Ziaukas 1

Domas Ziaukas

Professor Dragana Graovac

ENG 108

February 28, 2025

Artificial intelligence is already reshaping the job market by automating routine and

predictable tasks across numerous industries, leading to increased efficiency but also raising

legitimate concerns about large-scale job displacement (Goldman Sachs). Chatbots for customer

relationship management and stockroom management software are prime examples of where AI

is enhancing efficiency at the cost of rendering some work redundant in certain functions (Hunt

et al.). A 2023 Goldman Sachs report estimates that as many as 300 million full-time

employment in the world could be displaced by automation in the short term, particularly in

manufacturing, transportation, and administrative support. For instance, the growth of automated

checkout lanes at stores has cut deeply into demand for cashiers, and companies such as Tesla

and Waymo are engineering autonomous vehicles, threatening millions of jobs for truck drivers

(Goldman Sachs). Similarly, financial services AI today uses surveillance of market trends,

credit risk assessment, and fraud detection—tasks that were previously assigned to analysts and

bankers. In healthcare, advanced AI systems such as IBM Watson can make diagnoses with a

level of accuracy equal to or higher than human experts. All these developments show the

menace that automation presents to low-skilled work and some white-collar work. If not

mitigated, this wave of technological progress can worsen inequality and disrupt global labor

markets.
 Ziaukas 2

While artificial intelligence is likely to eliminate jobs, it is also creating whole new

industries and professions (Goldman Sachs). It is predicted in the World Economic Forum's

Future of Jobs Report that by 2025, AI will have created 97 million new jobs in such industries

as machine learning, cyber security, robotics, and data science (World Economic Forum 12).

These professions need skills that are not valued in traditional education systems, i.e.,

algorithmic literacy, tech ethics thinking, and transdisciplinary literacy. Hence, education has to

increasingly lean towards the ability of the future. Startups and tech firms already employ AI

engineers, data analysts, and even "AI ethicists" to drive responsible creation and deployment.

Significantly, the impact of AI doesn't end at technology itself—education, medicine,

agriculture, and art are all finding integration of AI. In education, for instance, intelligent

tutoring systems leverage machine learning to adapt instruction on an individual level, thereby

introducing need for instructional designers with expertise both in pedagogy as well as

technically. In advertising and journalism, Grammarly and ChatGPT somewhat support, but do

not replace, human creativity, allowing professionals to function better. These technologies

prove that with proper training and support through policies, human-AI collaboration can not

only preserve jobs but also improve them, increasing productivity and job satisfaction across the

industry (Goldman Sachs).

One of the biggest challenges towards an economy based on AI is mass upskilling and

reskilling (Hunt et al.). With the automation of jobs now becoming a norm, the workers will have

to acquire new cognitive and technical skills so that they can be useful in adaptive industries

(Goldman Sachs). The PwC report Will Robots Really Steal Our Jobs? Acknowledges that

creative, analytical, emotional intelligence, and people skills-based activities will continue to be

needed (PwC 9). This means that unemployed workforce must receive access to training modules
 Ziaukas 3

focused on these skills, computer literacy, and basic programming skills. Governments,

community colleges, and online universities are taking up the challenge. Coursera and Udacity

offer AI, cloud computing, and data science certifications available to students of all socio-

economic backgrounds. But that is not enough. Public-private partnerships will have to foot the

bill for subsidies, career counseling, and employer subsidies so that workers can transition into

new employment. Otherwise, enormous numbers of displaced workers—especially those in rural

or economically distressed areas—would fall behind, widening disparities further. Addressing

the workforce needs for AI is every bit a question of social justice as one of economic prudence.

Retraining and education must be accorded the highest priority to have a strong, inclusive labor

market.

Apart from its economic impact, artificial intelligence also presents core ethical and

social issues, primarily concerning questions on inequality (World Economic Forum 16).

