0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views20 pages

Springback Analysis in Sheet Metal Bending

Uploaded by

Jai Kumar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views20 pages

Springback Analysis in Sheet Metal Bending

Uploaded by

Jai Kumar
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

An experimental study on the examination of

springback of sheet metals with several


thicknesses and properties in bending dies

Zafer Tekiner
Accepted 25 July 2003
Presented by Jared Moyer
September 22, 2004
Bending Background

•Used anciently-5000 BC
•Utensils and jewelry
•A common shaping process today
•Seams, flanges
•Automotive-car bodies
•Aircraft fuselages
•Beverage can
•Metal desks
Modern forms
Advantages

• Low cost
• Good strength
• Light weight
• Formability characteristics
• no necking or tearing
• Versatile shapes
Disadvantages

• Cracking
• Springback
– Sheets
– Rod
– Wire
SB = (A’ – Ab’)/ Ab’
– bars
Reducing Springback

• Over bending part


• Elevated temperatures
• Bottoming the punch
• High-localized
compressive stresses
between the punch and
die surface
• Stretch bending
• Part is in tension while
being bent
Purpose of Paper

• Find a springback values


– Bending die designers
– Acceptable tolerances
• Experimental methods
• Time
• Money
Test Set Up

• Several materials: Steel, Copper, Brass, Aluminum, Galvanized and


stainless steels
• Dimensions: 25 mm x 50 mm
• Different thicknesses: .5, .75 & 1.00 mm
• Measured bending by optical profilometer (1 min)
• Used four different methods
• Results graphed by Microsoft Excel software
Forces Needed
• Force Equations
– C = 1 + (4*T/W)
– P*v = C (B*T^2*dd*b-/W) x 10
Method 1

• Punch doesn’t touch die corners


• Gap thickness between punch and die
equaled to sheet metal thickness
• Punched left for 20 sec.
• Repeated each material and thickness
Method 1 Results
Method 1 overall results
Method 2

• Punch on the sheet metal


• No maintaining load
Method 2 Results
Method 2 overall Results
Method 3 and 4
• Method 3
– No gap between punch and die
– Load left for 20 sec

• Method 4
– No gap between punch and sheet metal
– No holding load

• Results
– Too complicated
– Crushing material
– Depth of descending punch not considered
Conclusions

• Changed with material and die


• Reduced by leaving loads
• Developed equations help produce more
precise results
My conclusions

• Are the springback values valid with


multiple bends?
• Experiments have been preformed
• Machinists use charts
References

• Fundamentals of Modern
Manufacturing, Mikell P. Groover
• Manufacturing Engineering and
Technology, Kalpakjan and
Schmid
Questions

You might also like