0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views8 pages

Destructive Testing

Destructive testing is used to determine the quality of a weld. Some testing requires elaborate equipment that is not available in the field. Three tests that may be performed in the field without elaborate equip-ment are the freebend test, the guided-bend test and the nick-break test.

Uploaded by

ramverma163999
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views8 pages

Destructive Testing

Destructive testing is used to determine the quality of a weld. Some testing requires elaborate equipment that is not available in the field. Three tests that may be performed in the field without elaborate equip-ment are the freebend test, the guided-bend test and the nick-break test.

Uploaded by

ramverma163999
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Destructive Testing

In destructive testing, sample portions of the welded structures are required. These
samples are subjected to loads until they actually fail. The failed pieces are then studied
and compared to known standards to determine the quality of the weld. The most
common types of destructive testing are known as free bend, guided bend, nick-break,
impact, fillet welded joint, etching, and tensile testing. The primary disadvantage of
destructive testing is that an actual section of a weldment must be destroyed to evaluate
the weld. This type of testing is usually used in the certification process of the welder.

Some of the testing requires elaborate equipment that is not available for use in the field.
Three tests that may be performed in the field without elaborate equip-ment are the free-
bend test, the guided-bend test, and the nick-break test.

Free-Bend Test
The FREE-BEND TEST is designed to measure the ductility of the weld deposit and the
heat-affected area adjacent to the weld. Also it is used to determine the percentage of
elongation of the weld metal. Ductility, you should recall, is that property of a metal that
allows it to be drawn out or hammered thin.

The first step in preparing a welded specimen for the free-bend test is to machine the
welded reinforce-ment crown flush with the surface of the test plate. When the weld
area of a test plate is machined, as is the case of the guided-bend as well as in the free-
bend test, perform the machining operation in the opposite direc-tion that the weld was
deposited.

The next step in the free-bend testis to scribe two lines on the face of the filler deposit.
Locate these lines 1/16 inch from each edge of the weld metal, as shown in figure 7-61,
view B. Measure the distance, in inches, between the lines to the nearest 0.01 inch and
let the resulting measurement equal (x). Then bend the ends of the test specimen until
each leg forms an angle of 30 degrees to the original centerline. With the scribed lines
on the outside and the piece placed so all the bending occurs in the weld, bend the test
piece by using a hydraulic press or similar machine.
When the proper precautions are taken, a blacksmith’s forging press or hammer can be
used to complete the bending operation. If a crack more than 1/16 inch develops during
the test, stop the bending because the weld has failed; otherwise, bend the specimen flat.
After completing the test, measure the distance between the scribed lines and call that
measurement (y). The percentage of elongation is then determined by the formula:

Requirements for a satisfactory test area minimum elongation of 15 percent and no


cracks greater than 1/16 inch on the face of the weld.

Guided-Bend Test
You use the GUIDED-BEND TEST to determine the quality of weld metal at the face
and root of a welded joint. This test is made in a specially designed jig. An example of
one type of jig is shown in figure 7-62.
The test specimen is placed across the supports of the die. A plunger, operated from
above by hydraulic pressure, forces the specimen into the die. To fulfill the requirements
of this test, you must bend the specimen 180 degrees—the capacity of the jig. No cracks
should appear on the surface greater than 1/8 inch. The face-bend tests are made in this
jig with the face of the weld in tension (outside), as shown in figure 7-63. The root-bend
tests are made with the root of the weld in tension (outside), as shown in figure 7-63.
Figure 7-64 shows a machine used for making the guided-bend test. It is used in many
welding schools and testing laboratories for the daily testing of specimens. Simple in
construction and easy to use, it works by hydraulic pressure and can apply a direct load
up to 40,000 pounds, and even more on small specimens. When you make the test,
position the specimen in the machine as previously indicated and start pumping the
actuator. Keep your eye on the large gauge and watch the load increase. You will know
the actual load under which the test piece bends by the position of an auxiliary hand that
is carried along by the gauge pointer. The hand remains at the point of maximum load
after the pointer returns to zero.

