QUARTER 4 PERFORMANCE TASK

READING AND WRITING and PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS:
PR1 • The learner selects, cites, and synthesizes properly related literature.
• The learner describes qualitative research designs, sample, and data collection and analysis
procedures.
RW • The learner produces a type of academic writing following the properties of well-written
texts and process approach to writing.

Your goal is to continue crafting your research proposal, specific to RRL and Methodology. These
GOAL

sections should demonstrate your ability to synthesize relevant literature, establish a strong
foundation for your study, and outline a clear research method aligned with your objectives.

You are a budding researcher tasked with addressing a real-world issue in your chosen area of
ROLE

interest through a qualitative study, while presenting your ideas in a coherent, polished academic
text.

Your audience includes a panel of research mentors, peers, and academic reviewers who will
AUDIEN
CE

evaluate the clarity, relevance, and quality of your research proposal.

A local academic organization is calling for research proposals to address current issues in
ON
SITUATI

education, health, community development, or technology. You are participating in this call, aiming
to propose a qualitative research study that demonstrates both your research skills and your
academic writing ability.
PRODUCT Produce a research proposal that integrates the following elements:

1. PR1: Research Proposal

o Review of Related Literature (RRL)
o Methodology
§ Research Design
§ Research Participants
§ Data Sources
§ Data Collection
§ Data Analysis
§ Ethical Considerations
2. PR1: Video Presentation
- All members must be seen in the video.
- Presentation must be within 5 minutes only, explaining the following content:
§ Research Title
§ Research Questions
§ Research Design
§ Research Participants
§ Data Sources
§ Data Collection
§ Data Analysis

*FORMAT IS ATTACHED IN THIS DOCUMENT.*

3. Reading and Writing: Academic Writing

o Apply the properties of a well-written text when writing the RRL and Methodology.
o Write effective evaluative statements based on valid evidence.

SUBMISSION DATE:
STANDARDS (Rubrics) PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1: Research Proposal (Manuscript) – 50 points

Scoring Guide:
• RRL – 20 points
The RRL must contain relevant and recent (within 10 years) studies and researches, that effectively helps provide context to the
topic being studied. Should be organized, and uses the citations in APA format properly.
• Methodology
§ Research Design – 5 points
The Research Design must state the type of research the study uses, and its justification
§ Research Participants - 5 points
This section must state the characteristics of the prospect participants, including the exclusion and inclusion criteria
§ Data Sources – 5 points
These sections must enumerate and explain the tools to be used to gather data.
§ Data Collection – 5 points
This section must state the process of data collection in an orderly manner..
§ Data Analysis – 5 points
This section must enumerate and explain the tools to be used to interpret/analyze data.
§ Ethical Considerations – 5 points
In this section, the necessary ethical standards must be included and explained well in the context of their study.

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1: Video Presentation – 40 points

Scoring Guide:
• Content and Organization – 5 points
Evaluates how well the presentation is structured, whether ideas are logically sequenced, and if key points are clearly
communicated and well-supported by research.
• Depth of Research – 5 points
Measures the extent of the presenter's understanding of their research
• Delivery and Clarity – 5 points
Assesses confidence and articulation, ensuring that the speaker effectively conveys their message
• Use of Visual Aids – 5 points
Visual aids are effective in supporting the presentation

READING AND WRITING: Manuscript

Excellent (10) Proficient Developing Needs Emerging
(9-8) (7-6) Improvement (3-1)
(5-4)
Clarity and Ideas are Ideas are Some sections The The writing
Organization presented in a presented in a are organized, organization is lacks logical
logical, well- logical, well- but transitions unclear, with structure,
organized organized are weak, and frequent making it
manner. manner. ideas may not abrupt shifts in difficult to
Paragraphs Paragraphs flow smoothly. ideas and follow. Ideas
and sections and sections weak are disjointed
flow smoothly, flow smoothly, paragraph and
with clear with clear structure. unorganized.
topic topic
sentences and sentences and
transitions. transitions.
Cohesion The writing Ideas are Some ideas The writing The text is
and demonstrates mostly are lacks highly
Coherence excellent coherent, with disconnected coherence, disjointed,
cohesion; minor or repetitive, with frequent with little to
ideas are inconsistencie making parts jumps no logical
consistently s or occasional of the text between ideas connection
linked, and repetition. unclear. and between
transitions noticeable sentences
enhance redundancy. and excessive
readability. No repetition.
redundancy or
irrelevant
details.
Use of Evaluative Evaluative Evaluative Evaluative Evaluative
Effective statements are statements are statements are statements are statements
Evaluative well- mostly clear present but weak, with are absent or
Statements developed, and objective, may be noticeable entirely
objective, and with sufficient vague, biased, bias, unclear unsupported,
supported supporting or reasoning, or showing
with clear, evidence. inconsistently minimal heavy bias or
substantial Some may supported. supporting a lack of
evidence. lack depth. evidence. analysis.
Strengths and
weaknesses
are effectively
analyzed
based on
relevant
criteria.
Grammar, Wri$ng is Wri$ng is No$ceable Frequent Excessive
Sentence gramma$cally mostly grammar or gramma$cal grammar and
Construction sound, with gramma$cally sentence errors and sentence
, and Word well- correct, with construc$on awkward construc$on
Choice constructed minor errors affect sentence errors
sentences and sentence-level readability. structures severely
precise, issues or Word choice is make the hinder
academic slightly occasionally wri$ng comprehensi
word choice. informal word inappropriate difficult to on. Word
No or very choices. for academic read. Word choice is
minimal wri$ng. choice is too imprecise or
errors. informal or inappropriate
vague. .
Mechanics The document Few minor Some errors in Frequent Numerous
is polished, errors in spelling and errors in mechanical
with correct spelling and punctuation spelling and errors make
spelling and punctuation that slightly punctuation the text
punctuation. that do not impact clarity. that disrupt difficult to
readability read and
affect and academically
readability. professionalis unreliable.
m.