0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views2 pages

Relations

The document provides an overview of various types of mathematical relations, including universal, empty, identity, reflexive, symmetric, transitive, and equivalence relations. It also discusses properties of these relations, operations on relations, and the concept of equivalence classes. Additionally, it explains binary operations and counting relations based on set elements.

Uploaded by

p2345097
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views2 pages

Relations

The document provides an overview of various types of mathematical relations, including universal, empty, identity, reflexive, symmetric, transitive, and equivalence relations. It also discusses properties of these relations, operations on relations, and the concept of equivalence classes. Additionally, it explains binary operations and counting relations based on set elements.

Uploaded by

p2345097
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

“Mathematics is, in its way

the poetry of logical ideas”

RELATIONS
(1) Types of Relations
Universal Relation
1. Empty Relation
A relation in which no
2. A relation in which each 3. Identity Relation
4. Reflexive Relation:
A relation in which each (a, a)R, for every
element of A is related to element of A is related to
element is related to a A.
any other element of A, i.e., every element of A, i.e.,
R=ϕ  A×A. R=A×A.
{
itself only. I = ( a, a ) , a ∈ A }

Transitive Relation: 7. Equivalence Relation : 8. Inverse Relation


5. Symmetric Relation:
(a1, a2)R implies that
6. (a1, a2)R & (a2,a3)R implies
A relation R in a set A is said to
be an equivalence relation if
Inverse relation of R from A to B,
denoted by R–1, is a relation from B to
that (a1, a3)R, for all A is defined by
(a2,a1 )R, for all a1,a2A. R is reflexive,symmetric & R–1 = {(b, a) : (a, b) R}.
a1, a2, a3A.
transitive.

Antisymmetric: A relation is Irreflexive Partial order relation


Asymmetric Relation 10. antisymmetric if: 11. 12.
9. R is irreflexive iff R is a partial order, if R is
( x, y ) ∈ R ⇒ ( y, x ) ∉ R • For all x, y ∈ X[( x, y ) ∈ R & ( y, x ) ∈ R] ⇒ x = y ∀a ∈ A, ( ( a,a ) ∉ R ) Reflexive, Antisymmetric
• For all x, y ∈ X[( x, y ) ∈ R & x ≠ y] ⇒ ( y, x ) ∉ R and Transitive.

2. EXAMPLE: Relation Reflexive Symmetric Asymmetric Antisymmetric Irreflexive Transitive


R1
A = {1, 2, 3, 4}. Identify the properties of relations.
R2
R1 = {(1,1) , ( 2, 2 ) , ( 3,3) , ( 2,1) , ( 4,3) , ( 4,1) , ( 3, 2 )} R3
R 2 = A × A, R 3 = φ, R 4 = {(1,1) , ( 2, 2 ) , ( 3,3) , ( 4, 4 )} R4

R 5 = {(1,1) , ( 2, 2 ) , ( 3,3) , ( 4, 4 ) , (1, 2 ) , ( 2,1) , ( 4,3) , ( 3, 4 )}


R5

If A={1,2},a relation R={(1,2)} on A is a transitive relation.


NOTE using the similar argument a relation R = {(x, y) : x is wife of y} is transitive, where as R = {(x, y) : x is father of y} is not transitive.

3. PROPERTIES
2. 3. 6.
1. 4. 5. R is reflexive implies
R is asymmetric implies R is not symmetric
that R is irreflexive. By does not imply R is R is not symmetric R is not antisymmetric that R is not
definition, for all antisymmetric. Counter does not imply R is does not imply R is asymmetric. By
R is not reflexive does
a, b ∈ A, ( a, b ) ∈ R example: asymmetric. Counter symmetric. Counter definition, for all
not imply R is irreflexive. a ∈ A, ( a,a ) ∈ R
Counter example: and ( b,a ) ∉ R This implies example: example:
A = {1, 2,3} , R = This implies that, both
A = {1, 2,3} , R = {(1,1)} that for all ( a, b ) ∈ R,a ≠ b A = {1, 2,3} , R = A = {1, 2,3} , R =
{(1, 2 ) , ( 2,3) , ( 3, 2 )} (a, b) and (b, a) are in
Thus, for all a ∈ A, ( a,a ) ∉ R {(1, 2 ) , ( 2, 2 )} {(1, 2 ) , ( 2,3) , ( 3, 2 )} R when a = b. Thus, R is
Therefore, R is irreflexive.
not asymmetric.

