Project Management Data Security

All risk is enterprise risk. Cybersecurity Risk Management (CSRM) must be part of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Many companies think managing cyber risks is: ╳ Just an IT problem. ╳ Isolated from other risks. ╳ A low-priority task. But in reality, it is: ☑ A key part of the entire risk strategy. Here are the key steps to integrate cybersecurity risk into enterprise risk management: 1. Unified Risk Management ↳ Integrating CSRM into ERM helps handle all enterprise risks effectively. 2. Top-Level Involvement ↳ Top management must be involved in managing cyber risks along with other risks. 3. Contextual Consideration ↳ Cyber risks should be considered in the context of the enterprise's mission, financial, reputational, and technical risks. 4. Aligned Risk Appetite ↳ Align risk appetite and tolerance between enterprise management levels and cybersecurity systems. 5. Holistic Approach ↳ Adopt a holistic approach to identify, prioritize, and treat risks across the organization. 6. Common Risk Language ↳ Establish a common language around risk that permeates all levels of the organization. 7. Continuous Improvement ↳ Monitor, evaluate, and adjust risk management strategies continuously. 8. Clear Governance ↳ Ensure clear governance structures to support proactive risk management. 9. Digital Dependency ↳ Understand how cybersecurity risks affect business continuity, customer trust, and regulatory compliance. 10. Strategic Enabler ↳ Prioritize risk management as both a strategic business enabler and a protective measure. 11. Risk Register ↳ Use a unified risk register to consolidate and communicate risks effectively. 12. Organizational Culture ↳ Foster a culture that values risk management as important for achieving strategic goals. Integrating cybersecurity risk into enterprise risk management isn't just a technical task. It's a strategic necessity. 💬 Leave a comment — how does your company handle cyber risk? ➕ Follow Andrey Gubarev for more posts like this

🚨Incoming: The Federal Zero Trust Data Security Guide Fresh off the presses - In alignment with M-22-09, the Federal CDO Council and Federal CISO Council gathered a cross-agency team of data and security specialists to develop a comprehensive data security guide for Federal agencies. Representatives from over 30 Federal agencies and departments worked together to produce the Federal Zero Trust Data Security Guide, which: 🔹Establishes the vision and core principles for ZT data security 🔹Details methods to locate, identify, and categorize data with clear, actionable criteria 🔹Enhances data protection through targeted security monitoring and control strategies 🔹Equips practitioners with adaptable best practices to align with their agency’s unique mission requirements Securing the data pillar in Zero Trust has been a challenging endeavor, but it’s foundational to a resilient cybersecurity posture. This guide lays out essential principles and a roadmap to embed security at the core of data management beyond traditional perimeters. Here are a few key takeaways: 🔐 Core ZT Principles: Adopting a data-centric approach with strict access controls, data resiliency, and integration of privacy and compliance from day one. 📊 Data Inventory and Classification: It is crucial to understand the data landscape, and the guide provides insights into cataloging and labeling sensitive data for targeted protection. 🤝 Managing Third-Party Risks: From privacy-preserving technologies to detailed vendor assessments, agencies can better secure shared data and protect it from supply chain threats. I had the privilege of attending a couple of these Working Group meetings before leaving CISA earlier this year, and I congratulate the group on this necessary release. This guide aligns closely with CISA's Zero Trust Maturity Model, providing agencies with a robust framework to secure federal data assets and advance a strong, data-centric ZT security model. #data #zerotust #cybersecurity #technology #informationsecurity #computersecurity #datascience #artificialintelligence #digitaltransformation #bigdata 

Industrial Cyber Security—Layer by Layer OT environments can't rely on repackaged IT security checklists. Frameworks like IEC 62443 and NIST SP 800-82 demand a defence-in-depth strategy tailored to physical processes, real-time constraints, and integrated safety systems. This layered defence model visualizes the approach, moving from the physical perimeter to the core data: ✏️ Perimeter Security: Starts with physical controls like site fencing and progresses to network gateways that enforce one-way data flow. ✏️ Network Security: Involves segmenting the network (per the Purdue model), using industrial firewalls, and securing all remote access points. ✏️ Endpoint Security: Focuses on locking down devices with application whitelisting, ensuring secure boot processes, and using anomaly detection to spot unusual behavior. ✏️ Application Security: Secures the software layer through code-signing for logic downloads and hardening engineering workstations. ✏️ Data Security: Protects information itself with encrypted backups, PKI certificates for authenticity, and integrity monitoring. This entire strategy rests on two pillars: 1. Prevention: Proactive measures like architecture reviews, role-based access control (RBAC), and disciplined patch management. 2. Monitoring & Response: OT-aware security operations, practiced incident response playbooks, and the ability to perform forensics on industrial controllers. Why it matters: The data is clear. Over 80% of recent OT incidents exploited weak segmentation or unmanaged assets. Conversely, plants with layered controls have cut their mean-time-to-detect threats by 60% (Dragos 2024). Which of these security rings do you see most neglected in real-world plants? #OTSecurity #IEC62443 #NIST80082 #DefenseInDepth #IndustrialCyber #CriticalInfrastructure #CyberResilience

