Creating Inclusive Remote Workspaces

Oh, how many times I have been asked this. "Is neuroincusion at work just special treatment?" No. Neuroinclusion doesn't add special infrastructure for “special” people. It removes the assumption that the current infrastructure works well for actual humans. - Flexible schedules to remove the penalty on anyone whose best thinking doesn't happen between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. - Clear communication in different formats (e.g., spoken and written) to make information accessible to everyone. - Quiet spaces alongside collaborative ones to acknowledge that sustained cognitive work requires conditions that open-plan offices structurally prevent. - Agendas before meetings to respect everyone's time and make gatherings more effective. - Multiple ways to contribute one’s thoughts beyond real-time verbal performance to capture all the knowledge and perspectives. - Networking opportunities designed for non-surface connections to build true affinity. - Performance reviews with clear criteria based on work outcomes, to support both fairness and performance. Are these "special accommodations"? No, this is what good organizational design looks like when we stop pretending that humans are clones of each other. Fresh off the press. It was stuck in editorial limbo and missed the Neurodiversity Celebration Week (sad face), but fairness should not be limited to one week a year. https://lnkd.in/gM36qYi2 #neurodiversity #HumanResources #management

Good intentions cannot build a healthy work environment. We tell leaders to be inclusive, but rarely show them how. Inclusion is a daily practice, not a feeling. Meetings where the loudest voice dominates are systems designed to exclude. My dissertation on Workplace Neurodiverse Equity used Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory to show how environments shape our capacity to thrive. Neurodiversity is the natural variation in human functioning. Everyone is part of it. Some of us just need a bit more intentional help. So, here are 10 practices to lower stress and increase support for your team: 1/ Agendas Reality: Spontaneous demands spike cortisol. Practice: Send agendas and necessary decisions 24 hours in advance. Yield: Ensures deep processing time. 2/ Brainstorming Reality: Verbal brainstorming blocks ideas. Practice: First 10 minutes are silent. Write ideas before speaking. Yield: Eliminates bias of loudest voice. 3/ Cameras Reality: Forced visual attendance drains energy. Practice: State engagement is measured by contributions, not faces. Yield: Reduces sensory overload and prevents fatigue. 4/ Cold Calls Reality: Cold calls trigger fight or flight. Practice: Give notice before asking for input. Yield: Reduces performance anxiety and restores executive function. 5/ Captions Reality: Auditory processing varies wildly. Practice: Enable live transcription on every call by default. Yield: Ensures information is captured despite barriers. 6/ Movement Reality: Movement regulates; it is not a distraction. Practice: Normalize pacing, knitting, or sketching. Yield: Increases focus and emotional regulation. 7/ Processing Time Reality: Forced participation creates anxiety. Practice: Normalize saying you need time to process. Yield: Cultivates psychological safety. 8/ Expectations Reality: Unspoken rules are invisible barriers. Practice: If an expectation matters, write it down. Yield: Eliminates ambiguity and social guessing. 9/ Visuals Reality: Auditory information is fleeting. Practice: Never just speak a point. Share screen or provide written anchor. Yield: Reinforces working memory. 10/ Transitions Reality: Back to back tasks drain executive function. Practice: End meetings at 25 or 50 minute mark. Enforce strict hard stop. Yield: Respects biological limits and allows recovery. Stop relying on good intentions. Start cultivating an environment where every mind can thrive. Just remember, we are all a bit different, stay curious, and adapt to each person. What is one neuro-inclusive practice you plan to plant in your next meeting?

Employees stay where they feel they belong. Not where the coffee is better, not where the perks are louder—but where their presence is valued, their voice matters, and their work feels meaningful. We all go through tough moments: ➟ Companies still suffer from the recession. ➟ Many have had to make difficult cuts. ➟ More jobs will be automated. Free snacks, fancy offices, and ping pong tables can be fun. But they can't replace genuine appreciation. They won't fuel people's motivation. This is what people need right now: ✅ Leaders who listen ✅ Constructive feedback ✅ Recognition of achievements ✅ Encouraging open communication ✅ Ensuring every person is treated fairly ✅ Professional development opportunities ✅ Advocating for team needs to upper management ✅ Maintaining transparency during organizational changes ✅ Standing with the team, especially during hard times ✅ Shaping an environment of mutual respect and trust ✅ Protecting the team from unnecessary pressure ✅ Addressing concerns with empathy and action ✅ Collaborative teams that nurture belonging ✅ Supporting work-life balance with care ✅ A safe space to voice concerns freely ✅ Trust in the vision and direction ✅ Work that feels fulfilling Providing this kind of support is at the core of leadership. Focusing on what truly matters. Growing places where trust is the norm. Where people feel seen, heard, and valued. Shared by: Mental Health

