0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views3 pages

Interview Instrument

The document outlines an interview instrument designed to assess the distribution of time and attention among various leadership domains for Federal Secretaries. It includes sections on context setting, time distribution, drivers and constraints, leadership behavior, organizational impact, reform suggestions, and future governance outlook. The instrument aims to identify gaps between current and ideal distributions, evaluate institutional culture, and suggest reforms for improved strategic governance.

Uploaded by

print.nspp
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views3 pages

Interview Instrument

The document outlines an interview instrument designed to assess the distribution of time and attention among various leadership domains for Federal Secretaries. It includes sections on context setting, time distribution, drivers and constraints, leadership behavior, organizational impact, reform suggestions, and future governance outlook. The instrument aims to identify gaps between current and ideal distributions, evaluate institutional culture, and suggest reforms for improved strategic governance.

Uploaded by

print.nspp
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Interview Instrument

Rethinking a Federal Secretary: Balancing Different Hats

Section 1: Context Setting

Q1. Current Portfolio Context

1. Ministry/Division:

Section 2: Time and Attention Distribution (Core Quantitative Module)

Q2. Distribution of Leadership Effort

Please indicate approximately how your time and attention are/were distributed across the
following domains. Total must equal 100%.

Domain Description % Time & Attention


Compliance Rules, procedures, regulatory oversight, ____
file disposal, audits, accountability
processes
Conversation Stakeholder engagement, inter- ____
ministerial coordination, negotiation,
communication
Contemplation Strategic thinking, policy design, reform ____
planning, institutional development
Crisis Urgent decision-making, firefighting, ____
political or operational emergencies

Q3. Ideal vs Actual Distribution

Domain Current (%) Ideal (%)


Compliance
Conversation
Contemplation
Crisis

Q4. Gap Reflection

Which domain shows the largest gap between current and ideal distribution, and why?

Section 3: Drivers and Constraints (Diagnostic Module)

Q5. Structural Drivers

For each domain, rate the extent to which it is driven by systemic pressures rather than personal
leadership choice.

Scale:
1 = Minimal influence
5 = Dominant influence
Domain Rating (1-5) Key Drivers
Compliance
Conversation
Contemplation
Crisis

Q6. Constraint Identification

What are the top three institutional or environmental factors that prevent optimal balance among
these roles?

Section 4: Leadership Behaviour and Value Creation

Q7. Long-Term Public Value Assessment

Rank the domains according to long-term governance value.

1 = Highest value
4 = Lowest value

Domain Rank

Compliance

Conversation

Contemplation

Crisis

Q8. Role Trade-Off Reflection

Which domain most frequently crowds out others? Provide examples.

Q9. Leadership Style Reflection

When you consciously rebalance your time, which domain do you tend to prioritise and why?

Section 5: Organisational Impact

Q10. Institutional Culture Assessment

Rate how your ministry/division collectively distributes attention across the four domains.

Domain Underemphasized Balanced Overemphasized


Compliance ____
Conversation ____
Contemplation ____
Crisis ____

Q11. Delegation and System Design

Which domains are most amenable to delegation or institutionalisation, and which require direct
secretary-level engagement?
Section 6: Reform and Improvement

Q12. System Reform Suggestions

What reforms could enable Federal Secretaries to spend more time on contemplation and strategic
governance?

Q13. Personal Leadership Evolution

How has your distribution across the four domains changed over your career?

Section 7: Scenario Reflection

Provide the respondent with a short hypothetical scenario involving simultaneous compliance, crisis,
and policy reform demands.

Q14. Priority Ordering Exercise

How would you sequence your attention over the first two weeks?

Section 8: Meta Reflection

Q15. Future Governance Outlook

In the evolving governance environment, which of the four domains will gain importance over the
next decade and why?

Scoring and Analytical Framework (For Facilitators)

A. Balance Index

Measures deviation between ideal and actual distribution.

B. Strategic Orientation Score

Higher emphasis on contemplation + conversation indicates strategic leadership orientation.

C. Crisis Dominance Indicator

High crisis allocation may indicate reactive administrative culture.

D. Compliance Saturation Indicator

Identifies procedural overload risk.

You might also like