Skip to content

Serenity: Polarizability#1698

Open
lukas-paetow wants to merge 22 commits into
cclib:masterfrom
lukas-paetow:polarizability
Open

Serenity: Polarizability#1698
lukas-paetow wants to merge 22 commits into
cclib:masterfrom
lukas-paetow:polarizability

Conversation

@lukas-paetow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.38%. Comparing base (04b73bb) to head (70cc688).
⚠️ Report is 48 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1698      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.02%   82.38%   +0.36%     
==========================================
  Files          75       75              
  Lines       15914    16268     +354     
==========================================
+ Hits        13053    13402     +349     
- Misses       2861     2866       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@berquist berquist added this to the v1.9 milestone Nov 11, 2025

@berquist berquist left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment thread cclib/parser/serenityparser.py Outdated
Comment thread data/Serenity/serenity1.6.1/dvb_td/dvb_td.in Outdated
Comment thread data/Serenity/serenity1.6.1/dvb_ff/dvb_ff.in Outdated
@berquist

berquist commented Nov 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is looking better after I did the rebase, but I still see unrelated files in the branch (new version of SP?).

I also see that the polarizability result, even the isotropic one, is different from the other programs, which I can dig into a bit more.

@lukas-paetow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The polarizability result is probably different because I had to resort to a basis set that supports density fitting in Serenity. I could not avoid this for the analytical static polarizability. Regarding the test files, I redid some directories in the test directory during the development process... But it should be in working order.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants