Essay Writing Reflection and Improvement
Essay Writing Reflection and Improvement
The author improved their writing between the first and second essays by addressing feedback on clarity and connection to personal perspective. After the first essay, they realized the need for a deeper explanation of their identity influenced by different cultures, as the professor commented on the lack of self-perspective in their explanation . In the second essay, despite unfamiliarity with the topic, they focused on enhancing their thesis, support, organization, and mechanics, showing adaptation to feedback on quote integration and elaboration, which resulted in a better grade .
Writing about personal cultural experiences differed significantly from external topics for the author. Personal narratives on cultural identity allowed the author to write comfortably and with familiarity, making the process seem easier. In contrast, writing about external topics, like 'nature versus nurture,' required more rigorous research and exploration outside their comfort zone, thereby challenging their analytical and argumentation skills .
The author faced challenges with quote integration, such as failing to introduce and properly explain quotes in their essays. In the first essay, mistakes were made like creating a quote sandwich where quotes were inserted without adequate introduction or explanation . To address these challenges, the author acknowledged the need to provide context and deeper analysis after presenting quotes, and this realization helped improve their writing in the subsequent essay .
Professor feedback had a substantial impact on the author's ability to connect quotes to their arguments in essays. Initially, they struggled with this skill, as seen in their inadequate integration and explanation of quotes. Feedback highlighted these shortcomings, prompting the author to focus on connecting quotes meaningfully to their arguments, enhancing the coherence and depth of analysis in their essays .
The Learning Resource Center (LRC) played a crucial role in the author's writing improvement by providing assistance that helped the author understand and revise their work more effectively. With feedback from the LRC, the author was able to address issues such as repetition, understanding prompts, and refining arguments, which contributed significantly to their progress and confidence in writing essays .
Reflecting on the course, the author perceived understanding essay prompts and assignments as crucial for successful writing. Initially, they struggled with interpreting prompts, leading to challenges in developing cohesive essays. However, with revisions and the motivation to improve, the author learned to tackle assignments clearly, significantly impacting the quality of their essays and their confidence in writing .
By the end of the course, the author's perspective on the value of assignments evolved to recognize them as opportunities for significant improvement rather than mere tasks. The importance of assignments in enhancing their writing skills became clear, especially with the help of feedback and the LRC, motivating the author to invest more effort in their work .
Exploring the theme of 'nature versus nurture' in their essay allowed the author to develop a better understanding of constructing a well-supported argument. It required them to delve into research beyond personal comfort zones and connect their arguments with specific examples and evidence from the book "Every Day" by David Levithan, which improved their analytical skills and argument clarity .
From the feedback received, the author learned that self-perception in writing involves more than describing cultural experiences; it also demands insight into how these experiences shape their identity. The professor's comments highlighted the need for the author to connect their cultural behaviors with their self-perception, encouraging a reflection on how these behaviors influence their identity beyond surface-level actions .
Revisions and the Learning Resource Center fundamentally changed the author's approach to writing essays by instilling a discipline of continuous improvement. The author learned to appreciate the revision process, which allowed them to address issues like clarity and argument support. The LRC's role, on the other hand, offered guidance that helped refine their understanding and address gaps in knowledge, leading to a more confident and methodical approach to writing .