🚀 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧! 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐑𝐀 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐨𝐓 𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐲𝐜𝐥𝐞: 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬, 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐞𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 Proud to share our newest peer-reviewed article in Information (MDPI), co-authored with Miguel Ángel Ortega Velázquez, Iris Cuevas Martinez, and Dr. Antonio J. Jara (myself as ISACA CISM/CISA/AAIA). 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘢 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘜 𝘊𝘺𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘈𝘤𝘵 (𝘊𝘙𝘈) 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘐𝘰𝘛 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴. 🔥 𝐓𝐨𝐩 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 1️⃣ 𝐀 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐑𝐀 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: We introduce a two-phase framework: • Phase 1: Systematically transform CRA Articles 13–14 and Annexes into atomic, testable engineering requirements. • Phase 2: Apply Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) quantitative scoring to produce a defensible readiness metric. 2️⃣ 𝐀 𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐲𝐜𝐥𝐞-𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐂𝐑𝐀 𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐈𝐨𝐓 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬: From secure design to post-market obligations, the paper provides an actionable DevSecOps-aligned checklist. 3️⃣ 𝐀 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤-𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐇𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐲 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 (𝐀𝐇𝐏): We derive consistent domain weights, ensuring mathematically validated prioritization of CRA domains. 4️⃣ 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥-𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 through the TRUEDATA project funded by INCIBE - Instituto Nacional de Ciberseguridad: We applied the full model to a large industrial OT cybersecurity project (water infrastructure) with Neoradix Solutions AirTrace Bersey UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia at the pilots with the support of the Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura, O.A., Mancomunidad De Los Canales De Taibilla, and FRANCISCO ARAGÓN. 5️⃣ 𝐂𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞. The paper provides best practices for SBOM automation, PSIRT & CVD setup, Secure-by-design, OTA, monitoring, attestation, documentation and conformity assessment Our aim from Libelium with this paper is to give the industry a practical, structured, and evidence-based way to operationalize compliance and strengthen cybersecurity by design. 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐄𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐀 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡-𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐑𝐀 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 “𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧”, 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐈𝐨𝐓 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐄𝐮𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞. 👉 Download here: https://lnkd.in/dQu54qE2 European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) Felix A. Barrio (PhD, CISM) Global Cybersecurity Forum SITE سايت Betania Allo Axon Partners Group ISACA ISACA VALENCIA

You can’t hack your way to trust. And you can’t innovate in chaos. This post is a follow-up to yesterday's article because organizations must understand that you can't talk about one of the nodes in the triad without talking about the other two. Push one too hard, and the whole system grinds to a halt. But when they’re aligned? That’s when the magic really happens. 𝗔𝗜 𝗳𝘂𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗲𝘀—𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝘀 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗳𝗲𝗱. AI thrives on clean, accessible data, but your cybersecurity and data governance aren’t airtight, you’re feeding your AI poisoned inputs—or worse, leaking critical outputs. Data poisoning or model inference attacks FTW. 𝗖𝘆𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗿—𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗿. Too many people treat cybersecurity as the brakes on innovation. But think of it as the seatbelt on your AI-powered sports car. You wouldn’t drive at 200 mph without protection, right? Strong security frameworks aren’t just about protecting data; they’re about enabling trust—the foundation of any digital business. 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗹𝘂𝗲. All the AI innovation and cybersecurity in the world means nothing if it doesn’t deliver measurable business results. Enablement is where the rubber meets the road—turning insights into outcomes, trust into transactions, and resilience into revenue. The challenge? These gears don’t always mesh smoothly. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝘀𝘆𝗻𝗰: 1. Start with strategy: Define clear business outcomes and reverse-engineer the role of AI and cybersecurity. 2. Break the silos: Your AI and cybersecurity teams can’t operate in isolation. Collaboration isn’t optional; it’s essential. 3. Measure what matters: Align your KPIs across these three domains. You can’t manage what you don’t measure. When done right, this alignment creates a feedback loop: AI insights strengthen business enablement, cybersecurity safeguards them, and the results fuel more innovation. That’s the flywheel. Are your AI, cybersecurity, and business enablement efforts stuck in silos—or are they part of a single, unified strategy? Let’s discuss. #AIstrategy #Cybersecurity #BusinessEnablement #DigitalTransformation