Nick-Break Test
The NICK-BREAK TEST is useful for determining the internal quality of the weld
metal. This test reveals various internal defects (if present), such as slag inclu-sions, gas
pockets, lack of fusion, and oxidized or burned metal. To accomplish the nick-break test
for checking a butt weld, you must first flame-cut the test specimens from a sample weld
(fig. 7-65). Make a saw cut at each edge through the center of the weld. The depth of cut
should be about ¼ inch.
Next, place the saw-nicked specimen on two steel supports, as shown in figure 7-65.
Using a heave ham-mer, break the specimen by striking it in the zone where you made
the saw cuts. The weld metal exposed in the break should be completely fused, free
from slag inclu-sions, and contain no gas pockets greater than 1/16 inch across their
greatest dimension. There should not be more than six pores or gas pockets per square
inch of exposed broken surface of the weld.

Impact Test
You use the IMPACT TEST to check the ability of a weld to absorb energy under
impact without fracturing. This is a dynamic test in which a test speci-men is broken by
a single blow, and the energy used in breaking the piece is measured in foot-pounds.
This test compares the toughness of the weld metal with the base metal. It is useful in
finding if any of the mechanical properties of the base metal were destroyed by the
welding process.

The two kinds of specimens used for impact testing are known as Charpy and Izod (fig.
7-66). Both test pieces are broken in an impact testing machine. The only difference is
in the manner that they are anchored. The Charpy piece is supported horizontally
between two anvils and the pendulum strikes opposite the notch, as shown in figure 7-
67, view A. The Izod piece is supported as a vertical cantilever beam and is struck on
the free end projecting over the holding vise (fig. 7-67, view B).
Fillet-Welded Joint Test
You use the FILLET-WELDED JOINT TEST to check the soundness of a fillet weld.
Soundness refers to the degree of freedom a weld has from defects found by visual
inspection of any exposed welding surface. These defects include penetrations, gas
pockets, and inclusions. Prepare the test specimen, as shown in figure 7-68. Now apply
force (fig. 7-69) until a break occurs in the joint. This force may be applied by
hydraulics or hammer blows.

In addition to checking the fractured weld for soundness, now is a good time to etch the
weld to check for cracks.

Etching Test
The ETCHING TEST is used to determine the soundness of a weld and also make
visible the boundary between the base metal and the weld metal.

To accomplish the test, you must cut a test piece from the welded joint so it shows a
complete transverse section of the weld. You can make the cut by either sawing or flame
cutting. File the face of the cut and then polish it with grade 00 abrasive cloth. Now
place the test piece in the etching solution.

The etching solutions generally used are hydrochlo-ric acid, ammonium persulfate,
iodine and potassium iodide, or nitric acid. Each solution highlights different defects and
areas of the weld. The hydrochloric acid dissolves slag inclusions and enlarges gas
pockets, while nitric acid is used to show the refined zone as well as the metal zone.

Tensile Strength Test


The term TENSILE STRENGTH may be defined as the resistance to longitudinal stress
or pull and is meas-ured in pounds per square inch of cross section. Testing for tensile
strength involves placing a weld sample in a tensile testing machine and pulling on the
test sample until it breaks.
The essential features of a tensile testing machine are the parts that pull the test
specimen and the devices that measure the resistance of the test specimen. Another
instrument, known as an extensometer or strain gauge, is also used to measure the strain
in the test piece. Some equipment comes with a device that records and plots the stress-
strain curve for a permanent record.

The tensile test is classified as a destructive test because the test specimen must be
loaded or stressed until it fails. Because of the design of the test machine, weld samples
must be machined to specific dimensions.

This explains why the test is made on a standard speci-men, rather than on the part itself.
It is important that the test specimen represents the part. Not only must the specimen be
given the same heat treatment as the part but it also must be heat-treated at the same
time.

There are many standard types of tensile test specimens, and figure 7-70 shows one
standard type of specimen commonly used. The standard test piece is an accurately
machined specimen. Overall length is not a critical item, but the diameter and gauge
length are. The 0.505-inch-diameter (0.2 square inch area) cross section of the reduced
portion provides an easy factor to ma-nipulate arithmetically. The 2-inch gauge length is
the distance between strain-measuring points. This is the portion of the specimen where
you attach the extensometer. In addition, you can use the gauge length to determine
percent elongation.