Is your leadership's management philosophy stuck in the 1960s? Let's redefine it: Leadership by Being Engaged. The concept of "management by walking around" came from Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard (HP founders) in the 1960s, popularized by Tom Peters in 1982, and gets used today to describe what's missing in #remote work. "The expected benefit: by random sampling of events or employee discussions, managers are more likely to facilitate improvements to the morale, sense of purpose, productivity and and quality... compared to remaining in a specific office area, or the delivery of status reports." The literal concept doesn't work if your managers have people who are working in multiple locations, now the majority case. 60 to 80% of all "enterprise" company managers now have #distributed teams. 100% of Fortune 500 Execs have teams that are #distributed today, according to Atlassian (kudos Molly Sands, PhD). #RTO mandates rooted in this philosophy are trying to return to a world that no longer exists. Leaders need a both/and approach. Get employees together to jump-start #belonging, and build better #culture and #performance by being involved in the digital #collaboration tools that your teams use every day. Let's redefine a philosophy rooted in co-location into one for the #digital age. Four starting points for leaders looking to get digitally engaged: 🔸 Increase transparency. Internal transparency around clear goals and realistic progress against them drives focus on outcomes, and builds trust. 🔸 Get engaged in the work. Execs need to stop saying "Teams/Slack etc are for the kids; you'll find me in email" and get into the tools people use every day to work through account issues, project updates, and problem solving. 🔸 Participate in digital communities. Social forums at work build belonging. That cuts across everything from an Abilities ERG to Sneakerheads. Finding community at work boosts retention; even leaders need to find that. 🔸 Get a reverse mentor. Being available and engaged digitally can feel foreign as a leader, and initially scary to a team. Find a digital native in your organization who can coach you! What's your take? Retire the phrase, or revive an important concept?

Stop wasting meetings! Too many meetings leave people unheard, disengaged, or overwhelmed. The best teams know that inclusion isn’t accidental—it’s designed. 🔹 Here are 6 simple but powerful practices to transform your meetings: 💡 Silent Brainstorm Before discussion begins, have participants write down their ideas privately (on sticky notes, a shared document, or an online board). This prevents groupthink, ensures introverted team members have space to contribute, and brings out more original ideas. 💡 Perspective Swap Assign participants a different stakeholder’s viewpoint (e.g., a customer, a frontline employee, or an opposing team). Challenge them to argue from that perspective, helping teams step outside their biases and build empathy-driven solutions. 💡 Pause and Reflect Instead of jumping into responses, introduce intentional pauses in the discussion. Give people 30-60 seconds of silence before answering a question or making a decision. This allows for deeper thinking, more thoughtful contributions, and space for those who need time to process. 💡 Step Up/Step Back Before starting, set an expectation: those who usually talk a lot should "step back," and quieter voices should "step up." You can track participation or invite people directly, helping create a more balanced conversation. 💡 What’s Missing? At the end of the discussion, ask: "Whose perspective have we not considered?" This simple question challenges blind spots, uncovers overlooked insights, and reinforces the importance of diverse viewpoints in decision-making. 💡 Constructive Dissent Voting Instead of just asking for agreement, give participants colored cards or digital indicators to show their stance: 🟢 Green – I fully agree 🟡 Yellow – I have concerns/questions 🔴 Red – I disagree Focus discussion on yellow and red responses, ensuring that dissenting voices are explored rather than silenced. This builds a culture where challenging ideas is seen as valuable, not risky. Which one would you like to try in your next meeting?  Let me know in the comments! 🔔 Follow me to learn more about building inclusive, high-performing teams. __________________________ 🌟 Hi there! I’m Susanna, an accredited Fearless Organization Scan Practitioner with 10+ years of experience in workplace inclusion. I help companies build inclusive cultures where diverse, high-performing teams thrive with psychological safety. Let’s unlock your team’s full potential together!

