0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views7 pages

IELTS General Training Writing Samples

This document provides information about the IELTS General Training Writing Module assessment criteria. It discusses: - The module consists of two writing tasks that are assessed independently, with Task 2 carrying more weight. - Performance is assessed based on detailed band descriptors for tasks achievement, coherence/cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range/accuracy. - Minimum word lengths, plagiarism, and inappropriate formatting can negatively impact scores. - Sample candidate responses for Tasks 1 and 2 are included, with examiner comments and band scores to illustrate application of the assessment criteria.

Uploaded by

HarktheDark
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views7 pages

IELTS General Training Writing Samples

This document provides information about the IELTS General Training Writing Module assessment criteria. It discusses: - The module consists of two writing tasks that are assessed independently, with Task 2 carrying more weight. - Performance is assessed based on detailed band descriptors for tasks achievement, coherence/cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range/accuracy. - Minimum word lengths, plagiarism, and inappropriate formatting can negatively impact scores. - Sample candidate responses for Tasks 1 and 2 are included, with examiner comments and band scores to illustrate application of the assessment criteria.

Uploaded by

HarktheDark
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SampleCandidateWritingScriptsandExaminerComments

TheGeneralTrainingWritingModuleconsistsof
twotasks,[Link]
[Link]
Task2carriesmoreweightinmarkingthanTask
1.
Detailedperformancedescriptorshavebeen
developedwhichdescribewrittenperformance
[Link]
toboththeAcademicandGeneralTraining
Modules.
Task1scriptsareassessedonthefollowing
criteria:
TaskAchievement
CoherenceandCohesion
LexicalResource
GrammaticalRangeandAccuracy
Task2scriptsareassessedonthefollowing
criteria:
TaskResponse
CoherenceandCohesion
LexicalResource
GrammaticalRangeandAccuracy
Candidatesshouldnotethatscriptswillbe
penalisediftheyarea)undertheminimumword
length,b)partlyorwhollyplagiarised,c)not
writtenasfull,connectedtext([Link]
pointsinanypartoftheresponse,ornoteform,
isnotappropriate,etc.).
Task1
TaskAchievement
Thiscriterionassesseshowappropriately,
accuratelyandrelevantlytheresponsefulfilsthe
requirementssetoutinthetask,usingthe
minimumof150words.
Task1isalsoawritingtaskwithalargely
predictableoutputinthateachtasksetsoutthe
contextandpurposeoftheletterandthe
functionsthecandidateshouldcoverinorderto
achievethispurpose.
CoherenceandCohesion
Thiscriterionisconcernedwiththeoverallclarity
andfluencyofthemessage:howtheresponse
organisesandlinksinformation,ideasand
[Link]
[Link]
referstothevariedandappropriateuseof
cohesivedevices(forexample,logical
connectors,pronounsandconjunctions)to
assistinmakingtheconceptualandreferential
relationshipsbetweenandwithinsentences
clear.
LexicalResource
Thiscriterionreferstotherangeofvocabulary
thecandidatehasusedandtheaccuracyand
appropriacyofthatuseintermsofthespecific
task.
GrammaticalRangeandAccuracy
Thiscriterionreferstotherangeandaccurate
useofthecandidatesgrammaticalresourceas
manifestedinthecandidateswritingatsentence
level.
Task2
TaskResponse
Task2requiresthecandidatestoformulateand
developapositioninrelationtoagivenprompt
[Link]
shouldbesupportedbyevidence,andexamples
maybedrawnfromthecandidatesown
experience.Responsesmustbeatleast250
wordsinlength.
Writingscriptsaremarkedbytrainedand
[Link]
reportedaswholebandsorhalfbands.
Onthenext6pagesyouwillfindcandidates
[Link]
[Link]
hasbeenawardedabandscoreandis
accompaniedbyanexaminercommentonthe
candidatesperformanceforthattask.
Theexaminersguidelinesformarkingthe
[Link]
manydifferentwaysacandidatemay
[Link]
candidatesanswersthatfollowshouldnot
beregardedasdefinitiveexamplesofany
particularbandscore.
Pleaserefertothepublicbanddescriptors
forWriting.
GeneralTrainingWritingSampleTask1
SampleScriptA
Examinercomment
Band5
The answer is below the word limit and there is some repetition of the task rubric. (Length is a common problem in
General Training scripts.) Answers that are short lose marks because of inadequate content and may also lose marks
because there is insufficient material in the answerfor the examinerto givecredit for accuracy and coherence. Despite
these problems, the introduction to the letter is appropriate and the purpose of the writer is clear. The points are not
[Link]
assoonasmorecomplexstructuresareattempted.
GeneralTrainingWritingSampleTask1
SampleScriptB
Examinercomment
Band7
[Link],candidatesareatlibertytoincludesomeof
their own ideas in their answers. In this case, the candidate has attempted to incorporate some original material. The
answer reads quite fluently, is well organised and there is good use of conjunctions to link points. There are some
grammatical errors but these do not affect the reader greatly and there is evidence of some more complex sentence
structures.
GeneralTrainingWritingSampleTask2
SampleScriptA
Examinercomment
Band5
There are quite a lot of relevant ideas in the answer but they are not always well supported and sometimes they are
unclear. There aresome areasinthe answer where the organisation becomes weak and thereaderfindsthe message
[Link],[Link]
of mistakes in the answer and some parts, such as the conclusion, are very hard to follow because of these errors.
Althoughthere is some appropriate vocabulary, sentence control is very weak. These problems are made worse bythe
poorcorrectingwhichsometimesmakeswordsunreadable.
GeneralTrainingWritingSampleTask2
SampleScriptB
Examinercomment
Band8
Thisisaverywellorganisedscriptwhichcontainsalotofwellsupportedargumentsandanalysesthetopicfromdifferent
angles. The ideas follow each other well and there is a very honest conclusion. The answer is easy to read. There are
some areas where the expression is clumsy but this makes little difference to the overall flow of the answer. There are
minorerrorsinspellingandstructure.

You might also like