The tensile test amounts to applying a smooth, steadily increasing load (or pull) on a test
specimen and measuring the resistance of the specimen until it breaks. Even if recording
equipment is not available, the testis not difficult to perform. During the test, you
observe the behavior of the specimen and record the extensometer and gauge readings at
regular intervals. After the specimen breaks and the fracturing load is recorded, you
measure the specimen with calipers to determine the percent of elongation and the
percent reduction in area. In addition, you should plot a stress-strain curve. From the
data obtained, you can determine tensile strength, yield point, elastic limit, modulus of
elasticity, and other properties of the material.

Published by SweetHaven Publishing Services Copyright © 2001-2006 SweetHaven Publishing


Based upon a text provided by the U.S. Navy Services
All rights reserved

Common questions

Powered by AI

The free-bend test is beneficial for evaluating the ductility and percentage of elongation of weld metal . It allows assessing the ductility of both the weld deposit and the heat-affected zone adjacent to the weld . Limitations of this test include its destructive nature, as it requires the test specimen to be bent until potential failure . Furthermore, it doesn't provide information on defects like internal inclusions or gas pockets that might be revealed through other tests such as the nick-break test .

Destructive testing in the field is challenged by the lack of elaborate equipment, affecting tests like tensile strength which require precise machinery . In controlled environments, conditions, and equipment settings can be optimized for accuracy and repeatability. Limitations in the field also include difficulty in achieving uniformity in test specimen preparation and environmental factors affecting results. Field tests like the free-bend and guided-bend are simpler but provide limited information compared to comprehensive lab setups .

Extensometers play a vital role in tensile strength tests by measuring the strain in the test specimen. They provide precise data on the elongation of the material during testing, which is essential to derive properties like modulus of elasticity and yield point . These measurements allow for accurate stress-strain curves, providing detailed insights into material behavior under load, aiding in material assessment and ensuring real-world application suitability .

The nick-break test is superior in scenarios where the internal quality of the weld metal is of concern. It is specifically useful to identify internal defects like slag inclusions, gas pockets, and lack of fusion, which are critical for ensuring the structural integrity of a weld . This test is optimal when internal evaluation is prioritized over merely examining surface defects, which other tests like bend tests may not reveal as thoroughly .

Etching solutions play a crucial role in the etching test method by making defects and boundary lines visible between base and weld metal . Different solutions serve specific purposes: hydrochloric acid dissolves slag inclusions and enlarges gas pockets, while nitric acid is effective in revealing the refined zone and metal zone . This differentiation allows for customized analysis depending on whether the emphasis is on inclusions, structural alterations due to welding, or intermetallic boundary integrity .

The guided-bend test differs from the free-bend test in its setup and objective. In a guided-bend test, a specimen is bent to 180 degrees using a jig, allowing examination of weld metal quality at the face and root of the joint . It is often preferred when comprehensive evaluation of weld integrity at different stress points is needed, beyond just ductility. This test also reliably checks for surface-level defects by ensuring no cracks larger than 1/8 inch appear .

The main difference between Charpy and Izod impact tests lies in their setup: Charpy tests involve a specimen supported horizontally between anvils, struck opposite the notch, while Izod tests use a specimen as a vertical cantilever beam, struck on the free end . These differences affect application as Charpy is preferred for assessing energy absorption in a more distributed manner, useful in general material toughness evaluation, while Izod is more focused on the impact resistance in scenarios where materials face specific directional stress like vertical loads .

Percent elongation in tensile tests is determined by measuring the distance between the scribed lines on a bent test specimen before and after the application of load and using the formula provided in the free-bend test . This measurement is important as it indicates ductility, showing how much a material can deform plastically without fracturing, which is critical for understanding the material's capacity to endure deformation under stress without failing .

The tensile-strength test contributes significantly by quantifying a material's resistance to deformation and breakage under axial load. It deduces crucial mechanical properties such as tensile strength, yield point, elastic limit, and modulus of elasticity. These properties inform on how a material will perform under stress, resist fatigue, and ensure durability in structural applications . This comprehensive insight is essential for both design and practical application in engineering materials .

Ensuring tensile test specimens undergo the same heat treatment as the part being evaluated is critical because it guarantees that the mechanical properties assessed are representative of the actual structural components . This ensures reliability and validity in testing outcomes. Challenges include maintaining consistency and precision in heat treatment processes, which can be difficult due to scale and environmental variations, complicating both preparation and interpretative stages of testing .

You might also like