0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
93 tayangan6 halaman

Penilaian Tingkat Keparahan Risiko

Dokumen tersebut menjelaskan cara menentukan tingkat keparahan risiko dengan mempertimbangkan dampak risiko dan probabilitasnya. Severitas risiko dibagi menjadi 5 tingkatan yaitu minimal, minor, moderat, mayor dan ekstrem berdasarkan dampaknya, sedangkan probabilitas terdiri dari sangat jarang, jarang, mungkin, mungkin dan sering. Tingkat risiko kemudian ditentukan berdasarkan kombinasi antara severitas dan probabilitas, serta

Diunggah oleh

hannymarika
Hak Cipta
© All Rights Reserved
Kami menangani hak cipta konten dengan serius. Jika Anda merasa konten ini milik Anda, ajukan klaim di sini.
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai PPT, PDF, TXT atau baca online di Scribd
0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
93 tayangan6 halaman

Penilaian Tingkat Keparahan Risiko

Dokumen tersebut menjelaskan cara menentukan tingkat keparahan risiko dengan mempertimbangkan dampak risiko dan probabilitasnya. Severitas risiko dibagi menjadi 5 tingkatan yaitu minimal, minor, moderat, mayor dan ekstrem berdasarkan dampaknya, sedangkan probabilitas terdiri dari sangat jarang, jarang, mungkin, mungkin dan sering. Tingkat risiko kemudian ditentukan berdasarkan kombinasi antara severitas dan probabilitas, serta

Diunggah oleh

hannymarika
Hak Cipta
© All Rights Reserved
Kami menangani hak cipta konten dengan serius. Jika Anda merasa konten ini milik Anda, ajukan klaim di sini.
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai PPT, PDF, TXT atau baca online di Scribd

Severity assessment

Menentukan tingkat keparahan


risiko:
Variabel yang digunakan untuk
menilai severity:
Dampak risiko
dan
Probabilitas
Frequent
Probable
Possible
Unlikely
Rare

Probability
1. Extreme risk
Severity
2. High risk
assessment 3. Moderate risk
4. Low risk
Severity
(Dampak)
Extreme
Major
Moderate
Minor
Minimal 2
Dampak Risiko (Severity)
TK Deskripsi
RIKS
Dampak
1 Minimal Tidak ada cedera
2 Minor • Cedera ringan , mis luka lecet
• Dapat diatasi dng P3K

3 Moderat • Cedera sedang, mis : luka robek


• Berkurangnya fungsi motorik/ sensorik/
psikologis atau intelektual (reversibel. Tdk
berhubungan dengan penyakit
• Setiap kasus yg meperpanjang perawatan

4 Mayor • Cedera luas/berat, mis: cacat, lumpuh


• Kehilangan fungsi motorik/sensorik/ psikologis
atau intelektual (ireversibel), tidak berhubungan
dengan penyakit
5 Ekstrem Kematian yang tidak berhubungan dengan
perjalanan penyakit
3
4
5
LEVEL/BAN TINDAKAN
DS
EKSTREM Risiko ekstrem, dilakukan RCA paling lama 45 hari,
(SANGAT membutuhkan tindakan segera, perhatian sampai ke
TINGGI) Direktur RS

HIGH Risiko tinggi, dilakukan RCA paling lama 45 hari,


(TINGGI) kaji dengan detail & perlu tindakan segera, serta
membutuhkan tindakan top manajemen
MODERATE Risiko sedang dilakukan investigasi sederhana
(SEDANG) (PDCA) paling lama 2 minggu. Manajer/pimpinan klinis
sebaiknnya menilai dampak terhadap bahaya & kelola
risiko
LOW Risiko rendah dilakukan investigasi sederhana
(RENDAH) (PDCA) paling lama 1 minggu diselesaikan dengan
prosedur rutin 6

Common questions

Didukung oleh AI

The designation of 'extreme risk' demands immediate attention and resource allocation up to the hospital director level, highlighting its priority across the organization. It necessitates a comprehensive RCA within 45 days. Conversely, 'moderate risk' receives less intense organizational focus and resources, delegated to clinical managers with a simpler investigation (PDCA) required within two weeks. This disparity ensures that critical threats are prioritized while moderate ones are still effectively managed .

The severity assessment process involves evaluating the impact and probability of risks. The levels are operationally defined from minimal to extreme based on their impact. Minimal risks result in no injury, minor risks involve slight injuries, moderate risks lead to reversible injuries, major risks cause severe, irreversible injuries, and extreme risks are associated with death. This structured approach helps in systematically managing and mitigating risks .

The document categorizes risk severity into five levels: Extreme, Major, Moderate, Minor, and Minimal. These levels are based on the impact of the risk and the probability of occurrence. An extreme risk involves death unrelated to disease and requires immediate action up to the hospital director's level. A major risk entails severe injuries or irreversible loss of function, while a moderate risk involves reversible injuries that might extend care duration. Minor risks include minor injuries treatable with first aid, and minimal risks involve no injury .

In moderate risk scenarios, the document advises a simple investigation within two weeks, with clinical managers expected to assess the impact of the hazard and manage the risk accordingly. Insufficient management involvement may lead to inadequate assessment, overlooking factors that could escalate the risk or inappropriate mitigation strategies, potentially increasing the severity or recurrence of the risk .

Incorrect severity assessment can lead to inappropriate resource allocation and ineffective risk management strategies. Underestimating severity may result in insufficient response, potentially exacerbating risks and triggering adverse outcomes. Overestimation may waste resources and divert attention from truly critical risks, undermining overall organizational risk management effectiveness and resilience .

The document indicates a direct correlation between probability and impact in severity assessment. Higher severity levels, like extreme and high, are often associated with higher probabilities such as probable or frequent occurrence. Conversely, lower severity levels, like minor and minimal, are linked to lower probabilities such as unlikely or rare. This correlation helps in determining appropriate risk management strategies .

The document suggests a proportional relationship between risk severity and the intensity of managerial or procedural interventions. Higher severity risks (extreme and high) require more sophisticated interventions such as RCA, highlighting top management involvement and extended resource allocation. In contrast, lesser severity risks (moderate and low) involve simpler PDCA investigations and rely more on standard procedures and routine management .

For managing extreme risk, the document recommends conducting a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) within 45 days, requiring immediate actions and attention up to the hospital director level. This differs significantly from low-risk management, where a simple investigation through PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) is to be completed within one week, with standard procedures applied for resolution .

Risk severity levels guide the timeframe by dictating urgency and depth of investigative actions. Extreme and high risks necessitate an RCA, emphasizing comprehensive analysis and necessitating a 45-day window due to their critical nature. Moderate risks require a quicker, two-week PDCA, while low risks allow a one-week timeframe, aligning procedural simplicity with lower severity, thereby ensuring timely and appropriate responses .

The document prescribes Root Cause Analysis (RCA) for extreme and high risks within 45 days. Moderate risks involve a simple PDCA investigation within two weeks, while low risks require a PDCA investigation within one week. These methods are appropriate because they scale the depth and urgency of investigation to the severity of the risk, ensuring that resources are appropriately allocated based on potential impact .

Anda mungkin juga menyukai