(4) COUNTING OF RELATION


Number of relations Number of reflexive The number of The number of binary
Number of Identity Number of Symmetric
from set A to B = 2mn, relation set on a set antisymmetric binary relation on A which are
relation on a set with relation set on a set with
where with ‘n’ elements = n ( n+1) /2 relations possible on both symmetic and
‘n’ elements = 1 n ( n−1) ‘n’ elements = 2
| A |= m ,| B |= n 2 2
A is 2n ⋅ 3(n − n)/2 antisymmetric is 2n.

The number of binary The number of binary The number of There are at least 2n
transitive relations
relation on A which are relation which are both asymmetric binary
(lower bound) and
both symmetric and reflexive and antisymmetric relation possible on at most
2 2
asymmetric is 1. on the set A is3(n − n)/2 the set A is 3(n − n)/2 2
n2 −n
2n − 2 2 + 1 (upper bound)
5. OPERATION ON RELATIONS:
1. R1 − R 2 = {( a, b )∣( a, b ) ∈ R1 and ( a, b ) ∉ R 2 } 2.R 2 − R1 = {( a, b )∣( a, b ) ∈ R 2 and ( a, b ) ∉ R1} 3. R1 ∪ R 2 = {( a, b )∣( a, b ) ∈ R1 or ( a, b ) ∈ R 2 }

4. R1 ∩ R 2 = {( a, b )∣( a, b ) ∈ R1 and ( a, b ) ∈ R 2 }

PROPERTIES 6. COMPOSITON OF
1) If R1 and R2 are reflexive, and symmetric, then R1  R2
is reflexive, and symmetric. RELATIONS
2) If R1 is transitive and R 2 is transitive, then R1 ∪ R 2
need not be transitive. Let R1 ⊆ A × B and R 2 ⊆ B × C ,Composition of R 2 on
counter example: Let A = {1, 2} such that R1 = {(1, 2 )} and R1 , denoted as R1 R 2 or simply R1R 2 is
R 2 = {( 2,1)}.R1 ∪ R 2 = {(1, 2 ) , ( 2,1)} and (1,1) ∉ R1 ∪ R 2 implies that
R1 R 2 = {( a,c )∣a ∈ A,c ∈ C ∧ ∃b ∈ B such that
R1 ∪ R 2 is not transitive.

3) If R1 and R2 are equivalence relations, then R1  R2 is


( ( a, b ) ∈ R1 , ( b,c ) ∈ R 2 )}
an equivalence relation. NOTE
4) If R1 and R2 are equivalence relations on A, R1 (R2  R3)  R1 R2  R1 R3
• R1 − R 2 is not an equivalence relation (reflexivity fails).
R1 (R2  R3) = R1 R2  R1R3
• R1 − R 2 is not a partial order (since R1 − R 2 is not reflexive).
• R1 ⊕ R 2 = R1 ∪ R 2 − ( R1 ∩ R 2 ) is neither equivalence relation R1 ⊆ A × B, R2 ⊆ B × C , R3 ⊆ C × D. ( R1 R2 ) R3 = R1 ( R2 R3 )
nor partial order (reflexivity fails)
5) The union of two equivalence relation on a set is not ( R1oR 2 )−1 = R 2 −1oR1−1
necessarily an equivalence reation on the set.
6) The inverse of a equivalence relation R is an
equivalence relation.

7. EQUIVALENCE CLASS
Equivalence class of a ∈ A is defined as [a] = {x∣( x,a ) ∈ R} , that is all the elements related to a under
the relation R.
Example
E=Even integers, O=odd integers.
(i) All elements of E are related to each other and all elements of O are related to each other.
(ii) No element of E is related to any element of O and vice-versa.
(iii) E and O are disjoint andZ = E ∪ O
The subset E is called the equivalence class containing zero and is denoted by [0].

Properties: consider an equivalence relation R defiend on a set A.

1.  [a] = A 2. For every a,b∈A such that a ∈ [ b ] ,a ≠ b it follows that [ a ] = [ b ] 3. ∑ | [x] | =| R |


∀a∈A ∀x∈A

4. For any two equivalence class[ a ] and [ b ], either [ a ] = [ b ] or [ a ] ∩ [ b ] = φ 5. For all a, b ∈ A , if a ∈ [ b ] then b ∈ [ a ]

6. For all a, b,c ∈ A , if a ∈ [ b ] and b ∈ [ c ] , then a ∈ [ c ] 7. For all a ∈ A, [ a ] ≠ φ

Congruence modulo n given by a  b (mod n) if and only if n divides (a – b).

8. BINARY OPERATIONS
Let S be a non-empty set. A function f : S × S  S is called a binary opertion on set S.
Note
n2
Number of binary operations on a set containing n elements is n

You might also like