Neurodiversity 101: Making meetings more neuroinclusive Meetings are meant to bring people together to share ideas, make decisions, and build connection. Yet, for many neurodivergent colleagues and often for others too meetings can be overwhelming, confusing, or simply unproductive. Have you ever been to a meeting and wondered why you were there or what was expected of you? Whether online or in person, more inclusive meetings benefit everyone. They create clarity, structure, and safety for diverse thinkers to contribute meaningfully. Here’s how to make meetings more neuroinclusive: 1. Clarity before you start Share the purpose, agenda, timing, and who’s attending where possible in advance. Make clear if attendance is optional or essential and what preparation, if any, is expected. Sending materials early gives everyone time to process and plan. 2. Structure supports inclusion Outline how questions will be handled and what turn-taking looks like. Minute key actions and share them promptly. End by explaining what happens next. Predictability reduces anxiety and ensures accountability. Be aware of the 'quiet ones' in the room and ensure everyone can participate. 3. Inclusive communication Use clear, plain language avoid “acronym fests.” Pause regularly to check understanding and invite clarification. Remember, silence doesn’t mean disengagement; some people need more time to formulate ideas. Some people may need time after the meeting to come back with their responses too. 4. Online inclusivity Show participants how to use platform features like captions, transcripts, or chat. Encourage written contributions and offer the option to keep cameras off to reduce sensory load/allow movement/ or just not seeing your own face all the time! Provide recordings or transcripts afterwards so people can review at their own pace. 5. Make space for every voice Avoid putting people on the spot. Allow time after the meeting for those who prefer to reflect before responding. Remember: the “quiet ones” may hold the most valuable insights. **Small changes, big impact Microaggressions — such as dismissing someone’s idea or using “humour” that excludes can and do erode trust. Inclusion grows when meetings feel psychologically safe and respectful. Neuroinclusive meetings are not just a “nice to have.” This is a universal design concept in action. They are cost-effective, efficient, and fair improving engagement, retention, and creativity. When everyone can contribute in their own way, we get better decisions and stronger teams. 🟣 Inclusion isn’t about changing people. It’s about changing the conditions so people can thrive. Can you add any other ideas of what works too?

Designing work for neurodiversity sounds like a values conversation. It usually isn’t. Most organisations already say they value difference. The problem is what they quietly assume underneath. The assumption goes something like this: If people are capable, motivated, and professional, they’ll adapt to how work is set up. So we design work like this: • One dominant communication style • One idea of what “engaged” looks like • One way to show competence • One rhythm for meetings, feedback, and decisions And when performance varies, we explain it as confidence, resilience, or capability. That logic feels tidy. It just isn’t how brains work. Neuroscience and behavioural science are very clear on this point: People are not consistent, interchangeable processors. They are context-sensitive systems. The same person can perform brilliantly or poorly depending on: • Cognitive load • Sensory demand • Ambiguity of expectations • Social threat • How outcomes are evaluated Variation in performance is usually a design signal, not a motivation problem. Which changes the management question. Instead of asking: “Why can’t this person adapt?” The more useful question becomes: “What in the system is making good performance harder than it needs to be?” That’s where neurodiversity becomes operational, not rhetorical. Design implications are fairly unglamorous: • Judge outcomes, not performance theatre • Make expectations explicit instead of implied • Reduce unnecessary noise before demanding focus • Talk about ways of working without requiring disclosure • Fix processes and structures before questioning people None of this lowers standards. It raises the probability that capable people can meet them. This is the shift we explore in the attached document. Neurodiversity as a work design issue. Not an accommodation conversation. Not a personality discussion. Just competent management, informed by how brains actually function. It explains why so many “supportive” intentions quietly fail in practice.

