Scribd
Upload
5 views1 page

Animal Testing

The document discusses the controversial issue of animal testing, highlighting the moral dilemma it presents. The author supports limited animal experimentation for medical advancements, arguing that it can save human lives, while acknowledging the ethical concerns regarding animal suffering. Ultimately, the author believes the benefits of animal testing for humanity outweigh the moral objections.

Uploaded by

van nguyenbich
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views1 page

Animal Testing

The document discusses the controversial issue of animal testing, highlighting the moral dilemma it presents. The author supports limited animal experimentation for medical advancements, arguing that it can save human lives, while acknowledging the ethical concerns regarding animal suffering. Ultimately, the author believes the benefits of animal testing for humanity outweigh the moral objections.

Uploaded by

van nguyenbich
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

In recent years, animal testing has become a broad issue to the general public.

Some people think that animal experiments are morally wrong. However, I tend
towards the viewpoint that I could have to support a limited amount of animal
experimentation for the development of medicines before they are clearly safe for
human to use.
First and foremost, people should recognize that these experiments bring many
advantages to humanity. A very core point to consider is that the use of animals in
medical research believe that laboratory’s animals such as rats and mice can be
justified if people lives are saved. This means the mostly vital aim is keeping
human to be alive. To illustrate this statement, I would like to mention that some
people think that animal’s death in laboratory is not as essential as human’s life, so
that a totally born and die animal in experiment just like its responsibility. Another
point I would like to analyze is that banning of animal testing for non-medical
products can cause many terrible result in medical development. This is because of
the fact that we cannot use this medicine for people without testing, in this case,
animals which have the same gene with human are the most suitable way to test.
On the other hand, there are several arguments in support of the idea that animal
experimentation is morally wrong within any benefits it brought though many
experiments. It is also convincing to realize that the use of animal in medical
research has no right to subject animal to this kind of trauma and the lives of all
creatures should be respected. This means that all kinds of animals have their
separated thinks and awareness, so all of them have to be respected their living
authority.
In conclusion, the above mentioned facts created a dilemma when people evaluate
the impact of this issue, and it is still a controversial problem. As far as I am
concerned, I put more emphasis on the idea that animal testing brings many
advantages to humanity which we no longer deny.

You might also like