0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views5 pages

Clinical Affective Evaluation Summary

This document summarizes a clinical evaluation of 7 students over various evaluation periods from May/June to November/December. Across several categories like communications, accuracy, safety, dependability, and application of knowledge, all 7 students received a statistical mode and mean percentage score of 100%, indicating they met or exceeded expectations in all areas evaluated. The evaluator confirmed they reviewed the evaluation with each student.

Uploaded by

api-279520503
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views5 pages

Clinical Affective Evaluation Summary

This document summarizes a clinical evaluation of 7 students over various evaluation periods from May/June to November/December. Across several categories like communications, accuracy, safety, dependability, and application of knowledge, all 7 students received a statistical mode and mean percentage score of 100%, indicating they met or exceeded expectations in all areas evaluated. The evaluator confirmed they reviewed the evaluation with each student.

Uploaded by

api-279520503
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument

Page 1 of 5

Responses About You - Summary - "2nd & 3rd Semester Clinical Affective Evaluation"
Print
TOTAL RESPONSES: 7

Evaluation Period:
Response Response
Percent
Total

(Choice - One Answer Drop Down)


May/June - Summer
semester

14.3%

June/July -Summer
semester

14.3%

July/August Summer Semester

14.3%

September - Fall
Semester

14.3%

September/October Fall Semester

14.3%

October/November Fall Semester

14.3%

November/December
- Fall Semester

14.3%

Total Respondents:

Skipped this question:

Instructional Text

Communications
(Rating Scale - Matrix)
Statistical Mode in BOLD

1
5
10
Does Not
Partially
Meets
Meet
Meets
Expectations
Expectations Expectations

N/A

Additional
Comment

Mean
Percentage
[1Score
10]

Explains medical dosimetry


procedures to patient as
appropriate to situation (e.g.
when participating in
procedures in the treatment
room or simulation).

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Respects patient's rights to


privacy and confidentiality.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Acts and speaks in a respectful


manner with staff members.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Asks questions in an
appropriate manner.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

[Link] 12/11/2015

Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument

Page 2 of 5

Accepts correction and


direction in a professional
manner.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Contributes as a member of
the medical dosimetry team.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Uses effective verbal


communication skills with
physician during plan
consultation and review.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Uses effective written


communication skills for chart,
plan, and dosimetry note
documentation.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

OVERALL COUNTS/MEANS:

56

10.00

100.0%

Total Respondents:

Skipped this question:

Accuracy
(Rating Scale - Matrix)
Statistical Mode in BOLD

1
5
10
Does Not
Partially
Meets
Meet
Meets
Expectations
Expectations Expectations

N/A

Additional
Comment

Mean
Percentage
[1Score
10]

Performs dose calculations


accurately.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Reads radiation measurement


devices accurately and
carefully. (eg, TLD, Diodes,
Film, Ion Chamber)

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Accurately designs plans by


computer or manual
computation in accordance
with prescription.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Accurately enters information


into chart or R & V system.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

28

10.00

100.0%

OVERALL COUNTS/MEANS:

Total Respondents:

Skipped this question:

Safety
(Rating Scale - Matrix)
Statistical Mode in BOLD

1
5
10
Does Not
Partially
Meets
Meet
Meets
Expectations
Expectations Expectations

N/A

Additional
Comment

Mean
Percentage
[1Score
10]

Takes appropriate precautions


in Radiation Safety.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Double checks all calculations


and treatment plans with

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

[Link] 12/11/2015

Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument

Page 3 of 5

dosimetrist/physicist.
Performs Quality Assurance per
recommended guidelines and
reviews with
dosimetrist/physicist.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Uses time, distance, shielding


practices & principles.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

OVERALL COUNTS/MEANS:

28

10.00

100.0%

Total Respondents:

Skipped this question:

Dependability
(Rating Scale - Matrix)
Statistical Mode in BOLD

1
5
10
Does Not
Partially
Meets
Meet
Meets
Expectations
Expectations Expectations

N/A

Additional
Comment

Mean
Percentage
[1Score
10]

Arrives promptly as scheduled.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Schedules breaks, lunches, and


other time needs with clinical
instructors.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Adheres to attendance
standards of the program.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Uses clinical time wisely.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Follows school and hospital


policies and procedures.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Takes initiative in observing


and assisting in dosimetry
activities.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

42

10.00

100.0%

OVERALL COUNTS/MEANS:

Total Respondents:

Skipped this question:

Application of Knowledge
(Rating Scale - Matrix)
Statistical Mode in BOLD

1
5
10
Does Not
Partially
Meets
Meet
Meets
Expectations
Expectations Expectations

N/A

Additional
Comment

Mean
Percentage
[1Score
10]

Understands the technique and


use of special calculation
methods.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Is able to enter information


into the computer and design
treatment plan in accordance
with prescription.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Is able to identify anatomy and


contour appropriate structures.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

[Link] 12/11/2015

Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument

Page 4 of 5

Utilizes critical
thinking/problem solving skills
in approaching treatment
planning.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Understands how clinical


oncology information is used in
treatment planning (e.g. type,
grade, stage of cancer).

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Utilizes critical thinking skills


when evaluating dose volume
histograms.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Uses problem solving skills


when comparing various
treatment plans for a specific
treatment case.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Is able to design optimal


treatment plans based on
calculations, dose volume
histograms, prescription, and
treatment implementation.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

56

10.00

100.0%

OVERALL COUNTS/MEANS:

Total Respondents:

Skipped this question:

General Dosimetry Skills


(Rating Scale - Matrix)
Statistical Mode in BOLD

1
5
10
Does Not
Partially
Meets
Meet
Meets
Expectations
Expectations Expectations

N/A

Additional
Comment

Mean
Percentage
[1Score
10]

Performs calculations in a
timely manner.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Accurately uses dose


calculation databooks to
perform hand calculations.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Is able to dose out (complete)


chart per prescription and plan.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Exhibits knowledge of
anatomy, tissue dose
tolerance, definitive tumor
dose, and typical field
arrangement.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Is able to independently
produce treatment plans as
required by competency list for
the semester.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

Is able to prioritize and


organize duties to efficiently
complete requirements.

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

100.0% (7)

0.0% (0)

10.00

100.0%

42

10.00

100.0%

OVERALL COUNTS/MEANS:

Total Respondents:

Skipped this question:

[Link] 12/11/2015

Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument

Page 5 of 5

I have reviewed this evaluation with the student.


Response Response
Percent
Total

(Yes or No)

Yes

100.0%

No

0.0%

Additional Comment

0.0%

Total Respondents:

Skipped this question:

Additional Comments:
(Open Ended - Comments Box)
Total Respondents: 7
Skipped this question: 0

Mean percentage score for all rating scale questions: 100.0%


(Each main question equally weighted)

Responses as of 12/11/2015 7:37:24 PM CT

[Link] 12/11/2015

You might also like