Scribd
Upload
23 views3 pages

Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results in AMOS

1. The model fit statistics indicate good model fit. The Chi-Square, p-value, CFI, NFI, and RMSEA values meet acceptance criteria. 2. All items loaded statistically and practically significantly onto their respective factors. 3. The correlation between the Verbal/Math IQ factors was 0.613, which is both statistically and practically significant, indicating the factors are related but distinct.

Uploaded by

Milton Stevens
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views3 pages

Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results in AMOS

1. The model fit statistics indicate good model fit. The Chi-Square, p-value, CFI, NFI, and RMSEA values meet acceptance criteria. 2. All items loaded statistically and practically significantly onto their respective factors. 3. The correlation between the Verbal/Math IQ factors was 0.613, which is both statistically and practically significant, indicating the factors are related but distinct.

Uploaded by

Milton Stevens
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Confirmatory Factor Analysis Using AMOS: Answers

Verbal/Math IQ Test
1. Report the Chi-Square, p-value, CFI, NFI, and the RMSEA.
2. Did all item !load! on their repe"tive #a"tor$
%.
&hat i the "orrelation 'et(een the #a"tor$ I thi "orrelation tatiti"all) and pra"ti"all)
i*ni#i"ant$
+. ,o( (ould )ou interpret the "orrelation 'et(een the t(o #a"tor$
-. &rite a Reult e"tion #or thi pro.e"t.
1. Report the Chi-Square, p-value, CFI, NFI, and the RMSEA.
CMIN
Model N/AR CMIN DF / CMIN0DF
De#ault model 1% %1.2%3 4 .555 +.15-
Saturated model 21 .555 5
Independen"e model 2 -+2.411 1- .555 %2.144
Baseline Comparisons
Model
NFI
Delta1
RFI
rho1
IFI
Delta2
67I
rho2
CFI
De#ault model .3%1 .415 .3+- .43- .3++
Saturated model 1.555 1.555 1.555
Independen"e model .555 .555 .555 .555 .555
RMSEA
Model RMSEA 78 35 ,I 35 /C78SE
De#ault model .54- .5-3 .11% .512
Independen"e model .221 .2+% .245 .555
2. Did all item !load! on their repe"tive #a"tor$
YES! ALL ITEMS LOADED STATISTICALLY AND PRACTICALLY SIGNIFICANTLY ON THEIR
RESPECTIVE FACTOR.
Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number ! "e#ault model$
Etimate
9ER:1 ;--- F1 .214
9ER:2 ;--- F1 .211
9ER:% ;--- F1 .25-
MA6,1 ;--- F2 .+42
MA6,2 ;--- F2 .21%
MA6,% ;--- F2 .2-+
%. &hat i the "orrelation 'et(een the #a"tor$ I thi "orrelation tatiti"all) and pra"ti"all)
i*ni#i"ant$
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE FACTORS IS .613, WHICH IS BOTH STATISTICALLY
AND PRACTICALLY SIGNIFICANT.
Correlations: (Group number ! "e#ault model$
Etimate
F1 ;--< F2 .21%

+. ,o( (ould )ou interpret the "orrelation 'et(een the t(o #a"tor$
THE FACTORS DEMONSTRATED DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY
-. &rite a Reult e"tion #or thi pro.e"t.

You might also like