differentiation and methods for finding stationary points, including the use of first and second derivatives to classify these points. Additionally, it outlines a systematic approach for curve sketching, emphasizing the importance of asymptotes and stationary points.

Uploaded by

goldfire345
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CHAPTER 1.

DIFFERENTIATION 11

In general if y = uv then applying the product rule gives:

y (1) = u(1) v + uv (1)


y (2) = u(2) v + u(1) v (1) + u(1) v (1) + uv (2)
y (3) = u(3) v + 3u(2) v (1) + 2u(2) v (1) + 2u(1) v (2)
+ u(1) v (2) + uv (3)
= u(3) + 3u(2) v (1) + 3u(1) v (2) + uv (3) .

Notice that the binomial coefficients are appearing.

In fact. . .
! " ! "
(n) (n) n (n−1) (1) n (n−2) (2)
y = u v+ u v + u v + ···
1 2
! "
n
+ u(1) v (n−1) + uv (n)
n−1
#n ! "
n (n−k) (k)
= u v , (1.1)
k
k=0

where ! "
n n!
= .
k (n − k)!k!
Equation 1.1 is known as the Leibniz rule for differentiating a product n times.

Example 1.21.
dn y
If y = xex , what is ?
dxn
Using the Leibniz rule with v = x, u = ex gives
! "
dn n d dn−1
y (n) = x n (ex ) + (x) n−1 (ex )
dx 1 dx dx
! " 2 ✿
✘ 0
n d d✘ ✘✘✘
n−2
✘ ✘ x
+ ✘2✘(x) dxn−2 (e ) + 0
2 ✘dx
✘✘
= xex + [Link]
= ex (x + n).

Example 1.22.
d17 y
Let y = x2 sin x. Find.
dx17
Tip: When applying the Leibniz rule for the function uv you should choose v such that it
becomes zero when differentiated a relatively few number of times (if this is possible). So
we choose u = sin x, v = x2 .
17
! "
(17) 2 d 17 d16
y =x (sin x) + 2x (sin x)
dx17 1 dx16
! " 15
17 d
+ 2 15 (sin x) + 0.
2 dx
CHAPTER 1. DIFFERENTIATION 12

Now it can be shown that


d16 d17 d15
(sin x) = sin x, ∴ (cos x) , (− cos x) .
dx16 dx17 dx15

17.16
∴ y (17) = x2 cos x + 17.2x sin x + .2✁. (− cos x)
2✁
= x2 cos x + 34x sin x − 272 cos x.

1.4.2 Parametric differentiation

In many applications a function is expressed using a PARAMETER, e.g.

y = cos 2t, x = sin t,

where the parameter t ≡time (for example).

• For a given value of t, both x and y may be found.

• This implies that we can generate a curve y = f (x).

Example 1.23. If a curve is defined parametrically as

dy d2 y
y = cos 2t, x = sin t, then find and .
dx dx2
First,
dy dx
= −2 sin 2t and = cos t.
dt dt
dy
dy dy dt dt
Thus = . = dx
.
dx $dt%&dx' dt
Chain Rule
Then ✘t
dy −2 sin 2t 4 sin t✘
cos✘
= =− ✘✘t = −4 sin t.
dx cos t ✘cos

What about. . . ? ! "


d2 y d2 y ( d2 x
̸=
dx2 dt2 dt2
By definition
! "
d2 y d dy d
2
= = (−4 sin t)
dx dx dx dx
d dt
= (−4 sin t) (Chain Rule!)
dt dx
cos t 4✘ ✘✘
cos t
= −4 dx = − ✘ = −4.
dt
✘cos✘t
CHAPTER 1. DIFFERENTIATION 13

Example 1.24.

dy d2 y
y = 3 sin θ − sin3 θ, x = cos3 θ, Find , .
dx dx2
In this example θ is the parameter.

dy dy ( dx 3✁ cos θ − 3✁ sin2 θ cos θ


= = ,
dx dθ dθ ) −*3✁ cos2 θ sin
) θ *
cos θ 1 − sin2 θ ✘✘
cos θ✘cos 2 θ✘
=
− cos2 θ sin θ
=
−✘cos✘2✘θ sin θ
cos θ
= − = − cot θ.
sin θ
Meanwhile,

d2 y d d dθ
= (− cot θ) = (− cot θ)
dx2 dx! "( dθ dx
1 ) *
= − − 2 −3 cos2 θ sin θ
sin θ
1
= − .
3 cos θ sin3 θ
2

1.5 Using differentiation

1.5.1 Finding stationary points

Consider the following diagram...