🚀 My latest research "Cognitive Integration Process for Harmonising Emerging Risks" is now published in the Journal of AI, Robotics and Workplace Automation. 95% of Australian businesses are SMEs operating on ~$500 cybersecurity budgets. Yet they're being asked to securely integrate AI, quantum computing, and blockchain into their operations. How do you make sound security decisions about emerging technologies when you lack both technical expertise and enterprise-level resources? This is fundamentally a systems engineering challenge that requires first principles thinking. When I presented this research at the Programmable Software Developers Conference in Melbourne in March, I asked the room: "Heard of an AI security incident?" No hands up. "Would you know what an AI security incident looked like?" No hands. This illustrates the gap between AI hype and foundational security understanding - the first principles are missing. That's why I developed CIPHER (Cognitive Integration Process for Harmonising Emerging Risks) - a cognitive mental model that applies systems thinking to technology integration in resource-constrained environments. 🧠 Six cognitive stages: Contextualise, Identify, Prioritise, Harmonise, Evaluate, Refine 🔧 Systems engineering foundation: Built on cognitive science, game theory, and dynamical systems theory 🎯 Technology agnostic: Works across any emerging technology, any environment, any resource constraint CIPHER is a cybersecurity framework that gives smaller organisations the same strategic decision-making capabilities that large enterprises use, designed for their operational realities. It bridges the gap between cutting-edge security research and the practical constraints that define how most Australian businesses operate. The framework recognises that in resource-constrained environments, enterprise security models cannot be applied at scale. You need cognitive tools that help teams think systematically in complex integration challenges without requiring extensive technical depth or large security budgets. My research journey continues: I'm now deep into my UNSW Canberra Masters Research capstone, building on my 2023 work on LLMs in SME cybersecurity. The goal? Developing specialised security models and creating an agnostic, holistic measurement framework for LLMs in Australian SMEs - essentially taking the $500 problem from 2023 into the AI-driven reality of 2025. #CyberSecurity #SystemsEngineering #SME #Australia #AI #EmergingTech #ResourceConstrainedSecurity #CIPHER #FirstPrinciples

93% of companies struggle with ICS/OT cyber security. That percentage is probably even higher. Most companies struggle because of a lack of understanding. And that leads to a lack of planning. It's more about awareness than budget. Though budget does play a big part. Especially as you mature. The CSF v2 can help you plan a new ICS/OT cyber security strategy. Or help you improve an existing one. While the framework is mostly associated with the IT world, it can be used to help you with your ICS/OT cyber security program. Working the six phases into your environment. 1. Identify Planning for the worst to happen. And what you need to do to prevent it. -> Identify your assets -> Perform risk assessments -> Develop your risk strategy 2. Protect Taking the steps to protect your environment. Implementing the security controls. -> Secure network architecture -> Vulnerability management -> Secure remote access 3. Detect Watching network/host activity for suspicious signs. Is something bad happening in your ICS/OT network? -> Threat hunting -> Threat detection -> Event correlation -> Continuous monitoring 4. Respond Can you respond efficiently when something bad happens? Are you able to limit the damage? -> Escalation -> Incident triage -> Communication -> Coordinating the incident response team 5. Recover How safely are you able to restore operations? How quickly? -> Rebuild/replace systems -> Restore from backup -> Restore operations 6. Govern -> Audit & review -> Metrics & reporting -> Policies & procedures -> Continuous improvement These are just a start of how the CSF v2 can guide you. If you already have an ICS/OT cyber security program... Never stop improving. If you don't have an ICS/OT cyber security program today... Don't wait! The attackers aren't! P.S. Do you think most organizations are prepared for an attack?