I’ve been thinking a lot about the 90 minute virtual meeting paradox. We spend the first 30 minutes on welcoming everyone and introductions, the next 15 on framing, and then a few people share thoughts. Then, just when the conversation gets meaningful, the host abruptly announces "We're out of time!” and throws a few rushed closing thoughts and announcements together. Sound familiar? We crave deep, meaningful, trust-based exchanges in virtual meeting environments that feel both tiring and rushed. It seems like as soon as momentum builds and insights emerge, it’s time to wrap up. Share-outs become a regurgitation of top-level ideas—usually focused on the most soundbite-ready insights and omitting those seeds of ideas that didn’t have time to be explored further. And sometimes, we even cite these meetings as examples of participation in a process, even when that participation is only surface level to check the participation box.  After facilitating and attending hundreds (thousands?) of virtual meetings, I've found four practices that create space for more engagement and depth: 1. Send a thoughtful and focused pre-work prompt at least a few days ahead of time that invites reflection before gathering. When participants arrive having already engaged with the core question(s), it’s much easier to jump right into conversation. Consider who designs these prompts and whose perspectives they center. 2. Replace round-robin introductions with a focused check-in question that directly connects to the meeting's purpose. "What's one tension you're navigating in this work?" for example yields more insight than sharing organizational affiliations. Be mindful of who speaks first and how difference cultural communication styles may influence participation.  3. Structure the agenda with intentionally expanding time blocks—start tight (and facilitate accordingly), and then create more spaciousness as the meeting progresses. This honors the natural rhythm of how trust and dialogue develop, and allows for varying approaches to processing and sharing.  4. Prioritize accessibility and inclusion in every aspect of the meeting. Anticipating and designing for participants needs means you’re thinking about language justice, technology and materials accessibility, neurodivergence, power dynamics, and content framing. Asking “What do you need to fully participate in this meeting?” ahead of time invites participants to share their needs. These meeting suggestions aren’t just about efficiency—they’re about creating spaces where authentic relationships and useful conversations can actually develop. Especially at times when people are exhausted and working hard to manage their own energy, a well-designed meeting can be a welcome space to engage. I’m curious to hear from others: What's your most effective strategy for holding substantive meetings in time-constrained virtual spaces? What meeting structures have you seen that actually work?

Hybrid Meetings ≠ Inclusive Meetings. I’ve lived it - and here’s 5 practical tips to ensure everyone has a voice, regardless of location. I spent more than 10,000 hours in hybrid meetings while as a remote leader for The Clorox Company. I was often the 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 remote attendee - while the rest of the group sat together in a conference room at HQ. Here’s what I learned the hard way: 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲... ...by showing who gets heard, who feels seen, and who gets left out. If you're leading a distributed or hybrid team, how you structure your meetings sends a loud message about what (and who) matters. 𝟱 𝘁𝗶𝗽𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗵𝘆𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: 1️⃣ 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 – who will actively combat distance bias and invite input from all meeting members 2️⃣ 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲𝗿 – to monitor the chat and the raised hands, to launch polls and to free up the facilitator to focus on the flow 3️⃣ 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗴 𝗶𝗻 - so that there is equal access to the chat, polls, and reactions 4️⃣ 𝗕𝘂𝗱𝗱𝘆 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 – pair remote team members with in-room allies to help make space in the conversation and ensure they can see and hear everything 5️⃣ 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗽 𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘂𝗽 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻 – be ready with a Plan B for audio, video, or connectivity issues in the room 𝘞𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘧𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳? 𝗧𝗿𝘆 𝗮 𝗗𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹-𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴. If even one person is remote, have everyone log in from their own device from their own workspace to create a level playing field. 🔗 𝗚𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗽𝘀 for creating location-inclusive distributed teams in this Nano Tool I wrote for Wharton Executive Education: https://lnkd.in/eUKdrDVn #LIPostingDayApril

Belonging is a basic human need, and many companies strive to create workplaces where people feel that they belong. Yet, many of the measures focus on whether a person experiences belonging, as opposed to measuring the culture that supports people feeling that they can be their true selves and thrive. This report on covering is a valuable resource to diagnose the ways in which companies may inadvertently have cultures where people experience a disadvantage for aspect(s) of themselves, so that leaders can undo practices that enforce covering. Covering is the pressure your organization may impose on people to minimize their identities. Some of the examples illuminate the cost of covering, or the extra effort to conform to often-outdated and unexamined standards of “professionalism” or “success.” Here is one on covering mental health: “I try to look fairly put-together (pomaded hair, cohesive outfit, etc.) particularly when I'm struggling with my mental health. I don't want to look depressed.” And here is a quote about religious affiliation that is especially salient today: “I don’t talk about [my] feelings related to rising antisemitism.” Why do people cover? While the report cites a number of reasons, they include fear of judgment, association with negative stereotypes and respect from colleagues. 💡 What can leaders do? Role model authenticity through storytelling. Ensure the stories we tell do not reinforce a culture of perfection. Start at the top, and do not ask more junior folks or people from historically marginalized groups to uncover. 💡 Here is one practice that may be helpful for holiday party planning: “Ensure that company events are inclusive by design, such as by catering for a wide range of cultural and religious dietary requirements and by not structuring all events around alcohol consumption.” Together, we can change the behaviors in our workplaces to reduce the covering demand and create space for more authentic expression and more diverse ways to contribute to our collective work. Research by Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging at NYU School of Law, Deloitte, and Kenji Yoshino. #belongingatwork #diversityequityinclusion #covering