Marginalized and poorer individuals are likely to be displaced from work by automation because

they are disproportionately represented in occupations that are manual or routine. They do not

have access to quality education as well as digital networks, thus shutting them out from

occupation of new emerging jobs. Furthermore, application of AI will also occur earlier in rich

nations, widening existing inequality between industrial and developing nations further

(Goldman Sachs). World Economic Forum elucidates that divisions can make global inequalities

greater in the current day (World Economic Forum 18). Moreover, algorithmic bias remains.

Data, which will include inherent human prejudice, on which AI technology is trained continues

to replicate and reinforce such prejudice inadvertently. For instance, it has been found by

conducting research that some AI recruitment software discriminated between racial minorities

and women based on historical hiring trends (PwC 13). If not stopped, such systems can
 Ziaukas 4

perpetuate structural discrimination rather than eliminating it. To avoid such harms, developers

should be able to provide data set diversity and conduct open and inclusive design practice.

Governments should develop legal frameworks that encourage ethical practices and ensure

workers' rights. The social impact of AI is not a matter of cleverness, but of deliberate policy

choice in the name of fairness.

Artificial intelligence's critics will pose that the technology will end up causing

permanent employment loss and extensive unemployment, which will render human work

obsolete (World Economic Forum 16). This is on the basis that AI systems will be superior to

human ability at most things pertaining to work. While the threat is real and understandable, it

overlooks certain historical trends. Each of the great technology revolutions—printing press,

internet—has upended initially but eventually, economies have adapted to create new types of

work. The difference with AI is its unprecedented scale and velocity, which does necessitate

quicker policy responses. But the character of AI implies augmentation, not substitution. Most

machines can handle repetitive or data-based tasks, not creative, empathetic, or strategic ones.

The World Economic Forum also states that the likely future will not be one of joblessness but of

a transformed one where humans and machines collaborate (World Economic Forum 16). For

instance, AI in healthcare can assist physicians in diagnosing but cannot simulate patient

empathy and moral judgment. Similarly, in education, AI can assist in quantifying learning

performance but cannot substitute human guidance. Rather than succumbing to fear, society

needs to divert its energies toward crossing over by incremental investment in institutions and

people (Badet). Human flexibility remains our largest asset.

Conclusion
 Ziaukas 5

Artificial intelligence is a transformative force that is revolutionizing the job market, and

it presents both potential challenges and opportunities. While automation can replace most

conventional jobs, especially repetitive-task-based jobs, it also generates new careers involving

higher-order intelligence, creativity, and technical skills. To a great extent, the potential of AI as

a threat or an empowerment tool depends on the reaction of governments, companies, and

schools. Investment in reskilling programs, imposing the ethical development of AI, and

bringing technology within reach are all steps that need to be taken. The ethics—algorithmic bias

and digital inequality—need to be properly governed and architected into products with an

inclusive design ethos. Above all, however, society needs to let go of the fantasy of the human

vs. machines binary. Collaboration, not competition, is the future of work. If with foresight and

responsibly, AI can be a human flourishing driver that brings benefits to many individuals.

Rather than substituting human beings, technology needs to be harnessed to release the full

potential of human beings, attain higher productivity, and bring about greater social inclusion. It

is up to policymakers, educators, and business leaders to realize this potential. Lastly, the

genuine test of success for AI won't be technically, but its impact on making humanity better off

and improving the entire workforce at large.

Works Cited

Badet, Jaures. “AI, Automation and New Jobs.” Open Journal of Business and Management, vol. 9, no. 5,

Sept. 2021, pp. 2452–63, [Link]

Goldman Sachs. The Impact of AI on Jobs. 2023.

[Link]

[Link] ml.

Hunt, Wil, et al. “Measuring the Impact of AI on Jobs at the Organization Level: Lessons from a Survey

of UK Business Leaders.” Research Policy, vol. 51, no. 2, Mar. 2022, p. 104425,

[Link]

PwC. Will Robots Really Steal Our Jobs? 2020.

World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report 2020. 2020. [Link]

future-of-jobs-report-2020.