0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views4 pages

Report RRRR RRRP

This report analyzes the kinematics of two planar mechanisms: a Crank-Slider (RRRP) and a Four-Bar Linkage (RRRR). Analytical results obtained through MATLAB are compared with graphical simulations from Working Model 2D, showing strong correlation. The findings demonstrate effective position, velocity, and acceleration analysis for both mechanisms.

Uploaded by

Juan León
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views4 pages

Report RRRR RRRP

This report analyzes the kinematics of two planar mechanisms: a Crank-Slider (RRRP) and a Four-Bar Linkage (RRRR). Analytical results obtained through MATLAB are compared with graphical simulations from Working Model 2D, showing strong correlation. The findings demonstrate effective position, velocity, and acceleration analysis for both mechanisms.

Uploaded by

Juan León
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Kinematic Analysis of Planar Mechanisms

Mechanism Analysis Report: RRRP and RRRR

Juan Antonio León Cárdenas


Universidad Iberoamericana
February 13, 2026

1 Introduction
The objective of this report is to perform the position, velocity, and acceleration analysis
of two different planar mechanisms:

1. A Crank-Slider mechanism (RRRP).

2. A Four-Bar Linkage mechanism (RRRR).

The results obtained through analytical analysis using MATLAB will be compared with
graphical analysis using simulation in Working Model 2D.

2 Mechanism 1: Crank-Slider (RRRP)


2.1 Problem Statement
A mechanism with the following dimensions and input conditions is analyzed:

• Crank (R2 ): 1.4 units, Connecting Rod (L): 4 units, Offset (C): 1 unit.

• Input: θ2 = 45◦ , ω2 = 10 rad/s.

2.2 Analytical Analysis (MATLAB)


The vector loop equations were solved using the Newton-Raphson method via MATLAB’s
symbolic toolbox.
1 % Unknowns
2 syms t3 w3 Vp S
3
4 % Known constants
5 R2 = 1.4; L = 4; C = 1;
6 t2 = 45; % degrees
7 w2 = 10;
8 t2_rad = deg2rad ( t2 ) ;
9
10 % System equations
11 eq1 = R2 * cos ( t2_rad ) + L * cos ( t3 ) - S == 0;

1
12 eq2 = R2 * sin ( t2_rad ) + L * sin ( t3 ) - C == 0;
13 eq3 = - R2 * sin ( t2_rad ) * w2 - L * sin ( t3 ) * w3 - Vp == 0;
14 eq4 = R2 * cos ( t2_rad ) * w2 + L * cos ( t3 ) * w3 == 0;
15
16 % Solve system
17 sol = vpasolve ([ eq1 , eq2 , eq3 , eq4 ] , [S , t3 , Vp , w3 ]) ;
18
19 % Results
20 S_val = double ( sol . S ) ;
21 t3_val = double ( rad2deg ( sol . t3 ) ) ;
22 Vp_val = double ( sol . Vp ) ;
23 w3_val = double ( sol . w3 ) ;
Listing 1: MATLAB code for RRRP Analysis

2.3 Graphical Analysis & Comparison

Figure 1: RRRP Simulation in Working Model.

Variable Symbol MATLAB Working Model


Slider Position S 4.9899 4.9903
Conn. Rod Angle θ3 0.144◦ 0.149◦
Slider Velocity Vp -9.875 -9.869
Conn. Rod Vel. ω3 -2.475 -2.475

Table 1: RRRP Results Comparison.

2
3 Mechanism 2: Four-Bar Linkage (RRRR)
3.1 Problem Statement
A four-bar linkage is analyzed with the following parameters:

• Ground (R1 ): 6, Crank (R2 ): 2, Coupler (R3 ): 7, Rocker (R4 ): 9.

• Input: θ2 = 30◦ , ω2 = 10 deg/s, α2 = 0.

3.2 Analytical Analysis (MATLAB)


The system is modeled using vector loop equations for position, velocity, and acceleration.
1 % % Cleanup
2 clear ; clc ; close all ;
3 syms t3 w3 t4 w4 alfa3 alfa4
4
5 % Constants
6 R2 = 2; R1 = 6; R4 = 9; R3 = 7;
7 t2 = 30; w2 = 10; alfa2 = 0;
8 t2_rad = deg2rad ( t2 ) ;
9
10 % Equations ( Position , Velocity , Acceleration )
11 eq1 = R2 * cos ( t2_rad ) + R3 * cos ( t3 ) - R4 * cos ( t4 ) - R1 == 0;
12 eq2 = R2 * sin ( t2_rad ) + R3 * sin ( t3 ) - R4 * sin ( t4 ) == 0;
13 eq3 = - R2 * sin ( t2_rad ) * w2 - R3 * sin ( t3 ) * w3 + R4 * sin ( t4 ) * w4 == 0;
14 eq4 = R2 * cos ( t2_rad ) * w2 + R3 * cos ( t3 ) * w3 - R4 * cos ( t4 ) * w4 == 0;
15 eq5 = - R2 * cos ( t2_rad ) * w2 ^2 - R2 * sin ( t2 ) * alfa2 - R3 * cos ( t3 ) * w3 ^2 ...
16 - R3 * sin ( t3 ) * alfa3 + R4 * cos ( t4 ) * w4 ^2 + R4 * sin ( t4 ) * alfa4 == 0;
17 eq6 = - R2 * sin ( t2_rad ) * w2 ^2 + R2 * cos ( t2 ) * alfa2 - R3 * sin ( t3 ) * w3 ^2 ...
18 + R3 * cos ( t3 ) * alfa3 + R4 * sin ( t4 ) * w4 ^2 - R4 * cos ( t4 ) * alfa4 == 0;
19
20 % Initial Guesses and Solve
21 initialGuesses = [ deg2rad (100) , deg2rad (30) , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1];
22 sol = vpasolve ([ eq1 , eq2 , eq3 , eq4 , eq5 , eq6 ] , ...
23 [ t4 , t3 , w4 , w3 , alfa3 , alfa4 ] , initialGuesses ) ;
24
25 % Results conversion
26 t4_val = double ( rad2deg ( sol . t4 ) ) ;
27 t3_val = double ( rad2deg ( sol . t3 ) ) ;
28 w3_val = double ( sol . w3 ) ;
29 w4_val = double ( sol . w4 ) ;
30 alfa3_val = double ( sol . alfa3 ) ;
31 alfa4_val = double ( sol . alfa4 ) ;
Listing 2: MATLAB code for RRRR Analysis

3
3.3 Graphical Analysis & Comparison

Figure 2: RRRR Simulation in Working Model.

Variable Symbol MATLAB Working Model


Coupler Angle θ3 88.84◦ 88.82◦
Rocker Angle θ4 117.29◦ 117.28◦
Coupler Velocity ω3 -5.99 deg/s -5.99 deg/s
Rocker Velocity ω4 -3.99 deg/s -3.99 deg/s
Coupler Accel. α3 26.08 deg/s2 –
Rocker Accel. α4 53.33 deg/s2 –

Table 2: RRRR Results Comparison (Input ω2 in deg/s).

4 Conclusion
Both mechanisms were successfully analyzed. The analytical results from the MATLAB
scripts show a high degree of correlation with the graphical simulations provided by Work-
ing Model 2D.

You might also like