A comparison of Different Organization Structures
Functional Divisional Matrix Network
DIVISION By Inputs By Outputs By Inputs & By Knowledge
OF LABOR Outputs
COORDUNA Hierarchical Division general Dual reporting Cross-
TION supervision, plans manager & corporate relationship functional
MECHANIS & procedures staff teams
M
DECISION Highly Separation of Strategy Shared Highly
RIGHTS centralized & execution decentralized
BOUNDARIE Core/periphery Internal/External Multiple Porous &
S markets Interfaces changing
IMPORTANC Low Modest Considerable High
E OF
INFORMAL
STRUCTURE
POLITICS Inter-functional Corporate – division & Along matrix Shifting
Interdivisional dimensions coalitions
BASIS OF Positional & General management Negotiating Knowledge &
AUTHORITY functional responsibility & skills & resources
A relative advantages and disadvantages of Different Structures
Functional Divisional Matrix Network
RESOURCE Excellent Poor Moderate Good
EFFICIENCY
TIME Poor Good Moderate Excellent
EFFICIENCY
RESPONSIVENES Poor Moderate Good Excellent
S
ADAPTABILITY Poor Good Moderate Excellent
ACCOUNTABILI Good Excellent Poor Moderate
TY
ENVIRONMENT Stable Heterogeneous Complex Volatile
FOR WHICH Environmen Environment environment environment
BEST SUITED t with multiple
demands
STRATEGY FOR Focused Diversified Responsiveness Innovative Strategy
WHICH BEST /low cost strategies strategy
SUITED strategy
The virtual network approach
Examples
Virtual network structure means that the firm subcontracts most
of its major functions to separate companies and coordinates
their activities from a small headquarters organization.
Example-----I
Indian telecom company Bharti Tele –Ventures Ltd. Outsources
everything except marketing and customer management.
Example-----II
In the music Industry Vivendi Universal and Sony have formed
network of alliances with Internet service providers, digital
retailers, software firms and other companies to bring music
customers in new ways
Comparison of Structural Approach