First observe that

1. If f ′ (a) < 0 then f is decreasing near a,

2. If f ′ (b) > 0 then f is increasing near b.

dy
A stationary point is where dx = 0. It can correspond to either. . .
CHAPTER 1. DIFFERENTIATION 14

dy d2 y dy
dx dx2 dx is Classification
0 >0 ⇒ Increasing ⇒ Minimum
0 <0 ⇒ Decreasing ⇒ Maximum
0 =0 ⇒ ??? ⇒ Need more info!

Table 1.3: Using second derivatives to classify stationary points

1. A maximum (derivative changes from positive to negative)

2. A minimum (derivative changes from negative to positive)

3. A point of inflection (second derivative changes sign)

Remark 1.1. A point of inflection does not have to be a stationary point. So watch out!

Second Derivative Tests for stationary points. . .

Example 1.25. For


dy
y = x4 , = 4x3
dx
∴ Stationary point at x = 0.

d2 y
= 12x2 = 0 at x = 0.
dx2
But clearly x = 0 is a minimum, as shown in Figure 1.1.

. . . hence we need a different test. Fortunately, we do have one. . . we can construct a sign
dy d2 y
diagram of dx , as done in Figure 1.2. This works even when dx 2 = 0!

Hence the point x = 0 must be a minimum.

Example 1.26. Find all the stationary points and their nature for

y = f (x) = 3x4 − 4x3 + 1.


CHAPTER 1. DIFFERENTIATION 15

Figure 1.1: A plot of y = x4 . We can see that there is a minimum at x = 0; however, the
usual second derivative test doesn’t work on this one!

dy
Figure 1.2: The sign test for y = x4 . This is done by checking the sign of dx on either
side of the stationary point x = 0., which tells you whether the he tangent to the curve
points up or down for each side of the stationary point.

Calculating the first derivative yields


dy
= 12x3 − 12x2 = 12x2 (x − 1).
dx
At the stationary points
dy
= 0, and so 12x2 (x − 1) = 0,
dx
∴ Stationary points at x = 0, 1.

Now apply the second derivative test. Calculating the second derivative yields

d2 y
= 36x2 − 24x.
dx2
Evaluating the value of the second derivative at the stationary points gives

d2 y
At x=1 = 36 − 24 > 0 ∴ Minimum.
dx2
d2 y
At x=0 = 0 ∴ Use different test.
dx2
dy
For the point x = 0, construct a sign diagram for dx , as done in Figure 1.3

Therefore x = 1 is a minimum, while x = 0 is a point of inflection.


CHAPTER 1. DIFFERENTIATION 16

Figure 1.3: Sign test for the derivative of 3x4 − 4x3 + 1, which demonstrates that x = 0
has a point of inflection.

Example 1.27 (Exam Question (2007)). A curve is given by


x = t2 , y = te−t . (1.2)
dy d2 y
Find dx and dx2
.

Where does the curve have a critical (stationary) point? Is it a maximum, minimum
or point of inflection? Justify your answer.

Solution: First calculate the derivatives using the chain rule...


dy e−t − te−t (1 − t)e−t
= =
dx + 2t −t 2t ,
d2 y 2t −e − (1 − t)e−t − (1 − t)e−t (2)
= .
dx2 (2t)3
−2t − ✚2✚t + 2t2 − 2 + ✚
2✚t
= e−t 3
.
8t
e−t 2
= (t − t − 1).
4t3
e−t e−t e−t
= − 2 − 3.
4t 4t 4t
dy
Note that dx = 0 only when t = 1 (therefore it is the only possible stationary point). For
the second derivative
d2 y -- e−1✓ e−1✓ e−1
- = ✓ − ✓ − < 0,
dx t=1 ✓4
2
✓4 4
so our stationary point is a maximum.