AI is no longer just a productivity booster — it’s a security risk multiplier. Yet most organizations are still assessing AI like traditional IT — and that’s a costly mistake. An AI Security Risk Assessment must go beyond infrastructure and focus on: ✅ Model Hallucination & Manipulation (prompt injection, jailbreaks) ✅ Sensitive Data Leakage (accidental training, unlogged API calls) ✅ Shadow AI & Unapproved Integrations ✅ Compliance Risks — GDPR, DPDP, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF ✅ AI Supply Chain & Third-Party Model Trustworthiness ✅ Continuous Monitoring — not one-time assessment Companies that treat AI risk as a checkbox exercise today… will face a crisis tomorrow. AI is a strategic advantage — only if governed like a critical asset, not a cool tool. Are you already integrating AI risk into your enterprise GRC strategy? --- #AI #AIsecurity #AIGovernance #AIRiskAssessment #CyberSecurity #ISO42001 #NIST #GenAI #DataProtection #AICompliance #GRC #CISO #RiskManagement

🚨 Mastering IT Risk Assessment: A Strategic Framework for Information Security In cybersecurity, guesswork is not strategy. Effective risk management begins with a structured, evidence-based risk assessment process that connects technical threats to business impact. This framework — adapted from leading standards such as NIST SP 800-30 and ISO/IEC 27005 — breaks down how to transform raw threat data into actionable risk intelligence: 1️⃣ System Characterization – Establish clear system boundaries. Define the hardware, software, data, interfaces, people, and mission-critical functions within scope. 🔹 Output: System boundaries, criticality, and sensitivity profile. 2️⃣ Threat Identification – Identify credible threat sources — from external adversaries to insider risks and environmental hazards. 🔹 Output: Comprehensive threat statement. 3️⃣ Vulnerability Identification – Pinpoint systemic weaknesses that can be exploited by these threats. 🔹 Output: Catalog of potential vulnerabilities. 4️⃣ Control Analysis – Evaluate the design and operational effectiveness of current and planned controls. 🔹 Output: Control inventory with performance assessment. 5️⃣ Likelihood Determination – Assess the probability that a given threat will exploit a specific vulnerability, considering existing mitigations. 🔹 Output: Likelihood rating. 6️⃣ Impact Analysis – Quantify potential losses in terms of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. 🔹 Output: Impact rating. 7️⃣ Risk Determination – Integrate likelihood and impact to determine inherent and residual risk levels. 🔹 Output: Ranked risk register. 8️⃣ Control Recommendations – Prioritize security enhancements to reduce risk to acceptable levels. 🔹 Output: Targeted control recommendations. 9️⃣ Results Documentation – Compile the process, findings, and mitigation actions in a formal risk assessment report for governance and audit traceability. 🔹 Output: Comprehensive risk assessment report. When executed properly, this process transforms IT threat data into strategic business intelligence, enabling leaders to make informed, risk-based decisions that safeguard the organization’s assets and reputation. 👉 Bottom line: An organization’s resilience isn’t built on tools — it’s built on a disciplined, repeatable approach to understanding and managing risk. #CyberSecurity #RiskManagement #GRC #InformationSecurity #ISO27001 #NIST #Infosec #RiskAssessment #Governance

Integrating ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity throughout Project Lifecycle How to integrate cybersecurity in project phases is a million dollar question, let's explore together! >> integrating Cybersecurity in the project life cycle provides many benefits: > Proactive risk mitigation to prevent vulnerabilities. > Compliance with industry standards and regulations. > Cost savings by addressing security early. > Ensures operational reliability and safety. >> The IEC 62443 framework provides a structured approach to secure systems throughout their lifecycle—from conceptualization to ongoing operation. >> Relevant Standards: > ISA/IEC 62443-2-1, > ISA/IEC 62443-2-4, > ISA/IEC62443-3-2, and > ISA/IEC62443-3-3, >>These standards cover > cyber security management, > risk assessment, and > technical requirements. 1. Concept Phase: Define project goals, scope, and requirements. >> Key Activities: > Define scope of work and requirements. > Develop strategy and methodology. > Assign roles and responsibilities. >> Relevant Standards: IEC 62443-2-1 and IEC 62443-2-2. 2. FEED Phase: Front-End Engineering Design >> Key Activities: > Identify Systems under Consideration (SuC). > Conduct a high-level risk assessment. > Partition zones and conduits. > Perform detailed risk assessments. > Specify cybersecurity requirements. >> Relevant Standards: IEC 62443-3-2. 3. Project Phase: Execute the design, build, and testing activities. >> Key Activities: > Conduct detailed engineering. > Perform Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT). > Commission systems. > Hand over systems to operations. >> Relevant Standards: IEC 62443-3-3 and IEC 62443-2-4. 4. Operation Phase: operations and Maintenance >> Key Activities: > Maintain systems. > Monitor cybersecurity performance. > Manage change. > Respond to and recover from incidents. >>Relevant Standards: IEC 62443-3-3 and IEC 62443-2-4. #icssecurity #otsecurity