Don’t forget to give the Cartesian coordinates for the maximum! To do this, simply
substitute t = 1 into Equations (1.2). You end up with:
y = 1 × e−1 = e−1 , x = 12 = 1,
1
i.e. the maximum is at (1, ).
e

1.5.2 Curve sketching

Thanks to modern technology, we can use graphics calculators (or even computers!) as
a guide. However, you should work through the following recipe in order to accurately
sketch a curve.
CHAPTER 1. DIFFERENTIATION 17

First let y = f (x). Then follow this recipe:

1) Where is f defined? (Or put another way, where is it undefined?). Typically we can
sometimes get vertical asymptotes.

2) Is f odd or even or neither?

3) Find where f (x) = 0 (if possible), i.e. where the curve cuts the x axis.

4) Find the value of f when x = 0, i.e. y = f (0), where the curve cuts the y axis.

5) Find ALL stationary points and their nature (and the value of f at such points)

6) Analyse the asymptotes

i. Horizontal asymptotes: What happens to y as x → ±∞?


ii. If x = a is a vertical asymptote, what happens as x → a+ and x → a− ?

Note: When the notation of x → a+ is used, this refers to the right-sided limit, i.e. x→a
lim y.
x>a
Similarly, the notation x → a− represents the left-sided limit x→a
lim y.
x<a

Note 2: Often it is possible to deduce the nature of the turning point without calculating
d2 y
dx2
.
1
Example 1.28. Sketch the curve y = f (x) = x2 −1
.

1) Not defined at x = ±1 (i.e. vertical asymptotes as x = ±1).

2) f (−x) = f (x), therefore f (x) is even.

3) f (x) ̸= 0 or all x, therefore f (x) never cuts the x-axis.

4) f (0) = −1, i.e. the curve passes through the y-axis at (0, −1)

5) For the derivative


2x
f ′ (x) = − = 0 when x = 0,
(x2 − 1)2

where the nature of the turning point can be determined by analysing the vertical
asymptotes; you will see that x = 0 is a maximum.

6i) For the horizontal asymptotes,

As x → ∞, f (x) → ∞,
As x → −∞, f (x) → ∞.

6ii) For the vertical asymptotes, look at x → 1 first.

As x → 1+ , f (x) → ∞,

As x→1 , f (x) → −∞,
CHAPTER 1. DIFFERENTIATION 18

and similarly for x → −1,


As x → −1+ , f (x) → −∞,

As x → −1 , f (x) → ∞.

At last! We are now in a position to sketch the curve; see Figure 1.4.

Figure 1.4: A sketch of the function y = f (x) = 1/(x2 − 1). Observe the stationary point
at x = 0; the fact that this is a maximum has been deduced with the help of the vertical
asymptotes.
Example 1.29. Sketch the graph of
c. (1.3)
Again, we follow the recipe. . .

1) Note that
x(1 − x)
y2 = ,
(2 − x)(2 + x)
therefore there are vertical asymptotes at x = ±2. Also, are only interested in real
y, thus we require y 2 > 0. Hence it follows that y is defined only when
x(1 − x)
> 0.
4 − x2
The RHS of (1.3) may change sign at x = 0, 1, and possibly at the position of the
vertical asymptotes! Consider the following diagram of the sign of y 2 :

x(1−x)
Figure 1.5: You can make a sign diagram for y 2 = (2−x)(2+x) , too! Because y 2 is non-
negative for any real value of y, the function is undefined wherever we find that y 2 < 0.

Therefore the graph of y is undefined for


−2 ≤ x < 0 and 1 < x ≤ 2.

You might also like